1992—2018年内蒙古自治区植被动态演替特征及驱动力

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202202.020

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 人类的建设与破坏活动是植被动态变化的重要根源之一,利用遥感探究植被演替的量化监测过程及驱动力能够很好揭示人类活动对生态本底的影响。本研究利用欧洲航天局逐年土地覆被数据及地理学信息图谱方法,从植被型组、植被型尺度分析1992—2018年内蒙古自治区植被动态演替方向、演替速度及演替序列,明晰植被演替特征并量化其演替驱动力。结果表明: 研究期间,内蒙古自治区植被数量结构为“植增荒减”,具体年增长速率依次为耕地(353.10 km²)>草原(243.92 km²)>森林(-16.22 km²)>灌丛(-120.37 km²)>荒漠(-556.31 km²),并且空间相邻分布的草原、荒漠、灌丛三者的面积变化存在权衡关系。植被演替空间呈“绿进沙退”格局,演替热点集中于西辽河平原、内蒙古中部荒漠-草原交界处及黄河沿岸;植被演替序列结构复杂,进展、逆行演替相互交错,不同群落演替流量的截流率差距突出,其中,植被型组草原、灌丛与植被型草地、雨养农田群落在演替过程中截获最多演替流量。植被动态演替的核心驱动力为农牧业生产、经济发展水平、人口规模、生态工程、气候变化。作为“植物群落学-景观生态学”的实例研究,本研究结果可为植被格局优化、演替等级提升等生态措施实施空间的划定提供科学依据。

关键词: 植被演替, 地理学信息图谱, 演替序列, 驱动力

Abstract: Human activities related with construction and destruction are one of the important drivers for vegetation dynamics. Using remote sensing to explore the quantitative monitoring process and driving force of vegetation succession can well reveal the impacts of human activities on ecological background. Based on the vegetation formation group and vegetation formation scales, this study used the European Space Agency's annual land cover data and geo-information TUPU analysis to investigate vegetation succession direction, succession speed, and succession sequence in the Inner Mongolia from 1992 to 2018. The vegetation succession characteristics and its driving forces were then clarified. Results showed that vegetation structure changed dramatically with increasing vegetation and decreasing barren during the study period. The specific annual growth rate was cultivated land (353.10 km²) > grassland (243.92 km²) > forest (-16.22 km²) > shrubland (-120.37 km²) > desert (-556.31 km²). There was a trade-off between the area changes of adjacent grasslands, deserts, and shrublands. Vegetation succession presented a spatial pattern of vegetation expansion and desert reduction, with the succession hotspots concentrated in the West Liaohe River Plain, the desert-grassland junction of central Inner Mongolia, and along the Yellow River. The structure of vegetation succession sequence was complex with progressive succession and regressive succession intermixed. The retention rate of succession flow differed among different communities. Most of the succession flow was intercepted by the grassland and shrubland community of vegetation formation group and the grassland and cropland rainfed community of vegetation formation. The core driving forces of vegetation dynamic succession are agriculture and animal husbandry production, economic development level, population size, ecological engineering, and climate change. As a case study of plantsociology and landscape ecology, our results could provide scientific guidance for optimizing vegetation patterns and enhancing the spatial division and succession level of ecological measures.

Key words: vegetation succession, geo-information TUPU, succession sequence, driving force

吕基新, 赖勇, 耿守保, 陈升忠. 1992—2018年内蒙古自治区植被动态演替特征及驱动力[J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(5): 1240-1250.

LYU Ji-xin, LAI Yong, GENG Shou-bao, CHEN Sheng-zhong. Characteristics and driving forces of vegetation dynamics in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region from 1992 to 2018[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2022, 33(5): 1240-1250.

参考文献

[1] 高海东, 庞国伟, 李占斌, 等. 黄土高原植被恢复潜力研究. 地理学报, 2017, 72(5): 863-874
[2] 王卿, 汪承焕, 黄沈发, 等. 盐沼植物群落研究进展: 分布、演替及影响因子. 生态环境学报, 2012, 21(2): 375-388
[3] 李瑞. 植被动态研究进展及展望. 中国水土保持科学, 2012, 10(2): 115-120
[4] 孙艳玲, 郭鹏, 延晓冬, 等. 内蒙古植被覆盖变化及其与气候、人类活动的关系. 自然资源学报, 2010, 25(3): 407-414
[5] 郭帅, 赵宏霞. 恢复生态学领域的植被演替研究综述. 聊城大学学报: 自然科学版, 2011, 24(3): 59-63
[6] 李庆康, 马克平. 植物群落演替过程中植物生理生态学特性及其主要环境因子的变化. 植物生态学报, 2002, 4(增刊1): 9-19
[7] 涂丹丹, 刘蔚漪, 李媚, 等. 哀牢山西坡6种典型森林群落及物种多样性研究. 西部林业科学, 2020, 49(6): 76-84
[8] Heim R, Bucharova A, Brodt L, et al. Post-fire vegetation succession in the Siberian subarctic tundra over 45 years. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 760: 143425
[9] 税伟, 陈毅萍, 简小枚, 等. 喀斯特原生天坑植物群落空间格局特征——以云南沾益天坑为例. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(6): 1725-1735
[10] An Y, Gao Y, Liu X, et al. Soil organic carbon and nitrogen variations with vegetation succession in passively restored freshwater wetlands. Wetlands, 2021, 41: 11
[11] Zou J, Wu J, Osborne B, et al. Nitrogen accumulation, rather than carbon: Nitrogen stoichiometric variation, underlies carbon storage during forest succession. Environmental Research Letters, 2021, 16: 24055
[12] 喻阳华, 钟欣平, 郑维, 等. 喀斯特森林不同演替阶段植物群落物种多样性、功能性状与化学计量及关联. 生态学报, 2021, 41(6): 1-10
[13] 安慧, 杨新国, 刘秉儒, 等. 荒漠草原区弃耕地植被演替过程中植物群落生物量及土壤养分变化. 应用生态学报, 2011, 22(12): 3145-3149
[14] Verrelst J, Geerling GW, Sykora KV, et al. Mapping of aggregated floodplain plant communities using image fusion of CASI and LiDAR data. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2008, 11: 83-94
[15] 丁圣彦, 宋永昌. 常绿阔叶林植被动态研究进展. 生态学报, 2004, 24(8): 1769-1779
[16] Szostak M. Automated land cover change detection and forest succession monitoring using Lidar point clouds and GIS analyses. Geosciences, 2020, 10: 321
[17] 邹扬庆. 基于3S技术的中梁山植被演替识别与演替规律研究. 硕士论文. 重庆: 西南大学, 2014
[18] 张高生. 基于RS、GIS技术的现代黄河三角洲植物群落演替数量分析及近30年植被动态研究. 博士论文. 济南: 山东大学, 2008
[19] 陈宽, 杨晨晨, 白力嘎, 等. 基于地理探测器的内蒙古自然和人为因素对植被NDVI变化的影响. 生态学报, 2021, 41(12): 4963-4975
[20] 时忠杰, 高吉喜, 徐丽宏, 等. 内蒙古地区近25年植被对气温和降水变化的影响. 生态环境学报, 2011, 20(11): 1594-1601
[21] 张靓, 曾辉. 基于MODIS数据的内蒙古土地利用/覆被变化研究. 干旱区资源与环境, 2015, 29(1): 31-36
[22] 邬亚娟, 刘廷玺, 童新, 等. 基于长时间序列landsat数据的科尔沁沙地土地利用演变分析. 生态学报, 2020, 40(23): 8672-8682
[23] Defourny P, Schouten L, Bartalev S, et al. Accuracy assessment of a 300 m global land cover map: The GlobCover experience. 33rd International Symposium on Remote Sensing of Environment (ISRSE), Stresa, 2009: 5
[24] 郭柯, 方精云, 王国宏, 等. 中国植被分类系统修订方案. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(2): 111-127
[25] 张浚茂, 臧传富. 东南诸河流域1990—2015年土地利用时空变化特征及驱动机制. 生态学报, 2019, 39(24): 9339-9350
[26] 穆少杰, 李建龙, 陈奕兆, 等. 2001—2010年内蒙古植被覆盖度时空变化特征. 地理学报, 2012, 67(9): 1255-1268
[27] 于元赫, 李子君, 林锦阔, 等. 沂河流域土地利用时空变化图谱特征分析. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(5): 975-988
[28] 任海, 蔡锡安, 饶兴权, 等. 植物群落的演替理论. 生态科学, 2001(4): 59-67
[29] Xu L, Chen S, Xu Y, et al. Impacts of land-use change on habitat quality during 1985-2015 in the Taihu Lake Basin. Sustainability, 2019, 11: 3513
[30] 余继峰, 张涛, 宋召军. 数学地质方法与应用. 徐州: 中国矿业大学出版社, 2019
[31] 国家林业和草原局. 内蒙古阿拉善盟防沙治沙典型事迹. 北京: 国家林业和草原局, 2020
[32] 李润利, 吴海霄. 浅谈锡林郭勒盟重大生态工程建设思路. 内蒙古林业, 2016(3): 24-25
[33] 常亚斌, 朱睿, 肖生春, 等. 1980—2015年阿拉善盟沙地面积变化及其驱动因子. 中国沙漠, 2020, 40(6): 82-90
[34] 熊小刚, 韩兴国, 白永飞, 等. 锡林河流域草原小叶锦鸡儿分布增加的趋势、原因和结局. 草业学报, 2003, 12(3): 57-62
[35] 孟佩, 刘学敏. 内蒙古乌兰察布市国家重点生态工程区植被指数变化特征. 林业资源管理, 2018(4): 17-21
[36] 慕宗杰, 刘果厚, 桂荣, 等. 浑善达克沙地飞播区不同恢复阶段植物群落结构动态变化. 华中农业大学学报, 2020, 39(4): 46-56
[37] 聂明鹤, 沈艳, 饶丽仙. 宁夏典型草原区退耕草地群落演替序列与环境解释. 草业学报, 2018, 27(8): 11-20
[38] 李明, 孙洪泉, 苏志诚. 中国西北气候干湿变化研究进展. 地理研究, 2021, 40(4): 1180-1194
[39] 康文平, 刘树林, 段翰晨. 基于MODIS时间序列数据的沙漠化遥感监测及沙漠化土地图谱分析——以内蒙古中西部地区为例. 中国沙漠, 2016, 36(2): 307-318
[40] 易浪, 任志远, 张翀, 等. 黄土高原植被覆盖变化与气候和人类活动的关系. 资源科学, 2014, 36(1): 166-174