放牧强度对华北农牧交错带典型草地土壤化学计量特征的短期影响

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202107.008

应用生态学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (7): 2433-2439.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202107.008

放牧强度对华北农牧交错带典型草地土壤化学计量特征的短期影响

郑慧^1,2, 薛江博^1,2, 桂建华^1,2, 秦加敏^1,2, 郝杰^1,2, 陈晓鹏^1,2, 王常慧^1,2,3*, 董宽虎^1,2

¹山西农业大学草业学院, 山西晋中 030801;
²山西右玉黄土高原草地生态系统定位观测研究站, 山西右玉 037200;
³中国科学院植物研究所植被与环境变化国家重点实验室, 北京 100093

收稿日期:2021-02-02 修回日期:2021-03-22 出版日期:2021-07-15 发布日期:2022-01-15
通讯作者: *wangch@ibcas.ac.cn
作者简介:郑慧,女,1995年生,硕士研究生。主要从事草地生态与管理研究。E-mail:15149481427@163.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFC0500703)和国家自然科学基金项目(31872406)

Short-term effects of grazing intensity on soil stoichiometric characteristics of typical grassland in the agro-pastoral ecotone of northern China

ZHENG Hui^1,2, XUE Jiang-bo^1,2, GUI Jian-hua^1,2, QIN Jia-min^1,2, HAO Jie^1,2, CHEN Xiao-peng^1,2, WANG Chang-hui^1,2,3*, DONG Kuan-hu^1,2

¹College of Grassland Science, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong 030801, Shanxi, China;
²Youyu Loess Plateau Grassland Ecosystem Research Station of Shanxi Province, Youyu 037200, China;
³State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China

Received:2021-02-02 Revised:2021-03-22 Online:2021-07-15 Published:2022-01-15
Contact: *wangch@ibcas.ac.cn
Supported by:
National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFC0500703) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31872406).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 放牧是天然草地的主要利用方式之一,不同放牧强度可能通过影响家畜的选择性采食、凋落物输入和微生物的组成及结构等影响草地土壤化学计量特征。本研究通过在华北农牧交错带典型草地一个连续3年(2017—2019年)的生长季放牧试验,测定了土壤全碳(TC)、全氮(TN)、可溶性有机碳(DOC)和可溶性氮(DN)含量,以及土壤微生物生物量碳(MBC)和微生物生物量氮(MBN),分析这些参数间的化学计量特征,研究放牧强度对该地区草地土壤计量化学特征的影响。结果表明: 连续3年不同强度的放牧(1、2、4 sheep·0.2 hm^-2)对土壤TC含量没有显著影响,2019年中度放牧显著降低了10～20 cm土层中TN含量,轻度、中度和重度放牧显著提高10～20 cm层土壤的C/N。连续3年不同强度的放牧对土壤DOC、DN含量以及DOC/DN均没有显著影响,而DOC和DN含量在2019年呈现出随放牧强度增加而减少的趋势,表明持续高强度的放牧可能会引起土壤可溶性养分减少。随着放牧年限的增长,轻度放牧显著增加了土壤MBC,重度放牧显著降低了土壤MBC,而土壤MBN及MBC/MBN在不同放牧强度下变化不显著。

关键词: 放牧强度, 农牧交错带, 土壤碳氮比, 微生物生物量

Abstract: Grazing is the dominant land use way for natural grasslands. Different grazing intensities could affect soil stoichiometry in grasslands by influencing the selective feeding by livestock, litter input, and microbial community structure. In this study, a grazing experiment was carried out in a grassland of agro-pastoral ecotone in Northern China for three years (2017-2019). The concentrations of total carbon (TC), total nitrogen (TN), dissolved organic carbon (DOC), dissolved nitrogen (DN), microbial biomass carbon (MBC), and microbial biomass nitrogen (MBN) in soils were measured. We analyzed the stoichiometric characteristics of those parameters. The results showed that different grazing intensities (1, 2, 4 sheep·0.2 hm^-2) had no significant effect on soil TC after three years. The moderate grazing intensity significantly reduced soil TN in 10-20 cm layer in 2019. The light, moderate, and heavy grazing intensities significantly increased soil C/N at 10-20 cm layer, while grazing intensities did not affect soil DOC, DN and DOC/DN. The soil DOC and DN content showed a decreasing trend with the increase of grazing intensity in 2019. It indicated that continuous high intensity grazing might reduce soil dissolved nutrients. The light grazing inten-sity increased soil MBC, while heavy grazing intensity reduced soil MBC significantly, with the increase of grazing year. Different grazing intensities did not affect soil MBN and MBC/MBN.

Key words: grazing intensity, agro-pastoral ecotone, soil C/N, microbial biomass

郑慧, 薛江博, 桂建华, 秦加敏, 郝杰, 陈晓鹏, 王常慧, 董宽虎. 放牧强度对华北农牧交错带典型草地土壤化学计量特征的短期影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(7): 2433-2439.

ZHENG Hui, XUE Jiang-bo, GUI Jian-hua, QIN Jia-min, HAO Jie, CHEN Xiao-peng, WANG Chang-hui, DONG Kuan-hu. Short-term effects of grazing intensity on soil stoichiometric characteristics of typical grassland in the agro-pastoral ecotone of northern China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(7): 2433-2439.

参考文献

[1] Mitchell R, Allen V, Waller J, et al. A mobile classroom approach to graduate education in forage and range sciences. Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education, 2004, 33: 117-120
[2] 白永飞, 陈世苹. 中国草地生态系统固碳现状、速率和潜力研究. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(3): 7-10 [Bai Y-F, Chen S-P. Carbon sequestration of Chinese grassland ecosystems: Stock, rate and potential. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2018, 42(3): 7-10]
[3] Liu S, Zamanian K, Schleuss PM, et al. Degradation of Tibetan grasslands: Consequences for carbon and nutrient cycles. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2018, 252: 93-104
[4] 侯东杰, 郭柯. 典型草原植物养分对生长季不同放牧强度的动态响应. 草地学报, 2021, 29(1): 141-148 [Hou D-J, Guo K. Dynamic response of plant nutrients to grazing intensity in the growing season in typical steppe. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(1): 141-148]
[5] 牛钰杰, 杨思维, 王贵珍, 等. 放牧作用下高寒草甸群落物种分布与土壤因子的关系. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(12): 3891-3898 [Niu Y-J, Yang S-W, Wang G-Z, et al. Relation between species distribution of plant community and soil factors under grazing in alpine meadow. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017, 28(12): 3891-3898]
[6] Yu RP, Zhang WP, Fornara DA, et al. Contrasting responses of nitrogen:phosphorus stoichiometry in plants and soils under grazing: A global meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.13808
[7] 常宗强, 潘爱华, 刘贤德, 等. 祁连山区草地土壤氮空间分布格局. 甘肃林业科技, 2004, 29(2): 1-3 [Chang Z-Q, Pan A-H, Liu X-D, et al. A study on spatial variation of soil nitrogen in pasture of Qilian Mountains. Journal of Gansu Forestry Science and Technology, 2004, 29(2): 1-3]
[8] 李世卿, 王先之, 郭正刚, 等. 短期放牧对青藏高原东北边缘高寒草甸土壤及微生物碳氮含量的影响. 中国草地学报, 2013, 35(1): 55-60 [Li S-Q, Wang X-Z, Guo Z-G, et al. Effects of short-term grazing on C and N content in soil and soil microbe in alpine meadow in the north-eastern edge of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2013, 35(1): 55-60]
[9] 刘霞, 赵东, 程建伟, 等. 放牧和刈割对内蒙古典型草原大型土壤动物的影响. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(6): 1869-1878 [Liu X, Zhao D, Cheng J-W, et al. Effects of grazing and mowing on macrofauna communities in a typical steppe of Inner Mongolia, China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017, 28(6): 1869-1878]
[10] Sharrow SH, Ismail S. Carbon and nitrogen storage in agroforests, tree plantations, and pastures in western Oregon, USA. Agroforestry Systems, 2004, 60: 123-130
[11] 孙骞, 王兵, 周怀平, 等. 黄土丘陵区小流域土壤碳氮磷生态化学计量特征的空间变异性. 生态学杂志, 2020, 39(3): 766-774 [Sun Q, Wang B, Zhou H-P, et al. Spatial variation of ecological stoichiometry of soil C, N and P in a small catchment of loess hilly area. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2020, 39(3): 766-774]
[12] Manzoni S, Taylor P, Richter A, et al. Environmental and stoichiometric controls on microbial carbon-use efficiency in soils. New Phytologist, 2012, 196: 79-91
[13] Cleveland CC, Liptzin D. C:N:P stoichiometry in soil: Is there a ‘Redfield ratio' for the microbial biomass? Biogeochemistry, 2007, 85: 235-252
[14] 蒯晓妍, 邢鹏飞, 张晓琳, 等. 短期放牧强度对半干旱草地植物群落多样性和生产力的影响. 草地学报, 2018, 26(6): 1283-1289 [Kuai X-Y, Xing P-F, Zhang X-L, et al. Effects of short-term grazing intensity on plant community diversity and productivity in semi-arid grassland. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2018, 26(6): 1283-1289]
[15] Brookes PC, Landman A, Pruden G, et al. Chloroform fumigation and the release of soil nitrogen: A rapid direct extraction method to measure microbial biomass nitrogen in soil-science direct. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1985, 17: 837-842
[16] Vance ED, Brookes PC, Jenkinson DS. An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1987, 19: 703-707
[17] 许湘琴, 林植华, 陈慧丽. 凋落物分解对土壤生物的影响. 生态学杂志, 2011, 30(6): 1258-1264 [Xu X-Q, Lin Z-H, Chen H-L. Effects of litter composition on soil organisms. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2011, 30(6): 1258-1264]
[18] 薛亚芳, 宗宁, 何念鹏, 等. 长期围封和自由放牧对高寒草甸土壤微生物群落结构及碳源代谢多样性的影响. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(8): 2705-2712 [Xue Y-F, Zong N, He N-P, et al. Influence of long-term enclosure and free grazing on soil microbial community structure and carbon metabolic diversity of alpine meadow. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018, 29(8): 2705-2712]
[19] 朱晓亚, 李子豪, 赵小蓉, 等. 连续4年不同放牧强度内蒙古典型草原土壤微生物量碳、氮、磷含量差异. 中国农业大学学报, 2020, 25(9): 121-130 [Zhu X-Y, Li Z-H, Zhao X-R, et al. Differences of soil microbial biomass C, N and P contents in typical grassland of Inner Mongolia under different grazing intensities. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2020, 25(9): 121-130]
[20] 王绍强, 于贵瑞. 生态系统碳氮磷元素的生态化学计量学特征. 生态学报, 2008, 28(8): 3937-3947 [Wang S-Q, Yu G-R. Ecological stoichiometry characteristics of ecosystem carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus elements. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008, 28(8): 3937-3947]
[21] 萨仁高娃, 曹芙, 敖特根, 等. 短期放牧强度对典型草原土壤理化性质的影响. 内蒙古农业大学学报: 自然科学版, 2014, 35(5): 75-79 [Saren G-W, Cao F, Ao T-G, et al. The effects of short term grazing intensities on soil physical and chemical properties in the Inner Mongolia typical steppe. Journal of Inner Mongolia Agricultural University: Natural Science, 2014, 35(5): 75-79]
[22] Frank DA, Gehring CA, Machut L, et al. Soil community composition and the regulation of grazed temperate grassland. Oecologia, 2003, 137: 603-609
[23] 胡延斌, 肖国举, 仇正跻, 等. 西北半干旱区农田土壤有机碳和全氮分布特征及其对地膜玉米产量的影响. 水土保持研究, 2021, 28(1): 58-64 [Hu Y-B, Xiao G-J, Qiu Z-J, et al. Distribution characteristics of soil organic carbon and total nitrogen and its influence on film-mulched maize in northwest semiarid region. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021, 28(1): 58-64]
[24] Monteith DT, Stoddard JL, Evans CD, et al. Dissolved organic carbon trends resulting from changes in atmospheric deposition chemistry. Nature, 2007, 450: 537-541
[25] 吕学军, 刘庆, 陈印平, 等. 黄河三角洲土地利用方式对土壤可溶性有机碳、氮的影响. 农业现代化研究, 2011, 32(4): 505-508 [Lyu X-J, Liu Q, Chen Y-P, et al. Effects of different land use types on soil dissolved organic carbon and nitrogen in the Yellow River Delta. Research of Agricultural Modernization, 2011, 32(4): 505-508]
[26] 许华, 何明珠, 孙岩. 不同降水控制对荒漠土壤中可溶性碳、氮组分的影响. 兰州大学学报: 自然科学版, 2018, 54(6): 798-803 [Xu H, He M-Z, Sun Y. Effects of different precipitation controls on soil dissolved carbon and nitrogen fractions in desert region. Journal of Lanzhou University: Natural Science, 2018, 54(6): 798-803]
[27] 曹淑宝, 刘全伟, 王立群, 等. 短期放牧对草甸草原土壤微生物与土壤酶活性的影响. 微生物学通报, 2012, 39(6): 741-748 [Cao S-B, Liu Q-W, Wang L-Q, et al. Effect of short-term grazing on soil microorga-nisms and soil enzyme activities in meadow steppe. Microbiology China, 2012, 39(6): 741-748]
[28] 汪诗平, 马秀枝, 李长生, 等. 放牧对内蒙古锡林河流域草原土壤碳组分的影响. 植物生态学报, 2005, 29(4): 569-576 [Wang S-P, Ma X-Z, Li C-S, et al. Effects of grazing on carbon components of grassland soil in Xilin River Basin, Inner Mongolia. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2005, 29(4): 569-576]
[29] 王启兰, 王长庭, 杜岩功, 等. 放牧对高寒嵩草草甸土壤微生物量碳的影响及其与土壤环境的关系. 草业学报, 2008, 17(2): 39-46 [Wang Q-L, Wang C-T, Du Y-G, et al. Grazing impact on soil microbial biomass carbon and relationship with soil environment in alpine Kobresia meadow. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2008, 17(2): 39-46]
[30] Lin B, Zhao X, Zheng Y, et al. Effect of grazing intensity on protozoan community, microbial biomass, and enzyme activity in an alpine meadow on the Tibetan Plateau. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2017, 17: 2752-2762
[31] Jiang L, Wang S, Zhe P, et al. Effects of grazing on the acquisition of nitrogen by plants and microorganisms in an alpine grassland on the Tibetan Plateau. Plant and Soil, 2017, 416: 297-308
[32] Cai Y, Du Z, Yan Y, et al. Greater stimulation of greenhouse gas emissions by stored yak urine than urea in an alpine steppe soil from the Qinghai-Tibetan Pla-teau: A laboratory study. Grassland Science, 2017, 63: 196-207
[33] Zhao FZ, Ren CJ, Han XH, et al. Changes of soil microbial and enzyme activities are linked to soil C, N and P stoichiometry in afforested ecosystems. Forest Ecology and Management, 2018, 427: 289-295

放牧强度对华北农牧交错带典型草地土壤化学计量特征的短期影响

Short-term effects of grazing intensity on soil stoichiometric characteristics of typical grassland in the agro-pastoral ecotone of northern China

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	代泽成, 刘月秀, 党宁, 王志瑞, 蔡江平, 张玉革, 宋永波, 李慧, 姜勇. 长期氮水添加对温带草原土壤化学性质和微生物学特性的短期遗留效应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(7): 1834-1844.
[2]	吕晶花, 赵旭燕, 陆梅, 李聪, 杨志东, 刘攀, 陈志明, 冯峻. 氮沉降下纳帕海草甸植被与土壤变化对微生物生物量碳氮的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(6): 1525-1532.
[3]	吕付泽, 杨雅丽, 鲍雪莲, 张常仁, 郑甜甜, 何红波, 张旭东, 解宏图. 免耕不同秸秆覆盖量对黑土微生物群落及其残留物的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(4): 903-912.
[4]	豆梦珂, 张伟东, 杨庆朋, 陈龙池, 刘晔嘉, 胡亚林. 杉木种植和磷添加对土壤微生物生物量及胞外酶活性的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(3): 631-638.
[5]	谷昌军, 张镱锂, 刘林山, 魏博, 宫殿清, 崔伯豪. 放牧压力表述的分异及其适用场景 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(2): 433-441.
[6]	肖向前, 张海阔, 冯娅斯, 王吉鹏, 梁辰飞, 陈有超, 朱高荻, 蔡延江. 植物残体对青藏高原高寒草甸土壤、微生物和胞外酶C∶N∶P化学计量特征的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(1): 58-66.
[7]	邓亚琴, 徐智, 张勇, 王宇蕴. 土壤微生物生物量氮对不同腐熟度有机肥的响应及对土壤矿质氮的调控作用 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(1): 137-144.
[8]	王钧, 李广, 闫丽娟, 刘强, 聂志刚. 气候变化背景下甘肃农牧交错带玉米气候生产潜力和资源利用效率变化特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(1): 160-168.
[9]	汪亚芳, 刘宗悦, 张宝刚, 余树全, 蔡延江. 入侵毛竹皆伐对亚热带森林土壤微生物生物量和酶活性的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(5): 1233-1239.
[10]	刘玉祯, 刘文亭, 杨晓霞, 李彩弟, 冯斌, 俞旸, 张春平, 董全民. 放牧对全球草地生态系统碳氮磷化学计量特征影响的Meta分析 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(5): 1251-1259.
[11]	宋乃平, 陈晓莹, 王磊, 潘雅清, 杨新国, 陈娟, 陈林, 孟晨. 宁夏农牧交错带村域景观演替及驱动机制 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(5): 1387-1394.
[12]	刘晶晶, 尹亚丽, 李世雄, 赵文, 苏世锋, 董怡玲. 调控措施对祁连山中度退化高寒草甸土壤的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(4): 988-994.
[13]	武开阔, 张哲, 武志杰, 冯良山, 宫平, 白伟, 冯晨, 张丽莉. 不同秸秆还田量和氮肥配施对玉米田土壤CO₂排放的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(3): 664-670.
[14]	张彬, 赵天启, 贺启珅, 郑佳华, 赵萌莉. 放牧对短花针茅荒漠草原土壤团聚体组成及稳定性的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(12): 3263-3270.
[15]	马龙, 王书停, 史雷, 张然, 王楷, 郑伟, 李紫燕, 翟丙年. 有机肥配施氮肥对西北旱地冬小麦产量、品质及土壤生物学特性的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(10): 2718-2724.