欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

应用生态学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (3): 871-876.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201703.015

• 目次 • 上一篇    下一篇

耕作和养分管理方式对冬小麦-夏玉米轮作农田春季杂草群落的影响

王能伟1, 葛秀丽1*, 李升东2   

  1. 1齐鲁工业大学环境科学与工程学院, 济南 250353;
    2山东省农业科学院作物研究所, 济南 250100
  • 收稿日期:2016-07-08 发布日期:2017-03-18
  • 通讯作者: *E-mail: gexiuli@spu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:王能伟,男,1992年生,硕士研究生.主要从事群落生态学、污染控制化学研究.E-mail:605241353@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    本文由国家自然科学基金项目(31400356)和山东省自然科学基金项目(ZR2014CM032,ZR2014CQ032)资助

Impact of tillage and nutrient management practices on the spring weed community in a winter wheat-summer maize rotation farmland

WANG Neng-wei1, GE Xiu-li1, LI Sheng-dong2   

  1. 1College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Qilu University of Technology, Ji’nan 250353, China
    2Crop Research Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Ji’nan 250100, China
  • Received:2016-07-08 Published:2017-03-18
  • Contact: *E-mail: gexiuli@spu.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Na-tural Science Foundation of China (31400356) and the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong (ZR2014CM032, ZR2014CQ032)

摘要: 保护性耕作和杂草多样性是现代生态农业关注的热点问题.尽管保护性耕作下农田杂草多样性有所提高,但耕作方式与养分管理方式对农田杂草群落多样性的交互影响尚未探明.本研究以山东省济南市一块连续3年施行不同耕作方式(免耕、深松、旋耕、深耕)和不同养分管理措施(农户常规:年施氮肥480 kg·hm-2,高产高效:年施氮肥360 kg·hm-2,优化管理:年施氮肥300 kg·hm-2)的冬小麦-夏玉米轮作农田为研究样地,调查并比较了不同管理模式下农田春季杂草群落特征.结果表明: 该冬小麦-夏玉米农田春季杂草群落共发现杂草15种,其中优势物种为马唐和稗;与深耕和旋耕相比,免耕和深松下杂草密度较高.在群落多样性方面,深耕处理下的物种丰富度和均匀度最低,而群落优势度高于其余3种耕作方式;在养分管理中,随着施肥量的增加,物种丰富度和均匀度均升高;深耕和旋耕处理下,随着施肥量的增加,群落优势度升高;而在免耕深松处理下,群落优势度会随着施肥量的增加而减少.在杂草群落生物量方面,免耕和深松的生物量显著高于深耕和旋耕,农户常规处理均高于其余两种养分管理方式,杂草生物量最高的组合是免耕+农户常规.免耕和施肥将提高农田春季杂草群落丰富度、均匀度和生产力.

关键词: 杂草群落, 耕作方式, 生物多样性, 养分管理

Abstract: Conservation tillage and the weed diversity are two hot issues in the modern ecological agriculture. Although it is known that the diversity of weed would increase slightly in the farmland under conservation tillage, the interaction effects between the tillage and the nutrient management on the weed community are not clear. In this study, one wheat-maize rotation field located in Ji’nan, Shandong Province, was selected as the studying site. Different tillage methods (no-tillage, deep subsoiling, rotary tillage, deep tillage) and different nutrient managements (farmers routine, 480 kg N hm-2 per year; high production and efficiency, 360 kg N hm-2 per year; optimal management, 300 kg N hm-2 per year) were carried out for 3 years. The characteristics of the spring weed communities under different managements were investigated and compared. The results showed that there were 15 species in the spring weed communities in the test filed and Digitaria sanguinalis and Echinochloa crusgalli were the dominant species. The plots under no-tillage or deep subsoiling had higher weed densities compared with those under the deep tillage or rotary tillage. In terms of the effect of tillage on the weed community diversity, both species richness index and species evenness index were lowest but the community dominance index was highest in the plots under deep tillage. In terms of the effect of the nutrient management, with the increase of fertilizer application, both species richness and evenness index increased under the different tillage methods. The community dominance increased with the increasing fertilizer application under deep tillage or rotary tillage and vice versa under no-tillage, deep subsoiling. In terms of weed biomass, the plots under no-tillage or deep subsoiling had significantly higher weed biomass than those under the other two tillage methods. The plots under routine nutrient management had higher weed biomass than those under the other two nutrient managements. Among all these treatments, the plots under the combination treatment of no-tillage and routine nutrient management had the highest weed biomass. According to these results, it was implied that no-tillage and fertilization would improve species richness index, species evenness index, and the productivity of spring weed community in the wheat-maize farmland.

Key words: nutrient management, tillage practice, biodiversity, weed community