基于多源数据的福州市中心城区人居环境质量评价

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202008.016

应用生态学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (8): 2721-2730.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202008.016

基于多源数据的福州市中心城区人居环境质量评价

朱玉娇^1,2, 姚晓婧^1*, 陈伟², 何贞健³, 陈六嘉¹, 杨丽娜¹, 陈曙光⁴, 池天河¹

¹中国科学院空天信息创新研究院, 北京 100094;
²中国矿业大学北京地球科学与测绘工程学院, 北京 100083;
³福州市国土资源测绘队, 福州国家国土资源大数据管理中心, 福州 350007;
⁴特力惠信息科技股份有限公司, 福州 350003

收稿日期:2020-03-11 修回日期:2020-06-08 出版日期:2020-08-15 发布日期:2021-02-15
通讯作者: * E-mail: yaoxiaojing2008@126.com
作者简介:朱玉娇, 女, 1995年生, 硕士研究生。主要从事地理空间数据挖掘研究。E-mail: 15621341506@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41701438)和福州宜居指标评估项目(Y9B0530)资助

Evaluation of the quality of human settlement in downtown Fuzhou based on multi-source data

ZHU Yu-jiao^1,2, YAO Xiao-jing^1*, CHEN Wei², HE Zhen-jian³, CHEN Liu-jia¹, YANG Li-na¹, CHEN Shu-guang⁴, CHI Tian-he¹

¹Institute of Information Technology Innovation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China;
²School of Earth Science and Surveying Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China;
³Fuzhou Land and Resources Surveying and Mapping Team, Fuzhou National Land and Resources Big Data Management Center, Fuzhou 350007, China;
⁴Telihui Information Technology Co. , Ltd. , Fuzhou 350003, China

Received:2020-03-11 Revised:2020-06-08 Online:2020-08-15 Published:2021-02-15
Supported by:
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41701438) and the Project of Fuzhou Livability Index Evaluation (Y9B0530).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 城市内部居住环境的客观性评价有助于发现城市发展中暴露出的问题,有针对性地进行调整进而改善城市环境。以福州市中心城区为研究区,居住区为研究单元,利用气象监测数据、遥感影像数据、地图兴趣点数据、国土规划数据等多源数据,从环境健康舒适性、交通便捷性、城市安全性和生活方便性4方面构建城市人居环境监测体系,并使用优劣解距离法进行人居环境质量综合评价。结果表明: 福州市中心城区人居环境水平差异性较大,整体上呈现出中心区域高、边缘地区低的特点。城区中部人居环境指数较高,东部和南部区域较低,西部和北部区域人居环境高值与低值混杂分布。各指标层中,交通便捷性和生活方便性的高-高集聚以及低-低集聚特征与人居环境高低值聚类分布较为一致,便捷的交通以及完备的服务设施对人居环境评价的影响较大;环境健康舒适性呈现城市内部低、边缘高的特点,而城市安全性呈现内部高、边缘低的特点。

关键词: 福州市, 人居环境, 指标体系, 优劣解距离(TOPSIS)法

Abstract: The objective evaluation of human settlement in cities helps find the problems exposed in urban development and make targeted adjustments to improve urban environment. Taking the downtown of Fuzhou as the research area, the residential area as the research unit, using multi-source data such as meteorological monitoring data, remote sensing imagery, map points of interest data (POI), and land planning data, we constructed monitoring system of urban human settlement from four aspects: environmental health and comfort, traffic convenience, city safety, and life conve-nience. The TOPSIS method was used to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of human settlement. The results showed that the human settlement level of downtown Fuzhou was quite different, which was high in the central area and low in the peripheral areas. The human settlement index was high in the middle of the urban area, low in the eastern and southern areas, with mixed high and low values in the western and northern areas. In each index layer, the characteristics of high-high agglomeration and low-low agglomeration of traffic convenience and life convenience were consistent with the distribution of high and low value clusters of the human settlement. Convenient transportation and complete service facilities had a greater impact on human settlement. The environmental health and comfort were characterized by interior low and edge high of the city, while city safety was characterized by interior high and edge low.

Key words: Fuzhou, human settlement, index system, TOPSIS method

朱玉娇, 姚晓婧, 陈伟, 何贞健, 陈六嘉, 杨丽娜, 陈曙光, 池天河. 基于多源数据的福州市中心城区人居环境质量评价[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(8): 2721-2730.

ZHU Yu-jiao, YAO Xiao-jing, CHEN Wei, HE Zhen-jian, CHEN Liu-jia, YANG Li-na, CHEN Shu-guang, CHI Tian-he. Evaluation of the quality of human settlement in downtown Fuzhou based on multi-source data[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31(8): 2721-2730.

参考文献

[1] 张文忠. 宜居城市建设的核心框架. 地理研究, 2016, 35(2): 205-213 [Zhang W-Z. The core framework of livable urban construction. Geography, 2016, 35(2): 205-213]
[2] 张文忠. 城市内部居住环境评价的指标体系和方法. 地理科学, 2007, 27(1): 17-23 [Zhang W-Z. The index system and method of the evaluation of the living environment within the city. Geoscience, 2007, 27(1): 17-23]
[3] Reiner M, Rouse D. Dependency model: Reliable infrastructure and the resilient, sustainable, and livable city. Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure, 2018, 3: 103-108
[4] 崔凤琪, 唐海萍, 张钦. 京津冀地区城市宜居性评价及影响因素分析:基于2010—2016年面板数据的实证研究. 北京师范大学学报:自然科学版, 2018, 54(5): 666-673 [Cui F-Q, Tang H-P, Zhang Q. Evalua-tion of urban livability and analysis of influencing factors in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region: Empirical research based on panel data from 2010 to 2016. Journal of Beijing Normal University: Natural Science, 2018, 54(5): 666-673]
[5] Gawai N, Phadke A. Quality of urban life: Identification of livable urban spaces within Mumbai metropolitan region. Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing & Spatial Information Sciences, 2018, 5: 117-121
[6] 张志斌, 巨继龙, 陈志杰. 兰州城市宜居性评价及其空间特征. 生态学报, 2014, 34(21): 6379-6389 [Zhang Z-B, Ju J-L, Chen Z-J. Evaluation of urban livability and its spatial characteristics in Lanzhou. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014, 34(21): 6379-6389]
[7] Fu B, Yu D, Zhang Y. The livable urban landscape: GIS and remote sensing extracted land use assessment for urban livability in Changchun Proper, China. Land Use Policy, 2019, 87: 104048
[8] 程钢, 张富杰, 杨杰, 等. GIS支持下的城市小区的居住适宜性分析研究. 测绘通报, 2016(1): 49-52 [Cheng G, Zhang F-J, Yang J, et al. Analysis on the residential suitability of urban communities supported by GIS. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping, 2016(1): 49-52]
[9] Paul A, Sen J. Livability assessment within a metropolis based on the impact of integrated urban geographic factors (IUGFs) on clustering urban centers of Kolkata. Cities, 2018, 74: 142-150
[10] 简煊祥, 卢菲菲, 杨永均. 建筑用地变化的福州市地理国情监测. 测绘科学, 2015, 40(3): 68-70 [Jian X-X, Lu F-F, Yang Y-J. Fuzhou City geographical situation monitoring of land use change. Science of Surveying and Mapping, 2015, 40(3): 68-70]
[11] 汤俊红, 申琪, 柳建玲. 国土空间规划视角下福州市周边永久基本农田空间布局研究. 福建农业学报, 2018, 33(11): 1201-1205 [Tang J-H, Shen Q, Liu J-L. Spatial layout for permanent essential farmlands around Fuzhou. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 33(11): 1201-1205]
[12] 韩骥, 袁坤, 黄鲁霞, 等. 全球城市宜居性评价及发展趋势预测——以上海市为例. 华东师范大学学报:自然科学版, 2017(1): 80-90 [Han J, Yuan K, Huang L-X, et al. Evaluation of global city livability and prediction of its development trend: Taking Shanghai as an example. Journal of East China Normal University: Natural Science, 2017(1): 80-90]
[13] 祁瑞, 罗琼, 舒红, 等. 基于地理国情普查数据的武汉市中心城区社区宜居性评价. 城市勘测, 2017(3): 13-18 [Qi R, Luo Q, Shu H, et al. Evaluation of community livability in central urban areas of Wuhan based on census data of geographical conditions. Urban Survey, 2017(3): 13-18]
[14] 谭紫嫣, 董婷. 基于多源数据的武汉市主城区宜居性评价. 国土与自然资源研究, 2017(2): 5-10 [Tan Z-Y, Dong T. Evaluation of the livability of Wuhan's main urban area based on multi-source data. Research on Land and Natural Resources, 2017(2): 5-10]
[15] 龙瀛, 李苗裔, 李晶. 基于新数据的中国人居环境质量监测:指标体系与典型案例. 城市发展研究, 2018, 25(4): 86-96 [Long Y, Li M-Y, Li J. Monitoring of Chinese human settlement environment quality based on new data: Indicator system and typical cases. Urban Development Research, 2018, 25(4): 86-96]
[16] 刘婕, 徐东群. 环境空气污染空间分布插值模型及其应用. 卫生研究, 2020, 49(1): 169-173 [Liu J, Xu D-Q. Interpolation model for spatial distribution of ambient air pollution and its application. Health Research, 2020, 49(1): 169-173]
[17] 潘欣, 刘冰, 刘凤伟, 等. 基于Landsat 8的绿地格局对地表热环境的影响研究. 北京测绘, 2018, 32(12): 1508-1511 [Pan X, Liu B, Liu F-W, et al. Impact of green space pattern on land surface thermal environment based on Landsat 8. Beijing Surveying and Mapping, 2018, 32(12): 1508-1511]
[18] 刘秋艳, 吴新年. 多要素评价中指标权重的确定方法评述. 知识管理论坛, 2017, 2(6): 500-510 [Liu Q-Y, Wu X-N. A review on the method of determining index weights in multi-factor evaluation. Forum on Know-ledge Management, 2017, 2(6): 500-510]
[19] 王富喜, 毛爱华, 李赫龙, 等. 基于熵值法的山东省城镇化质量测度及空间差异分析. 地理科学, 2013, 33(11): 1323-1329 [Wang F-X, Mao A-H, Li H-L, et al. Analysis of urbanization quality measurement and spatial difference in Shandong Province based on entropy method. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2013, 33(11): 1323-1329]
[20] 李帅, 魏虹, 倪细炉, 等. 基于层次分析法和熵权法的宁夏城市人居环境质量评价. 应用生态学报, 2014, 25(9): 2700-2708 [Li S, Wei H, Ni X-L, et al. Evaluation of urban residential environment quality in Ningxia based on AHP and entropy weight method. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2014, 25(9): 2700-2708]
[21] 游细斌, 代启梅, 郭昌晟. 基于熵权TOPSIS模型的南方丘陵地区乡村人居环境评价——以赣州为例. 山地学报, 2017, 35(6): 899-907 [You X-B, Dai Q-M, Guo C-S. Evaluation of rural human settlement environment in southern hilly regions based on entropy weight TOPSIS model: Taking Ganzhou as an example. Journal of Mountain Science, 2017, 35(6): 899-907]
[22] 杨卫泽, 韩之俊. 基于TOPSIS的宜居生态市评价研究. 环境保护, 2008(14): 31-32 [Yang W-Z, Han Z-J. Evaluation of livable ecological city based on TOPSIS. Environmental Protection, 2008(14): 31-32]
[23] Zeng C, Song Y, He Q, et al. Spatially explicit assessment on urban vitality: Case studies in Chicago and Wuhan. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2018, 40: 296-306
[24] Zhang Y, Li Q, Wang H, et al. Community scale livability evaluation integrating remote sensing, surface observation and geospatial big data. International Journal of Applied Earth Observations and Geoinformation, 2019, 80: 173-186
[25] 杜挺, 谢贤健, 梁海艳, 等. 基于熵权TOPSIS和GIS的重庆市县域经济综合评价及空间分析. 经济地理, 2014, 34(6): 40-47 [Du T, Xie X-J, Liang H-Y, et al. Comprehensive evaluation and spatial analysis of county economy in Chongqing based on entropy TOPSIS and GIS. Economic Geography, 2014, 34(6): 40-47]
[26] 党云晓, 余建辉, 张文忠, 等. 北京居民生活满意度的多层级定序因变量模型分析. 地理科学, 2016, 36(6): 829-836 [Dang Y-X, Yu J-H, Zhang W-Z, et al. Multilevel ordered dependent variable model analysis of Beijing residents' life satisfaction. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2016, 36(6): 829-836]
[27] 张元博, 黄宗胜, 陈旋, 等. 贵州石漠化区布依族传统村落人居环境适宜度. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(9): 3203-3214 [Zhang Y-B, Huang Z-S, Chen X, et al. Suitability of human settlement environment in traditional villages of Buyi nationality in the rocky desertification area of Guizhou. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2019, 30(9): 3203-3214]

基于多源数据的福州市中心城区人居环境质量评价

Evaluation of the quality of human settlement in downtown Fuzhou based on multi-source data

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	闫明, 陈利顶, 孙然好. 城市生态品质的内涵及其核心指标体系构建 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(6): 1459-1466.
[2]	叶鹏程, 刘灿, 王爱华, 武建勇, 赵晓, 陈慧, 斯琴. 生物多样性关键区域的理论框架、指标体系与应用实践 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(3): 835-845.
[3]	吕晓, 辛宗斐, 彭文龙, 牛善栋. 农业可持续集约化评价的研究进展与展望 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(12): 3205-3212.
[4]	杨晓霞, 龚久平, 张雪梅, 张伟, 李典晏, 杨俊英, 柴勇, 刘剑飞. 亚致死剂量乙草胺对蚯蚓的毒性效应及敏感生物标记物 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(9): 3327-3334.
[5]	王琦, 史娜娜, 韩煜, 肖能文. 中国陆域生物多样性综合评估指标体系构建 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(8): 2773-2782.
[6]	宋家鹏, 陈松林. 基于生态系统服务簇的福州市生态系统服务格局 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(3): 1045-1053.
[7]	王娇月, 邴龙飞, 尹岩, 郗凤明, 马铭婧, 张文凤, 牛乐, 张丽霞. 福州市生态系统破坏损失评估 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(11): 3781-3792.
[8]	牛乐,王娇月,郗凤明,尹岩,邴龙飞,马铭婧,张文凤. 福州市经济生态生产总值核算 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(11): 3793-3804.
[9]	牛乐,王娇月,郗凤明,尹岩,邴龙飞,马铭婧,张文凤. 基于生态系统服务付费模型的福州市区域生态补偿额度核算 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(11): 3805-3814.
[10]	王娇月,邴龙飞,尹岩,郗凤明,马铭婧,张文凤. 湿地生态系统服务功能及其价值核算——以福州市为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(11): 3824-3834.
[11]	邓娇娇,常璐,张月,周旺明,齐麟,周莉,于大炮,. 福州市生态系统生产总值核算 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(11): 3835-3844.
[12]	张元博, 黄宗胜, 陈旋, 郭小兰, 冯微微, 刘逸夫, 庞敏, 方银. 贵州石漠化区布依族传统村落人居环境适宜度 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(9): 3203-3214.
[13]	吴波, 郭书海, 李宝林, 张玲妍. 中国土壤环境功能区划方案 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(3): 961-968.
[14]	陈铸,黄雅冰,朱志鹏,郑祈全,阙晨曦,董建文. 基于地形梯度特征的福州市景观格局演变 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(12): 4135-4144.
[15]	朱美青, 史文娇, 黄宏胜. 江西省绿色发展区划 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(8): 2687-2696.