应用生态学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (6): 1768-1778.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201806.016
刘帆,王传宽,王兴昌*
收稿日期:
2017-09-19
修回日期:
2018-03-13
出版日期:
2018-06-18
发布日期:
2018-06-18
通讯作者:
E-mail: xcwang_cer@nefu.edu.cn
作者简介:
刘 帆, 女, 1992年生, 博士研究生. 主要从事近地遥感物候与生产力关系研究. E-mail: ecology_liufan@126.com
基金资助:
本文由黑龙江省自然科学基金项目(QC2017010)、国家科技支撑计划项目(2011BAD37B01)、中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(2572016BA03)和教育部长江学者和创新团队发展计划项目(IRT_15R09)资助
LIU Fan, WANG Chuan-kuan, WANG Xing-chang*
Received:
2017-09-19
Revised:
2018-03-13
Online:
2018-06-18
Published:
2018-06-18
Supported by:
This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province of China (QC2017010), the National Science and Technology Support Program of China (2011BAD37B01), the Fundamental Research Fund for the Central Universities (2572016BA03), and the Program for Changjiang Scholar and Innovative Research Team in University (IRT_15R09).
摘要: 近地遥感技术是原位观测森林冠层物候的重要手段,具有高时间分辨率的优点,而且空间尺度适中,是实现物候尺度推绎的有力工具.本研究首先评述了利用3种光学传感器(辐射表、光谱仪和数码相机)监测森林物候的近地遥感方法;结合帽儿山通量观测站的实测数据分析识别物候期的不确定性来源,发现最重要的误差来自物候提取方法;剖析近地遥感与其他物候观测方法的衔接以及该技术自身存在的问题.最后提出该领域的重点研究方向: 加强冠层光学(或冠层结构)物候与功能(生理、生态过程)物候的联系;整合各区域冠层物候观测网络,实现冠层尺度的全球物候联网观测与数据共享;充分发挥近地遥感的优势,整合多源多尺度物候数据;发展近地遥感物候模型,改进动态全球植被模型中物候模拟.
刘帆,王传宽,王兴昌. 近地遥感在森林冠层物候动态监测中的应用[J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(6): 1768-1778.
LIU Fan, WANG Chuan-kuan, WANG Xing-chang. Application of near-surface remote sensing in monitoring the dynamics of forest canopy phenology.[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018, 29(6): 1768-1778.
[1] Richardson AD, Anderson RS, Arain MA, et al. Terrestrial biosphere models need better representation of vegetation phenology: Results from the North American Carbon Program Site Synthesis. Global Change Biology, 2012, 18: 566-584 [2] Gill AL, Gallinat AS, Sanders-DeMott R, et al. Changes in autumn senescence in northern hemisphere deci-duous trees: A meta-analysis of autumn phenology stu-dies. Annals of Botany, 2015, 116: 875-888 [3] Piao S, Tan J, Chen A, et al. Leaf onset in the northern hemisphere triggered by daytime temperature. Nature Communications, 2015, 6: 6911, doi: 10.1038/ncomms7911 [4] Tang J, K rner C, Muraoka H, et al. Emerging opportunities and challenges in phenology: A review. Ecosphere, 2016, 7: e01436, doi: 10.1002/ecs2.1436 [5] Liu Q, Fu YH, Zhu Z, et al. Delayed autumn phenology in the Northern Hemisphere is related to change in both climate and spring phenology. Global Change Biology, 2016, 22: 3702-3711 [6] Zhang Y, Song C, Band LE, et al. Reanalysis of global terrestrial vegetation trends from MODIS products: Browning or greening? Remote Sensing of Environment, 2017, 191: 145-155 [7] Zhang X, Wang J, Gao F, et al. Exploration of scaling effects on coarse resolution land surface phenology. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2017, 190: 318-330 [8] Liu L, Zhang X, Yu Y, et al. Real-time and short-term predictions of spring phenology in North America from VIIRS data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2017, 194: 89-99 [9] Richardson AD, Klosterman S, Toomey M. Near-surface sensor-derived phenology, Phenology: An Integrative Environmental Science. Berlin: Springer, 2013 [10] Liu Y, Hill MJ, Zhang X, et al. Using data from Landsat, MODIS, VIIRS and PhenoCams to monitor the phenology of California oak/grass savanna and open grassland across spatial scales. Agricultural and Forest Meteo-rology, 2017, 237: 311-325 [11] Peng D, Zhang X, Wu C, et al. Intercomparison and evaluation of spring phenology products using National Phenology Network and AmeriFlux observations in the contiguous United States. Agricultural and Forest Meteo-rology, 2017, 242: 33-46 [12] Brown LA, Dasha J, Ogutua BO, et al. On the relationship between continuous measures of canopy greenness derived using near-surface remote sensing and satellite-derived vegetation products. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2017, 247: 280-292 [13] Balzarolo M, Vicca S, Nguy-Robertson AL, et al. Mat-ching the phenology of net ecosystem exchange and vegetation indices estimated with MODIS and FLUXNET in-situ observations. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2016, 174: 290-300 [14] Baldocchi D. Measuring fluxes of trace gases and energy between ecosystems and the atmosphere: The state and future of the eddy covariance method. Global Change Biology, 2014, 20: 3600-3609 [15] Wang S, Zhang B, Yang Q, et al. Responses of net primary productivity to phenological dynamics in the Tibe-tan Plateau, China. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2017, 232: 235-246 [16] Balzarolo M, Anderson K, Nichol C, et al. Ground-based optical measurements at European flux sites: A review of methods, instruments and current controversies. Sensors, 2011, 11: 7954-7981 [17] Nagai S, Nasahara KN, Inoue T, et al. Review: Advances in in situ and satellite phenological observations in Japan. International Journal of Biometeorology, 2016, 60: 615-627 [18] Moore CE, Brown T, Keenan TF, et al. Australian vege-tation phenology: New insights from satellite remote sensing and digital repeat photography. Biogeosciences, 2016, 13: 5085-5102 [19] Brown TB, Hultine KR, Steltzer H, et al. Using phenocams to monitor our changing Earth: Toward a global phenocam network. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2016, 14: 84-93 [20] Filippa G, Cremonese E, Galvagno M, et al. NDVI derived from IR-enabled digital cameras: Applicability across different plant functional types. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2018, 249: 275-285 [21] Michez A, Piégay H, Lisein J, et al. Classification of riparian forest species and health condition using multi-temporal and hyperspatial imagery from unmanned aerial system. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2016, 188: 1-19 [22] Huemmrich KF, Black TA, Jarvis PG, et al. High temporal resolution NDVI phenology from micrometeorological radiation sensors. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmosphere, 1999, 104: 27935-27944 [23] Wang Q, Iio A, Kakubari Y. Broadband simple ratio closely traced seasonal trajectory of canopy photosynthetic capacity. Geophysical Research Letters, 2008, 35: 154-162 [24] Ross J, Sulev M. Sources of errors in measurements of PAR. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2000, 100: 103-125 [25] Rocha AV, Shaver GR. Advantages of a two band EVI calculated from solar and photosynthetically active radiation fluxes. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2009, 149: 1560-1563 [26] Liu F (刘 帆), Wang C-K (王传宽), Wang X-C (王兴昌). Monitoring temporal dynamics in leaf area index of the temperate broadleaved deciduous forest in Maoershan region with tower-based radiation measurements. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 2016, 27(8): 2409-2419 (in Chinese) [27] Rouse JW, Jr, Haas RH, Schell JA, et al. Monitoring vegetation systems in the great plains with ERTS. NASA Special Publication, 1974, 351: 309-317 [28] Jiang Z, Huete AR, Didan K, et al. Development of a two-band enhanced vegetation index without a blue band. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2008, 112: 3833-3845 [29] Gitelson AA. Wide dynamic range vegetation index for remote quantification of biophysical characteristics of vegetation. Journal of Plant Physiology, 2004, 161: 165-173 [30] Pinty B, Verstraete MM. GEMI: A non-linear index to monitor global vegetation from satellites. Vegetatio, 1992, 101: 15-20 [31] Huete AR. A soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI). Remote Sensing of Environment, 1988, 25: 295-309 [32] Yang X, Tang J, Mustard JF, et al. Solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence that correlates with canopy photosynthesis on diurnal and seasonal scales in a temperate deciduous forest. Geophysical Research Letters, 2015, 42: 2977-2987 [33] Nagai S, Inoue T, Ohtsuka T, et al. Relationship between spatio-temporal characteristics of leaf-fall phenology and seasonal variations in near surface- and satellite-observed vegetation indices in a cool-temperate deciduous broad-leaved forest in Japan. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2014, 35: 3520-3536 [34] Potithep S, Nagai S, Nasahara KN, et al. Two separate periods of the LAI-VIs relationships using in situ mea-surements in a deciduous broadleaf forest. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2013, 169: 148-155 [35] Muraoka H, Noda HM, Nagai S, et al. Spectral vegetation indices as the indicator of canopy photosynthetic productivity in a deciduous broadleaf forest. Journal of Plant Ecology, 2012, 6: 393-407 [36] Nagai S, Saitoh TM, Kobayashi H, et al. In situ examination of the relationship between various vegetation indices and canopy phenology in an evergreen coniferous forest, Japan. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2012, 33: 6202-6214 [37] Huete A, Didan K, Miura T, et al. Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation indices. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2002, 83: 195-213 [38] Tucker CJ. Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1979, 8: 127-150 [39] Gamon JA, Pe uelas J, Field CB. A narrow-waveband spectral index that tracks diurnal changes in photosynthetic efficiency. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1992, 41: 35-44 [40] Gitelson A, Merzlyak MN. Spectral reflectance changes associated with autumn senescence of Aesculus hippocastanum L. and Acer platanoides L. leaves: Spectral features and relation to chlorophyll estimation. Journal of Plant Physiology, 1994, 143: 286-292 [41] Sims DA, Luo H, Hastings S, et al. Parallel adjustments in vegetation greenness and ecosystem CO2 exchange in response to drought in a Southern California chaparral ecosystem. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2006, 103: 289-303 [42] Richardson AD, Jenkins JP, Braswell BH, et al. Use of digital webcam images to track spring green-up in a deciduous broadleaf forest. Oecologia, 2007, 152: 323-334 [43] Bothmann L, Menzel A, Menze BH, et al. Automated processing of webcam images for phenological classification. PLoS One, 2017, 12(2): e0171918 [44] Toomey M, Friedl MA, Frolking S, et al. Greenness indices from digital cameras predict the timing and seasonal dynamics of canopy-scale photosynthesis. Ecological Applications, 2015, 25: 99-115 [45] Melaas EK, Friedl MA, Richardson AD. Multiscale modeling of spring phenology across deciduous forests in the eastern United States. Global Change Biology, 2016, 22: 792-805 [46] Wingate L, Ogée J, Cremonese E, et al. Interpreting canopy development and physiology using a European phenology camera network at flux sites. Biogeosciences, 2015, 12: 5995-6015 [47] Chen M, Melaas EK, Gray JM, et al. A new seasonal-deciduous spring phenology submodel in the Community Land Model 4.5: Impacts on carbon and water cycling under future climate scenarios. Global Change Biology, 2016, 22: 3675-3688 [48] Zhou L (周 磊), He H-L (何洪林), Sun X-M (孙晓敏), et al. Using digital repeat photography to model winter wheat phenology and photosynthetic CO2 uptake. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 2012, 32(16): 5146-5153 (in Chinese) [49] Zhou L (周 磊), He H-L (何洪林), Zhang L (张黎), et al. Simulations of phenology in alpine grassland communities in Damxung, Xizang, based on digital camera images. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology (植物生态学报), 2012, 36(11): 1125-1135 (in Chinese) [50] Sonnentag O, Hufkens K, Teshera-Sterne C, et al. Digi-tal repeat photography for phenological research in forest ecosystems. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2012, 152: 159-177 [51] Saitoh TM, Nagai S, Saigusa N, et al. Assessing the use of camera-based indices for characterizing canopy phenology in relation to gross primary production in a deci-duous broad-leaved and an evergreen coniferous forest in Japan. Ecological Informatics, 2012, 11: 45-54 [52] Mizunuma T, Mencuccini M, Wingate L, et al. Sensitivity of colour indices for discriminating leaf colours from digital photographs. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 2014, 5: 1078-1085 [53] Keenan TF, Darby B, Felts E, et al. Tracking forest phenology and seasonal physiology using digital repeat photography: A critical assessment. Ecological Applications, 2014, 24: 1478-1489 [54] Yang X, Tang J, Mustard JF. Beyond leaf color: Comparing camera-based phenological metrics with leaf biochemical, biophysical, and spectral properties throughout the growing season of a temperate deciduous forest. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 2014, 119: 181-191 [55] Adamsen FG, Pinter PJ, Barnes EM, et al. Measuring wheat senescence with a digital camera. Crop Science, 1999, 39: 719-724 [56] Gillespie AR, Kahle AB, Walker RE. Color enhancement of highly correlated images-channel ratio and ‘chromaticity’ transformation techniques. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1987, 22: 343-365 [57] Woebbecke D, Meyer G, Vonbargen K, et al. Color indices for weed identification under various soil, residue, and lighting conditions. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 1995, 38: 259-269 [58] Kawashima S, Nakatani M. An algorithm for estimating chlorophyll content in leaves using a video camera. Annals of Botany, 1998, 81: 49-54 [59] Joblove GH, Greenberg D. Color spaces for computer graphics. ACM Siggraph Computer Graphics, 1978, 12: 20-25 [60] Chen X-Q (陈效逑), Wang L-H (王林海). Progress in remote sensing phenological research. Progress in Geography (地理科学进展), 2009, 28(1): 33-40 (in Chinese) [61] Xia C-F (夏传福), Li J (李 静), Liu Q-H (柳钦火). Review of advances in vegetation phenology monitoring by remote sensing. Journal of Remote Sensing (遥感学报), 2013, 17(1): 1-16 (in Chinese) [62] Fan D-Q (范德芹), Zhao X-S (赵学胜), Zhu W-Q (朱文泉), et al. Review of influencing factors of accuracy of plant phenology monitoring based on remote sen-sing data. Progress in Geography (地理科学进展), 2016, 35(3): 304-319 (in Chinese) [63] Cao P-Y (曹沛雨), Zhang L-M (张雷明), Li S-G (李胜功), et al. Review on vegetation phenology observation and phenological index extraction. Advances in Earth Science (地球科学进展), 2016, 31(4): 365-376 (in Chinese) [64] Migliavacca M, Galvagno M, Cremonese E, et al. Using digital repeat photography and eddy covariance data to model grassland phenology and photosynthetic CO2 uptake. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2011, 151: 1325-1337 [65] Zhou L, He HL, Sun XM, et al. Species- and community-scale simulation of the phenology of a temperate forest in Changbai Mountain based on digital camera images. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2013, 4: 317-326 [66] Liu Y, Wu C, Peng D, et al. Improved modeling of land surface phenology using MODIS land surface reflectance and temperature at evergreen needleleaf forests of central North America. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2016, 176: 152-162 [67] Gonsamo A, Chen JM, Price DT, et al. Land surface phenology from optical satellite measurement and CO2 eddy covariance technique. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 2012, 117: 1472-1472 [68] Wilson T, Meyers T. Determining vegetation indices from solar and photosynthetically active radiation fluxes. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2007, 144: 160-179 [69] Wang Q, Tenhunen J, Dinh NQ, et al. Similarities in ground- and satellite-based NDVI time series and their relationship to physiological activity of a Scots pine forest in Finland. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2004, 93: 225-237 [70] Richardson AD, Braswell BH, Hollinger DY, et al. Near-surface remote sensing of spatial and temporal varia-tion in canopy phenology. Ecological Applications, 2009, 19: 1417-1428 [71] D’Odorico P, Gonsamo A, Gough CM, et al. The match and mismatch between photosynthesis and land surface phenology of deciduous forests. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2015, 214: 25-38 [72] Gu L, Fuentes JD, Shugart HH, et al. Responses of net ecosystem exchanges of carbon dioxide to changes in cloudiness: Results from two North American deciduous forests. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 1999, 104: 31421-31434 [73] Barr AG, Black T, Hogg E, et al. Inter-annual variabi-lity in the leaf area index of a boreal aspen-hazelnut forest in relation to net ecosystem production. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2004, 126: 237-255 [74] Klosterman S, Hufkens K, Gray J, et al. Evaluating remote sensing of deciduous forest phenology at multiple spatial scales using PhenoCam imagery. Biogeosciences, 2014, 11: 4305-4320 [75] Wu C, Peng D, Soudani K, et al. Land surface pheno-logy derived from normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) at global FLUXNET sites. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2017, 233: 171-182 [76] Filippa G, Cremonese E, Migliavacca M, et al. Phenopix: A R package for image-based vegetation phenology. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2016, 220: 141-150 [77] Elmore AJ, Guinn SM, Minsley BJ, et al. Landscape controls on the timing of spring, autumn, and growing season length in mid-Atlantic forests. Global Change Biology, 2012, 18: 656-674 [78] Cong N, Wang T, Nan HJ, et al. Changes in satellite-derived spring vegetation green-up date and its linkage to climate in China from 1982 to 2010: A multimethod analysis. Global Change Biology, 2013, 19: 881-891 [79] Reed BC, Brown JF, Vanderzee D, et al. Measuring phenological variability from satellite imagery. Journal of Vegetation Science, 1994, 5: 703-714 [80] Zhang X, Friedl MA, Schaaf CB, et al. Monitoring vege-tation phenology using MODIS. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2003, 84: 471-475 [81] Fisher JI, Mustard JF, Vadeboncoeur MA. Green leaf phenology at Landsat resolution: Scaling from the field to the satellite. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2006, 100: 265-279 [82] Ahrends HE, Brügger R, St ckli R, et al. Quantitative phenological observations of a mixed beech forest in northern Switzerland with digital photography. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 2008, 113: G04004, doi:10.1029/2007JG000650 [83] White K, Pontius J, Schaberg P. Remote sensing of spring phenology in northeastern forests: A comparison of methods, field metrics and sources of uncertainty. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2014, 148: 97-107 [84] Zhang H (张 慧), Li P-H (李平衡), Zhou G-M (周国模), et al. Advances in the studies on topographic effects of vegetation indices. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 2018, 29(2): 669-677 (in Chinese) [85] Zuo L (左 璐), Wang H-J (王焕炯), Liu R-G (刘荣高), et al. Differences of vegetation phenology monitoring by remote sensing based on different spectral vegetation indices. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 2018, 29(2): 599-606 (in Chinese) [86] Panchen ZA, Primack RB, Gallinat AS. Substantial varia-tion in leaf senescence times among 1360 temperate woody plant species: Implications for phenology and ecosystem processes. Annals of Botany, 2015, 116: 865-873 [87] Ahrends H, Etzold S, Kutsch W, et al. Tree phenology and carbon dioxide fluxes: Use of digital photography for process-based interpretation at the ecosystem scale. Climate Research, 2009, 39: 261-274 [88] Cescatti A, Marcolla B, Vannan SKS, et al. Intercomparison of MODIS albedo retrievals and in situ measurements across the global FLUXNET network. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2012, 121: 323-334 [89] Misson L, Baldocchi DD, Black TA, et al. Partitioning forest carbon fluxes with overstory and understory eddy-covariance measurements: A synthesis based on FLUXNET data. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2007, 144: 14-31 [90] Moore CE, Beringer J, Evans B, et al. Tree-grass phenology information improves light use efficiency modelling of gross primary productivity for an Australian tropical savanna. Biogeosciences, 2017, 14: 1-38 [91] Zhao J-J (赵晶晶), Liu L-Y (刘良云). Extraction of temperate vegetation phenology thresholds in North America based on flux tower observation data. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 2013, 24(2): 311-318 (in Chinese) [92] Matiu M, Bothmann L, Steinbrecher R, et al. Monitoring succession after a non-cleared windthrow in a Norway spruce mountain forest using webcam, satellite vege-tation indices and turbulent CO2 exchange. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2017, 244/245: 72-81 [93] Peichl M, Sonnentag O, Nilsson MB. Bringing color into the picture: Using digital repeat photography to investigate phenology controls of the carbon dioxide exchange in a boreal Mire. Ecosystems, 2015, 18: 115-131 [94] Garrity SR, Bohrer G, Maurer KD, et al. A comparison of multiple phenology data sources for estimating seasonal transitions in deciduous forest carbon exchange. Agri-cultural and Forest Meteorology, 2012, 151: 1741-1752 [95] Fisher JI, Mustard JF. Cross-scalar satellite phenology from ground, Landsat, and MODIS data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2007, 109: 261-273 [96] Wang S, Zhang L, Huang C, et al. An NDVI-based vegetation phenology is improved to be more consistent with photosynthesis dynamics through applying a light use efficiency model over boreal high-latitude forests. Remote Sensing, 2017, 9: 695 [97] Nasahara KN, Nagai S. Development of an in situ observation network for terrestrial ecological remote sensing: The phenological eyes network (PEN). Ecological Research, 2015, 30: 211-223 [98] Yang H, Yang X, Zhang Y, et al. Chlorophyll fluorescence tracks seasonal variations of photosynthesis from leaf to canopy in a temperate forest. Global Change Biology, 2017, 23: 2874-2886 [99] Gallinat, Amanda S, Primack, et al. Autumn, the neglected season in climate change research. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 2015, 30: 169-176 [100] Liu L, Liang L, Schwartz MD, et al. Evaluating the potential of MODIS satellite data to track temporal dynamics of autumn phenology in a temperate mixed forest. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2015, 160: 156-165 [101] Croft H, Chen JM, Froelich NJ, et al. Seasonal controls of canopy chlorophyll content on forest carbon uptake: Implications for GPP modeling. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 2015, 120: 1576-1586 [102] Forkel M, Migliavacca M, Thonicke K, et al. Codominant water control on global interannual variability and trends in land surface phenology and greenness. Global Change Biology, 2015, 21: 3414-3435 [103] Chuine I, Régnière J. Process-based models of pheno-logy for plants and animals. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 2017, 48: 159-182 |
No related articles found! |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||