欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

应用生态学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (1): 278-284.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201801.033

• 目次 • 上一篇    下一篇

水稻镉安全材料的镉吸收动力学特征

郭静怡1, 张曼1, 张锡洲1*, 李廷轩1, 张路1, 黄富2, 陈东明3, 孙先明4   

  1. 1四川农业大学资源学院, 成都 611130;
    2四川农业大学农学院, 成都 611130;
    3成都市双流区农村发展局, 成都 610200;
    4合江县农业局, 四川合江 646200
  • 收稿日期:2017-06-28 出版日期:2018-01-18 发布日期:2018-01-18
  • 通讯作者: * E-mail: zhangxzhou@126.com
  • 作者简介:郭静怡,女,1993年生,博士研究生. 主要从事土壤污染防控和安全生产研究. E-mail: gggjingyi@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    本文由国家科技支撑计划项目(2015BAD05B01)和四川省重点研发项目(2017SZ0188、2017SZ0198)资助

Characterization of cadmium uptake kinetics in cadmium pollution-safe rice material.

GUO Jing-yi1, ZHANG Man1, ZHANG Xi-zhou1*, LI Ting-xuan1, ZHANG Lu1, HUANG Fu2, CHEN Dong-ming3, SUN Xian-ming4   

  1. 1College of Resource Science, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China;
    2College of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China;
    3Shuangliu Bureau of Rural Development,Chengdu 610200,China;
    4Hejiang Department of Agriculture, Hejiang 646200, Sichuan, China
  • Received:2017-06-28 Online:2018-01-18 Published:2018-01-18
  • Contact: * E-mail: zhangxzhou@126.com
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Science and Technology Support Program(2015BAD05801) and the Key Research Project of Sichuan Province (2017SZ0188, 2017SZ0198).

摘要: 采用水培试验,以前期筛选出的水稻Cd安全材料D62B为试验材料,普通材料泸恢17为对照材料,在不同Cd浓度和时间处理下,研究水稻Cd安全材料的Cd吸收动力学特性.结果表明: 在不同Cd处理时间下,D62B根系对Cd的吸收总量均低于泸恢17,且随吸收时间的延长,差异逐渐增大.当吸收时间达到72 h,泸恢17体内积累的Cd总量为D62B的1.3倍.两种水稻材料Cd吸收动力学符合米氏方程,米氏方程常数(Km)值差异不大,但泸恢17的最大吸收速率(Vmax)是D62B的2倍.当Cd处理时间大于48 h,D62B根系对Cd的转移系数低于泸恢17,且其根部Cd分配比例明显大于泸恢17,即D62B根系对Cd的固持能力大于泸恢17.D62B的Cd吸收能力较弱,且其向地上部转移Cd的能力显著低于泸恢17.

Abstract: The characteristics of cadmium (Cd) uptake kinetics in a pollution-safe rice variety of D62B were studied in a hydroponic experiment under different Cd levels and stress time, with a common variety Luhui17 as the control. The results showed that Cd uptake in root of D62B was significantly lower than that of Luhui17 under different stress times. The differences in Cd uptake of the two rice varieties increased with the extension of absorption time. Total Cd amount of Luhui17 was 1.3 times as much as that of D62B when the absorption time was 72 h. Meanwhile, the Cd uptake kinetic of the two varieties accorded to Michaelis-Menten equation, and little difference in Michaelis constants (Km) was observed in the two varieties. However, the maximum uptake rate (Vmax) of Luhui17 was 2 times as much as that of D62B. Once the stress time was more than 48 h, the transfer coefficients of D62B was lower than that of Luhui17, and the Cd distribution ratio in root of D62B was much higher, indicating that D62B had greater accumulation ability in root compared with Luhui17. In conclusion, the Cd uptake and transfer ability of D62B were lower than those of Luhui17.