欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

应用生态学报

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

石灰岩退化生态系统不同恢复阶段土壤酶活性研究

何跃军1,2 钟章成1 刘济明2 刘锦春1 金静1 李青雨1   

  1. 1西南师范大学生命科学学院,三峡库区生态环境教育部重点实验室,重庆400715;2贵州大学林学院,贵阳 550025
  • 收稿日期:2004-08-16 修回日期:2004-11-19 出版日期:2005-06-18

Soil enzyme activities of limestone degraded ecosystem at its different restoration phases

HE Yuejun1,2,ZHONG Zhangcheng1,LIU Jiming2,LIU Jinchun1,JIN Jing1, LI Qingyu1   

  1. 1Key Laboratory of EcoEnvironments in Three Gorges Reservoir Region of Education Ministry,College of Life Science,Southwest China Normal University, Chongqing 400715,China;2College of Forestry,Guizhou University,Guiyang 550025,China

  • Received:2004-08-16 Revised:2004-11-19 Online:2005-06-18

摘要: 研究了石灰岩退化生态系统不同恢复阶段的土壤酶活性.结果表明,石灰岩退化生态系统土壤酶活性在土壤剖面上无明显的递减规律;随着演替进展,土壤酶活性增强,土壤酶活性随植被特征、土壤类型以及酶本身的性质不同而表现各异.整体上石灰岩各阶段土壤酶活性:灌木林>柏木乔林>草本,同一植被类型下石灰岩柏木林>紫色砂岩柏木林.石灰岩退化生态系统土壤酶活之间以及酶活与pH值之间无显著相关性,而含水率和土壤全氮则与土壤酶活性呈显著或极显著相关,说明水分以及养分是石灰岩地区生态恢复的关键性因子.不同类型的土壤酶在同一植被-土壤系统中酶活性表现不一,同一种酶在同一土壤类型而不同的生态恢复阶段酶活性表现不一,同一植被类型下的不同土壤类型中酶活性也有分异.

关键词: 生态足迹, 生态承载力, 多样性, 发展能力, 可持续发展

Abstract: The study showed that there was no distinct descending of enzyme activities along the soil profile of limestone degraded ecosystem,which were enhanced with progressive succession,and varied with vegetation characteristics,soil types,and soil enzyme properties.On the whole,soil enzyme activities enhanced in order of herb < Cupressuss funebris high forest<shrubbery,and under the same vegetation,limestone Cupressuss funebris high forest had higher soil enzyme activities than purple psammophytia.There was no significant correlation between soil enzyme activities and soil pH,while significant correlation was found between soil moisture content,soil total nitrogen content and soil enzyme activities,indicating that soil water and nutrient contents were the key factors of ecological restoration in this region.Different soil enzymes in the same vegetation-soil system as well as the same enzyme in the same soil type but at different restoration phases had different activities,so did for the same type vegetation but different soil type.

Key words: Ecological footprint, Ecological carrying capacity, Diversity, Development capacity, Sustainable development