FQA:一种基于物种保守性的植物区系质量评价方法

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.201804.007

应用生态学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (4): 1367-1372.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201804.007

• 综合评述 • 上一篇

FQA:一种基于物种保守性的植物区系质量评价方法

曹丽娟^1,2, 何萍^2,3*, 王汨¹, 徐杰^2,3, 任颖^2,3

¹大连海洋大学水产与生命学院, 辽宁大连 116023;
²中国环境科学研究院生态所, 北京 100012;
³国家环境保护区域生态过程与功能评估重点实验室, 北京 100012;

收稿日期:2017-10-27 出版日期:2018-04-18 发布日期:2018-04-18
通讯作者: * E-mail: heping@craes.org.cn
作者简介:曹丽娟, 女,1992年生,硕士研究生. 主要从事流域植被生态修复研究. E-mail: 565086329@qq.com
基金资助:
本文由“十二五”国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项(2014ZX07508-001)资助

FQA: A method for floristic quality assessment based on conservatism of plant species

CAO Li-juan^1,2, HE Ping^2,3*, WANG Mi¹, XU Jie^2,3, REN Ying^2,3

¹College of Fisheries and Life Science, Dalian Ocean University, Dalian 116023, Liaoning, China;
²Ecology Institute, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China;
³State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Regional Ecological Processes and Functions Assessment, Beijing 100012, China;

Received:2017-10-27 Online:2018-04-18 Published:2018-04-18
Contact: * E-mail: heping@craes.org.cn
Supported by:
This work was supported by the 12th Five-Year Plan of Major Science and Technology Program for Water Pollution Control and Treatment (2014ZX07508-001).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 植物区系质量评价法(FQA)是一种利用植物物种对特定生境的保守性和植物群落的物种丰富度快速评估栖息地质量的方法.基于样方物种组成和专家赋值的植物物种保守系数,运用简单的公式即可计算出样方的植物区系质量指数(FQI).该指数能够反映植被的完整性和退化程度,可以用于对栖息地质量进行时空对比,已经在美国、加拿大等十余个国家广泛应用.本文介绍该方法的原理、计算公式和应用案例,为生态管理工作者和研究人员提供一种简单、可重复、可对比的生境质量评估工具.

关键词: 保守系数, 栖息地质量, 植物区系质量指数, 植物区系质量评价

Abstract: FQA, which uses the conservatism of plant species for particular habitats and the species richness of plant communities, is a rapid method for the assessment of habitat quality. This method is based on species composition of quadrats and coefficients of conservatism for species which assigned by experts. Floristic Quality Index (FQI) that reflects vegetation integrity and degradation of a site can be calculated by a simple formula and be used for space-time comparison of habitat quality. It has been widely used in more than ten countries including the United States and Canada. This paper presented the principle, calculation formulas and application cases of this method, with the aim to provide a simple, repeatable and comparable method to assess habitat quality for ecological managers and researchers.

Key words: floristic quality assessment, conservatism coefficient, habitat quality, floristic quality index.

曹丽娟, 何萍, 王汨, 徐杰, 任颖. FQA:一种基于物种保守性的植物区系质量评价方法[J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(4): 1367-1372.

CAO Li-juan, HE Ping, WANG Mi, XU Jie, REN Ying. FQA: A method for floristic quality assessment based on conservatism of plant species[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018, 29(4): 1367-1372.

参考文献

[1] Xiao Y (肖洋), Ouyang Z-Y (欧阳志云), Wang L-Y (王莉雁), et al. Spatial patterns of ecosystem quality in Inner Mongolia and its driving forces analysis. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 2016, 36(19): 6019-6030 (in Chinese)
[2] Yang X (杨霞), Gu Y-L (谷永丽), Zang D-K (臧德奎). Study on the plant species diversity evaluation system in urban green space. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences (安徽农业科学), 2015, 43(4): 166-168 (in Chinese)
[3] Ren Y (任颖). Plant Community Characteristics and Integrity Assessment of Vegetation in Riparian Area of Hai Basin. Master Thesis. Beijing: Institute of Ecology, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, 2015 (in Chinese)
[4] Swink F, Wilhelm G. Plants of the Chicago Region. 3rd Ed. Lisle, IL: Morton Arboretum, 1979
[5] Swink F, Wilhelm G. Plants of the Chicago Region. 4th Ed. Indianapolis, IN: Indiana Academy of Science, 1994
[6] Freyman WA. The Universal Floristic Quality Assessment (FQA) Calculator: An Online Tool for Ecological Assessment and Monitoring [EB/OL]. (2016-07-01) [2017-12-12]. https: //universalFQA.org
[7] Peng W-T (彭婉婷), Luo P (罗鹏), Liu C-Q (刘长青), et al. A rapid and quantitative assessment of wetland vegetation restoration effects with Floristic Quality Assessment Index. Biodiversity Science (生物多样性), 2014, 22(5): 564-573 (in Chinese)
[8] Tu W-G (涂卫国). Floristic and Biodiversity Studies of Vascular Plants in the West Slope of Mt. Jiuding and Mt. Longzhou, Western Sichuan, China. PhD Thesis. Chengdu: Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2008 (in Chinese)
[9] Peng W-T (彭婉婷). A Rapid and Quantitative Assessment of Wetland Vegetation Restoration Effects with Floristic Quality Assessment Index in Yunqiao, China. Master Thesis. Chengdu: Sichuan Agricultural University, 2015 (in Chinese)
[10] Bonanno G, Giudice RL. Application of two quality indices as monitoring and management tools of rivers. Case study: The Imera Meridionale River, Italy. Environmental Management, 2010, 45: 856-867
[11] Malik RN, Shinwari ZK, Waheed H. Linkages between spatial variations in riparian vegetation and floristic quality to the environmental heterogeneity: A case study of River Soan and its associated streams, Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 2012, 44: 187-197
[12] Mushet DM, Euliss NH, Shaffer TL. Floristic quality assessment of one natural and three restored wetland complexes in North Dakota, USA. Wetlands, 2002, 22: 126-138
[13] Miller SJ, Wardrop DH. Adapting the floristic quality assessment index to indicate anthropogenic disturbance in central Pennsylvania wetlands. Ecological Indicators, 2006, 6: 313-326
[14] Herman B. Testing the Floristic Quality Assessment Index in Natural and Created Wetlands in Mississippi, USA. Master Thesis. Starkville, MI: Mississippi State University, 2005
[15] Maginel CJ, Knapp BO, Kabrick JM, et al. Floristic Quality Index for woodland ground flora restoration: Utility and effectiveness in a fire-managed landscape. Ecological Indicators, 2016, 67: 58-67
[16] McIndoe JM, Rothrock PE, Reber RT, et al. Monitoring tallgrass prairie restoration performance using floristic quality assessment. Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science, 2008, 117: 16-28
[17] Bowers K, Boutin C. Evaluating the relationship between floristic quality and measures of plant biodiversity along stream bank habitats. Ecological Indicators, 2008, 8: 466-475
[18] Wu G-L (武高林), Chen M (陈敏), Du G-Z (杜国祯). Effects of nutrient and light on seedlings morphological plasticity of four Saussurea species with different ecological breadth. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 2008, 19(8): 1708-1713 (in Chinese)
[19] Andreas BK, Lichvar RW. Floristic Index for Establishing Assessment Standards: A Case Study for Northern Ohio. Vicksburg: Army Corps of Egineers Waterways Experiment Station, 1995
[20] Taft JB, Wilhelm GS, Ladd DM, et al. Floristic Quality Assessment for Vegetation in Illinois, A Method for Assessing Vegetation Integrity. Carbondale, IL: Illinois Native Plant Society, 1997
[21] Wilhelm G, Ladd D. Natural area assessment in the Chicago region. North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference, Louisville, US, 1988
[22] Fennessy MS, Elifrita B, Lopez R. Testing the Floristic Quality Assessment Index as an Indicator of Riparian Wetland Disturbance [EB/OL]. (1998-01-01) [2017-12-12]. http://xueshu.baidu.com/s?wd=paperuri%3A%284ce5490507744616b03c62e764b29e91%29&filter=sc_long_sign&tn=SE_xueshusource_2kduw22v&sc_vurl=http%3A%2F%2Fworks.bepress.com%2Fsiobhan_fennessy%2F54&ie=utf-8&sc_us=13228265994710671522
[23] Freyman WA, Masters LA, Packard S. The Universal Floristic Quality Assessment (FQA) Calculator: An online tool for ecological assessment and monitoring. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 2016, 7: 380-383
[24] Cretini KF, Visser JM, Krauss KW, et al. Development and use of a floristic quality index for coastal Louisiana marshe. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2012, 184: 2389-2403
[25] Cretini KF, Steyer GD. Floristic Quality Index: An Assessment Tool for Restoration Projects and Monitoring Sites in Coastal Louisiana [EB/OL]. (2011-04-01) [2017-12-12]. https://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2011/3044/pdf/FS11-3044.pdf
[26] Buchanan C, Coy C, Ho C, et al. Floristic Quality Assessment and Ecosystem Analysis of the Duncan Bay Nature Preserve, Cheboygan County, Michigan [EB/OL]. (2015-04-01) [2017-12-12]. https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/116389
[27] Connell JH. Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. Science, 1978, 199: 1302-1310
[28] Lopez RD, Fennessy MS. Testing the floristic quality assessment index as an indicator of wetland conditions. Ecological Applications, 2002, 12: 487-497
[29] Wilson MJ, Forrest AS, Bayley SE. Floristic quality assessment for marshes in Alberta’s northern prairie and boreal regions. Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management, 2013, 16: 288-299
[30] Zhu D (朱丹). Study on Benefit Monitoring of National Day Soil and Water Conservation Ecological Rehabilitation Project in Dayao of Yunnan Province. Master Thesis. Kunming: Kunming University of Science and Technology, 2015 (in Chinese)
[31] Herman K, Masters L, Penskar M, et al. Floristic Qua-lity Assessment with Wetland Categories and Examples of Computer Applications for the State of Michigan. [EB/OL]. (2001-01-01) [2017-12-12]. https://www.mendeley.com/research-papers/floristic-quality-assessment-wetland-categories-examples-computer-applications-state-michigan/

FQA:一种基于物种保守性的植物区系质量评价方法

FQA: A method for floristic quality assessment based on conservatism of plant species

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 1

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价