欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

应用生态学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (3): 1045-1053.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202103.013

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于生态系统服务簇的福州市生态系统服务格局

宋家鹏1,2, 陈松林1,2*   

  1. 1福建师范大学地理科学学院, 福州 350007;
    2福建师范大学福建省亚热带资源与环境重点实验室, 福州 350007
  • 收稿日期:2020-10-04 接受日期:2020-12-20 出版日期:2021-03-15 发布日期:2021-09-15
  • 通讯作者: * E-mail: slchen6@163.com
  • 作者简介:宋家鹏, 男, 1994年生, 硕士研究生。主要从事土地利用与区域可持续发展的研究。E-mail: 18127255387@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(41771136)和福建科技计划项目(2019R0124)资助

Ecosystem service pattern of Fuzhou City based on ecosystem service bundles

SONG Jia-peng1,2, CHEN Song-lin1,2*   

  1. 1School of Geographical Sciences, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350007, China;
    2Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Subtropical Resources and Environment, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350007, China
  • Received:2020-10-04 Accepted:2020-12-20 Online:2021-03-15 Published:2021-09-15
  • Contact: * E-mail: slchen6@163.com
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China (41771136) and the Science and Technology Project of Fujian Province (2019R0124)

摘要: 基于InVEST模型、游憩机会谱、因子分析、冷热点分析、SOFM神经网络和地形起伏度等方法,评估福州市6项生态系统服务,分析不同生态系统服务之间的权衡与协同,并阐明区域的主导服务类型和不同地形起伏度下服务簇的空间格局。结果表明: 福州市各项生态系统服务的空间异质性显著,产水、碳固持、生境质量和游憩机会供给总体较高,农产品供给和水土保持相对较弱且高低值差异明显;产水服务与文化服务存在协同关系,调节服务、支持服务与农产品供给服务之间存在权衡关系,权衡与协同高低值呈明显的空间聚集;生态系统服务簇分为郊区游憩簇、水源涵养簇、农产品供给簇、城镇生活簇和森林生态保育簇,不同地形起伏度下的服务簇组成各不相同,具有明显的空间异质性。

关键词: 生态系统服务簇, 权衡, 协同, 地形起伏度, 空间格局, 福州市

Abstract: Based on InVEST model, recreational opportunity spectrum, factor analysis, cold and hot spot analysis, SOFM neural network, relief degree of land surface (RDLS) methods, we evalua-ted six kinds of ecosystem service in Fuzhou City and analyzed the trade-offs and synergies among them, with the aim to clarify the dominant services and the spatial pattern of service bundles in different topographical regions. The results showed substantial spatial heterogeneity in different ecosystem services of Fuzhou City. Water yield, carbon sequestration, habitat quality, and recreational opportunities were totally high, whereas the supply of agricultural products and soil and water conservation were low and substantial differences. The interaction between water yield and cultural servi-ces were synergies, but trade-offs occurred among regulating service, supporting service and agricultural products service. There were spatial aggregations for both trade-offs and synergies. Ecosystem service bundles could be divided into suburban recreation bundle, water conservation bundle, agricultural products bundle, urban life bundle, and forest ecological conservation bundle. The composition of service bundles clusters was different under different RDLS, with obvious spatial heterogeneity.

Key words: ecosystem service bundles, trade-off, synergy, relief degree of land surface, spatial pattern, Fuzhou City