东北三江平原覆盖作物种植效果

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202210.011

应用生态学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (10): 2736-2742.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202210.011

东北三江平原覆盖作物种植效果

蔡丽君¹, 张敬涛^1*, 盖志佳¹, 刘婧琦¹, 郭震华², 赵桂范¹, 孟庆英¹

¹黑龙江省农业科学院佳木斯分院/三江平原主要作物育种栽培重点实验室, 黑龙江佳木斯 154007;
²黑龙江省农业科学院水稻研究所, 黑龙江佳木斯 154026

收稿日期:2021-12-15 修回日期:2022-07-25 出版日期:2022-10-15 发布日期:2023-04-15
通讯作者: * E-mail: zhangjt2008@163.com
作者简介:蔡丽君, 女, 1988年生, 硕士研究生。主要从事作物高产栽培和保护性耕作技术研究。E-mail: cai_lijun@yeah.net
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目(2020YFD1000903-04)

The planting effect of cover crop in Sanjiang Plain, Northeast China

CAI Li-jun¹, ZHANG Jing-tao^1*, GAI Zhi-jia¹, LIU Jing-qi¹, GUO Zhen-hua², ZHAO Gui-fan¹, MENG Qing-ying¹

¹Jiamusi Branch, Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Sanjiang Plain Key Laboratory of Main Crops Breeding and Cultivation, Jiamusi 154007, Heilongjiang, China;
²Rice Research Institute, Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jiamusi 154026, Heilongjiang, China

Received:2021-12-15 Revised:2022-07-25 Online:2022-10-15 Published:2023-04-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以土壤紧实度、冬前生物量、根系性状、植株氮累积量等为指标对供试12种覆盖作物(豆科:紫花苜蓿、光叶苕子、毛叶苕子、红三叶、白三叶、箭筈豌豆;非豆科:苏丹草、青萝卜、Nitro radish、甘蓝型油菜、羽衣甘蓝、菊苣)在东北三江平原地区的种植效果及应用潜力进行综合评价。结果表明: 12种覆盖作物在试验播期均能正常生长,不同覆盖作物与对照相比均有利于降低土壤紧实度,其中青萝卜、Nitro radish和苏丹草土壤紧实度下降最显著,分别较对照下降了47.1%、43.4%和33.4%;覆盖作物群体冬前鲜生物量为3.38～13.98 kg·m^-2,干生物量为0.78～2.43 kg·m^-2,非豆科覆盖作物的生物量显著高于豆科覆盖作物;覆盖作物的群体根系体积以萝卜、油菜、菊苣较大,尤其Nitro radish的根体积高达4018.5 cm³·m^-2,苏丹草的根系横向延展范围最宽;豆科覆盖作物的灰分含量显著低于非豆科覆盖作物,能提供更多易分解的有机物质;覆盖作物总氮积累量为18.72～53.09 g·m^-2,其中,羽衣甘蓝和菊苣的氮积累量最高,且生物量相对较大,有利于氮的积累和固定。在三江平原地区根据主栽作物的类型与冠层结构,选择豆科的三叶草、苕子、紫花苜蓿和非豆科的萝卜、羽衣甘蓝、苏丹草作为覆盖作物进行行间或行内混播的种植方式,可以在调控土壤结构的同时促进养分循环,有利于三江平原黑土地力的提升。

关键词: 三江平原, 覆盖作物, 土壤紧实度, 生物量, 根系性状, 氮累积量

Abstract: The planting effect and the planting potential of 12 cover crops (Leguminous: alfalfa, smooth vetch, hairy vetch, red clover, white clover, common vetch; non-leguminous: sudangrass, green radish, Nitro radish, rape, kale, endive) in the Sanjiang Plain of Northeast China were comprehensively evaluated by soil penetration resistance, pre-winter biomass, root characteristics, and plant nitrogen accumulation. The results showed that all the 12 cover crops grew normally during the experimental sowing period. Compared with the control, all the cover crops successfully reduced soil compactness. The planting of green radish, nitro radish, and sudangrass decreased soil penetration resistance by 47.1%, 43.4% and 33.4%, respectively. The pre-winter total fresh biomass of cover crop populations was between 3.38 and 13.98 kg·m^-2, and the total dry matter mass was between 0.78 and 2.43 kg·m^-2. The biomass of non-leguminous cover crops was significantly higher than that of the leguminous cover crops. The group roots of radish, rape and endive had large volumes. In particular, the nitro radish roots had a vo-lume of 4018.5 cm³·m^-2, and the root system of sudangrass extended over the widest horizontal range. The ash content of leguminous cover crops was significantly lower than that of non-leguminous species, which could provide more organic matter with high decomposability. The total nitrogen accumulation of cover crops varied from 18.72 to 53.09 g·m^-2. Kale and endive accumulated the highest amount of nitrogen and large biomass, which could facilitate nitrogen fixation and accumulation. According to the type of main crops in Sanjiang Plain and canopy structure, planting leguminous (clover, vetch, and alfalfa) and non-leguminous (radish, kale and sudangrass) cover crops to plant inter-row or in a line mixed cropping pattern could regulate soil structure and promote nutrient cycing, with positive effects on the fertility of black soil in the Sanjiang Plain.

Key words: Sanjiang Plain, cover crop, soil penetration resistance, biomass, root trait, nitrogen accumulation

蔡丽君, 张敬涛, 盖志佳, 刘婧琦, 郭震华, 赵桂范, 孟庆英. 东北三江平原覆盖作物种植效果[J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(10): 2736-2742.

CAI Li-jun, ZHANG Jing-tao, GAI Zhi-jia, LIU Jing-qi, GUO Zhen-hua, ZHAO Gui-fan, MENG Qing-ying. The planting effect of cover crop in Sanjiang Plain, Northeast China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2022, 33(10): 2736-2742.

参考文献

[1] Bugg RL. Cover crop and control of arthropod pests of agriculture// Hargroveed WL, ed. Cover Crop for Clean Water. Ankeny, IA, USA: Soil and Water Conservation Society, 1991: 157-163
[2] Wawan, Dini IR, Hapsoh. The effect of legume cover crop Mucuna bracteata on soil physical properties, runoff and erosion in three slopes of immature oil palm plantation. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2019, 250: 012021
[3] Kaye J, Finney D, White C, et al. Managing nitrogen through cover crop species selection in the U.S. mid-Atlantic. PLoS One, 2019, 14: e0215448
[4] Christina M, Negrier A, Marnotte P, et al. A trait-based analysis to assess the ability of cover crop to control weeds in a tropical island. European Journal of Agronomy, 2021, 128: 126316
[5] Mortensen ES, Notaris CD, Peixoto L, et al. Short-term cover crop carbon inputs to soil as affected by long-term cropping system management and soil fertility. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2021, 311: 107339
[6] Boselli R, Fiorini A, Santelli S, et al. Cover crop du-ring transition to no-till maintain yield and enhance soil fertility in intensive agro-ecosystems. Field Crops Research, 2020, 255: 107871
[7] 王明亮, 刘惠芬, 王丽丽, 等. 不同覆盖作物模式对茶园土壤微生物群落功能多样性的影响. 农业资源与环境学报, 2020, 37(3): 332-339
[8] 蹇述莲, 李书鑫, 刘胜群, 等. 覆盖作物及其作用的研究进展. 作物学报, 2022, 48(1): 1-14
[9] Werle R, Burr C, Blanco-Canqui H. Cereal rye cover crop suppresses winter annual weeds. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 2018, 98: 498-500
[10] 严磊, 张中彬, 丁英志, 等. 覆盖作物根系对砂姜黑土压实的响应. 土壤学报, 2021, 58(1): 140-150
[11] 唐海明, 程凯凯, 肖小平, 等. 不同冬季覆盖作物对双季稻田土壤有机碳的影响. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(2): 465-473
[12] 韩上, 耿明建, 宋莉, 等. 三峡库区橘园不同豆科绿肥的生长及养分积累比较. 华中农业大学学报, 2014, 33(1): 62-66
[13] 曹锐. 覆盖作物栽培对土壤质量的影响. 水土保持应用技术, 2019(3): 10-12
[14] 王晶晶, 李娜, 张身嗣. 覆盖作物白三叶对蓝莓园杂草的生物防除效果. 北方园艺, 2017(3): 138-140
[15] 赵秋, 高贤彪, 宁晓光, 等. 华北地区几种冬闲覆盖作物碳氮蓄积及其对土壤理化性质的影响. 生态环境学报, 2011, 20(4): 750-753
[16] 韩晓增, 邹文秀, 严君, 等. 农田生态学和长期试验示范引领黑土地保护和农业可持续发展. 中国科学院院刊, 2019, 34(3): 362-370
[17] 鲍士旦. 土壤农业化学分析. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1999
[18] 陈学文, 张晓平, 梁爱珍, 等. 耕作方式对黑土硬度和容重的影响. 应用生态学报, 2012, 23(2): 439-444
[19] Alcantara C, Sanchez S, Pujadas A, et al. Brassica species as winter cover crop in sustainable agricultural systems in southern Spain. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 2009, 33: 619-635
[20] Ishaq M, Ibrahim M, Hassan A, et al. Subsoil compaction effects on crops in Punjab, Pakistan: II. Root growth and nutrient uptake of wheat and sorghum. Soil and Tillage Research, 2001, 60: 153-161
[21] 昭日格图, 张玉旭. 蓖麻栽培地不同覆盖作物和耕作方式对土壤物理性质的影响. 江苏农业科学, 2017, 45(21): 82-85
[22] Williams SM, Weil RR. Cover crop root channels may alleviate soil compaction effects on soybean crop. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2004, 68: 1403-1409
[23] Nouri A, Lee J, Yoder DC, et al. Management duration controls the synergistic effect of tillage, cover crop, and nitrogen rate on cotton yield and yield stability. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2020, 301: 107007
[24] 谭英爱, 赵秋, 田秀平, 等. 冬绿肥覆盖翻压对土壤碳、氮含量的影响. 河南农业科学, 2020, 49(5): 81-87
[25] Yang XM, Drury CF, Reynolds WD, et al. Legume co-ver crop provide nitrogen to corn during a three-year transition to organic cropping. Agronomy Journal, 2019, 111: 3253-3264
[26] Thilakarathna MS, Serran S, Lauzon J, et al. Management of manure nitrogen using cover crop. Agronomy Journal, 2015, 107: 1595-1607
[27] Gieske MF, Ackroyd VJ, Baas DG, et al. Brassica co-ver crop effects on nitrogen availability and oat and corn yield. Agronomy Journal, 2016, 108: 151-161
[28] 熊静, 王改兰, 曹卫东, 等. 华北二月兰-春玉米轮作体系中土壤硝态氮的时空变化特征. 应用生态学报, 2014, 25(2): 467-473
[29] Finney DM, Murrell EG, White CM, et al. Ecosystem services and disservices are bundled in simple and diverse cover cropping systems. Agricultural and Environmental Letters, 2017, 2: 1-5

东北三江平原覆盖作物种植效果

The planting effect of cover crop in Sanjiang Plain, Northeast China

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	苑淑媛, 张鹏, 沈海龙. 天然更新红松苗针叶光合和解剖特性对不同郁闭环境的响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2314-2320.
[2]	赵月琴, 马秀静, 赵琬婧, 张治军, 孙晓新. 三江平原垦殖湿地恢复对温室气体排放的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(8): 2142-2152.
[3]	代泽成, 刘月秀, 党宁, 王志瑞, 蔡江平, 张玉革, 宋永波, 李慧, 姜勇. 长期氮水添加对温带草原土壤化学性质和微生物学特性的短期遗留效应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(7): 1834-1844.
[4]	巴晓博, 隋鑫, 刘鸣达, 解宏图, 梁超, 鲍雪莲. 东北黑土区覆盖作物-玉米间作保护性耕作的生态系统服务价值 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(7): 1883-1891.
[5]	吕晶花, 赵旭燕, 陆梅, 李聪, 杨志东, 刘攀, 陈志明, 冯峻. 氮沉降下纳帕海草甸植被与土壤变化对微生物生物量碳氮的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(6): 1525-1532.
[6]	吕付泽, 杨雅丽, 鲍雪莲, 张常仁, 郑甜甜, 何红波, 张旭东, 解宏图. 免耕不同秸秆覆盖量对黑土微生物群落及其残留物的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(4): 903-912.
[7]	豆梦珂, 张伟东, 杨庆朋, 陈龙池, 刘晔嘉, 胡亚林. 杉木种植和磷添加对土壤微生物生物量及胞外酶活性的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(3): 631-638.
[8]	高羽, 谢龙飞, 郝元朔, 董利虎. 考虑随机效应的长白落叶松立木生物量模型构建及精度分析 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(2): 333-341.
[9]	李文慧, 林妍敏, 南雄雄, 王芳, 朱丽珍. 果树-覆盖作物可持续种植体系土壤碳氮固存及其影响因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(2): 471-480.
[10]	叶俊龙, 郭梁, 赵璐峰, 唐建军, 胡亮亮, 陈欣. 农业生态系统植物功能性状研究进展 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(11): 3144-3156.
[11]	于鑫磊, 苑俊风, 刘冬伟, 陈金辉, 闫巧玲. 野外土壤增温对胡桃楸幼苗生长和生理特性的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(1): 11-17.
[12]	肖向前, 张海阔, 冯娅斯, 王吉鹏, 梁辰飞, 陈有超, 朱高荻, 蔡延江. 植物残体对青藏高原高寒草甸土壤、微生物和胞外酶C∶N∶P化学计量特征的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(1): 58-66.
[13]	邓亚琴, 徐智, 张勇, 王宇蕴. 土壤微生物生物量氮对不同腐熟度有机肥的响应及对土壤矿质氮的调控作用 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(1): 137-144.
[14]	马靖然, 王亚楠, 常璐, 邓娇娇, 周旺明, 于大炮, 王庆伟. 冠层光谱组成对红松和蒙古栎幼苗生长和光合荧光特性的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(9): 2314-2320.
[15]	谢龙飞, 李凤日, 董利虎. 基于贝叶斯似乎不相关回归方法的天然蒙古栎生物量模型构建 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1937-1947.