地市尺度气候调节服务评估——以福州市为例

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202207.021

应用生态学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (7): 1966-1974.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202207.021

地市尺度气候调节服务评估——以福州市为例

邴龙飞^1,2, 王娇月^1,2, 尹岩^1,2, 郗凤明^1,2*, 张文凤^1,3, 马铭靖^1,3, 牛乐^1,3

¹中国科学院沈阳应用生态研究所, 沈阳 110016;
²中国科学院污染生态与环境工程重点实验室, 沈阳 110016;
³中国科学院大学, 北京 100049

收稿日期:2021-09-09 接受日期:2022-04-22 出版日期:2022-07-15 发布日期:2023-01-15
通讯作者: *E-mail: xifengming@iae.ac.cn
作者简介:邴龙飞, 男, 1979年生, 助理研究员。主要从事土地利用及其生态效应研究。E-mail: binglf@iae.ac.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41603068,41977290)、中国科学院青年创新促进会项目(2020201,Y202050)和福州市生态系统价值核算科研服务项目([350100]HH[CS]2019001)资助。

Evaluation of climate regulation service at prefecture-level city: A case study of Fuzhou City, China

BING Long-fei^1,2, WANG Jiao-yue^1,2, YIN Yan^1,2, XI Feng-ming^1,2*, ZHANG Wen-feng^1,3, MA Ming-jing^1,3, NIU Le^1,3

¹Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China;
²Key Laboratory of Pollution Ecology and Environmental Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China;
³University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received:2021-09-09 Accepted:2022-04-22 Online:2022-07-15 Published:2023-01-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 生态系统服务是衔接生态系统功能和人类福利的桥梁,气候调节服务在生态系统服务中占有极其重要的地位。对气候调节服务发生的全过程进行评估,对科学开展生态系统服务评估具有重要意义。本研究以福州市为案例,开展地市尺度气候调节服务评估,分析气候调节服务在行政单元、地类尺度上的时空变化特征。结果表明: 2015、2018年,福州市气候调节服务总实物量分别为4.01×10¹² MJ(价值量6139.44亿元,GDP为5618.08亿元)和4.66×10¹² MJ(价值量7140.02亿元,GDP为7856.81亿元),气候调节服务价值大致与当年GDP相当。主要的土地利用/覆被类型是森林、耕地、水域,分别占福州市国土面积的57%、15%和9%;水域对福州市气候调节服务贡献最大,2018年贡献度超过60%,高于林地(12%)及耕地(13%)。建成区、东部农耕区域气候调节服务价值较低。2015、2018年,福州市土地利用/覆被变化面积为1805.5 km²,变化最大的用地类型是耕地、林地,主要的土地利用转移方向是耕地与林地、林地与园地、耕地与城镇村及工矿用地之间的转化;气候调节服务总实物量变化了6.74×10¹¹ MJ,相应的价值变化量为1035.8亿元;气候调节服务变化集中在闽侯、闽清、永泰等中西部地区,以及罗源、福清等西部山区;水域的气候调节服务变化最剧烈,水域类型转化会产生极为强烈的气候调节服务变化,远高于其他用地类型转换的效果。

关键词: 气候调节服务, 蒸散, 土地利用/覆被, 实物量, 价值量

Abstract: Ecosystem services are the bridge between ecosystem functions and human welfare. Climate regulation service (CRS) has an extremely important role in ecosystem services. It is important to conduct a comprehensive assessment based on the whole process of CRS occurrence for scientific assessment of ecosystem services. With Fuzhou City as a case, we carried out the assessment of CRS at the local and municipal scales, and analyzed the spatial and temporal variations of CRS at the administrative unit and land use and land cover scales. The results showed that the aggregated physical capacity of CRS in Fuzhou City was 4.01×10¹² MJ (monetary value 613.944 billion yuan, GDP 561.808 billion yuan) and 4.66×10¹² MJ (monetary value 714.002 billion yuan, GDP 785.681 billion yuan) in 2015 and 2018, respectively, and that the monetary value of CRS was roughly equivalent to the GDP of that year. The main land use/cover (LULC) type was woodland, cultivated land, and water area, which accounted for 57%, 15%, and 9% of Fuzhou’s land area, respectively. Water area contributed the most to Fuzhou’s CRS, with a contribution of over 60% in 2018, higher than woodland (12%), and cultivated land (13%). The CRS was lower in built-up areas and eastern farming areas. Between 2015 and 2018, the area of LULC change in Fuzhou was 1805.5 km². The largest changes were cultivated land and wood land. The main land use transfer direction was between cultivated land and woodland, woodland and garden land, cultivated land and residential and industrial and mining land. The aggregated physical capacity of CRS changed by 6.74×10¹¹ MJ, while the corresponding monetary value of 103.58 billion yuan. The CRS changes were concentrated in the central and western regions such as Minhou, Minqing, and Yongtai, and the western mountainous regions such as Luoyuan and Fuqing. The most drastic change of CRS was found in water area. The conversion of water areas produced extremely strong changes in CRS, much stronger than the effects of conversion of other LULC types.

Key words: climate regulation service, evapotranspiration, land use/cover, physical capacity, monetary value

邴龙飞, 王娇月, 尹岩, 郗凤明, 张文凤, 马铭靖, 牛乐. 地市尺度气候调节服务评估——以福州市为例[J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1966-1974.

BING Long-fei, WANG Jiao-yue, YIN Yan, XI Feng-ming, ZHANG Wen-feng, MA Ming-jing, NIU Le. Evaluation of climate regulation service at prefecture-level city: A case study of Fuzhou City, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2022, 33(7): 1966-1974.

参考文献

[1] 欧阳志云, 王如松, 赵景柱. 生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值评价. 应用生态学报, 1999, 10(5): 635-640
[2] Daily G, Postel S, Bawa K, et al. Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Washington, DC: Island Press, 1997
[3] 赵士洞, 张永民. 生态系统与人类福祉——千年生态系统评估的成就、贡献和展望. 地球科学进展, 2006, 21(9): 895-902
[4] MA. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Washington DC: Island Press, 2005
[5] 刘国华, 傅伯杰, 陈利顶, 等. 中国生态退化的主要类型、特征及分布. 生态学报, 2000, 20(1): 13-19
[6] United Nations Environment Programme. Becoming #Generation Restoration: Ecosystem Restoration for People, Nature and Climate. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme, 2021
[7] 马国霞, 於方, 王金南, 等. 中国2015年陆地生态系统生产总值核算研究. 中国环境科学, 2017, 37(4): 1474-1482
[8] SCEP. Man’s Impact on the Global Environment. Cambridge, UK: MIT Press, 1970
[9] Mengist W, Soromessa T, Feyisa GL. A global view of regulatory ecosystem services: Existed knowledge, trends, and research gaps. Ecological Processes, 2020, 9: 40
[10] Costanza R, D’Arge R, de Groot R, et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 1997, 387: 253-260
[11] de Groot RS, Wilson MA, Boumans RMJ. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics, 2002, 41: 393-408
[12] Engel S, Pagiola S, Wunder S. Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: An overview of the issues. Ecological Economics, 2008, 65: 663-674
[13] Bagstad KJ, Semmens DJ, Waage S, et al. A comparative assessment of decision-support tools for ecosystem services quantification and valuation. Ecosystem Services, 2013, 5: 27-39
[14] Costanza R, de Groot R, Sutton P, et al. Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change, 2014, 26: 152-158
[15] 李文华, 欧阳志云, 赵景柱. 生态系统服务功能研究. 北京: 气象出版社, 2002
[16] Forster P, Ramaswamy V, Artaxo P, et al. Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and in Radiative Forcing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2007
[17] Ten Brink P. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity in National and International Policy Making. London, UK: Routledge, 2012
[18] House JI, Brovkin V, Betts R, et al. Climate and air quality// Hassan R, Scholes R, Ash N, eds. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Current State and Trends. Washington DC: Island Press, 2006: 355-390
[19] 谢高地, 张彩霞, 张昌顺, 等. 中国生态系统服务的价值. 资源科学, 2015, 37(9): 1740-1746
[20] Grêt-Regamey A, Weibel B. Global assessment of mountain ecosystem services using earth observation data. Ecosystem Services, 2020, 46: 101213
[21] Liu H, Zheng L, Wu J, et al. Past and future ecosystem service trade-offs in Poyang Lake Basin under different land use policy scenarios. Arabian Journal of Geo-sciences, 2020, 13: 46
[22] Wu C, Ma G, Yang W, et al. Assessment of ecosystem service value and its differences in the Yellow River Basin and Yangtze River Basin. Sustainability, 2021, 13: 3822
[23] 欧阳志云, 朱春全, 杨广斌, 等. 生态系统生产总值核算: 概念、核算方法与案例研究. 生态学报, 2013, 33(21): 6747-6761
[24] Smith P, Ashmore MR, Black HIJ, et al. REVIEW: The role of ecosystems and their management in regulating climate, and soil, water and air quality. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2013, 50: 812-829
[25] Geneletti D, Cortinovis C, Zardo L, et al. Developing Ecosystem Service Models for Urban Planning: A Focus on Micro-Climate Regulation. Cham: Springer, 2020: 31-42
[26] Takács Á, Kiss M, Hof A, et al. Microclimate modification by urban shade trees: An integrated approach to aid ecosystem service based decision-making. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 2016, 32: 97-109
[27] MA. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: A Framework for Assessment. Washington DC: Island Press, 2005
[28] Scholz T, Hof A, Schmitt T. Cooling effects and regulating ecosystem services provided by urban trees: Novel analysis approaches using urban tree cadastre data. Sustainability, 2018, 10: 712
[29] Ma R, Xie M, Yun W, et al. Evaluating responses of temperature regulating service to landscape pattern based on ‘source-sink’ theory. International Journal of Geo-Information, 2020, 9: 295
[30] Herreros-Cantis P, Mcphearson T. Mapping supply of and demand for ecosystem services to assess environmental justice in New York City. Ecological Applications, 2021, 31: e2390
[31] 肖强, 肖洋, 欧阳志云, 等. 重庆市森林生态系统服务功能价值评估. 生态学报, 2014, 34(1): 216-223
[32] Wang K, Wang P, Li Z, et al. A simple method to estimate actual evapotranspiration from a combination of net radiation, vegetation index, and temperature. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres, 2007, 112: D15101-D15107
[33] 闵骞, Min Sai. 道尔顿公式风速函数的改进. 水文, 2005, 25(1): 37-41
[34] Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, et al. Crop Evapotranspiration: Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 1998
[35] 王名才. 大气科学常用公式. 北京: 气象出版社, 1994

地市尺度气候调节服务评估——以福州市为例

Evaluation of climate regulation service at prefecture-level city: A case study of Fuzhou City, China

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	蓝浩宸, 刘琰琰, 张玉芳, 康杨. 基于标准化降水蒸散指数的川西高原干旱时空变化 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(6): 1533-1540.
[2]	黄辉, 郑昌玲, 张劲松, 孟平. 1980—2019年南太行地区气候变化趋势 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(8): 2139-2145.
[3]	曹银轩, 黄卓, 徐喜娟, 陈上, 王钊, 冯浩, 于强, 何建强. 黄土高原植被日光诱导叶绿素荧光对气象干旱的响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(2): 457-466.
[4]	闫明, 刘青青, 刘志萍, 奚为民. 干旱和林分因子对树木死亡的影响——以美国德克萨斯州东部国家森林为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(11): 2897-2906.
[5]	陈睿, 杨灿, 杨艳, 董祥泽. 洞庭湖生态经济区生态系统服务价值的时空演绎及其驱动因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(1): 169-179.
[6]	朱光磊, 佟守正, 赵春子. 嫩江流域参考作物蒸散量时空变化及其气候归因 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(1): 201-209.
[7]	魏宁宁, 母艳梅, 姜晓燕, 贾昕, 高圣杰, 蒋燕, 靳川, 韩聪, 查天山. 毛乌素沙地油蒿-杨柴灌丛生态系统蒸散组分分配及其影响因子 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(7): 2407-2414.
[8]	王军邦, 赵烜岚, 叶辉, 张志军, 何洪林. 基于贝叶斯模型平均的蒸散遥感产品集成——以三江源国家公园为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(6): 2119-2128.
[9]	秦颢萍, 刘泽彬, 郭建斌, 王彦辉, 于松平, 王蕾. 环境和冠层结构对华北落叶松林树干液流的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(5): 1681-1689.
[10]	侯青青, 裴婷婷, 陈英, 吉珍霞, 谢保鹏. 1986—2019年黄土高原干旱变化特征及趋势 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(2): 649-660.
[11]	袁晴雪, 喻树龙, 姜盛夏, 秦宁生, 张同文. 川西雅江地区过去567年3—8月干旱变化的树轮重建 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(10): 3627-3635.
[12]	韦钧培, 杨云川, 谢鑫昌, 廖丽萍, 田忆, 周津羽. 基于三温模型的南宁市蒸散量估算及其影响因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(1): 289-298.
[13]	张丽娜, 张育斌, 王军德. 黄土高原降水年内分布差异对旱作果园蒸散特征的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(7): 2363-2372.
[14]	胡晨, 葛继稳, 许向南, 谭雨松, 袁琛皓. 基于FAO56 Penman-Monteith公式估算神农架大九湖泥炭湿地蒸散及作物系数 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(5): 1699-1706.
[15]	曹恭祥, 王云霓, 郭中, 季蒙, 王彦辉, 徐丽宏. 六盘山南侧华北落叶松人工林蒸腾对土壤水分和潜在蒸散的响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(10): 3376-3384.