基于FvCB模型的几种草本和木本植物光合生理生化特性

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.201705.029

应用生态学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (5): 1482-1488.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201705.029

基于FvCB模型的几种草本和木本植物光合生理生化特性

唐星林^1,2, 周本智^1,2*, 周燕³, 倪霞^1,2,4, 曹永慧^1,2, 顾连宏⁵

¹中国林业科学研究院亚热带林业研究所, 杭州 311400;
²国家林业局钱江源森林生态系统定位观测研究站, 杭州 311400;
³新安江林场, 浙江建德 311600;
⁴南京林业大学生物与环境学院, 南京 210037;
⁵美国橡树岭国家实验室气候变化研究所, 美国田纳西州橡树岭 37831

收稿日期:2016-09-22 修回日期:2017-02-22 发布日期:2017-05-18
通讯作者: *E-mail: benzhi_zhou@126.com
作者简介:唐星林, 男, 1988年生, 博士研究生. 主要从事森林生态学研究. E-mail: txl_insist@163.com
基金资助:
本文由国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFD0600202)、国家林业局948项目(2014-4-57)、浙江省自然科学基金项目(LY13C160002)、中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项(RISF2013002)和中国林业科学研究院基本科研业务费专项资金项目(CAFYBB2011007)资助

Photo-physiological and photo-biochemical characteristics of several herbaceous and woody species based on FvCB model

TANG Xing-lin^1,2, ZHOU Ben-zhi^1,2*, ZHOU Yan³, NI Xia^1,2,4, CAO Yong-hui^1,2, GU Lian-hong⁵

¹Research Institute of Subtropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Hangzhou 311400, China;
²Qianjiangyuan Forest Ecosystem Research Station, State Forestry Administration, Hangzhou 311400, China;
³Xin’anjiang Forest Center, Jiande 311600, Zhejiang, China;
⁴College of Biology and the Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China;
⁵Institute of Climate Change, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, USA

Received:2016-09-22 Revised:2017-02-22 Published:2017-05-18
Contact: *E-mail: benzhi_zhou@126.com
Supported by:
This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFD0600202), the 948 Program of State Forestry Administration (2014-4-57), the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province, China (LY13C160002), the Special Fund for Scientific Research in the Central Public-interest Research Institutes (RISF2013002), and the Basic Research Fund of Chinese Academy of Forestry (CAFYBB2011007)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为研究不同生活型植物的光合能力及其叶片光合机构,采用直角双曲线修正模型和C3植物FvCB模型对7种木本植物和4种草本植物的CO₂响应曲线进行拟合,并对不同木本植物、不同草本植物和2种生活型植物的最大净光合速率(P_{n max})、Rubisco酶最大羧化速率(V_{c max})、最大电子传递速率(J_max)、光合暗呼吸速率(R_d)和叶肉阻力(r_m)等参数进行比较.结果表明: 7种木本植物P_{n max}大小顺序为乌桕、苎麻>润楠、海桐>青冈、苦槠、娜塔栎;乌桕、苎麻、润楠和海桐的V_{c max}显著大于青冈和苦槠;J_max大小顺序为乌桕>苎麻、海桐>娜塔栎、苦槠和青冈;润楠和苦槠的r_m显著大于乌桕、海桐和苎麻.商陆的P_{n max}显著大于藿香蓟和土牛膝;4种草本植物的V_{c max}无显著差异;商陆的J_max显著大于藿香蓟;龙葵和土牛膝的r_m显著大于藿香蓟;商陆的R_d显著大于藿香蓟和土牛膝.木本植物的P_{n max}、V_{c max}、J_max和r_m光合参数均显著大于草本植物,但二者的R_d无显著差异.不同物种之间以及2种生活型植物光合能力的差异主要是由叶片内部Rubisco酶羧化能力、电子传递能力和叶肉阻力等差异引起的.

Abstract: To explore the photosynthetic capacity and the leaf photosynthetic apparatus for plants with different life forms, CO₂ response curves of 7 woody species and 4 herbaceous species were fitted by the modified rectangular hyperbolic model and the FvCB model, and the photosynthetic parameters, including maximum net photosynthetic rate (P_{n max}), maximal Rubisco carboxylation rate (V_{c max}), maximal electron transport rate (J_max), day respiration (R_d), and mesophyll resistance to CO₂ transport (r_m), were compared among different woody species, among different herbaceous species, and between woody and herbaceous life-forms, respectively. The results showed P_{n max} of seven woody species descended in the order of Sapium sebiferum and Boehmeria nivea ＞ Machilus pingii and Pittosporum tobira ＞ Cyclobalanopsis glauca, Castanopsis sclerophylla, and Quercus nuttallii. V_{c max} of S. sebiferum, B. nivea, M. pingii, and P. tobira was significantly higher than that of C. glauca and C. sclerophylla. J_max of woody species was in descending order as S. sebiferum ＞ B. nivea and P. tobira ＞ Q. nuttallii, C. sclerophylla, and C. glauca. r_m of M. pingii and C. sclerophylla was higher than that of S. sebiferum, P. tobira and B. nivea. P_{n max} of Phytolacca acinosa was significantly higher than that of Ageratum conyzoides and Achyranthes aspera. There was no significant difference in V_{c max} among 4 herbaceous species. J_max of P. acinosa was higher than that of A. conyzoides. r_m of S. nigrum and A. aspera was higher than that of A. conyzoides. R_d of P. acinosa was higher than that of A. conyzoides and A. aspera. The photosynthetic parameters (P_{n max}, V_{c max}, J_max and r_m) of woody species were significantly higher than those of herbaceous species, but no significant difference was found in R_d between woody and herbaceous species. In conclusion, the difference in photosynthetic capacity among different species and between the two plant life-forms resulted from the difference in Rubisco carboxylation capacity, electron transport capacity, and mesophyll resistance among these species.

唐星林, 周本智, 周燕, 倪霞, 曹永慧, 顾连宏. 基于FvCB模型的几种草本和木本植物光合生理生化特性[J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(5): 1482-1488.

TANG Xing-lin, ZHOU Ben-zhi, ZHOU Yan, NI Xia, CAO Yong-hui, GU Lian-hong. Photo-physiological and photo-biochemical characteristics of several herbaceous and woody species based on FvCB model[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017, 28(5): 1482-1488.

参考文献

[1] Nie H (聂昊), Wang S-Q (王绍强), Zhou L (周蕾), et al. Carbon sequestration potential of forest vegetation in Jiangxi and Zhejiang provinces based on national forest inventory. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 2011, 22(10): 2581-2588 (in Chinese)
[2] Zhu Y (祝燕), Zhao G-F (赵谷风), Zhang L-W (张俪文), et al. Community composition and structure of Gutianshan forest dynamic plot in a mid-subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest east China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology (植物生态学报), 2008, 32(2): 262-273 (in Chinese)
[3] Sun J, Zhang J, Larue CT, et al. Decrease in leaf sucrose synthesis leads to increased leaf starch turnover and decreased RuBP regeneration-limited photosynthesis but not Rubisco-limited photosynthesis in Arabidopsis null mutants of SPSA1. Plant, Cell and Environment, 2011, 34: 592-604
[4] Price GD, Badger MR, Von CS. The prospect of using cyanobacterial bicarbonate transporters to improve leaf photosynthesis in C3 crop plants. Plant Physiology, 2010, 155: 20-26
[5] Wu T-G (吴统贵), Zhou H-F (周和锋), Wu M (吴明), et al. Dynamics of Salix matsudana photosynthesis and its relations to environmental factors. Chinese Journal of Ecology (生态学杂志), 2008, 27(12): 2056-2061 (in Chinese)
[6] Wang Z-H (王振华), Sun H-Y (孙宏勇), Zhang X-Y (张喜英), et al. Response of photosynthesis of different winter wheat cultivars to environmental factors. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica (华北农学报), 2007, 22(1): 9-12 (in Chinese)
[7] Gao Z-K (高志奎), Gao R-F (高荣孚), He J-P (何俊萍), et al. Analysis of photosynthetic simulation by a biochemical model or mathematical model in greenhouse egg plant. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 2007, 27(6): 2265-2271 (in Chinese)
[8] Farquhar GD, von Caemmerer S, Berry JA. A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO₂ assimilation in leaves of C3 species. Planta, 1980, 149: 78-90
[9] von Caemmerer S. Steady-state models of photosynthesis. Plant, Cell and Environment, 2013, 36: 1617-1630
[10] Long SP, Bernacchi CJ. Gas exchange measurements, what can they tell us about the underlying limitations to photosynthesis? Procedures and sources of error. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2003, 54: 2393-2401
[11] Zhang Y-M (张彦敏), Zhou G-S (周广胜). Advances in leaf maximum carboxylation rate and its response to environmental factors. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 2012, 32(18): 5907-5917 (in Chinese)
[12] Ye Z-P (叶子飘). A review on modeling of responses of photosynthesis to light and CO₂. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology (植物生态学报), 2010, 34(6): 727-740 (in Chinese)
[13] Gu L, Pallardy SG, Tu K, et al. Reliable estimation of biochemical parameters from C3 leaf photosynthesis-intercellular carbon dioxide response curves. Plant, Cell and Environment, 2010, 33: 1852-1874
[14] Sharkey TD, Bernacchi CJ, Farquhar GD, et al. Fitting photosynthetic carbon dioxide response curves for C3 leaves. Plant, Cell and Environment, 2007, 30: 1035-1040
[15] von Caemmerer S. Biochemical Models of Leaf Photosynthesis. Collingwood: CSIRO Publishing, 2000
[16] Ethier GJ, Livingston NJ. On the need to incorporate sensitivity to CO₂ transfer conductance into the Farquhar-von Caemmerer-Berry leaf photosynthesis model. Plant, Cell and Environment, 2004, 27: 137-153
[17] Muir CD, Hangarter RP, Moyle LC, et al. Morphological and anatomical determinants of mesophyll conduc-tance in wild relatives of tomato (Solanum sect. Lycopersicon, sect. Lycopersicoides; Solanaceae). Plant, Cell and Environment, 2014, 37: 1415-1426
[18] Harley PC, Thomas RB, Reynolds JF, et al. Modelling photosynthesis of cotton grown in elevated CO₂. Plant, Cell and Environment, 1992, 15: 271-282
[19] Harley PC, Sharkey TD. An improved model of C3 photosynthesis at high CO₂: Reversed O₂ sensitivity explained by lack of glycerate reentry into the chloroplast. Photosynthesis Research, 1991, 27: 169-178
[20] Flexas J, Ribas-Carbó M, Hanson DT, et al. Tobacco aquaporin NtAQP1 is involved in mesophyll conductance to CO₂ in vivo. The Plant Journal, 2006, 48: 427-439
[21] Flexas J, Ribas-Carbó M, Diaz-Espejo A, et al. Mesophyll conductance to CO₂: Current knowledge and future prospects. Plant, Cell and Environment, 2008, 31: 602-621
[22] Evans JR, Kaldenhoff R, Genty B, et al. Resistances along the CO₂ diffusion pathway inside leaves. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2009, 60: 2235-2248
[23] Flexas J, Barbour MM, Brendel O, et al. Mesophyll diffusion conductance to CO₂: An unappreciated central player in photosynthesis. Plant Science, 2012, 193-194: 70-84
[24] Wullschleger SD. Biochemical limitations to carbon assimilation in C3 plants: A retrospective analysis of the A/C_i curves from 109 species. Journal of Experimental Botany, 1993, 44: 907-920
[25] Zhu XG, Portis AR Jr, Long SP. Would transformation of C3 crop plants with foreign rubisco increase producti-vity? A computational analysis extrapolating from kinetic properties to canopy photosynthesis. Plant, Cell and Environment, 2004, 27: 155-165
[26] Hanba YT, Kogami H, Terashima I. The effect of growth irradiance on leaf anatomy and photosynthesis in Acer species differing in light demand. Plant, Cell and Environment, 2002, 25: 1021-1030
[27] Yamori W, Evans JR, Von Caemmerer S. Effects of growth and measurement light intensities on temperature dependence of CO₂assimilation rate in tobacco leaves. Plant, Cell and Environment, 2010, 33: 332-343
[28] Hommel R, Siegwolf R, Saurer M, et al. Drought response of mesophyll conductance in forest understory species-impacts on water-use efficiency and interactions with leaf water movement. Physiologia Plantarum, 2014, 152: 98-114
[29] Xiong D, Liu XI, Liu L, et al. Rapid responses of me-sophyll conductance to changes of CO₂concentration, temperature and irradiance are affected by N supplements in rice. Plant, Cell and Environment, 2015, 38: 2541-2550

基于FvCB模型的几种草本和木本植物光合生理生化特性

Photo-physiological and photo-biochemical characteristics of several herbaceous and woody species based on FvCB model

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价