黄土高原不同生态治理小流域土壤有机质、容重及黏粒含量的对比

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.201902.013

应用生态学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (2): 370-378.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201902.013

• 土壤物理与生态环境专栏 • 上一篇下一篇

黄土高原不同生态治理小流域土壤有机质、容重及黏粒含量的对比

黄艳丽^1,2,李占斌^1,3,4*,苏辉⁵,王杉杉⁴,李垚林⁶,刘晨光¹

(¹西北农林科技大学水土保持研究所黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室, 陕西杨凌 712100;
²河南理工大学测绘与国土信息工程学院, 河南焦作 454000;
³西安理工大学西北水资源与环境生态教育部重点实验室, 西安 710048;
⁴中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所, 陕西杨凌 712100;
⁵新乡学院生命科学技术学院, 河南新乡 453003;
⁶黄河水利委员会西峰水土保持科学试验站, 甘肃西峰 745000

收稿日期:2018-06-27 修回日期:2018-12-17 出版日期:2019-02-20 发布日期:2019-02-20
通讯作者: E-mail:zhanbinli@126.com
作者简介:黄艳丽,女,1978年生,博士研究生.主要从事生态水文研究.E-mail:hyl@hpu.edu.cn
基金资助:
本文由国家自然科学基金重点项目(41330858)资助

Comparison of soil organic matter, bulk density and clay content in small watersheds under different ecological managements of Loess Plateau, China.

HUANG Yan-li^1,2, LI Zhan-bin^1,3,4*, SU Hui⁵, WANG Shan-shan⁴, LI Yao-lin⁶, LIU Chen-guang¹

¹State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dry-land Farming on the Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China;
²College of Surveying and Land Information Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454000, Henan, China;
³Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Northwest Water Resources and Environment Ecology, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an 710048, China;
⁴Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Acade-my of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China;
⁵School of Life Science and Technology, Xinxiang University, Xinxiang 453003, Henan, China;
⁶Xifeng Experiment Station of Soil and Water Conservation, Yellow River Conservancy Committee, Xifeng 745000, Gansu, China

Received:2018-06-27 Revised:2018-12-17 Online:2019-02-20 Published:2019-02-20
Supported by:
This work was supported by the Key Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China (41330858).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探讨不同生态治理小流域土壤性质的差异,本研究分别从坡向、坡位、区段和土层4个方面分析了人工刺槐林流域杨家沟(YJG)与封禁荒草地流域董庄沟(DZG)土壤有机质(SOM)、土壤容重(BD)和黏粒含量(CC)的空间分异.结果表明: YJG与DZG的SOM、BD、CC分别为12.78 g·kg^-1、1.24 g·cm^-3、19.2%与11.13 g·kg^-1、1.21 g·cm^-3、18.2%,前者均略高,但差异不显著.各指标均为东坡大于西坡;SOM和CC顺坡向下有增加趋势,BD变异最小;SOM由上游至下游呈增大趋势,BD和CC不断减小;由土表向下至60 cm土深,BD和CC不断增大,SOM不断减小.各指标的空间敏感性依次为CC＞SOM＞BD,空间因素的影响效用依次为土层＞区段＞坡向＞坡位.上游CC、中游BD和CC在两流域间的差异显著,各指标对坡位、区段、土层的敏感性均为YJG＜DZG.

关键词: 小流域, 土壤有机质, 生态治理, 黏粒含量, 土壤容重

Abstract: To explore the effects of small watersheds with different ecological managements on soil properties, the spatial differences of soil organic matter (SOM), bulk density (BD), and clay content (CC) in the four facets, including slope aspect, slope position, zone, and soil layer, were analyzed between Yangjiagou (YJG, artificial Robinia pseudoacacia forest watershed) and Dongzhuanggou (DZG, closed grassland watershed). The results showed that SOM, BD and CC were 12.78 g·kg^-1, 1.24 g·cm^-3, 19.2% for YJG and 11.13 g·kg^-1, 1.21 g·cm^-3, 18.2% for DZG, respectively. The values for YJG were slightly higher than those for DZG, but the difference was insignificant. All indices in the east slope were bigger than those in the west slope. Across different slope positions, the variation of BD was small, SOM and CC showed increasing trends from top to bottom. BD and CC declined downward the watershed, whereas SOM changed in an opposite trend. From the soil surface down to 60 cm soil depth, BD and CC increased and SOM decreased. The spatial sensitivity followed CC > SOM > BD, and the effects of the spatial factors can be ordered as soil layer > zone > slope aspect > slope position. There were significant differences in CC of the upper reaches, BD and CC of the middle reaches between the two basins. The sensitivity of each index to slope position, zone and soil layer in YJG was lower than that in DZG.

Key words: ecological management, small watershed, soil bulk density, clay content, soil organic matter

黄艳丽,李占斌,苏辉,王杉杉,李垚林,刘晨光. 黄土高原不同生态治理小流域土壤有机质、容重及黏粒含量的对比[J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(2): 370-378.

HUANG Yan-li, LI Zhan-bin, SU Hui, WANG Shan-shan, LI Yao-lin, LIU Chen-guang. Comparison of soil organic matter, bulk density and clay content in small watersheds under different ecological managements of Loess Plateau, China.[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2019, 30(2): 370-378.

参考文献

[1] Li E-H (李二辉), Mu X-M (穆兴民), Zhao G-J (赵广举). Temporal changes in annual runoff and influential factors in the upper and middle reaches of Yellow River from 1919—2010. Advances in Water Science (水科学进展), 2014, 25(2): 155-163 (in Chinese)
[2] Liu X-Y (刘晓燕), Ma S-Y (马思远), Dang S-Z (党素珍). Processes of sediment yield in the Yellow River basin in recent hundred years. Journal of Sediment Research (泥沙研究), 2017, 42(5): 1-6 (in Chinese)
[3] Shao M-A (邵明安), Jia X-X (贾小旭), Wang Y-Q (王云强), et al. A review of studies on dried soil layers in the Loess Plateau. Advances in Earth Science (地球科学进展), 2016, 31(1): 14-22 (in Chinese)
[4] Wu JW, Miao CY, Wang YM, et al. Contribution analy-sis of the long-term changes in seasonal runoff on the Loess Plateau, China, using eight Budyko-based metho-ds. Journal of Hydrology, 2016, 545: 263-275
[5] Yang KJ, Lu CH. Evaluation of land-use change effects on runoff and soil erosion of a hilly basin of Yanhe River in the Chinese Loess Plateau. Land Degradation & Development, 2018, 29: 1211-1221
[6] Xia L, Song XY, Fu N, et al. Impacts of land use change and climate variation on green water in the Loess Plateau Gully Region: A case study of Nanxiaohegou basin. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2017, 48: 678-688
[7] Li Y-S (李玉山). The properties of water cycle in soil and their effect on water cycle for land in the loess regin. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 1983, 3(2): 91-101 (in Chinese)
[8] Yang W-Z (杨文治). Soil water resources and affores-tation in Loess Plateau. Journal of Natural Resources (自然资源学报), 2001, 16(5): 433-438 (in Chinese)
[9] Lu Y-D (陆耀东), Xue L (薛立), Cao H (曹鹤), et al. Imapacts of litter removal on soil characteristics in a Pinus caribaea stand. Acta Ecologica Sinica (生态学报), 2008, 28(7): 3205-3211 (in Chinese)
[10] Chang RY, Fu BJ, Liu GH, et al. The effects of affore-station on soil organic and inorganic carbon: A case study of the Loess Plateau of China. Catena, 2012, 95: 145-152
[11] Fu B, Qi YB, Chang QR. Impacts of revegetation mana-gement modes on soil properties and vegetation ecological restoration in degraded sandy grassland in farming-pastoral ecotone. International Journal of Agricultural & Biological Engineering, 2015, 8: 26-34
[12] Wang L, Mu Y, Zhang QF, et al. Effects of vegetation restoration on soil physical properties in the wind-water erosion region of the northern Loess Plateau of China. Clean: Soil, Air, Water, 2012, 40: 7-15
[13] Zhao YG, Wu PT, Zhao SW, et al. Variation of soil infiltrability across a 79-year chronosequence of naturally restored grassland on the Loess Plateau, China. Journal of Hydrology, 2013, 504: 94-103
[14] Zhang XP, Lin PF, Chen H, et al. Understanding land use and cover change impacts on runoff and sediment load at flood events on the Loess Plateau, China. Hydrological Processes, 2018, 32: 576-589
[15] Yan R, Zhang XP, Yan SJ, et al. Estimating soil erosion response to land use/cover change in a catchment of the Loess Plateau, China. International Soil & Water Conservation Research, 2018, 6: 13-22
[16] Hu J, Lu YH, Fu BJ, et al. Quantifying the effect of ecological restoration on runoff and sediment yields: A meta-analysis for the Loess Plateau of China. Progress in Physical Geography, 2017, 41: 753-774
[17] Zhou J, Fu BJ, Gao GY, et al. Effects of precipitation and restoration vegetation on soil erosion in a semi-arid environment in the Loess Plateau, China. Catena, 2016, 137: 1-11
[18] Wu CS, Liu GH, Liu QS, et al. The spatial distribution of soil organic matter on the north-central Mongolian Plateau. Resources Science (资源科学), 2016, 38(5): 994-1002 (in Chinese)
[19] Sun Y (孙岩), Wang Y-B (王一博), Sun Z (孙哲), et al. Impact of soil organic matter on water hold capacity in permafrost actice layer in the Tibetan Pla-teau. Journal of Desert Research (中国沙漠), 2017, 37(2): 288-295 (in Chinese)
[20] Zhang Y-X (张永萱), Zhang G-H (张光辉), Wang Z-Q (王志强). Influence of soil particle composition on soil moisture in loess profiles. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation (水土保持通报), 2009, 29(6): 6-9 (in Chinese)
[21] Li Z (李卓), Wu P-T (吴普特), Feng H (冯浩), et al. Simulated experiment on effect of soil bulk density on soil infiltration capacity. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (农业工程学报), 2009, 25(6): 40-45 (in Chinese)
[22] Sun L (孙龙), Zhang G-H (张光辉), Wang B (王兵), et al. Soil erosion resistance of black locust land with different ages of returning farmland on Loess Pla-teau. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (农业工程学报), 2017, 33(10): 191-197 (in Chinese)
[23] Cai W-T (蔡文涛), Li H-Y (李贺祎), Lai L-M (来利明), et al. Dynamics of soil physical properties and biological soil crust during the vegetation restoration process of abandoned croplands in the Ordos Plateau, China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 2017, 28(3): 829-837 (in Chinese)
[24] Li X-Y (李晓原), Zhang W-T (张文太), Li J-G (李建贵), et al. Correlation among terrain, vegetation and soil properties at hillslope scale topography in Ili Valley. Journal of Xinjiang Agricultural University (新疆农业大学学报), 2016, 39(6): 477-482 (in Chinese)
[25] Baskan O, Dengiz O, Gunturk A. Effects of toposequence and land use-land cover on the spatial distribution of soil properties. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2016, 75: 1-10
[26] Zhou P (周萍), Liu G-B (刘国彬), Hou X-L (侯喜禄). Study on soil physical and nutrients properties of different slope aspects and positions in eroded loess hilly region. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation (水土保持学报), 2008, 22(1): 7-12 (in Chinese)
[27] Zhu M, Feng Q, Qin YY, et al. Soil organic carbon as functions of slope aspects and soil depths in a semiarid alpine region of Northwest China. Catena, 2017, 152: 94-102
[28] Zhou ZC, Zhang XY, Gan ZT. Changes in soil organic carbon and nitrogen after 26 years of farmland management on the Loess Plateau of China. Journal of Arid Land, 2015, 7: 806-813
[29] Feng Q (冯强), Duan B-L (段宝玲), Jiang S (姜硕), et al. Spatial heterogeneity of bulk density and its influencing factors at small watershed scale. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University (Natural Science) (山西农业大学学报:自然科学版), 2016, 36(1): 39-45 (in Chinese)
[30] Wang YQ, Shao MA, Liu ZP , et al. Prediction of bulk density of soils in the Loess Plateau region of China. Surveys in Geophysics, 2014, 35: 395-413
[31] Wang ZQ, Hu YX, Wang R, et al. Soil organic carbon on the fragmented Chinese Loess Plateau: Combining effects of vegetation types and topographic positions. Soil & Tillage Research, 2017, 174: 1-5
[32] Huang Y-L (黄艳丽), Li Z-B(李占斌), Su H (苏辉), et al. Effect of man-made forest on soil moisture of different slopes in upper and lower reaches of small watershed of Loess Plateau. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (农业工程学报), 2018, 34(15): 108-116 (in Chinese)
[33] Ai Z-M (艾泽民), Chen Y-M (陈云明), Cao Y (曹扬). Storage and allocation of carbon and nitrogen in Robinia pseudoacacia plantation at different ages in the loess hilly region, China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 2014, 25(2): 333-341 (in Chinese)
[34] Zheng J-Y (郑纪勇), Shao M-A (邵明安), Zhang X-C (张兴昌). Spatial variation of surface soil’s bulk density and saturated hydraulic conductivity on slope in loess region. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation (水土保持学报), 2004, 18(3): 53-56 (in Chinese)
[35] Ru H-L (汝海丽), Zhang H-D (张海东), Jiao F (焦峰). Plant and soil C, N, P stoichiometric characteristics in relation to micro-topography in the hilly Loess Plateau region, China. Journal of Natural Resources (自然资源学报), 2016, 31(10): 1752-1763 (in Chinese)

黄土高原不同生态治理小流域土壤有机质、容重及黏粒含量的对比

Comparison of soil organic matter, bulk density and clay content in small watersheds under different ecological managements of Loess Plateau, China.

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	陈月鹏, 李石开, 安波, 朱勇, 邹汉鲁, 崔松祥, 付宏燕, 毛瑢, 张芸. 亚热带树种的菌根和根外菌丝对土壤氮矿化及酶活性的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(5): 1235-1243.
[2]	尚天浩, 陈睿华, 张俊华, 王怡婧. 基于分数阶微分联合光谱指数估算银川平原土壤有机质含量 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(3): 717-725.
[3]	蔡玉山, 王雯倩, 肖湘, 郎明翰, 段亮亮. 大兴安岭多年冻土区流域春季冻融期氮湿沉降与水体氮输出特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(2): 396-404.
[4]	王毅焕, 靳一丹, 姜铭楷, 马书琴, 陈有超, 蔡延江. 短期氮沉降改变毛竹林凋落物和土壤有机质化学组成 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(10): 2593-2600.
[5]	姚莹莹, 黄炎和, 林金石, 蒋芳市, 管家琳, 季翔. 基于最小累积阻力模型的崩岗侵蚀危险性分区——以安溪县小流域为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(5): 1370-1376.
[6]	霍彦慧, 王美娥, 姜瑢, 陈卫平. 典型矿冶区周边土壤微生物功能特征及影响因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(12): 3403-3409.
[7]	马红娇, 马东豪, 刘志鹏, 张佳宝, 姜晓文, 陆荣生. 顺磁物质对土壤低场核磁共振信号特征及含水量测定的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(11): 3037-3045.
[8]	魏彬萌, 李忠徽, 王益权. 渭北旱塬苹果园土壤紧实化现状及成因 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(3): 976-982.
[9]	李森, 李玲, 樊华, 罗雪梅, 苟小林, 涂卫国. 川西北高寒沙地不同生态治理模式下土壤碳氮磷储量及生态化学计量特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(8): 2567-2573.
[10]	王曦, 李玉环, 王瑞燕, 史丰智, 徐绍棠. 基于无人机的冬小麦拔节期表层土壤有机质含量遥感反演 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(7): 2399-2406.
[11]	邹文秀, 韩晓增, 陆欣春, 陈旭, 严君, 宋宝辉, 杨宁, 林青华, 贺宇. 肥沃耕层构建对东北黑土区旱地土壤肥力和玉米产量的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(12): 4134-4146.
[12]	吴鹏年, 王艳丽, 李培富, 王西娜, 侯贤清. 滴灌条件下秸秆还田配施氮肥对宁夏扬黄灌区春玉米产量和土壤理化性质的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(12): 4177-4185.
[13]	柳开楼,韩天富,黄庆海,余喜初,李大明,马常宝,薛彦东,张会民. 鄱阳湖流域长期施肥下双季稻田的土壤基础地力 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(1): 209-216.
[14]	周嘉聪, 刘小飞, 纪宇皝, 张秋芳, 郑永, 陈岳民, 杨玉盛. 减少降雨对杉木幼林土壤有机质组分及稳定性的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(7): 2203-2210.
[15]	马维伟,王跃思,李广,吴江琪,罗永忠,陈国鹏. 尕海湿地植被退化过程中植被-土壤系统有机碳储量变化特征 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(12): 3900-3906.