基于坡面水文连通性的黄河下游河岸缓冲带植被格局优化

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.201803.014

应用生态学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (3): 739-747.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201803.014

基于坡面水文连通性的黄河下游河岸缓冲带植被格局优化

曹梓豪^1,2, 赵清贺^1,2*, 左宪禹³, 丁圣彦^1,2, 张祎帆^1,2, 徐珊珊^1,2, 吴东星^1,2

¹河南大学环境与规划学院, 河南开封 475004;
²河南大学黄河中下游数字地理技术教育部重点实验室, 河南开封 475004;
³河南大学数据与知识工程研究所, 河南开封 475004

收稿日期:2017-07-25 出版日期:2018-03-18 发布日期:2018-03-18
通讯作者: * E-mail: zhaoqinghe@henu.edu.cn
作者简介:曹梓豪,男,1992年生,硕士研究生.主要从事流域景观格局与生态过程研究. E-mail: caozihaohh@163.com
基金资助:
本文由国家自然科学基金项目(41301197,41371195)、河南省高等学校重点科研项目(18A170004)和河南省高校科技创新团队支持计划项目(16IRTSTHN012)资助

Optimizing vegetation pattern for the riparian buffer zone along the lower Yellow River based on slope hydrological connectivity.

CAO Zi-hao^1,2, ZHAO Qing-he^1,2*, ZUO Xian-yu³, DING Sheng-yan^1,2, ZHANG Yi-fan^1,2, XU Shan-shan^1,2, WU Dong-xing^1,2

¹College of Environment and Planning, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, Henan, China;
²Key Laboratory of Geospatial Technology for the Middle and Lower Yellow River Regions (Henan University), Ministry of Education, Kaifeng 475004, Henan, China;
³Institute of Data and Knowledge Engineering, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, Henan, China

Received:2017-07-25 Online:2018-03-18 Published:2018-03-18
Contact: * E-mail: zhaoqinghe@henu.edu.cn
Supported by:
This work was supported by the National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (41301197, 41371195), the Colleges and Universities Key Scientific Research Project of Henan Province (18A170004) and the Program for Science and Technology Innovative Research Team in Universities of Henan Province (16IRTSTHN012)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 河岸缓冲带作为河流-陆地之间重要的生态过渡区,恢复以及优化其退化的植被系统对防止水土流失、改善生态环境及实现该区域生态系统的可持续发展具有重要的现实意义.本文基于植被格局情景模拟和汇流路径长度指数,分析不同植被盖度和坡度下坡面水文连通性对植被格局的响应,探讨黄河下游河岸缓冲带水土保持效应的最优植被格局.结果表明: 坡中格局-粗粒度-集群分布的植被配置方式所产生的汇流路径长度最小、水文连通性最弱,是抑制坡面产流汇流效果最优的植被格局类型.对于最优植被格局,其汇流路径长度随坡长的增加而增加,坡长越长,坡度的作用越明显,水文连通性在各坡度之间的差异越显著;汇流路径长度随植被盖度增加而减小,低盖度时各坡度之间的汇流路径长度差异明显,当盖度达到45%时,各坡度之间的汇流路径长度趋于一致、水文连通性差异较小.实证坡面汇流路径长度随植被盖度增加其降低趋势无规律性,而最优植被格局汇流路径长度随植被盖度增加均呈现出一致的先急剧后平缓下降趋势.在设置的5°～20°坡度范围内,最优植被格局在一定程度上改变了盖度变化过程中不同坡度之间汇流路径长度的差异,突显了河岸缓冲带植被格局对水文连通性的影响.

Abstract: Riparian buffer zone is important ecological transitional region between river and upland. Restoring the degraded vegetation system is important for preventing soil erosion, improving ecological environment and helping to achieve the sustainable development of ecosystems. Based on the scenario simulation of vegetation pattern and flow length index, we analyzed the responses of hydrological connectivity to vegetation pattern under different vegetation coverages and slope gradients, and explored the optimal vegetation pattern of soil and water conservation in riparian buffer zone in the lower reaches of the Yellow River. The results showed that the midslope-coarsness-clustered distribution of vegetation configuration, which exhibited the shortest flow length and the weakest hydrological connectivity, being the optimal vegetation pattern for controlling slope runoff generation and flow concentration. For the optimal vegetation pattern, its flow length increased with increasing slope length, namely, the longer slope length the more significant difference of hydrological connectivity between different slope gradients. Meanwhile, flow length of the optimal vegetation pattern decreased with increasing vegetation coverage. The differences between different slope gradients were obvious under low vegetation coverage, while it was unobvious on slope with vegetation coverage of 45%. Compared with the irregular variation trend of flow length on the actual vegetation slope, there was a consistent trend of first increase and then decrease on the simulated slope with the optimal vegetation pattern. Within the pre-set slope gradient range (5°-20°), the optimal vegetation pattern changed the variation of flow length between different slope gradients in the process of coverage change, which highlighted the influence of riparian buffer zone vegetation pattern on hydrological connectivity.

曹梓豪, 赵清贺, 左宪禹, 丁圣彦, 张祎帆, 徐珊珊, 吴东星. 基于坡面水文连通性的黄河下游河岸缓冲带植被格局优化[J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(3): 739-747.

CAO Zi-hao, ZHAO Qing-he, ZUO Xian-yu, DING Sheng-yan, ZHANG Yi-fan, XU Shan-shan, WU Dong-xing. Optimizing vegetation pattern for the riparian buffer zone along the lower Yellow River based on slope hydrological connectivity.[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018, 29(3): 739-747.

参考文献

[1] Tang Q, Bao Y, He X, et al. Sedimentation and associa-ted trace metal enrichment in the riparian zone of the Three Gorges Reservoir, China. Science of the Total Environment, 2014, 479-480: 258-266
[2] Han L (韩路), Wang H-Z (王海珍), Yu J (于军). Research progress and prospects on riparian zone ecology. Ecology and Environmental Sciences (生态环境学报), 2013, 22(5): 879-886 (in Chinese)
[3] Xiu C (修晨), Zheng H (郑华), Ouyang Z-Y (欧阳志云). Community characteristics of riparian alien plants influenced by different types of human disturbance: A case study of Yongding River, Beijing. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 2016, 36(15):4689-4698 (in Chinese)
[4] Stella JC, Rodríguez-González PM, Dufour S, et al. Riparian vegetation research in Mediterranean-climate regions: Common patterns, ecological processes, and considerations for management. Hydrobiologia, 2013, 719: 291-315
[5] Méndeztoribio M, Zermeñohernández I, Ibarramanríquez G. Effect of land use on the structure and diversity of riparian vegetation in the Duero river watershed in Michoacan, Mexico. Plant Ecology, 2014, 215: 285-296
[6] Sandercock PJ, Hooke JM.Vegetation effects on sediment connectivity and processes in an ephemeral channel in SE Spain. Journal of Arid Environments, 2011, 75: 239-254
[7] Guo E-H (郭二辉), Sun R-H (孙然好), Chen L-D (陈利顶). Main ecological service functions in riparian vegetation buffer zone: Research progress and prospects. Chinese Journal of Ecology (生态学杂志), 2011, 30(8): 1830-1837 (in Chinese)
[8] Vásquez-Méndez R, Ventura-Ramos E, Oleschko K, et al. Soil erosion and runoff in different vegetation patches from semiarid Central Mexico. Catena, 2010, 80: 162-169
[9] Deng H-B (邓红兵), Wang Q-C (王青春), Wang Q-L (王庆礼), et al. On riparian forest buffers and ripa-rian management. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 2001, 12(6): 951-954 (in Chinese)
[10] Ali GA, Roy AG. Revisiting hydrologic sampling strategies for an accurate assessment of hydrologic connectivity in humid temperate systems. Geography Compass, 2009, 3: 350-374
[11] Bracken LJ, Jacky C. The concept of hydrological connectivity and its contribution to understanding runoff-dominated geomorphic systems. Hydrological Processes, 2010, 21: 1749-1763
[12] Wang S-P (王盛萍), Yao A-K (姚安坤), Zhao X-C (赵小婵). Analyzing hydrological connectivity for a slope-surface on the basis of rainfall simulation experiment. Advance in Water Science (水科学进展), 2014, 25(4): 526-533 (in Chinese)
[13] Mayor ÁG, Bautista S, Small EE, et al. Measurement of the connectivity of runoff source areas as determined by vegetation pattern and topography: A tool for assessing potential water and soil losses in drylands. Water Resources Research, 2008, 44: 2183-2188
[14] Ludwig JA, Eager RW, Bastin GN, et al. A leakiness index for assessing landscape function using remote sensing. Landscape Ecology, 2002, 17: 157-171
[15] Liu Y, Fu BJ, Lyu YH, et al. Linking vegetation cover patterns to hydrological responses using two process-based pattern indices at the plot scale. Science China Earth Sciences, 2013, 56: 1888-1898
[16] Tuo D-F (脱登峰), Xu M-X (许明祥), Zheng S-Q (郑世清), et al. Sediment-yielding process and its mechanisms of slope erosion in wind-water erosion crisscross region of Loess Plateau, Northwest China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 2012, 23(12): 3281-3287 (in Chinese)
[17] Li X-H (李谢辉), Han H-F (韩荟芬). Loss assessment and prediction of flood disaster in the middle and lower reaches of Yellow River in Henan Province. Journal of Catastrophology (灾害学), 2014, 29(1): 87-92 (in Chinese)
[18] Zhao Q-H (赵清贺), Ma L-J (马丽娇), Liu Q (刘倩), et al. Plant species diversity and its response to environmental factors in typical river riparian zone in the middle and lower reaches of Yellow River. Chinese Journal of Ecology (生态学杂志), 2015, 34(5): 1325-1331 (in Chinese)
[19] Zhao Q-H (赵清贺), Liu Q (刘倩), Ma L-J (马丽娇), et al. Spatial variation in riparian soil properties and its response to environmental factors in typical reach of the middle and lower reaches of the Yellow River. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 2015, 34(12): 3795-3802 (in Chinese)
[20] Cantón Y, Solé-Benet A, Vente JD, et al. A review of runoff generation and soil erosion across scales in semiarid south-eastern Spain. Journal of Arid Environments, 2011, 75: 1254-1261
[21] Muñoz-Robles C, Tighe M, Reid N, et al. A two-step up-scaling method for mapping runoff and sediment production from pasture and woody encroachment on semi-arid hillslopes. Ecohydrology, 2013, 6: 83-93
[22] O’Callaghan JF, Mark DM. The extraction of drainage networks from digital elevation data. Computer Vision Graphics & Image Processing, 1984, 28: 323-344
[23] Li M (李勉), Yao W-Y (姚文艺), Chen J-N (陈江南), et al. Impact of different grass coverages on the sediment yield process in the slope-gully system. Acta Geographica Sinica (地理学报), 2005, 60(5): 725-732 (in Chinese)
[24] Ludwig JA, Tongway DJ, Marsden SG. Stripes, strands or stipples: Modelling the influence of three landscape banding patterns on resource capture and productivity in semi-arid woodlands, Australia. Catena, 1999, 37: 257-273
[25] You Z (游珍), Li Z-B (李占斌), Jiang Q-F (蒋庆丰). Study on the effect of vegetation patterns on the slope on the rainfall erosion. Journal of Sediment Research (泥沙研究), 2005(6): 40-43 (in Chinese)
[26] Shen Z-Y (沈中原). Study on the Effect of Vegetation Slope Pattern on Soil and Water Loss. PhD Thesis. Xi’an: Xi’an University of Technology, 2006 (in Chinese)
[27] Ludwig JA, Bartley R, Hawdon AA, et al. Patch configu-ration non-linearly affects sediment loss across scales in a grazed catchment in North-east Australia. Ecosystems, 2007, 10: 839-845
[28] Kong Y-P (孔亚平), Zhang K-L (张科利), Cao L-X (曹龙熹). Appraise slope length factors in soil erosion study. Research of Soil and Water Conservation (水土保持研究), 2008, 15(4):43-47 (in Chinese)
[29] Hu S-X (胡世雄), Jin C-X (靳长兴). Theoretical analysis and experimental study on the critical slope of erosion. Acta Geographica Sinica (地理学报), 1999, 54(4): 61-70 (in Chinese)
[30] Han P (韩鹏), Li X-X (李秀霞). Study on soil erosion and vegetation effect on soil conservation in the Yellow River Basin. Journal of Basic Science and Engineering (应用基础与工程科学学报), 2008, 16(2): 181-190 (in Chinese)
[31] Zhang Y-F (张祎帆), Zhao Q-H (赵清贺), Ding S-Y (丁圣彦), et al. Effects of slope gradient and vegetation coverage on hydrodynamic characteristics of overland flow on silty riparian slope. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 2017, 28(8): 2488-2498 (in Chinese)
[32] Cao Z-H (曹梓豪), Zhao Q-H (赵清贺), Ding S-Y (丁圣彦), et al. Effect of slope gradient and vegetation cover on sediment yielding characteristics of the riparian slope. Journal of Natural Resources (自然资源学报), 2017, 32(11): 1892-1904 (in Chinese)
[33] Qin W (秦伟), Cao W-H (曹文洪), Zuo C-Q (左长清). Review on the coupling influences of vegetation and topography to soil erosion and sediment yield. Journal of Sediment Research (泥沙研究), 2005(3): 74-80 (in Chinese)
[34] Gao C-J (高常军), Gao X-C (高晓翠), Jia P (贾朋). Summary comments on hydrologic connectivity. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology (应用与环境生物学报), 2017, 23(3): 586-594 (in Chinese)

基于坡面水文连通性的黄河下游河岸缓冲带植被格局优化

Optimizing vegetation pattern for the riparian buffer zone along the lower Yellow River based on slope hydrological connectivity.

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价