水利工程对河流生态系统服务功能的影响评价方法初探

应用生态学报 ›› 2003, Vol. ›› Issue (5): 803-807.

水利工程对河流生态系统服务功能的影响评价方法初探

鲁春霞, 谢高地, 成升魁, 于贵瑞

中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, 北京 100101

收稿日期:2002-09-14 修回日期:2002-12-13
通讯作者: 鲁春霞,女,1965生,博士,副研究员.主要从事环境影响评价、生态环境与资源安全等研究,发表论文10余篇.E-mail:lucx@igsnrr.ac.cn.
基金资助:
中国科学院“百人计划”生态系统管理的基础生态学过程研究和中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所知识创新工程资助项目(CX10G-G01-01)

Approaches to evaluate the effects of hydraulic engineering on river ecosystem services

LU Chunxia, XIE Gaodi, CHENG Shengkui, YU Guirui

Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China

Received:2002-09-14 Revised:2002-12-13

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 通过分析水利工程对河流生态系统服务功能的影响,建立了评价指标体系和定量化的评价方法.评价指标体系包括建立评价指标的原则、对河流生态系统服务功能的分类和指标确定等.本文将河流生态系统的服务功能分为四类即供水及与供水量相关的航运和水电功能、生态支持功能、调节控制功能和文化美学功能.依据不同的功能类型,应用以前的研究成果,针对水利工程产生的生态效应如生物多样性的变化和河流净化功能的变化,确定了不同的测度指标,并建立了相应的数量化评价方法,主要包括指数法和BODDO模型方法,这些方法将有助于对水利工程的生态环境效应进行深入的分析与评价.

关键词: 水利工程影响, 河流生态系统, 服务功能, 评价方法

Abstract: To evaluate the effects of hydraulic engineering on river ecosystem services,a set of indictor system and quantitative methods, which included the appraisal principles, classification of river services and indictor selection were established.The river ecosystem services could be classified into four types:water supply and related services (e.g.,transportation and hydroelectric generation),ecological supporting functions, regulation and control, and aesthetic and cultural services. Based on relative studies, the quantitative approaches were established to measure the indices reflecting the ecological effects of hydraulic engineering involving the change of biodiversity and purification services. The methods mainly contained exponent methods and BOD DOmodel. These approaches will be helpful for further analysis and assessment on the effects of hydraulic engineering impact on river ecosystem services.

Key words: Hydraulic engineering, River ecosystem, Ecosystem services, Assessment approaches

中图分类号:

G304

鲁春霞, 谢高地, 成升魁, 于贵瑞. 水利工程对河流生态系统服务功能的影响评价方法初探[J]. 应用生态学报, 2003, (5): 803-807.

LU Chunxia, XIE Gaodi, CHENG Shengkui, YU Guirui . Approaches to evaluate the effects of hydraulic engineering on river ecosystem services[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2003, (5): 803-807.

参考文献

[1] Bishop R,Boyle K,Welsh M,et al.1987. Glen Canyon Dam releases and downstream recreation: an analysis of user preferences and economic values.Madison, Wisconsin:Heberlein-Baumgartener Research Services.188pp.
[2] Brown TC, Taylor JG,Shelby B.1992. Assessing the direct effects of streamflow on recreation:a literature review.Water Resour Bull,27(6):979～989
[3] Brown TC, Daniel TC.1991. Landscape aesthetics of riparian environments: relationship of flow quality to scienic quality along a wild and scenic river.Water Resour Res,27(4): 1787～1796
[4] Carson RT, Mitchell RC. 1993. The value of clean water: the public's willingness to pay for boatable, fishable, and swimmable quality water.Water Resour Res,29(7):2445～2454
[5] Cordell HK & Bergstron JC.1993. Comparison of recreation use values among alternative reservoir water level management scenarios.Water Resour Res,29(2): 247～258
[6] Daubert J & Young R.1981. Recreational demands for maintaining instream flows: a contingent valuation approach.Amer J Agric Econ,63(4):666～675
[7] Duffield JW, Neher CJ,Brown TC.1992. Recreation benefits of instream flow: application to Montana's Big Hole and Bitterroot Rivers.Water Resour Res,28 (9): 2169～2181
[8] Fu G-W(付国伟), Cheng S-T(程声通).1985.Systematic Planning of Aquatic Pollution Control. Beijing: Qinghua University Press. 118～125(in Chinese)
[9] Gao R-S (高荣松). 1988. Principle and Approaches of Environmental Effect Assessment.Chengdu: Sichuan Science and Techology Press.475(in Chinese)
[10] Jon N.1999. Linking nature's services to ecosystems: some general ecological concepts.Ecol Econ,29(3):183～202
[11] Kulshreshtha SN, Gillies JA.1993. Economic evaluation of aesthetic amenities: a case study of river view.Water Resour Bull,29(2): 257～266
[12] Loomis J,Kent P, Strange L,et al.2000. Measuring the total economic value of restoring ecosystem services in an impaired river basin: results from a contingent valuation survey.Ecol Econ,33(1): 103～117
[13] Lu C-X(鲁春霞), Xie G-D(谢高地), Cheng S-K(成升魁).2001. Progress of study on economic valuation of river ecosystem services in recreation.Resour Sci(资源科学),23(5):77～81 (in Chinese)
[14] Moore SD, Wilkosz ME,Brickler SK. 1990. The recreational impact of reducing the laughing water of Aravaipa Creek, Arizona.Rivers,1(1): 43～50
[15] Munasinghe M.1994. Economic and policy issues in natural habitats and protected areas.In:Munasinghe M and McNeely J eds. Protected Area Economic and Policy-Linking Conservation and Sustainable Development. World Bank / IUCN. 15～49
[16] Postel S, Carpenter S. 1997. Ecosystem services of freshwater. In: Daily DC ed.Nature's Service: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems.Washington:Island Press.195～214
[17] Romme WH.1982. Fire and landscape diversity in subalpine forests of Yellowstone National Park.Ecol Monog,52:199～221
[18] Ward FA, Roach BA,Henderson JE.1996. The economic value of water in recreation: evidences from the California drought.Water Resour Res,32(4): 1075～1081
[19] Wilson MA, Carpenter SR.1999. Economic valuation of freshwater ecosystem services in the United States: 1971～1997.Ecol Appl,9(3): 772～783
[20] Xi J-Z(席家治).1996.Water Resource of Yellow River. Zhengzhou: Yellow River Water Conservancy Press.81～97(in Chinese)