欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

应用生态学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (5): 1569-1575.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201805.001

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

微地形对优势种群点格局和关联性的影响

刘旻霞*, 连依明, 李文   

  1. 西北师范大学地理与环境科学学院, 兰州 730070
  • 收稿日期:2017-11-02 出版日期:2018-05-18 发布日期:2018-05-18
  • 通讯作者: *E-mail: xiaminl@163.com
  • 作者简介:刘旻霞, 女, 1972年生, 博士, 教授. 主要从事植物生态学与恢复生态学研究. E-mail: xiamin@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    本文由国家自然科学基金项目(31760135,31360114)资助

Effects of microtopography on the pattern and association of dominant population.

LIU Min-xia*, LIAN Yi-ming, LI Wen   

  1. College of Geography and Environmental Science, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China
  • Received:2017-11-02 Online:2018-05-18 Published:2018-05-18
  • Contact: *E-mail: xiaminl@163.com
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31760135,31360114)

摘要: 不同的空间格局类型和关联性可以反映出不同生境下植物种群的资源环境适应策略.老鹳草与米口袋是甘南亚高寒草甸的主要物种,通过野外群落调查和室内试验,运用点格局分析法中的Ripley K函数,对不同坡向的米口袋和老鹳草种群的空间分布格局及种间关联性进行分析.结果表明: 从阳坡-西坡-阴坡,土壤含水量和养分含量逐渐增加,土壤温度和光照度逐渐降低.米口袋和老鹳草在3个坡向(阴坡、西坡、阳坡)上的分布呈现出明显差异,随着坡向由阴坡向阳坡的转变,米口袋种群数量呈递增趋势,老鹳草种群数量则表现出递减趋势.在阴坡,米口袋种群在0~1.8 m尺度上呈聚集分布,在1.8~5.0 m尺度上聚集强度减弱并趋向于随机分布,老鹳草种群在0~5.0 m尺度上均以聚集分布为主;在西坡,米口袋种群在0~1.2 m尺度上呈聚集分布,在1.2~5.0 m研究尺度上趋向于随机分布,老鹳草种群在0~2.2 m尺度上呈聚集分布,在2.2~5.0 m研究尺度上趋向于随机分布;在阳坡,米口袋与老鹳草种群在0~5.0 m尺度内均表现出随机分布.阴坡上这两种物种在0~1.0 m尺度上表现为正相关,在1.0~5.0 m尺度不相关;西坡上两物种在0~2.1 m尺度上呈负关联,在2.1~5.0 m尺度上两个物种间关联度均趋向于不相关;阳坡上这两个物种在0~5.0 m尺度上表现出不相关.

Abstract: Different spatial distribution patterns and correlations could reflect the adaptation strategies of plant populations to different habitats. Geranium wilfordii and Gueldenstaedtia verna are the major species in the subalpine meadow. Within a field experiment, the Ripley K function was used to analyze the relationship of spatial distribution pattern and interspecific association between G. wilfordii and G. verna in different slope aspects. The results showed that soil water content and nutrient content gradually increased, whereas soil temperature and light intensity gradually decreased along the gradient from south to north slope. The distribution of G. verna and G. wilfordii showed significant differences in three slope aspects (north, west and south slopes). G. verna showed an increa-sing trend, while G. wilfordii showed a decreasing trend from north to south slope. On the north slope, G. verna populations showed aggregation distribution at 0-1.8 m scale, while the aggregation intensity weakened and tended to be a random distribution at 1.8-5.0 m scale. G. wilfordii populations showed aggregation distribution at 0-5.0 m scale. On the west slope, G. verna population showed aggregation distribution at the 0-1.2 m scale, and tended to be a random distribution at the 1.2-5.0 m scale. G. wilfordii population showed aggregation distribution at the 0-2.2 m scale, and tended to be a random distribution at the 2.2-5.0 m scale. On the south slope, G. verna and G. wilfordii population showed random distribution at the 0-5.0 m scale. Both species showed positive correlation at the 0-1.0 m scale but not at the 1.0-5.0 m scale on the north slope. G. verna and G. wilfordii were negatively associated at the 0-2.1 m scale but unrelated at the 2.1-5.0 m scale on the west slope. On the south slope, both species showed no correlation at the 0-5.0 m scale.