[1] Scott GP, Lopez, J. The use of FADs in tuna fisheries [EB/OL]. (2014-01) [2020-04-26]. http://www.euro-parl.europa.eu/studies [2] 王学昉, 许柳雄, 戴小杰, 等. 金枪鱼渔业中人工集鱼装置生态影响研究进展. 中国水产科学, 2015, 22(6): 1289-1298 [Wang X-F, Xu L-X, Dai X-J, et al. Review of the ecological impact of fish aggregation devices on tuna fisheries. Journal of Fishery Sciences of China, 2015, 22(6): 1289-1298] [3] Hall MA. An ecological view of the tuna-dolphin problem: Impacts and trade-offs. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 1998, 8: 1-34 [4] Dagor L, Holland KN, Restrepo V, et al. Is it good or bad to fish with FADs? What are the real impacts of the use of drifting FADs on pelagic marine ecosystems? Fish and Fisheries, 2013, 14: 391-415 [5] Forget FG, Capello M, Filmalter JD, et al. Behaviour and vulnerability of target and non-target species at drifting fish aggregating devices (FADs) in the tropical tuna purse seine fishery determined by acoustic telemetry. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 2015, 72: 1398-1405 [6] Miyake M, Guillotreau P, Sun CH, et al. Recent Deve-lopments in Tuna Industry: Stocks, Fisheries, Management, Processing, Trade and Markets. Rome, Italy: FAO, 2010: 125 [7] He P, Suuronen P. Technologies for the marking of fishing gear to identify gear components entangled on marine animals and to reduce abandoned, lost or otherwise discarded fishing gear. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2018, 129: 253-261 [8] Filmalter JD, Capello M, Deneubourg JL, et al. Looking behind the curtain: Quantifying massive shark mortality in fish aggregating devices. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2013, 11: 291-296 [9] Cillari T, Allegra A, Andaloro F, et al. The use of echo-sounder buoys in Mediterranean Sea: A new technological approach for a sustainable FADs fishery. Ocean and Coastal Management, 2018, 152: 70-76 [10] Murua J, Itano D, Hall M, et al. Advances in the use of entanglement-reducing drifting fish aggregating devices (DFADs) in tuna purse seine fleets. ISSF Technical Report 2016-08. Washington, DC, USA: ISSF, 2016 [11] Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC). Conservation and Management Measure for Bigeye, Yellowfin and Skipjack Tuna in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean [EB/OL]. (2018-12-14) [2020-04-26]. https://www.wcpfc.int/doc/cmm-2018-01 [12] Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (IOTC). Procedures on a Fish Aggregating Devices (FADs) Management Plan [EB/OL]. (2019) [2020-04-26]. https://www.iotc.org/cmm/resolution-1902-procedures-fish-aggregating-devices-fads-management-plan [13] Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC). Amendment to Resolution C-18-05 on the Collection and Analyses of Data on Fish-aggregating Devices [EB/OL]. (2019-06-26) [2020-04-26]. https://www.iattc.org/PDFFiles/Resolutions/IATTC/_English/C-19-01-Acti-ve_Amends%20and%20replaces%20C-18-05%20FADs.pdf [14] International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT). Recommendation by ICCAT on a Multi-Annual Conservation and Management program for Tropical Tunas [EB/OL]. (2016) [2020-04-26]. https://www.iccat.int/ [15] Moreno G, Jauhary R, Adam SM, et al. Moving away from synthetic materials used at FADs: Evaluating biodegradable ropes degradation//IOTC Secretariat, ed. Report of the 19th Session of the IOTC Working Party on Tropical Tunas. Seychelles: IOTC, 2017, 19: 50 [16] Fréon P, Dagorn L. Review of fish associative beha-viour: Toward a generalisation of the meeting point hypothesis. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 2000, 10: 183-207 [17] Castro JJ, Santiago JA, Santana-Ortega AT. A general theory on fish aggregation to floating objects: An alternative to the meeting point hypothesis. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 2001, 11: 255-277 [18] Bromhead D, Foster J, Attard R, et al. A review of the impact of fish aggregating devices (FADs) on tuna fishe-ries. Final Report to the Fisheries Resources Research Fund. Bureau of Rural Sciences, Canberra, Australia, 2003: 122 [19] Dagorn L, Holland KN, Itano DG. Behavior of yellowfin (Thunnus albacares) and bigeye (T. obesus) tuna in a network of fish aggregating devices (FADs). Marine Biology, 2007, 151: 595-606 [20] 王学昉, 朱国平, 孙满昌, 等. 人工集鱼装置对热带金枪鱼类行为模式的影响. 应用生态学报, 2012, 23(1): 278-284 [Wang X-F, Zhu G-P, Sun M-C, et al. Impact of fish aggregation devices on tropical tuna's behavioral pattern. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2012, 23(1): 281-287] [21] Block BA, Booth DT, Carey FG. Depth and temperature of the blue marlin, Makaira nigricans, observed by acoustic telemetry. Marine Biology, 1992, 114: 175-183 [22] Josse E, Bach P, Dagorn L. Simultaneous observations of tuna movements and their prey by sonic tracking and acoustic surveys. Hydrobiologia, 1998, 371/372: 61-69 [23] Bach P, Dagorn L, Bertrand A, et al. Acoustic telemetry versus monitored longline fishing for studying the vertical distribution of pelagic fish: Bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus) in French Polynesia. Fisheries Research 2003, 60: 281-292 [24] Franco J, Dagorn L, Sancristobal I, et al. Design of ecological FADs// IOTC Secretariat, ed. Report of the Fifth Session of the IOTC Working Party on Ecosystems and Bycatch. Mombasa, Kenya: IOTC, 2009, 16: 21 [25] Lennert-Cody CE, Roberts JJ, Stephenson RJ. Effects of gear characteristics on the presence of bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus) in the catches of the purse-seine fishery of the eastern Pacific Ocean. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 2008, 65: 970-978 [26] Orue B, Lopez J, Moreno G, et al. Aggregation process of drifting fish aggregating devices (DFADs) in the Western Indian Ocean: Who arrives first, tuna or non-tuna species? PLoS One, 2019, 14: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210435 [27] Moreno G, Orue B, Restrepo V. Pilot project to test biodegradable ropes at FADs in real fishing conditions in Western Indian Ocean// ICCAT, ed. Collective Volume of Scientific Papers. Madrid, Spain: ICCAT, 2018, 74: 2199-2208 [28] Zudaire I, Tolotti M, Murua J, et al. Preliminary results of the BIOFAD project: Testing designs and identify options to mitigate impacts of drifting fish aggregating devices on the ecosystem// IOTC Secretariat, ed. Report of the 15th Session of the IOTC Working Party on Ecosystems and Bycatch. Reunion, France: IOTC, 2019: 34 [29] Santiago LD, Arrizabalaga H, Murua H. Results of BIOFAD project: Testing designs and identify options to mitigate impacts of drifting fish aggregating devices on the ecosystem// IOTC Secretariat, ed. Report of the 21st Session of the IOTC Working Party on Tropical Tunas. Donostia-San Sebastian, Spain: IOTC, 2019: 52 [30] Murua J, Moreno G, Restrepo V. Progress on the adoption of nonentangling drifting fish aggregating devices in tuna purse seine fleets// ICCAT Secretariat, ed. Collective Volume of Scientific Papers. Madrid, Spain: ICCAT, 2017, 73: 958-973 [31] Pilling GM, Smith N, Moreno G, et al. Review of research into drifting FAD designs to reduce species of special interest bycatch entanglement and bigeye/yellowfin interactions// WCPFC Secretariat, ed. WCPFC 13th Regular Session of the Scientific Committee. Rarotonga, Cook Islands: WCPFC, 2017: 2 [32] Moreno G, Dagorn L, Sancho G, et al. Using local ecological knowledge (LEK) to provide insight on the tuna purse seine fleets of the Indian Ocean useful for management. Aquatic Living Resources, 2007, 20: 367-376 [33] Dempster T, Taquet M. Fish aggregation device (FAD) research: Gaps in current knowledge and future directions for ecological studies. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 14: 21-42 [34] Dempster T, Kingsford MJ. Drifting objects as habitat for pelagic juvenile fish off New South Wales, Australia. Marine and Freshwater Research, 2004, 55: 675-687 [35] International Seafood Sustainability Foundation (ISSF). Towards biodegradable FADs: Evaluating the lifetime of biodegradable ropes in controlled conditions [EB/OL]. (2019-12-17) [2020-04-26]. https://iss-foundation.org/download-monitor-demo/download-info/issf-2019-13-towards-biodegradable-fads-evaluating-the-lifetime-of-bio-degradable-ropes-in-controlled-conditions [36] Schaefer K, Fuller D. Behavior of bigeye (Thunnus obesus) and skipjack (Katsuwonus pelamis) tunas within aggregations associated with floating objects in the equatorial eastern Pacific. Marine Biology, 146: 781-792 [37] Schaefer KM, Fuller DW. Simultaneous behavior of skipjack (Katsuwonus pelamis), bigeye (Thunnus obsesus), and yellowfin (T. albacares) tunas, within large multi-species aggregations associated with drifting fish aggregating devices (FADs) in the equatorial eastern Pacific Ocean. Marine Biology, 2013, 160: 3005-3014 [38] Gaertner D, Pagavino M, Marcano J. Influence of fishers' behaviour on the catchability of surface tuna schools in the Venezuelan purse-seiner fishery in the Caribbean Sea. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 1999, 56: 394-406 [39] Moreno G, Dagorn L, Sancho G, et al. Fish behaviour from fishers' knowledge: The case study of tropical tuna around drifting fish aggregating devices (DFADs). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 2007, 64: 1517-1528 |