人工长白落叶松冠层光合作用-光响应曲线最优模型

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.201608.023

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以黑龙江省帽儿山林场15年生人工长白落叶松为研究对象,采用直角双曲线模型(RH)、非直角双曲线模型(NRH)、指数模型(EM)、修正直角双曲线模型(MRH)和修正指数模型(MEM)分别对4种不同光响应特征的光合作用-光响应曲线(光抑制型光响应曲线,PLC_i;光饱和型光响应曲线,PLC_s;未饱和型光响应曲线,PLC_u;弱光环境下植被的光响应曲线,PLC_w)进行拟合,计算出光饱和时的最大净光合速率(P_{n max})、暗呼吸速率(R_d)、光补偿点(LCP)、光饱和点(LSP)及表观量子效率(AQY)等重要的光合生理指标,综合对比5个候选模型对不同响应曲线的拟合优度和对光合生理指标的估计精度.结果表明: MEM模型仅适用于拟合光抑制型曲线,MRH对光抑制型曲线和光饱和型曲线的拟合效果最好(R_a²分别为0.9986和0.9978),NRH最适合拟合未饱和型曲线和弱光环境型曲线(R_a²分别为0.9996和0.9963).在所有类型曲线中,MRH模型估计P_{n max}时,平均相对误差绝对值(MAPE)最低(0.1%<MAPE<0.7%),但对LCP的估计效果相对较差(2.5%<MAPE<9.4%);NRH模型对光饱和型曲线和未饱和型曲线中的LCP以及未饱和型曲线的R_d表现出更准确的估计(MAPE分别为1.8%、0.1%和3.9%);RH模型对光抑制型曲线的LCP及光饱和型曲线的R_d有更好的估计效果(MAPE分别为1.0%和2.7%);EM模型适用于估计弱光环境型曲线的LCP(MAPE为0.2%).MRH在保证较好的模型拟合效果及光合生理指标估计精度以外,还在拟合不同类型曲线时表现出极高的稳定性,因此,本文选择MRH模型作为拟合人工长白落叶松冠层光合作用-光响应曲线的最优模型.

关键词: 最优模型, 长白落叶松, 净光合速率, 暗呼吸速率, 光饱和点, 光合-光响应曲线, 光补偿点

Abstract: Rectangle hyperbola model (RH), nonrectangle hyperbola model (NRH), exponential model (EM), modified rectangle hyperbola model (MRH), and modified exponential model (MEM) were applied respectively for modeling the photosynthesis-light response curves (PLC) based on four types of curves (photosynthesis-light response curve of inhibition, PLC_i, photosynthesis-light response curve of saturation, PLC_s, photosynthesis-light response curve of unsaturation, PLC_u andphotosynthesis-light response curve in weak light, PLC_w) in canopy of 15 years old planted Larix olgensis tree in the Maoershan Forest Farm, Heilongjiang Province. The major photosynthetic physiological indexes including maximum net photosynthetic rate (P_{n max}), dark respiration rate (R_d), light compensation point (LCP), light saturation point at saturated light intensity (LSP) and apparent quantum yield (AQY) were calculated. All the five candidate models were comprehensively compared by the model goodness-of-fit and the precision estimations of photosynthetic physiological indexes in the four types of curves. The results showed that MEM model was only suitable for fitting the PLC_i. MRH model showed the best goodness-of-fit for PLC_i and PLC_s(R_a²was 0.9986 and 0.9978, respectively). Meanwhile, NRH model expressed the best fitting result in PLC_u and PLC_w (R_a² was 0.9996 and 0.9963, respectively). MRH had the lowest mean absolute value of relative error (MAPE) when evaluating P_{n max} in different types of curves (0.1%<MAPE<0.7%), but its precision estimation for LCP was relatively worse (2.5%<MAPE<9.4%). NRH model exhibited more accurate estimation for LCP of PLC_s and PLC_u, as well as R_d of PLC_u(MAPE was 1.8%, 0.1%, and 3.9%, respectively). RH model represented better prediction effect for LCP of PLC_i and R_d of PLC_s(MAPE was 1.0% and 2.7%, respectively). EM was more sui-table for estimating LCP of PLC_w(MAPE was 0.2%). Comprehensive analysis showed that MRH model not only proved well model goodness-of-fit and accurate estimation of photosynthetic physiological indexes, but also showed the highest stability when fitting different types of curves. As a result, MRH model was finally selected as the optimal canopy photosynthesis-light response model of planted L. olgensis tree.

Key words: optimal model, Larix olgensis, net photosynthetic rate, dark respiration rate., photosynthesis-light response curve, light compensation point, light saturation point

刘强, 李凤日, 谢龙飞. 人工长白落叶松冠层光合作用-光响应曲线最优模型[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(8): 2420-2428.

LIU Qiang, LI Feng-ri, XIE Long-fei. Optimal model of photosynthesis-light response curve in canopy of planted Larix olgensis tree.[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016, 27(8): 2420-2428.

参考文献

[1] Blackman FF. Optima and limiting factors. Annals of Botany, 1905, 19: 281-295
[2] Baly EC. The kinetics of photosynthesis. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A, 1935, 117: 218-239
[3] Thornley JHM. Mathematical Models in Plant Physiology. London: Academic Press, 1976
[4] Lootens P, Van Waes J, Carlier L. Effect of a short photoinhibition stress on photosynthesis, chlorophyll a fluorescence, and pigment contents of different maize cultivars. Can a rapid and objective stress indicator be found? Photosynthetica, 2004, 42: 187-192
[5] Ye ZP. A new model for relationship between irradiance and the rate of photosynthesis in Oryza sativa. Photosynthetica, 2007, 45: 637-640
[6] Duan A-G (段爱国), Zhang J-G (张建国). Selection of models of photosynthesis in response to irradiance and definition of attribute of weak light. Forest Research (林业科学研究), 2009, 22(6): 765-771 (in Chinese)
[7] Chen ZY, Peng ZS, Yang J, et al. A mathematical model for describing light-response curves in Nicotiana tabacum L. Photosynthetica, 2011, 49: 467-471
[8] Marino G, Aqil M, Shipley B. The leaf economics spectrum and the prediction of photosynthetic light-response curves. Functional Ecology, 2010, 24: 263-272
[9] Lachapelle PP, Shipley B. Interspecific prediction of photosynthetic light response curves using specific leaf mass and leaf nitrogen content: Effects of differences in soil fertility and growth irradiance. Annals of Botany, 2012, 109: 1149-1157
[10] Calama R, Puértolas J, Madrigal G, et al. Modeling the environmental response of leaf net photosynthesis in Pinus pinea L. natural regeneration. Ecological Modelling, 2013, 251: 9-21
[11] Xu JZ, Yu YM, Peng SZ, et al. A modified nonrectangular hyperbola equation for photosynthetic light-response curves of leaves with different nitrogen status. Photosynthetica, 2014, 52: 117-123
[12] Lu P-L (陆佩玲), Yu Q (于强). Fitting light response curves of photosynthesis of winter wheat. Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology (中国农业气象), 2001, 22(2): 12-14 (in Chinese)
[13] Zhang M (张弥), Wu J-B (吴家兵), Guan D-X (关德新), et al. Light response curve of dominant tree species photosynthesis in broadleaved Korean pine forest of Changbai Mountain. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 2006, 17(9): 1575-1578 (in Chinese)
[14] Wang X-W (王秀伟), Mao Z-J (毛子军). Practicability of 7 light responsive curve models to different plant species. Bulletin of Botanical Research (植物研究), 2009, 29(1): 43-48 (in Chinese)
[15] Ye Z-P (叶子飘), Yu Q (于强). Comparison of a new model of light response of photosynthesis with traditional models. Journal of Shenyang Agricultural University (沈阳农业大学学报), 2007, 38(6): 771-775 (in Chinese)
[16] Fang L, Zhang S, Zhang G, et al. Application of five light-response models in the photosynthesis of Populus× euramericana cv.‘Zhonglin46’ leaves. Applied Bioche-mistry and Biotechnology, 2015, 176: 86-100
[17] Chen W-Y (陈卫英), Chen Z-Y (陈真勇), Luo F-Y (罗辅燕), et al. Comparison between modified exponential model and common models of light-response curve. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology (植物生态学报), 2012, 36(12): 1277-1285 (in Chinese)
[18] Chai S-F (柴胜丰), Tang J-M (唐健民), Yang X (杨雪), et al. The fitting analysis of 4 photosynthesis light response curve models in Keteleeria calcarea. Journal of Guangxi Academy of Sciences (广西科学院学报), 2015, 31(4): 1-4 (in Chinese)
[19] Lobo FA, de Barros MP, Dalmagro HJ, et al. Fitting net photosynthetic light-response curves with Microsoft Excel: A critical look at the models. Photosynthetica, 2013, 51: 445-456
[20] Reich PB, Ellsworth DS, Kloeppel BD, et al. Vertical variation in canopy structure and CO₂ exchange of oak-maple forests: Influence of ozone, nitrogen, and other factors on simulated canopy carbon gain. Tree Physiology, 1990, 7: 329-345
[21] Rook DA, Corson MJ. Temperature and irradiance and the total daily photosynthetic production of the crown of a Pinus radiate tree. Oecologia, 1978, 36: 371-382
[22] Long SP, Humphries S, Falkowski PG. Photoinhibition of photosynthesis in nature. Annual Review of Plant Bio-logy, 1994, 45: 633-662
[23] Jones HG, Archer N, Rotenberg E, et al. Radiation measurement for plant ecophysiology. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2003, 54: 879-889
[24] Kyei-Boahen S, Lada R, Astatkie T, et al. Photosynthetic response of carrots to varying irradiances. Photosynthetica, 2003, 41: 301-305
[25] Leakey ADB, Uribelarrea M, Ainsworth EA, et al. Photosynthesis, productivity, and yield of maize are not affected by open-air elevation of CO₂ concentration in the absence of drought. Plant Physiology, 2006, 140: 779-790
[26] Zhang X-S (张雪松), Shen S-H (申双和), Song J (宋洁). The vertical distribution of cotton leaf nitrogen content and photosynthetic characteristics in the north China plain. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 2009, 29(4): 1893-1898 (in Chinese)
[27] Huang H-Y (黄红英), Dou X-Y (窦新永), Sun P-Y (孙蓓育), et al. Comparison of photosynthetic characteristics in two ecotypes of Jatropha curcas in summer. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 2009, 29(6): 2861-2867 (in Chinese)
[28] Wang M-L (王满莲), Feng Y-L (冯玉龙), Li X (李新). Effects of soil phosphorus level on morphological and photosynthetic characteristics of Ageratina adenophora and Chromolaena odorata. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 2006, 17(4): 602-606 (in Chinese)
[29] Ye Z-P (叶子飘), Wang J-L (王建林). Comparison and analysis of light-response models of plant photosynthesis. Journal of Jinggangshan University (Natrual Sciences) (井冈山学院学报:自然科学版), 2009, 30(4): 9-13 (in Chinese)
[30] Ye Z-P (叶子飘), Li J-X (李进省). Comparative investigation light response of photosynthesis on ono-rectangular hyperbola model and modified model of rectangular hyperbola. Journal of Jinggangshan University (Natrual Sciences) (井冈山学院学报:自然科学版), 2010, 31(3): 38-44 (in Chinese)
[31] Walker DA, Jarvis PG, Farquhar GD, et al. Automated measurement of leaf photosynthetic O₂ evolution as a function of photon flux density. Philosophical Transactions of Royal Society of London Series B, 1989, 323: 313-326
[32] Richardson A, Berlyn G. Changes in foliar spectral reflectance and chlorophyll fluorescence of four temperate species following branch cutting. Tree Physiology, 2002, 22: 499-506
[33] Ye Z-P (叶子飘), Yu Q (于强). Comparison of new and several classical models of photosynthesis in response to irradiance. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology (植物生态学报), 2008, 32(6): 1356-1361 (in Chinese)