亚热带砂岩发育森林土壤酚氧化酶活性测定方法优化

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202205.016

应用生态学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (5): 1223-1232.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202205.016

亚热带砂岩发育森林土壤酚氧化酶活性测定方法优化

夏允^1,2, 施佳淇^1,2, 肖华翠^1,2, 王全成^1,2, 杨柳明^1,2,3*, 范跃新^1,2,3

¹福建师范大学地理科学学院, 福州 350007;
²福建师范大学福建省植物生理生态重点实验室, 福州 350007;
³福建师范大学地理研究所, 福州 350007

收稿日期:2021-09-02 接受日期:2022-02-28 出版日期:2022-05-15 发布日期:2022-11-15
通讯作者: * E-mail: yanglm2007@aliyuncom
作者简介:夏允, 女, 1996年生, 硕士研究生。主要从事森林生态系统磷素生物地球化学循环研究。E-mail: 1753439706@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(32171587,41977090)、福建省公益类研究专项(2019R10026)、福建省中青年教师教育科研项目(JT180072)和福建师范大学2020年大学生创新创业训练计划项目(S202010394034)资助。

Optimization for the determination of phenol oxidase activity in subtropical forest soils developed on sandstone

XIA Yun^1,2, SHI Jia-qi^1,2, XIAO Hua-cui^1,2, WANG Quan-cheng^1,2, YANG Liu-ming^1,2,3*, FAN Yue-xin^1,2,3

¹School of Geographical Science, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350007, China;
²Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory for Plant Eco-physiology, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350007, China;
³Institute of Geography, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350007, China

Received:2021-09-02 Accepted:2022-02-28 Online:2022-05-15 Published:2022-11-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 酚氧化酶在土壤有机质降解过程中起重要作用,然而,目前用于测定土壤酚氧化酶活性的方法尚未统一。本研究以亚热带地区砂岩发育的3种不同林分的森林土壤为对象,探讨底物类型、pH值、土壤储存条件、储存时间、底物浓度、水土比、培养时间和温度对土壤酚氧化酶活性的影响,以期建立统一、可比较的测定亚热带森林土壤酚氧化酶活性的方法。结果表明: 浸提液pH值显著影响土壤酚氧化酶活性,且与目前普遍使用的左旋多巴胺(L-DOPA)相比,2,2′-联氨-双(3-乙基苯并噻唑啉-6-磺酸)-二胺盐(ABTS)所测得的氧化酶活性更高、适用pH值范围更广,说明ABTS可能更适合作为测定亚热带森林酸性土壤酚氧化酶活性的底物。储存方式显著影响酚氧化酶活性,3种供试土壤样品酚氧化酶活性均随时间呈降低的趋势,降幅表现为风干> 4 ℃冷藏> -20 ℃冷冻> -80 ℃冷冻,表明在无法保证快速测定土壤酚氧化酶活性的情况下,冷冻保存方式更有利于维持土壤酚氧化酶活性。底物浓度、水土比以及培养时间和温度均影响土壤酚氧化酶活性。当土壤样品与浸提液比例为1∶100时,选择2 mmol·L^-1浓度的ABTS为底物,在25~30 ℃下培养4 h,测定酚氧化酶活性结果重复性好、灵敏度高,是测定亚热带森林酸性土壤酚氧化酶活性的最优条件。

关键词: 多巴胺, ABTS, 酚氧化酶, 亚热带森林土壤

Abstract: Phenol oxidase plays an important role in the degradation of soil organic matter. There was no standard method to determine soil phenol oxidase activity. To fill such knowledge gap, we investigated the effects of substrate type, pH, soil storage conditions, storage time, substrate concentration, water-soil ratio, incubation time and incubation temperature on soil phenol oxidase activity in three different subtropical forest soils developed on sandstone. The pH of extraction buffers significantly affected the phenol oxidase activity. Using 2,2′-azinobis-(-3-ethylbenzo-thiazoline-6-sulfononic acid)-diammonium salt (ABTS) as substrate acquired higher oxidase activity and was applicable to wider pH range than using 3-(3,4-Dihydroxyphenyl)-L-alanine (L-DOPA) as substrate, indicating that ABTS was more suitable as a substrate for measuring phenol oxidase activity in acidic soils of subtropical forests. The storage condition significantly affected phenol oxidase activity. The phenol oxidase activity declined with time in all the three types of soil. The decreasing rate was air-dried > 4 ℃ refrigerated > -20 ℃ frozen > -80 ℃ frozen, suggesting that the frozen storage method was better than others in maintaining soil phenol oxidase activity if the determination of phenol oxidase activity in fresh soil samples cannot be immediately done. Substrate concentration, water-soil ratio, and incubation time and temperature all affected the activity of soil phenol oxidase. The condition of soil: buffer ratio of 1:100, 2 mmol·L^-1 concentration of ABTS with an incubation time of 4 h at 25-30 ℃ was optimal for measuring phenol oxidase activity in acidic soils of subtropical forests, with high repeatability and sensitivity.

Key words: dopamine, ABTS, phenol oxidase, subtropical forest soil

夏允, 施佳淇, 肖华翠, 王全成, 杨柳明, 范跃新. 亚热带砂岩发育森林土壤酚氧化酶活性测定方法优化[J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(5): 1223-1232.

XIA Yun, SHI Jia-qi, XIAO Hua-cui, WANG Quan-cheng, YANG Liu-ming, FAN Yue-xin. Optimization for the determination of phenol oxidase activity in subtropical forest soils developed on sandstone[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2022, 33(5): 1223-1232.

参考文献

[1] Sinsabaugh RL. Phenol oxidase, peroxidase and organic matter dynamics of soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2010, 42: 391-404
[2] Floch C, Alarcon-Gutiérrez E, Criquet S. ABTS assay of phenol oxidase activity in soil. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 2007, 71: 319-324
[3] Duran N, Esposito E. Potential applications of oxidative enzymes and phenoloxidase-like compounds in wastewater and soil treatment: A review. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2000, 28: 83-99
[4] Gianfreda L, Rao MA. Potential of extra cellular enzymes in remediation of polluted soils: A review. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 2004, 35: 339-354
[5] Freeman C, Ostle NJ, Kang H. An enzymic ‘latch' on a global carbon store. Nature, 2001, 40: 149
[6] Sinsabaugh RL, Carreiro MM, Repert DA. Allocation of extracellular enzymatic activity in relation to litter composition, N deposition, and mass loss. Biogeochemistry, 2002, 60: 1-24
[7] Sinsabaugh RL, Saiya-Cork K, Long T, et al. Soil microbial activity in a Liquidambar plantation unresponsive to CO₂-driven increases in primary production. Applied Soil Ecology, 2003, 24: 263-271
[8] Liu X, Kang J, Wang Y, et al. Amine-triggered dopamine polymerization: From aqueous solution to organic solvents. Macromolecular Rapid Communications, 2018, 39: e1800160
[9] 徐又一, 蒋金泓, 朱利平, 等. 多巴胺的自聚-附着行为与膜表面功能化. 膜科学与技术, 2011, 31(3): 32-38
[10] Pind A, Freeman C, Lock MA. Enzymic degradation of phenolic materials in peatlands-measurement of phenol oxidase activity. Plant and Soil, 1994, 159: 227-231
[11] Sinsabaugh RL, Lauber CL, Weintraub MN, et al. Stoichiometry of soil enzyme activity at global scale. Ecology Letters, 2008, 11: 1252-1264
[12] Williams CJ, Shingara EA, Yavitt JB. Phenol oxidase activity in peatlands in New York State: Response to summer drought and peat type. Wetlands, 2000, 20: 416-421
[13] Bach CE, Warnock DD, Horn D, et al. Measuring phenol oxidase and peroxidase activities with pyrogallol, L-DOPA, and ABTS: Effect of assay conditions and soil type. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2013, 67: 183-191
[14] Deforest JL. The influence of time, storage temperature, and substrate age on potential soil enzyme activity in acidic forest soils using MUB-linked substrates and L-DOPA. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2009, 41: 1180-1186
[15] 梅孔灿, 程蕾, 张秋芳, 等. 不同植物来源可溶性有机质对亚热带森林土壤酶活性的影响. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(12): 1273-1284
[16] Xu F. Effects of redox potential and hydroxide inhibition on the pH activity profile of fungal laccases. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 1997, 272: 924-928
[17] Wiedermann MM, Kane ES, Veverica TJ, et al. Are colorimetric assays appropriate for measuring phenol oxidase activity in peat soils? Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2017, 105: 108-110
[18] 史丽娟, 王辉民, 付晓莉, 等. 中亚热带典型人工林土壤酶活性及其化学计量特征. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(6): 1980-1988
[19] 王志瑞, 杨山, 马锐骜, 等. 内蒙古草甸草原土壤理化性质和微生物学特性对刈割与氮添加的响应. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(9): 3010-3018
[20] 赵颖, 史晓爽, 周连仁, 等. 土壤样品风干后对土壤酶活性的影响. 东北农业大学学报, 2011, 42(11): 126-130
[21] 马志良, 赵文强, 刘美. 高寒灌丛生长季根际和非根际土壤多酚氧化酶和过氧化氢酶活性对增温的响应. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(11): 3681-3688
[22] Bell CW, Fricks BE, Rocca JD, et al. High-throughput fluorometric measurement of potential soil extracellular enzyme activities. Journal of Visualized Experiments, 2013, 81: e50961
[23] Allison SD, Vitousek PM. Extracellular enzyme activities and carbon chemistry as drivers of tropical plant litter decomposition. Biotropica, 2004, 36: 285-296
[24] Farnet AM, Criquet S, Cigna M, et al. Purification of a laccase from Marasmius quercophilus induced with ferulic acid: Reactivity towards natural and xenobiotic aromatic compounds. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 2004, 34: 549-554
[25] Saiya-Cork KR, Sinsabaugh RL, Zak DR. The effects of long term nitrogen deposition on extracellular enzyme activity in an Acer saccharum forest soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2002, 34: 1309-1315
[26] Tabatabai MA. Soil enzymes// Weaver RW, Angle JS, Bottomley PS, eds. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Microbiological and Biochemical Properties. Madison: Soil Science Society of America, 1994: 775-833
[27] Serpentini CL, Gauchet C, Montauzon DD, et al. First electrochemical investigation of the redox properties of DOPA-melanins by means of a carbon paste electrode. Electrochimica Acta, 2000, 45: 1663-1668
[28] Eichlerová I, Snajdr J, Baldrian P. Laccase activity in soils: Considerations for the measurement of enzyme activity. Chemosphere, 2012, 88: 1154-1160
[29] Blankinship JC, Becerra CA, Schaeffer SM, et al. Separating cellular metabolism from exoenzyme activity in soil organic matter decomposition. Soil Biology and Bioche-mistry, 2014, 71: 68-75
[30] Sanchez JM, Turner BL. Abiotic contribution to phenol oxidase activity across a manganese gradient in tropical forest soils. Biogeochemistry, 2021, 153: 1-13
[31] 贺武, 帅韬, 高明阳, 等. 聚多巴胺形成的机理及影响因素. 江西化工, 2017(4): 4-10
[32] Iwahashi H, Morishita H, Ishii T, et al. Enhancement by catechols of hydroxyl-radical formation in the pre-sence of ferric ions and hydrogen peroxide. Journal of Biochemistry, 1989, 105: 429-434
[33] Eivazi F, Tabatabai MA. Glucosidases and galactosidases in soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1988, 20: 601-606
[34] Amonette R, Gallo ME, Lauber C, et al. Microbial community structure and oxidative enzyme activity in nitrogen-amended north temperate forest soils. Microbial Ecology, 2004, 48: 218-229
[35] Nannipieri P, Gianfreda L. Kinetics of enzyme reactions in soil environments// Huang PM, Senesi N, Buffle J, eds. Structure and Surface Reactions of Soil Particles. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 1998: 449-479
[36] 傅恺. 真菌漆酶高产菌株的发酵产酶及酶促降解有机染料的动力学研究. 博士论文. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2013
[37] Burns RG. Enzyme activity in soil: Location and a possible role in microbial ecology. Soil Biochemistry, 1982, 14: 423-427
[38] Record E, Punt PJ, Chamkha M, et al. Expression of the Pycnoporus cinnabarinus laccase gene in Aspergillus niger and characterization of the recombinant enzyme. European Journal of Biochemistry, 2002, 269: 602-609

亚热带砂岩发育森林土壤酚氧化酶活性测定方法优化

Optimization for the determination of phenol oxidase activity in subtropical forest soils developed on sandstone

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 8

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	马志良, 赵文强, 刘美. 高寒灌丛生长季根际和非根际土壤多酚氧化酶和过氧化氢酶活性对增温的响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(11): 3681-3688.
[2]	胡艳霞, 孙振钧, 孙永明, 王车辉. 蚯蚓粪对黄瓜炭疽病的系统诱导抗性作用 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2004, (8): 1358-1362.
[3]	胡艳霞, 孙振钧, 孙永明, 王车辉. 蚯蚓粪对黄瓜炭疽病的系统诱导抗性作用 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2004, (8): 1358-1362.
[4]	胡艳霞孙振钧孙永明王车辉. 蚯蚓粪对黄瓜炭疽病的系统诱导抗性作用 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2004, 15(08): 1358-1362 .
[5]	谭启玲[1] 胡承孝[1] 赵斌[1]. 两种污泥连续施用对潮土重金属含量及酶活性的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2004, 15(03): 497-500 .
[6]	王娓, 冯江, 王振堂, 孙刚, 包振民. 对虾暴发性流行病的群体感染及投饲蝇幼的抗病机制研究 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2002, (6): 728-730.
[7]	王娓, 冯江, 王振堂, 孙刚, 包振民. 对虾暴发性流行病的群体感染及投饲蝇幼的抗病机制研究 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2002, (6): 728-730.
[8]	汪敏, 郑师章. 凤眼莲与其根际细菌相互作用的研究 [J]. 应用生态学报, 1994, 5(3): 309-313.