欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

应用生态学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (5): 1579-1586.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202005.010

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

施肥和增水对弃耕草地土壤酸中和容量的影响

孟亚妮1,2, 李天鹏1,2, 施展1,2, 蔡江平1, 徐柱文3, 姜勇1*   

  1. 1中国科学院沈阳应用生态研究所, 沈阳 110016;
    2中国科学院大学, 北京 100049;
    3内蒙古大学生态与环境学院, 呼和浩特 010021
  • 收稿日期:2019-10-21 出版日期:2020-05-15 发布日期:2020-05-15
  • 通讯作者: * E-mail: jiangyong@iae.ac.cn
  • 作者简介:孟亚妮, 女, 1994年生, 硕士研究生。主要从事草地生态学研究。E-mail: mengyani123@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(31870441)和国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFC0500707)资助

Effects of fertilization and water addition on soil acid neutralizing capacity in an old-field grassland

MENG Ya-ni1,2, LI Tian-peng1,2, SHI Zhan1,2, CAI Jiang-ping1, XU Zhu-wen3, JIANG Yong1*   

  1. 1Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China;
    2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
    3School of Ecology and Environment, Inner Mongolia University, Huhhot 010021, China
  • Received:2019-10-21 Online:2020-05-15 Published:2020-05-15
  • Contact: * E-mail: jiangyong@iae.ac.cn
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31870441) and the National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFC0500707).

摘要: 大气氮沉降增加是草地土壤酸化的主要原因。土壤酸缓冲性能作为评估土壤酸化的重要指标,对氮输入的响应受到降水与其他限制养分含量的影响。本研究以我国北方温带弃耕草地氮、磷、水添加试验13年后的土壤为对象,利用二次多项式模型拟合酸滴定曲线,计算了土壤酸缓冲容量(ABC)以及以pH 5.0和4.0为参比的土壤酸中和容量(ANC)。结果表明: 不增水处理下,单独加氮和同时添加氮磷均显著降低土壤pH,降低以pH 5.0和4.0为参比时的酸中和容量(ANCpH5.0和ANCpH4.0);单独加磷对土壤pH、ANCpH5.0和ANCpH4.0均无显著影响。增水处理下,加氮及加氮磷显著降低土壤pH、ANCpH5.0和ANCpH4.0;加磷显著降低土壤pH,但增加了ANCpH4.0,而对ANCpH5.0无显著影响。与不增水处理相比,增水处理对土壤pH、酸中和容量均具有显著的正效应。对于初始pH值不同的土壤,采用土壤酸中和容量比酸缓冲容量能更好地指示土壤抗酸化能力。

关键词: 土壤酸化, 土壤酸缓冲性能, 酸滴定曲线, 养分平衡

Abstract: Increasing nitrogen (N) deposition results in soil acidification in grasslands. Acid buffering capacity of soil is a critical index evaluating soil acidification, the response of which to N input is regulated by precipitation and concentration of other limiting elements. To explore the responses of soil acidification to N, phosphorus (P), and water inputs, we conducted a 13-year field experiment in an old-field grassland and calculated the acid buffering capacity (ABC) and acid neutralizing capacity (ANC) at the reference of pH=5.0 (ANCpH5.0) and 4.0 (ANCpH4.0), using quadratic curve fitting model. The results showed that, without water addition, single N addition or combined with P addition significantly decreased soil pH, ANCpH5.0 and ANCpH4.0, whereas single P addition had no significant effect on soil pH, ANCpH5.0 or ANCpH4.0. With water addition, the addition of N or combined with P decreased soil pH, ANCpH5.0 and ANCpH4.0, whereas P addition decreased soil pH, increased ANCpH4.0, without effect on ANCpH5.0. In contrast with treatments without water addition, water addition had positive effects on soil pH, ANCpH5.0 and ANCpH4.0. For soils with different initial soil pH values, it was better to select ANC rather than ABC as an index to evaluate soil anti-acidification capacity.

Key words: soil acidification, soil acid buffering capacity, acid titration curve, nutrient balance