黄土高原三种耐干藓营养繁殖的季节差异及机理

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202207.011

应用生态学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (7): 1738-1746.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202207.011

黄土高原三种耐干藓营养繁殖的季节差异及机理

郭玥微^1,3, 赵允格^1,2*, 钱煦坤², 万杨卓群², 王闪闪^1,3

¹中国科学院教育部水土保持与生态环境研究中心, 黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室, 陕西杨凌 712100;
²西北农林科技大学水土保持研究所, 黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室, 陕西杨凌 712100;
³中国科学院大学, 北京 100049

收稿日期:2022-01-11 接受日期:2022-04-28 出版日期:2022-07-15 发布日期:2023-01-15
通讯作者: *E-mail: zyunge@ms.iswc.ac.cn
作者简介:郭玥微, 女, 1992年生, 博士研究生。主要从事苔藓植物生理与繁殖研究。E-mail: guoyuewei2013@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金重点项目(41830758)和中国科学院“西部之光”交叉团队-重点实验室合作研究专项(2019年入选)资助。

Seasonal differences in vegetative regeneration of three desiccation-tolerant mosses in the Loess Plateau and its mechanism

GUO Yue-wei^1,3, ZHAO Yun-ge^1,2*, QIAN Xu-kun², WAN Yang-zhuo-qun², WANG Shan-shan^1,3

¹State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dry-land Farming on the Loess Plateau, The Research Center of Soil and Water Conservation and Ecological Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Education, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China;
²State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dry-land Farming on the Loess Pla-teau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China;
³University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received:2022-01-11 Accepted:2022-04-28 Online:2022-07-15 Published:2023-01-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 苔藓植物在园林绿化、水土保持等方面的应用日益增加,目前藓类植物营养繁殖的影响因素鲜见报道,限制了其应用研究。本研究以黄土高原常见的耐干藓(扭口藓、土生对齿藓、短叶对齿藓)为对象,研究了3种藓春、夏、秋、冬季营养繁殖能力(以活力指数表征)差异及其叶绿素、可溶性糖、可溶性蛋白质、丙二醛(MDA)含量等生理指标变化,探索了耐干藓营养繁殖的季节差异与其生理特征之间的关系。结果表明: 1)藓类繁殖具有明显的季节差异,3种藓夏季活力指数均低于其他3个季节,平均较秋、冬、春季分别下降56.1%、48.4%、10.1%;相同季节的活力指数具有明显的年际变化。2)3种藓繁殖能力具有明显的种间差异,以短叶对齿藓最高,扭口藓最低,且后者的繁殖能力季节和年际变化最大。3)3种藓不同季节生理特征差异显著,其中夏季MDA含量高于其他季节,可溶性糖和可溶性蛋白质含量低于其他季节。4)耐干藓的营养繁殖季节变化主要与可溶性糖含量有关。本研究明确了藓类营养繁殖能力随季节变化的规律,指出可溶性糖含量是影响藓类营养繁殖的关键因素,可为藓类植物保护和人工培养提供科学依据。

关键词: 苔藓, 生物结皮, 无性繁殖, 季节动态, 人工接种, 生态恢复

Abstract: Bryophytes have been used in many fields, such as landscaping and soil and water conservation. How-ever, few studies focused on moss regeneration and its influencing factors, which retards the application study. Three common desiccation-tolerant mosses (Barbula unguiculata, Didymodon vinealis, and Didymodon tectorum) in the Loess Plateau region were collected across four seasons. We measured vigor index of new shoots, representing vegetative regeneration capacity, and physiological indices, which included the contents of chlorophyll, soluble sugar, soluble protein and malondialdehyde (MDA), to determine seasonal differences in regeneration capacity and physiological characteristics of the three mosses, as well as their relationships. The results showed that, 1) vegetative regeneration of mosses showed significantly seasonal differences. The vigor index of the three mosses in summer were the lowest, averagely decreased by 56.1%, 48.4%, and 10.1% compared with that in autumn, winter, and spring, respectively. The vigor index of the three mosses in the same season showed interannual variation. 2) There were considerable differences in the regeneration capacity of mosses across species. D. tectorum and B. unguiculata had the highest and lowest vigor indices, respectively. In terms of regeneration capacity, B. unguiculata had the largest seasonal and interannual variations. 3) The physiological characteristics of mosses had seaonal variations. The mosses collected in the summer had the highest MDA content but the lowest contents of soluble sugar and soluble protein. 4) Seasonal variations in desiccation-tolerant moss regeneration were mostly due to soluble sugar. Our results showed seasonal variations of vegetative propagation capacity, and highlighted the role of soluble sugar as a critical factor influencing vegetative propagation of mosses. These findings could provide scientific support for moss protection and artificial cultivation.

Key words: bryophytes, biological soil crusts, asexual reproduction, seasonal dynamic, artificial inoculation, ecological restoration

郭玥微, 赵允格, 钱煦坤, 万杨卓群, 王闪闪. 黄土高原三种耐干藓营养繁殖的季节差异及机理[J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1738-1746.

GUO Yue-wei, ZHAO Yun-ge, QIAN Xu-kun, WAN Yang-zhuo-qun, WANG Shan-shan. Seasonal differences in vegetative regeneration of three desiccation-tolerant mosses in the Loess Plateau and its mechanism[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2022, 33(7): 1738-1746.

参考文献

[1] 汪庆, 贺善安, 吴鹏程. 苔藓植物的多样性研究. 生物多样性, 1999, 7(4): 332-339
[2] Gerdol R, Bragazza L, Marchesini R. Element concentrations in the forest moss Hylocomium splendens: Variation associated with altitude, net primary production and soil chemistry. Environmental Pollution, 2002, 116: 129-135
[3] 陈俊和, 蒋明, 张力. 苔藓植物园林景观应用浅析. 广东园林, 2010, 32(1): 31-34
[4] Zhao YG, Bowker MA, Zhang YM, et al. Enhanced recovery of biological soil crusts after disturbance// Weber B, Büdel B, Belnap J, eds. Biological Soil Crusts: An Organizing Principle in Drylands. Berlin: Springer, 2016: 499-523
[5] Reed SC, Coe KK, Sparks JP, et al. Changes to dryland rainfall result in rapid moss mortality and altered soil fertility. Nature Climate Change, 2012, 2: 752-755
[6] Condon LA, Pyke DA. Filling the interspace-restoring arid land mosses: Source populations, organic matter, and overwintering govern success. Ecology and Evolution, 2016, 6: 7623-7632
[7] Xiao B, Zhao YG, Wang QH, et al. Development of artificial moss-dominated biological soil crusts and their effects on runoff and soil water content in a semi-arid environment. Journal of Arid Environments, 2015, 117: 75-83
[8] 肖波, 赵允格, 邵明安. 黄土高原侵蚀区生物结皮的人工培育及其水土保持效应. 草地学报, 2008, 16(1): 28-34
[9] Mishler BD. Reproductive ecology of bryophytes// Doust JL, Doust LL, eds. Plant Reproductive Ecology: Patterns and Strategies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988: 285-306
[10] 郭玥微. 不同季节及保存条件对耐干藓生理特性及营养繁殖的影响. 硕士论文. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2018
[11] Doherty KD, Bowker MA, Antoninka AJ, et al. Biocrust moss populations differ in growth rates, stress response, and microbial associates. Plant and Soil, 2017, 429: 187-198
[12] Guo YW, Zhao YG, Downing AJ. Effect of storage time on the physiological characteristics and vegetative rege-neration of desiccation-tolerant mosses on the Loess Plateau, China. Restoration Ecology, 2020, 28: S203-S211
[13] Guo YW, Zhao YG. Effects of storage temperature on the physiological characteristics and vegetative propagation of desiccation-tolerant mosses. Biogeosciences, 2018, 15: 797-808
[14] 郭玥微, 赵允格. 保存光强对耐干藓生理特性与营养繁殖的影响. 西北农林科技大学学报: 自然科学版, 2019, 47(5): 110-117
[15] Stark LR. Ecology of desiccation tolerance in bryophytes: A conceptual framework and methodology. The Bryologist, 2017, 120: 130-165
[16] Proctor MCF, Oliver MJ, Wood AJ, et al. Desiccation-tolerance in bryophytes: A review. The Bryologist, 2007, 110: 595-621
[17] Proctor MCF. How long must a desiccation-tolerant moss tolerate desiccation? Some results of 2 years’ data logging on Grimmia pulvinata. Physiologia Plantarum, 2004, 122: 21-27
[18] Coe KK, Belnap J, Sparks JP. Precipitation-driven carbon balance controls survivorship of desert biocrust mosses. Ecology, 2012, 93: 1626-1636
[19] 杨雪伟, 赵允格, 许明祥. 黄土丘陵区藓结皮优势种形态结构差异. 生态学杂志, 2016, 35(2): 370-377
[20] Melick DR, Seppelt RD. Seasonal investigations of soluble carbohydrates and pigment levels in Antarctic bryophytes and lichens. The Bryologist, 1994, 97: 13-19
[21] Seel WE, Hendry GAF, Lee JA. The combined effects of desiccation and irradiance on mosses from xeric and hydric habitats. Journal of Experimental Botany, 1992, 43: 1023-1030
[22] Tang YK, Jiang J, Chen C, et al. Rainfall pulse response of carbon fluxes in a temperate grass ecosystem in the semiarid Loess Plateau. Ecology and Evolution, 2018, 8: 11179-11189
[23] 高谦. 属17 扭口藓属Barbula Hedw.// 中国科学院中国孢子植物志编辑委员会. 中国苔藓志第2卷凤尾藓目、丛藓目. 北京: 科学出版社, 1996: 171-193
[24] 李合生. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2000
[25] 安塞站. 生态系统要素联网长期监测数据[EB/OL]. (2019-11-16) [2022-04-24]. http://www.cnern.org.cn/data/initDRsearch?classcode=SYC_A01
[26] Glime JM. Chapter 4-2 Adaptive Strategies: Phenology, It’s All in the Timing[EB/OL]. (2020-06-03) [2022-04-24]. http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/bryophyte-ecology
[27] Jia RL, Li XR, Liu LC, et al. Effects of sand burial on dew deposition on moss soil crust in a revegetated area of the Tennger Desert, Northern China. Journal of Hydrology, 2014, 519: 2341-2349
[28] 王浩, 贾志峰, 卢玉东, 等. 陕北安塞县黄土丘陵区露水凝结时间与频率. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(8): 2563-2568
[29] Zotz G, Rottenberger S. Seasonal changes in diel CO₂ exchange of three central European moss species: A one-year field study. Plant Biology, 2001, 3: 661-669
[30] Duckett JG, Burch J, Fletcher PW, et al. In vitro cultivation of bryophytes: A review of practicalities, problems, progress and promise. Journal of Bryology, 2004, 26: 3-20

黄土高原三种耐干藓营养繁殖的季节差异及机理

Seasonal differences in vegetative regeneration of three desiccation-tolerant mosses in the Loess Plateau and its mechanism

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	姜静宜, 孙晓新, 王宪伟, 王淑洁, 马国宝, 陈宁, 杜宇. 大兴安岭多年冻土泥炭地土壤水可溶性有机碳夏秋季节变化特征及其影响因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2413-2420.
[2]	李志丽, 王红梅, 赵亚楠, 周玉蓉. 荒漠草原灌丛引入过程中土壤氮矿化的季节动态及其影响因子 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(8): 2161-2170.
[3]	明姣, 杨光, 赵允格, 马昕昕, 孙会, 乔羽. 放牧对降雨条件下黄土高原退耕草地土壤水分补给的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(6): 1555-1562.
[4]	王芳, 卢尧舜, 张昭臣, 陈琳, 杨永川, 张宏伟, 王潇然, 舒丽, 商晓凡, 刘鹏程, 杨清培, 张健. 江西官山亚热带森林近地表和土壤温度的海拔梯度变化及其季节动态 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(5): 1161-1168.
[5]	于贵瑞, 郝天象, 杨萌. 中国区域生态恢复和环境治理的生态系统原理及若干学术问题 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(2): 289-304.
[6]	孙瑜硕, 常选选, 张雪, 王磊, 曲文杰, 秦伟春, 张波, 牛金帅. 腾格里沙漠东南缘不同植被类型土壤种子库多样性 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(9): 2356-2362.
[7]	王彦峰, 肖波, 汪万福, 余星兴, 张雪. 黄土高原北部水蚀风蚀交错区苔藓多样性及苔藓结皮发育的微生境特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1729-1737.
[8]	庞景文, 卜崇峰, 郭琦, 鞠孟辰, 江熳, 莫秋霞, 王鹤鸣. 毛乌素沙地区域尺度生物结皮有机碳 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1755-1763.
[9]	江熳, 卜崇峰, 郭琦, 鞠孟辰, 庞景文, 莫秋霞, 王鹤鸣. 不同降水条件下生物结皮覆盖对沙地土壤有机碳的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1764-1772.
[10]	张冠华, 易亮, 孙宝洋, 李建明, 沈盛彧. 亚热带苔藓结皮对土壤-微生物-胞外酶化学计量特征的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1791-1800.
[11]	刘哲, 叶兴旺, 王吉平, 程永韬, 钱隆, 肖敬尚, 吴丽. 生物结皮胞外多糖理化特性及菌群结构的季节动态 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1801-1809.
[12]	钟香艳, 石辉, 李旋, 赵一键. 物理结皮和生物结皮的斥水特征及其对水分入渗的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1843-1852.
[13]	淡晨希, 张琼, 刘畅, 郭珍, 刘刚. 生物结皮与草本植物共生坡面的产流-入渗过程特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1853-1860.
[14]	郭雅丽, 赵允格, 高丽倩, 杨凯, 孙会, 谷康民. 黄土丘陵区草本植物覆盖下生物结皮对坡面径流流速的削减作用 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1871-1877.
[15]	周光, 徐玮泽, 万静, 汪雁楠, 刘丽婷, 刘琪璟. 长白山阔叶红松林不同演替阶段林下红松幼苗能量与养分季节动态 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(5): 1663-1672.