基于能值-生态足迹模型的东北老工业基地生态安全评价——以辽宁省为例

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.201605.023

应用生态学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (5): 1594-1602.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201605.023

基于能值-生态足迹模型的东北老工业基地生态安全评价——以辽宁省为例

杨青^1,2, 逯承鹏^1*, 周锋^2,3, 耿涌⁴, 景红双⁵, 任婉侠¹, 薛冰¹

¹中国科学院沈阳应用生态研究所污染生态与环境工程重点实验室, 沈阳 110016;
²中国科学院大学, 北京 100049;
³中国科学院沈阳应用生态研究所土壤生态与农业生态工程研究中心, 沈阳 110164;
⁴上海交通大学环境科学与工程学院, 上海 200240;
⁵中国科学院沈阳应用生态研究所, 沈阳 110016

收稿日期:2015-09-02 出版日期:2016-05-18 发布日期:2016-05-18
通讯作者: luchp@iae.ac.cn
作者简介:杨青,女,1990年,硕士研究生. 主要从事产业生态与环境管理研究. E-mail: yangqing14@mails. ucas. ac. cn
基金资助:
本文由国家杰出青年基金项目(71325006)、国家自然科学基金项目(41471116,71303230)、辽宁省博士科研启动基金项目(201501037)、四川省社会科学重点研究基地——四川循环经济研究中心重点项目(XHJJ-1505)资助

An emergy-ecological footprint model based evaluation of ecological security at the old industrial area in Northeast China: A case study of Liaoning Province.

YANG Qing^1,2, LU Cheng-peng^1*, ZHOU Feng^2,3, GEGN Yong⁴, JING Hong-shuang⁵, REN Wan-xia¹, XUE Bing¹

¹Key Laboratory of Pollution Ecology and Environmental Engineering, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China;
²University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
³Research Center of Soil Ecology and Agricultural Ecology Engineering, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110164, China;
⁴School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200240, China;
⁵Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China

Received:2015-09-02 Online:2016-05-18 Published:2016-05-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用能值-生态足迹模型,对辽宁省2003—2012年生态安全状况进行时间序列的定量分析与评价,并采用灰色动力学模型预测其动态变化趋势.结果表明: 研究期内辽宁省人均能值生态承载力从3.13 hm²下降到3.07 hm²,人均能值生态足迹由13.88 hm²增加到21.96 hm²,处于生态赤字状态,且赤字增大趋势明显;生态压力指数由4.43增长到7.16,生态安全预警等级由轻警过渡到中警程度.照此发展,2013—2022年辽宁省人均能值生态承载力将由3.04 hm²下降到2.98 hm²,人均能值生态足迹将由22.72 hm²上升到35.87 hm²;生态赤字将越来越大,生态压力指数将由7.46上升到12.04,生态安全等级将由较安全变为轻度不安全状态,并呈现由中警到重警的生态安全预警等级,生态安全问题亟待解决.

Abstract: Based on the integrated model of emergy-ecological footprint approaches, the ecological security of Liaoning Province, a typical case for the old industrial area, was quantitatively evaluated from 2003 to 2012, followed by a scenario analysis on the development trend of the ecological secu-rity by employing the gray kinetic model. The results showed that, from 2003 to 2012, the value of emergy ecological-capacity per capita in Liaoning Province decreased from 3.13 hm² to 3.07 hm², while the emergy-ecological footprint increased from 13.88 hm² to 21.96 hm², which indicated that the ecological deficit existed in Liaoning Province and the situation was getting worse. The ecological pressure index increased from 4.43 to 7.16 during the studied period, and the alert level of ecological security changed from light to middle level. According to the development trend, the emergy ecological capacity per capita during 2013-2022 would correspondingly decrease from 3.04 hm² to 2.98 hm², while the emergy ecological footprint would increase from 22.72 hm² to 35.87 hm², the ecological pressure index would increase from 7.46 to 12.04, and the ecological deficit would keep increasing and the ecological security level would slide into slightly unsafe condition. The alert level of ecological security would turn to be middle or serious, suggesting the problems in ecological safety needed to be solved urgently.

杨青, 逯承鹏, 周锋, 耿涌, 景红双, 任婉侠, 薛冰. 基于能值-生态足迹模型的东北老工业基地生态安全评价——以辽宁省为例[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(5): 1594-1602.

YANG Qing, LU Cheng-peng, ZHOU Feng, GEGN Yong, JING Hong-shuang, REN Wan-xia, XUE Bing. An emergy-ecological footprint model based evaluation of ecological security at the old industrial area in Northeast China: A case study of Liaoning Province.[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016, 27(5): 1594-1602.

参考文献

[1] Carroll SP, Jorgensen PS, Kinnison MT, et al. Applying evolutionary biology to address global challenges. Science, 2014, 346: 313
[2] Krabbenhoft DP, Sunderland EM. Global change and mercury. Science, 2013, 341: 1457
[3] Suding K, Higgs E, Palmer M, et al. Committing to ecological restoration. Science, 2015, 348: 638-640
[4] He C-L (和春兰), Rao H (饶辉), Zhao X-Q (赵筱青). Advances in ecological security assessment research in China. Yunnan Geographic Environment Research (云南地理环境研究), 2010, 22(3): 104-110 (in Chinese)
[5] Wu X (吴晓). Research on Ecological Security Assessment of Three Gorges Reservoir Area of Eastern Chongqing. PhD Thesis. Wuhan: School of City and Environmental Science, Central China Normal University, 2014 (in Chinese)
[6] Wang H-M (王韩民). Evaluation and prediction of ecological security system. Environmental Assessment (环境评价), 2003(11): 30-34 (in Chinese)
[7] Liu H (刘红), Wang H (王慧), Zhang X-W (张兴卫). Research review on ecological security assessment. Chinese Journal of Ecology (生态学杂志), 2006, 25(1): 74-78 (in Chinese)
[8] Zhou X (周旭). Review of research on ecological security assessment in China. Journal of China West Normal University (Natural Science) (西华师范大学学报: 自然科学版), 2007, 28(3): 200-206 (in Chinese)
[9] Zhou T (周婷), Meng J-J (蒙吉军). Research progress in regional ecological risk assessment methods. Chinese Journal of Ecology (生态学杂志), 2009, 28(4): 762-767 (in Chinese)
[10] Wang M-E (王美娥), Chen W-P (陈卫平), Peng C (彭驰). Urban ecological risk assessment: A review. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 2014, 25(3): 911-918 (in Chinese)
[11] Chen X-P (陈兴鹏), Lu C-P (逯承鹏), Yang J (杨静), et al. Analysis of human-environment coordination fluctuations of Ningxia in 1986-2005 based on the ecological footprint model. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment (干旱区资源与环境), 2011, 25(10): 15-20 (in Chinese)
[12] Xiao D-N (肖笃宁), Chen W-B (陈文波), Guo F-L (郭福良). Study on the basic concepts and contents of ecological security. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 2002, 13(3): 354-358 (in Chinese)
[13] Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 1997, 387: 3-15
[14] Chen X-P (陈兴鹏), Zhang W-W (张伟伟), Xue B (薛冰), et al. Evaluation on urban ecosystem health by employing the set pair analysis: Case of Lanzhou City, China. Ecological Science (生态科学), 2011, 30(2): 135-141 (in Chinese)
[15] Zhang Z-L (张子龙), Chen X-P (陈兴鹏), Jiao W-T (焦文婷), et al. Quantitative measure method for environmental carrying capacity and its application based on emergy theory. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment (干旱区资源与环境), 2011, 25(8): 18-23(in Chinese)
[16] Rees WE. Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: What urban economics leave out. Environment and Urbanization, 1992, 4: 120-130
[17] Wackernagel M, Rees WE. Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth. Gabriela Island: New Society Publishers, 1996
[18] Odum HT. Environmental Accounting: Emergy and Environmental Decision Making. New York: John & Wiley, 1996
[19] Lan S-F (蓝盛芳), Qin P (钦佩), Lu H-F (陆宏芳). Emergy Analysis of Eco-economic System. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2002 (in Chinese)
[20] Zhang F-Y (张芳怡), Pu L-J (濮励杰), Zhang J (张健). A modified model ofecological footprint calculationbased on the theory of emergy analysis: Taking Jiangsu Province as an example. Journal of Natural Resources (自然资源学报), 2006, 21(4): 653-660 (in Chinese)
[21] Zhao S, Li Z, Li W. A modified method of ecological footprint calculation and its application. Ecological Modelling, 2005, 185: 65-75
[22] Liu M (刘淼), Hu Y-M (胡远满), Chang Y (常禹), et al. Modification of ecological footprint assessment based on emergy: A case study in the Upper Reach of Minjiang River. Journal of Natural Resources (自然资源学报), 2008, 23(3): 447-457 (in Chinese)
[23] Wang J-Y (王建源), Chen Y-C (陈艳春), Li M-H (李曼华), et al. Ecological footprint of Shandong Pro-vince based on emergy analysis. Chinese Journal of Eco-logy (生态学杂志), 2007, 26(9): 1505-1510 (in Chinese)
[24] Campbell ET, Brown MT. Environmental accounting of natural capital and ecosystem services for the US Natio-nal Forest System. Environment Development and Sustai-nability, 2012, 14: 691-724
[25] Liu J (刘晶). Study on the Ecological Security of Jilin Province Based on the Emergy and Ecological Footprint Model. Master Thesis. Changchun: Jilin University, 2008 (in Chinese)
[26] Yan Z (燕子). Study on the Ecological Security of Wuhan based on the Emergy-Ecological Footprint Model. Master Thesis. Wuhan: Central China Normal University, 2012 (in Chinese)
[27] Deng J-L (邓聚龙). The Grey System Theory Tutorial. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology Press, 1990 (in Chinese)
[28] Xu J-H (徐建华). Mathematical Method in Contemporary Geography. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2002(in Chinese)
[29] Liaoning Statistic Bureau (辽宁统计局). Liaoning Statistic Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2013(in Chinese)
[30] Cao J-J (曹晶晶). Assessment and Prediction on Ecological Security of Hubei Province Based on the Energy and Ecological Footprint Model. Master Thesis. Wuhan: Faculty of Resources and Environmental Science, Hubei University, 2012 (in Chinese)
[31] Zhao Z-Q (赵志强), Li S-C (李双成), Gao Y (高阳). Emergy-based modification for ecological footprint accounting and application to open eco-economic system: A case study of Shenzhen City. Acta Ecologica Sinica(生态学报), 2008, 28(5): 2220-2231 (in Chinese)

基于能值-生态足迹模型的东北老工业基地生态安全评价——以辽宁省为例

An emergy-ecological footprint model based evaluation of ecological security at the old industrial area in Northeast China: A case study of Liaoning Province.

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价