欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

应用生态学报 ›› 2011, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (10): 2653-2661.

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

含度量误差的黑龙江省主要树种生物量相容性模型

董利虎,李凤日**,贾炜玮,刘福香,王鹤智   

  1. 东北林业大学林学院, 哈尔滨 150040
  • 出版日期:2011-10-18 发布日期:2011-10-18

Compatible biomass models for main tree species with measurement error in Heilongjiang Province of Northeast China.

DONG Li-hu, LI Feng-ri, JIA Wei-wei, LIU Fu-xiang, WANG He-zhi   

  1. School of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China
  • Online:2011-10-18 Published:2011-10-18

摘要: 基于516株样木的生物量数据,采用非线性度量误差模型理论和方法,构建了黑龙江省15个主要树种(组)总生物量与地上、地下、树干、树冠、树枝、树叶6个分项生物量以及分项生物量间的相容性生物量模型,分别选出各树种总生物量和各分项生物量的最优模型,采用比值函数分级联合控制方程组构建了以总生物量为基础的相容性模型,并采用对数变换对总生物量模型消除异方差,采用加权回归对各分项生物量模型消除异方差.结果表明:本文所建的15个树种(组)相容性生物量模型中,总生物量的预估精度最高,达到90%以上;其次是地上部分生物量和树干生物量,预估精度在87.5%以上;地下部分、树冠、树枝和树叶生物量的预估精度相对较低,但绝大多数树种(组)的预估精度在80%以上;所有树种(组)总生物量、地上部分生物量、树干生物量模型的模拟效率(EF)值达0.9以上,绝大多数树种(组)的地下部分、树冠、树枝、树叶生物量模型的EF值在0.8以上.

Abstract: Based on the biomass data of 516 sampling trees, and by using non-linear error-in-variable modeling approach, the compatible models for the total biomass and the biomass of six components including aboveground part, underground part, stem, crown, branch, and foliage of 15 major tree species (or groups) in Heilongjiang Province were established, and the best models for the total biomass and components biomass were selected. The compatible models based on total biomass were developed by adopting the method of joint control different level ratio function. The heteroscedasticity of the models for total biomass was eliminated with log transformation, and the weighted regression was applied to the models for each individual component. Among the compatible biomass models established for the 15 major species (or groups), the model for total biomass had the highest prediction precision (90% or more), followed by the models for aboveground part and stem biomass, with a precision of 87.5% or more. The prediction precision of the biomass models for other components was relatively low, but it was still greater than 80% for most test tree species. The modeling efficiency (EF) values of the total, aboveground part, and stem biomass models for all the tree species (or groups) were over 0.9, and the EF values of the underground part, crown, branch, and foliage biomass models were over 0.8.