不同轮作茬口土壤细菌群落及后茬小麦产量

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202211.013

应用生态学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (11): 2954-2962.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202211.013

不同轮作茬口土壤细菌群落及后茬小麦产量

靳海洋¹, 岳俊芹¹, 闫雅倩², 张德奇¹, 杨程¹, 李向东^1*, 邵运辉¹, 方保停¹

¹河南省农业科学院小麦研究所/农业农村部中原地区作物栽培科学观测实验站/河南省小麦产量-品质协同提升工程研究中心, 郑州 450002;
²河南农业大学农学院/省部共建小麦玉米作物学国家重点实验室, 郑州 450002

收稿日期:2022-01-06 修回日期:2022-08-30 出版日期:2022-11-15 发布日期:2023-05-15
通讯作者: *E-mail: hnlxd@126.com
作者简介:靳海洋, 男, 1991年生, 博士。主要从事作物栽培耕作与土壤生态功能研究。E-mail: jinhaiyang321@163.com
基金资助:
中原科技创新领军人才计划项目(224200510028)、中原青年博士后创新人才计划项目(ZYYCYU202012184)、国家重点研发计划项目(SQ2020YFF0426480)和河南省农业科学院科技创新团队项目(2022TD09)

Soil bacterial communities of different crop rotations and yield of succeeding wheat.

JIN Hai-yang¹, YUE Jun-qin¹, YAN Ya-qian², ZHANG De-qi¹, YANG Cheng¹, LI Xiang-dong^1*, SHAO Yun-hui¹, FANG Bao-ting¹

¹Wheat Research Institute, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Scientific Observing and Experimental Station of Crop Cultivation in Central Plain, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Henan Province Engineering Research Center of Wheat Yield-Quality Simultaneous Improvement, Zhengzhou 450002, China;
²College of Agronomy, Henan Agricultural University/Co-construction State Key Laboratory of Wheat and Maize Crop Science, Zhengzhou 450002, China

Received:2022-01-06 Revised:2022-08-30 Online:2022-11-15 Published:2023-05-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 评估不同轮作模式的生态可持续性和作物生产力,可为调整优化种植结构提供理论依据。设置7个不同轮作作物和周期茬口处理,采用实时荧光定量PCR技术测定不同轮作茬口的土壤细菌群落丰度,采用16S rRNA基因扩增子高通量测序技术分析土壤细菌群落多样性与物种组成,并测定土壤速效养分状况和后茬小麦产量。结果表明: 与夏玉米茬口相比,不同轮作周期夏花生或夏大豆茬口处理降低了土壤有机碳、无机氮和速效钾含量,显著增加了土壤有效磷含量。不同轮作周期夏花生或夏大豆茬口处理的土壤细菌16S rRNA基因拷贝数显著降低,而群落丰富度和多样性有所增加。不同轮作作物显著改变了土壤细菌群落结构和物种组成。与夏玉米茬口相比,不同轮作周期夏大豆茬口显著增加了后茬冬小麦籽粒千粒重和产量。综上,不同轮作周期夏花生或夏大豆茬口有利于增加土壤有效磷含量和细菌群落多样性,显著改变土壤细菌群落结构,其中,夏大豆茬口对后茬冬小麦产量形成具有积极作用。

关键词: 轮作, 土壤, 速效养分, 细菌群落, 产量

Abstract: Evaluating ecological sustainability and crop productivity of different crop rotation patterns could provide theoretical support for adjusting and optimizing crop planting structure. We set seven treatments with different rotation crops and periods. We used real-time quantitative PCR to determine the abundance of soil bacterial community and 16S rRNA gene amplicon high-throughput sequencing technology to analyze diversity and taxa composition of soil bacterial community. Both soil available nutrients and succeeding wheat yield were measured. The results showed that, compared with the rotation with summer maize, the rotations with summer peanut or soybean in diffe-rent periods reduced soil organic carbon, mineral nitrogen, and available potassium, but significantly increased soil available phosphorus. The 16S rRNA gene copy numbers of soil bacteria in the treatments of rotations with summer peanut or soybean in different periods were significantly decreased, while community richness and diversity were increased. Different rotation crops significantly changed the structure and taxonomic composition of soil bacterial community. Compared with the rotation with summer maize, the rotations with summer soybean in different periods significantly increased the 1000-grain weight and grain yield of succeeding winter wheat. In conclusion, rotations with summer peanut or soybean in different periods could increase soil available phosphorus content and bacterial diversity, and significantly change soil bacterial community structure. In particular, rotation with summer soybean performed best in promoting yield formation of succeeding winter wheat.

Key words: crop rotation, soil, available nutrient, bacterial community, yield

靳海洋, 岳俊芹, 闫雅倩, 张德奇, 杨程, 李向东, 邵运辉, 方保停. 不同轮作茬口土壤细菌群落及后茬小麦产量[J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(11): 2954-2962.

JIN Hai-yang, YUE Jun-qin, YAN Ya-qian, ZHANG De-qi, YANG Cheng, LI Xiang-dong, SHAO Yun-hui, FANG Bao-ting. Soil bacterial communities of different crop rotations and yield of succeeding wheat.[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2022, 33(11): 2954-2962.

参考文献

[1] 赵斌, 李宗新, 李勇, 等. 冬小麦-夏玉米周年光温资源高效利用. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(19): 3893-3899
[2] 周宝元, 马玮, 孙雪芳, 等. 冬小麦-夏玉米高产模式周年气候资源分配与利用特征研究. 作物学报, 2019, 45(4): 589-600
[3] Gaudin ACM, Janovicek K, Deen B, et al. Wheat improves nitrogen use efficiency of maize and soybean-based cropping systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2015, 210: 1-10
[4] Tiemann LK, Grandy AS, Atkinson EE, et al. Crop rotational diversity enhances belowground communities and functions in an agroecosystem. Ecology Letters, 2015, 18: 761-771
[5] McDaniel MD, Grandy AS, Tiemann LK, et al. Crop rotation complexity regulates the decomposition of high and low quality residues. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2014, 78: 243-254
[6] Feng H, Abagandura GO, Senturklu S, et al. Soil qua-lity indicators as influenced by 5-year diversified and monoculture cropping systems. Journal of Agricultural Science, 2020, 158: 594-605
[7] McDaniel MD, Tiemann LK, Grandy AS. Does agricultural crop diversity enhance soil microbial biomass and organic matter dynamics? A meta-analysis. Ecological Applications, 2014, 24: 560-570
[8] Fu X, Wang J, Sainju UM, et al. Soil carbon fractions in response to long-term crop rotations in the Loess Pla-teau of China. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2017, 81: 503-513
[9] Venter ZS, Jacobs K, Hawkins HJ. The impact of crop rotation on soil microbial diversity: A meta-analysis. Pedobiologia, 2016, 59: 215-223
[10] Taveira CJ, Farrell RE, Wagner-Riddle C, et al. Tra-cing crop residue N into subsequent crops: Insight from long-term crop rotations that vary in diversity. Field Crops Research, 2020, 255: 107904
[11] 姜雨林, 陈中督, 遆晋松, 等. 华北平原不同轮作模式固碳减排模拟研究. 中国农业大学学报, 2018, 23(1): 19-26
[12] Kumar TK, Rana DS, Nain L. Legume residue and N management for improving productivity and N economy and soil fertility in wheat (Triticum aestivum)-based cropping systems. National Academy Science Letters, 2019, 42: 297-307
[13] Meyer-Aurich A, Weersink A, Janovicek K, et al. Cost efficient rotation and tillage options to sequester carbon and mitigate GHG emissions from agriculture in Eastern Canada. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2006, 117: 119-127
[14] Wang XQ, Yang YD, Pei K, et al. Nitrogen rhizodeposition by legumes and its fate in agroecosystems: A field study and literature review. Land Degradation and Deve-lopment, 2021, 32: 410-419
[15] Ncube B, Twomlow SJ, van Wijk MT, et al. Productivity and residual benefits of grain legumes to sorghum under semi-arid conditions in southwestern Zimbabwe. Plant and Soil, 2007, 299: 1-15
[16] Liu H, Pan FJ, Han XZ, et al. A comprehensive analysis of the response of the fungal community structure to long-term continuous cropping in three typical upland crops. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2020, 19: 866-880
[17] Grover KK, Karsten HD, Roth GW. Corn grain yields and yield stability in four long-term cropping systems. Agronomy Journal, 2009, 101: 940-946
[18] Chimonyo VGP, Snapp SS, Chikowo R. Grain legumes increase yield stability in maize based cropping systems. Crop Science, 2019, 59: 1222-1235
[19] Zhou XG, Wang ZL, Jia HT, et al. Continuously monocropped jerusalem artichoke changed soil bacterial community composition and ammonia-oxidizing and denitrifying bacteria abundances. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2018, 9: 705
[20] Song HJ, Peng L, Li ZY, et al. Metal distribution and biological diversity of crusts in paddy fields polluted with different levels of cadmium. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2019, 184: 109620
[21] 鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000
[22] Magoc T, Salzberg SL. FLASH: Fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics, 2011, 27: 2957-2963
[23] Chen SF, Zhou YQ, Chen YR, et al. fastp: An ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics, 2018, 34: 884-890
[24] Edgar RC. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics, 2010, 26: 2460-2461
[25] Wang Q, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM, et al. Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2007, 73: 5261-5267
[26] Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: Improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Research, 2013, 41: D590-D596
[27] Schloss PD. Reintroducing mothur: 10 years later. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2020, 86: e02343-19
[28] Krzywinski M, Schein J, Birol I, et al. Circos: An information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Research, 2009, 19: 1639-1645
[29] Segata N, Izard J, Waldron L, et al. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biology, 2011, 12: R60
[30] Kou TJ, Zhu P, Huang S, et al. Effects of long-term cropping regimes on soil carbon sequestration and aggregate composition in rainfed farmland of Northeast China. Soil and Tillage Research, 2012, 118: 132-138
[31] Cui JW, Song DL, Dai XL, et al. Effects of long-term cropping regimes on SOC stability, soil microbial community and enzyme activities in the Mollisol region of Northeast China. Applied Soil Ecology, 2021, 164: 103941
[32] Bender SF, Wagg C, van der Heijden MGA. An underground revolution: Biodiversity and soil ecological engineering for agricultural sustainability. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 2016, 31: 440-452
[33] Xuan DT, Guong VT, Rosling A, et al. Different crop rotation systems as drivers of change in soil bacterial community structure and yield of rice, Oryza sativa. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2012, 48: 217-225
[34] Linton NF, Machado PVF, Deen B, et al. Long-term diverse rotation alters nitrogen cycling bacterial groups and nitrous oxide emissions after nitrogen fertilization. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2020, 149: 107917
[35] Wang WH, Luo X, Ye XF, et al. Predatory Myxococcales are widely distributed in and closely correlated with the bacterial community structure of agricultural land. Applied Soil Ecology, 2020, 146: 103365
[36] Zhao J, Yang YD, Zhang K, et al. Does crop rotation yield more in China? A meta-analysis. Field Crops Research, 2020, 245: 107659
[37] Andrade JF, Poggio SL, Ermácora M, et al. Land use intensification in the Rolling Pampa, Argentina: Diversifying crop sequences to increase yields and resource use. European Journal of Agronomy, 2017, 82: 1-10
[38] Agomoh IV, Drury CF, Phillips LA, et al. Increasing crop diversity in wheat rotations increases yields but decreases soil health. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2020, 84: 170-181
[39] Osterholz WR, Liebman M, Castellano MJ. Can soil nitrogen dynamics explain the yield benefit of crop diversification? Field Crops Research, 2018, 219: 33-42

不同轮作茬口土壤细菌群落及后茬小麦产量

Soil bacterial communities of different crop rotations and yield of succeeding wheat.

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王婷, 牟长城, 孙梓淇, 李美霖, 王文婧, 许文, 赵海明. 长白山园池沼泽湿地碳源/汇沿湖岸至高地环境梯度变化 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2363-2373.
[2]	许雄钞, 张前前, 滕秋梅, 赵明水, 李永春. 毛竹和次生阔叶林优势树种根际效应对土壤有机碳矿化的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2374-2382.
[3]	张雯怡, 姜振辉, 潘丽霞, 周家树, 刘娟, 蔡延江, 李永夫. 玉米秸秆及其生物质炭输入对毛竹林土壤有机碳化学组分与碳降解功能基因的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2383-2390.
[4]	李长青, 纪萌, 马萌萌, 王硕, 刘欢, 孙志梅. 天然增效剂与化学抑制剂复配对小麦/玉米轮作体系产量、氮素利用及氮平衡的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2391-2397.
[5]	赵燕翘, 连煜超, 许文文, 韩高玲, 赵洋. 土壤基质中细物质含量对人工蓝藻结皮形成的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2398-2404.
[6]	郭丽娜, 卢霖, 董学瑞, 张凤路, 闫鹏, 董志强. 赤霉素、激动素和吲哚丁酸合剂对滨海盐碱区粒用高粱耐盐性和产量的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2405-2412.
[7]	杨振康, 杨婉蓉, 刘志娟, 高伟达, 任图生, 沈彦俊, 杨晓光. 气候变化对东北三省土壤风蚀的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2429-2435.
[8]	吴绍雄, 张勇勇, 赵文智, 康文蓉, 田子晗. 基于COSMIC模型的宇宙射线中子反演荒漠-绿洲区土壤水分 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2445-2452.
[9]	孔东彦, 杨灵芳, 刁静文, 郭鹏. 不同生境下氮沉降对土壤N₂O通量影响的整合分析 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(8): 2171-2177.
[10]	冷鹏, 王建青, 谭云燕, 邵亚军, 王丽燕, 施秀珍, 张国友. 大气CO₂和O₃浓度升高对水稻根际土壤胞外酶活性的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(8): 2185-2193.
[11]	代泽成, 刘月秀, 党宁, 王志瑞, 蔡江平, 张玉革, 宋永波, 李慧, 姜勇. 长期氮水添加对温带草原土壤化学性质和微生物学特性的短期遗留效应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(7): 1834-1844.
[12]	薛志婧, 屈婷婷, 刘春晖, 刘小槺, 王蕊, 王宁, 周正朝, 董治宝. 培养条件下枯落物分解过程中微生物残体对土壤有机碳形成的贡献 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(7): 1845-1852.
[13]	隋鹏祥, 罗洋, 郑洪兵, 李瑞平, 王浩, 袁野, 郑金玉, 刘武仁. 长期耕作对农田黑土团聚体和有机碳稳定性的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(7): 1853-1861.
[14]	杨浩, 王文龙, 娄义宝, 冯兰茜, 朱亚男. 黄土塬沟壑区典型植被沟头土壤渗透性和抗剪强度特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(7): 1862-1870.
[15]	朱振闯, 孙仕军, 朱淼淼, 李咚祎, 王哲, 谌入瑄, 陈伟. 地下水埋深对东北平原地下水补给及大豆生长动态的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(7): 1871-1882.