欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

应用生态学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (1): 326-332.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202101.038

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

煤气炮和声波驱鸟器有效距离的评估

金麟雨1,3, 李舒萌2, 赵小英3, 刘泰杉3, 范陈3, 李东来1*   

  1. 1辽宁大学生命科学院, 沈阳 110036;
    2沈阳桃仙国际机场股份有限公司, 沈阳 100043;
    3四川省机场集团有限公司成都天府国际机场分公司, 成都 641419
  • 收稿日期:2020-05-05 接受日期:2020-10-20 出版日期:2021-01-15 发布日期:2021-07-15
  • 通讯作者: * E-mail: lidonglai@lnu.edu.cn; lidonglaibnu@163.com
  • 作者简介:金麟雨, 男, 1994年生, 硕士研究生。主要从事鸟类生态学和鸟击防范研究。E-mail: jinlinyulnu@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(31672316,3191101017)、辽宁大学本科教学改革研究项目(YG2018YB25)和桃仙机场鸟情生态调研专项

Comparative evaluation of efficient bird repeller distance between gas gun and sound bird repeller

JIN Lin-yu1,3, LI Shu-meng2, ZHAO Xiao-ying3, LIU Tai-shan3, FAN Chen3, LI Dong-lai1*   

  1. 1College of Life Sciences, Liaoning University, Shenyang 110036, China;
    2Shenyang Tao-xian International Airport, Shenyang 100043, China;
    3Chengdu Tianfu International Airport Branch of Sichuan Airport Group Limited Company, Chengdu 641419, China
  • Received:2020-05-05 Accepted:2020-10-20 Online:2021-01-15 Published:2021-07-15
  • Contact: * E-mail: lidonglai@lnu.edu.cn; lidonglaibnu@163.com
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China (31672316, 3191101017), the Undergraduate Teaching Reform Research Project of Liaoning University (YG2018YB25) and the Special Fund for Bird Strike and Ecology Survey of Shenyang Taoxian Airport.

摘要: 鸟击事故主要发生在机场区域,通过使用驱鸟设备减少机场鸟类活动是预防鸟击的主要措施之一。本研究以家鸽和红隼两种高危险鸟类作为受试对象,选择沈阳桃仙国际机场使用的煤气炮和定向声波驱鸟器,观察在设备正常运行期间鸟类位于不同距离上的行为反应,探究两种驱鸟设备的有效作用距离以及效果。结果表明: 家鸽和红隼在距离煤气炮驱鸟器10、30 m时的警戒、逃跑行为显著高于对照,而在50 m处的各种行为次数与对照没有显著差别。家鸽和红隼在距离定向声波驱鸟器50、100 m时能够显著引起警戒和逃跑行为,在300 m处仍能显著引起红隼的警戒行为。可见,煤气炮的有效驱鸟距离为30 m,定向声波的有效驱鸟距离可达300 m,即定向声波的驱鸟效果要强于煤气炮。本研究可为机场引进驱鸟设备以及合理使用提供依据。

关键词: 桃仙机场, 鸟击, 定向声波驱鸟器, 驱鸟效果, 行为反应

Abstract: Bird strike accidents mainly occur in the airport area. Reducing bird activities through bird repeller equipment is one of the main measures to prevent bird strike. In this study, two bird species with high-risk, pigeon (Columba livia domestica) and kestrel (Falco tinnunculus), were selected as the subjects and the gas gun and directional acoustic bird repeller were selected as the evaluation objects in Shenyang Taoxian International Airport. This study aimed to examine the behavioral responses of birds at different distances during the normal operation of these equipment to explore their effective distance and effects. The results showed that the vigilant and escape behaviors of pigeons and kestrels at 10 m and 30 m away from the gas gun bird repeller which were significantly higher than those of the control, while the number of these behaviors at 50 m away was not significantly different from that of the control. Pigeons and kestrels at 50 m and 100 m away from the directional acoustic bird repeller could significantly increase their vigilant and escape behaviors, whereas the repeller could significantly cause kestrels to increase their vigilant behavior at 300 m away. We concluded that the effective bird expel distance of the gas gun was 30 m, and the directional acoustic bird repeller could effectively expel to 300 m, and that the effect of the directional acoustic bird repeller on birds was stronger than the gas gun. Our results could provide a reference for the introduction and rational use of bird expel equipment in the airports.

Key words: Shenyang Taoxian International Airport, bird strike, directional acoustic bird repeller, bird expel effect, behaviour response