宁夏沿黄城市带湿地景观格局演变特征及驱动力

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202010.013

应用生态学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (10): 3499-3508.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202010.013

宁夏沿黄城市带湿地景观格局演变特征及驱动力

高祖桥¹, 白永平^1*, 周亮^2,3, 乔富伟¹, 宋龙军¹, 陈小宁¹

¹西北师范大学地理与环境科学学院, 兰州 730070;
²兰州交通大学测绘与地理信息学院, 兰州 730070;
³中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, 资源与环境信息系统国家重点实验室, 北京 100101

收稿日期:2020-06-10 接受日期:2020-07-28 出版日期:2020-10-15 发布日期:2021-04-15
通讯作者: * E-mail: baiyp@nwnu.edu.cn
作者简介:高祖桥, 男, 1995年生, 硕士研究生。主要从事区域发展与区域管理研究。E-mail: geogzq@126.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41701173,40771054,41961027)、甘肃省重点研发项目(18YF1FA052)、教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(17YJCZH268)、甘肃省“一带一路”研究一般项目(LDBR2018-017)和甘肃省政府决策咨询委员会2019年度重点课题资助

Characteristics and driving forces of wetland landscape pattern evolution of the city belt along the Yellow River in Ningxia, China

GAO Zu-qiao¹, BAI Yong-ping^1*, ZHOU Liang^2,3, QIAO Fu-wei¹, SONG Long-jun¹, CHEN Xiao-ning¹

¹College of Geographic and Environmental Science, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China;
²Faculty of Geomatics, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, China;
³State Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Information System, Institute of Geographical Science and Natural Resource Research, Chinese Aca-demy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China

Received:2020-06-10 Accepted:2020-07-28 Online:2020-10-15 Published:2021-04-15
Contact: * E-mail: baiyp@nwnu.edu.cn
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China (41701173, 40771054, 41961027), the Key Research and Development Project of Gansu Province (18YF1FA052), the Ministry of Education Humanities and Social Sciences Research Youth Foundation (17YJCZH268), the General Project of the “Belt and Road” Research in Gansu Province (LDBR2018-017), and the Key Project of the Gansu Provincial Government Decision Advisory Committee in 2019.

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 湿地作为全球生产力最高的生态系统之一,具有水净化、气候调节、碳汇等多种功能,但由于人类社会发展的胁迫和自然条件的改变,湿地流失尤为严重。为探究沿黄湿地景观格局演变规律,了解湿地资源的现状和动态变化,本研究以2000、2009、2018年3个时期Landsat卫星影像为数据源,选用景观指数、地理探测器等方法定量分析2000—2018年间宁夏沿黄城市带湿地景观格局演变特征及驱动力。结果表明: 2000—2018年,宁夏沿黄城市带湿地面积呈先增后减的趋势,湿地面积在研究前期增加了52.2 km²,增长率为8.2%,后期减少了26.8 km²,减少率为3.9%。湿地主要转出为建设用地和未利用地,转出面积分别为166.7、158.4 km²;新增湿地主要由未利用地和林草地转入,转入面积为543.1 km²。城市带湿地景观的破碎化程度呈上升趋势,但各类湿地均衡分布的态势逐渐增强,景观多样性也不断增加,景观优势种类逐渐弱化。自然要素和社会经济要素共同影响城市带湿地景观格局演变,其中,社会经济要素中的人口因素影响最显著,自然要素中的降水量、气温驱动作用明显,其他驱动力因子相对较弱但也不容忽视。

关键词: 湿地, 景观格局, 流域高质量发展, 干旱区, 城市带

Abstract: Wetlands are one of the most productive ecosystems in the world, with functions of water purification, climate regulation, and carbon sinks. Due to the stresses caused by human social development and changes of natural conditions, wetlands have been seriously damaged. We examined the evolutionary law of landscape pattern of wetland along the Yellow River, and acquainted the current situation of wetland resources and dynamic change. Based on satellite images of year 2000, 2009, and 2018 from Landsat, we used landscape indices and geographic detectors to quantitatively analyze the characteristics and driving forces of wetland landscape pattern evolution of the city belt along the Yellow River in Ningxia from 2000 to 2018. The results showed that the wetland area of the city belt along the Yellow River in Ningxia enlarged first and then decreased from 2000 to 2018. The wetland area increased by 52.2 km² in the early stage of the study with an increasing rate of 8.2%, and decreased by 26.8 km² with a reduction rate of 3.9% in the later stage. The wetland was mainly transformed to construction land and unused land, with transfer out area being 166.7 and 158.4 km² respectively. New wetland was mainly transformed from unused land, forest, and grassland, with an area of 543.1 km². The fragmentation degree of wetland landscape in city belt was increasing, the balanced distribution of all kinds of wetlands was gradually strengthened, the landscape diversity was increasing, and the dominant landscape types were gradually weakening. Natural factors and socio-economic factors jointly affected the evolution of wetland landscape pattern in city belt. Among all socio-economic factors population was the most important one. Among natural factors, precipitation and temperature were important. Other driving factors were relatively weak, but could not be ignored.

Key words: wetland, landscape pattern, high quality development in the basin, arid area, city belt

高祖桥, 白永平, 周亮, 乔富伟, 宋龙军, 陈小宁. 宁夏沿黄城市带湿地景观格局演变特征及驱动力[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(10): 3499-3508.

GAO Zu-qiao, BAI Yong-ping, ZHOU Liang, QIAO Fu-wei, SONG Long-jun, CHEN Xiao-ning. Characteristics and driving forces of wetland landscape pattern evolution of the city belt along the Yellow River in Ningxia, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31(10): 3499-3508.

参考文献

[1] Grimm NB, Faeth SH, Golubiewski NE, et al. Global change and the ecology of cities. Science, 2008, 319: 756-760
[2] Lienert J, Diemer M, Schmid B. Effects of habitat fragmentation on population structure and fitness components of the wetland specialist Swertia perennis L. (Entia-naceae). Basic and Applied Ecology, 2002, 3: 101-114
[3] Zedler JB, Kercher SM. Wetland resources: Status, trends, ecosystem services, and restorability. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 2005, 30: 39-74
[4] Ramsar. Convention on Wetlands of International Importance Especially as Waterfowl Habitat [EB/OL]. (1972-02-02) [2020-06-10]. https://www. ramsar.org/document/present-text-of-the-convention-on-wetlands
[5] 国家林业局. 中国湿地保护行动计划. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2000 [State Forestry Administration. China Wetland Protection Action Plan. Beijing: China Forestry Press, 2000]
[6] 郭笃发. 黄河三角洲滨海湿地土地覆被和景观格局的变化. 生态学杂志, 2005, 24(8): 907-912 [Guo D-F. Changes in land cover and landscape pattern of coastal wetlands in the Yellow River Delta. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2005, 24(8): 907-912]
[7] 白军红, 欧阳华, 崔保山, 等. 近40年来若尔盖高原高寒湿地景观格局变化. 生态学报, 2008, 28(5): 2245-2252 [Bai J-H, Ouyang H, Cui B-S, et al. Changes of alpine wetland landscape pattern in the Ruoergai Plateau in recent 40 years. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008, 28(5): 2245-2252]
[8] 李建国, 濮励杰, 徐彩瑶, 等. 1977—2014年江苏中部滨海湿地演化与围垦空间演变趋势. 地理学报, 2015, 70(1): 17-28 [Li J-G, Pu L-J, Xu C-Y, et al. Evolution trend of coastal wetlands and reclamation space in central Jiangsu from 1977 to 2014. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015, 70(1): 17-28]
[9] 周昊昊, 杜嘉, 南颖, 等. 1980年以来5个时期珠江三角洲滨海湿地景观格局及其变化特征. 湿地科学, 2019, 17(5): 559-566 [Zhou H-H, Du J, Nan Y, et al. Landscape pattern and changing characteristics of coastal wetlands in the Pearl River Delta in 5 periods since 1980. Wetland Science, 2019, 17(5): 559-566]
[10] 褚琳, 黄翀, 刘庆生, 等. 2000—2010年辽宁省海岸带景观格局与生境质量变化研究. 资源科学, 2015, 37(10): 1962-1972 [Chu L, Huang C, Liu Q-S, et al. Study on landscape pattern and habitat quality change in coastal zone of Liaoning Province from 2000 to 2010. Resources Science, 2015, 37(10): 1962-1972]
[11] 李莹莹, 尤罗利, 陈永生, 等. 环巢湖地区多水塘景观时空格局演变特征及其驱动因素. 生态学报, 2018, 38(17): 6280-6291 [Li Y-Y, You L-L, Chen Y-S, et al. Evolution characteristics and driving factors of multi-reservoir landscape in Chaohu Region. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(17): 6280-6291]
[12] 易凤佳, 李仁东, 常变蓉, 等. 2000—2010年汉江流域湿地动态变化及其空间趋向性. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016, 25(9): 1412-1420 [Yi F-J, Li R-D, Chang B-R, et al. Dynamic change and spatial trend of wetland in the Hanjiang river basin from 2000 to 2010. Resources and Environment of the Yangtze River Basin, 2016, 25(9): 1412-1420]
[13] Yan F, Zhang S, Liu X, et al. Monitoring spatiotemporal changes of marshes in the Sanjiang Plain, China. Ecological Engineering, 2017, 104: 184-194
[14] 刘吉平, 董春月, 盛连喜, 等. 1955—2010年小三江平原沼泽湿地景观格局变化及其对人为干扰的响应. 地理科学, 2016, 36(6): 879-887 [Liu J-P, Dong C-Y, Sheng L-X, et al. Changes of wetland landscape pattern and its response to human disturbance in Xiaosanjiang Plain from 1955 to 2010. Geographical Science, 2016, 36(6): 879-887]
[15] 马骅, 王义飞, 宁宇, 等. 若尔盖县高原湿地景观格局动态分析研究. 林业资源管理, 2019, 48(1): 109-115 [Ma H, Wang Y-F, Ning Y, et al. Dynamic analysis of landscape pattern of plateau wetland in Ruoergai County. Forestry Resources Management, 2019, 48(1): 109-115]
[16] 甄硕, 董李勤, 郑茹敏, 等. 2007年和2016年若尔盖高原沼泽湿地景观格局及变化. 湿地科学, 2017, 15(4): 522-525 [Zhen S, Dong L-Q, Zheng R-M, et al. Landscape pattern and changes of wetlands on the Ruoergai Plateau in 2007 and 2016. Wetland Science, 2017, 15(4): 522-525]
[17] 郭斌, 王珊, 王明田. 1999—2015年若尔盖草原湿地净初级生产力时空变化. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(2): 424-432 [Guo B, Wang S, Wang M-T. Spatial and temporal changes of net primary productivity in Ruoergai grassland wetland from 1999 to 2015. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31(2): 424-432]
[18] 黄翀, 刘高焕, 王新功, 等. 黄河流域湿地格局特征、控制因素与保护. 地理研究, 2012, 31(10): 1764-1774 [Huang C, Liu G-H, Wang X-G, et al. Pattern characteristics, control factors and protection of wetland in the Yellow River basin. Geography Research, 2012, 31(10): 1764-1774]
[19] Mitsch WJ. Wetland creation, restoration, and conservation: A wetland invitational at the Olentangy River Wetland Research Park. Ecological Engineering, 2005, 24: 243-251
[20] Zhao R, Chen Y, Zhou H, et al. Assessment of wetland fragmentation in the Tarim River Basin, Western China. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2009, 57: 455-464
[21] 中国城市规划设计研究院. 宁夏沿黄城市带发展规划 [EB/OL]. (2009-04-09) [2020-06-10]. http://www.docin.com/p-543128596.html [China Academy of Urban Planning and Design. Development Plan of Ningxia City Belt along the Yellow River [EB/OL]. (2009-04-09) [2020-06-10]. http://www.docin.com/p-543128596.html]
[22] 张荣群, 乔月霞, 刘欢. 湿地景观演变与土地利用强度变化的响应关系——以银川平原为例. 测绘科学, 2015, 40(10): 54-59 [Zhang R-Q, Qiao Y-X, Liu H. Response relationship between wetland landscape evolution and land use intensity change: A case study of Yinchuan Plain. Science of Surveying and Mapping, 2015, 40(10): 54-59]
[23] 宁夏统计局. 2000宁夏统计年鉴. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2000 [Ningxia Bureau of Statistics. 2000 Ningxia Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistical Press, 2000]
[24] 宁夏统计局. 2009宁夏统计年鉴. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2009 [Ningxia Bureau of Statistics. 2009 Ningxia Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistical Press, 2009]
[25] 宁夏统计局. 2018宁夏统计年鉴. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2018 [Ningxia Bureau of Statistics. 2018 Ningxia Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistical Press, 2018]
[26] 唐小平, 黄桂林. 中国湿地分类系统的研究. 林业科学研究, 2003, 16(5): 531-539 [Tang X-P, Huang G-L. Research on wetland classification system in China. Forest Research, 2003, 16(5): 531-539]
[27] Lu C, Ren C, Wang Z, et al. Monitoring and assessment of wetland loss and fragmentation in the Cross-boundary Protected Area: A case study of Wusuli River Basin. Remote Sensing, 2019, 11: 2581
[28] 张敏, 宫兆宁, 赵文吉, 等. 近30年来白洋淀湿地景观格局变化及其驱动机制. 生态学报, 2016, 36(15): 4780-4791 [Zhang M, Gong Z-N, Zhao W-J, et al. Changes of Baiyangdian wetland landscape pattern and its driving mechanism in recent 30 years. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(15): 4780-4791]
[29] 傅伯杰, 徐延达, 吕一河. 景观格局与水土流失的尺度特征与耦合方法. 地球科学进展, 2010, 25(7): 673-681 [Fu B-J, Xu Y-D, Lyu Y-H. Scale characte-ristics and coupling method of landscape pattern and soil erosion. Progress in Earth Science, 2010, 25(7): 673-681]
[30] 陈芝聪, 谢小平, 白毛伟. 南四湖湿地景观空间格局动态演变. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(10): 3316-3324 [Chen Z-C, Xie X-P, Bai M-W. Dynamic evolution of wetland landscape spatial pattern in Nansihu Lake. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016, 27(10): 3316-3324]
[31] 张路, 李炳章, 郭克疾, 等. 西藏唐北地区湖泊动态及空间格局预测. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(8): 2793-2802 [Zhang L, Li B-Z, Guo K-J, et al. Prediction of lake dynamics and spatial pattern in the northern tang region of Xizang. Chinese Journal of Applied Eco-logy, 2019, 30(8): 2793-2802]
[32] 谢帅, 刘士彬, 段建波, 等. OSDS注册用户空间分布特征及影响因素分析. 地球信息科学学报, 2016, 18(10): 1332-1340 [Xie S, Liu S-B, Duan J-B, et al. Analysis of spatial distribution characteristics and influencing factors of OSDS registered users. Journal of Earth Information Science, 2016, 18(10): 1332-1340]
[33] 周亮, 周成虎, 杨帆, 等. 2000—2011年中国PM2.5时空演化特征及驱动因素解析. 地理学报, 2017, 72(11): 2079-2092 [Zhou L, Zhou C-H, Yang F, et al. Spatial and temporal evolution characteristics and dri-ving factors of PM2.5 in China from 2000 to 2011. Acta Geographica Ginica, 2017, 72(11): 2079-2092]
[34] 王劲峰, 徐成东. 地理探测器: 原理与展望. 地理学报, 2017, 72(1): 116-134 [Wang J-F, Xu C-D. Geo-graphical detectors: Principles and prospects. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(1): 116-134]
[35] 周伟, 牟凤云, 刚成诚, 等. 1982—2010年中国草地净初级生产力时空动态及其与气候因子的关系. 生态学报, 2017, 37(13): 4335-4345 [Zhou W, Mou F-Y, Gang C-C, et al. Spatio-temporal dynamics of net primary productivity of grassland in China from 1982 to 2010 and its relationship with climatic factors. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(13): 4335-4345]
[36] 马炜, 张阳武, 周天元, 等. 基于空间抽样调查的宁夏全区和吴忠市湿地面积估测. 湿地科学, 2019, 17(4): 384-390 [Ma W, Zhang Y-W, Zhou T-Y, et al. Estimation of wetland area in Ningxia Autonomous Region and Wuzhong City based on spatial sampling survey. Wetland Science, 2019, 17(4): 384-390]

宁夏沿黄城市带湿地景观格局演变特征及驱动力

Characteristics and driving forces of wetland landscape pattern evolution of the city belt along the Yellow River in Ningxia, China

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王婷, 牟长城, 孙梓淇, 李美霖, 王文婧, 许文, 赵海明. 长白山园池沼泽湿地碳源/汇沿湖岸至高地环境梯度变化 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2363-2373.
[2]	谢卓洪, 雷敏, 刘利杰, 莫燕卿, 战国强, 刘萍. 珠三角城市群景观生态格局评价与优化 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2481-2488.
[3]	连虎刚, 曲张明, 刘春芳, 贺扬希. 北方防沙带河西走廊段景观格局时空演变及其防风固沙服务响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(9): 2518-2526.
[4]	李成龙, 周广胜, 周梦子, 周莉, 刘杰. 1971—2020年盘锦芦苇湿地净生态系统生产力及其影响因子 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(5): 1331-1340.
[5]	李佳琛, 侯磊, 王艳霞, 梁启斌. 氮输入对罗时江湿地沉积物N₂O生成过程及酶活性的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(2): 405-414.
[6]	陈国远, 王成, 陈浩, 苏越, 於冉, 徐晓华. 盐城滨海湿地獐栖息地选择的季节变化 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(2): 510-518.
[7]	展鹏飞, 仝川. 甲烷排放部分抵消湿地生态系统碳汇功能:全球数据分析 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(11): 2958-2968.
[8]	龚政, 文天翼, 靳闯, 赵堃, 苏敏. 江苏中部潮滩湿地土壤有机碳分布特征及影响因子 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(11): 2978-2984.
[9]	张佳彭, 杨继松, 刘玥, 宁凯, 于君宝, 王志康, 王雪宏. 电子受体添加对黄河口湿地土壤厌氧碳矿化温度敏感性的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(11): 2985-2992.
[10]	张峻铭, 孙永玉, 周姗, 邱昕腾, 孙仕仙, 欧朝蓉. 2000—2020年金沙江干热河谷景观生态风险的时空变化 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(10): 2767-2776.
[11]	盛菲, 刘士余, 张婷, 余敏琪. 濂水流域降雨变化和景观格局演变的径流效应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(1): 196-202.
[12]	李月辉, 胡远满, 王正文. 山水林田湖草沙一体化保护和修复工程与景观生态学 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(1): 249-256.
[13]	李浙, 张琦, 吴庆明, 高晓冬, Ngo Thi Kieu Trang, 徐卓. 不同天气条件下青头潜鸭越冬期行为的响应模式 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(9): 2557-2562.
[14]	周怡, 焦亮, 秦慧君, 吴晶晶, 车曦晨. 克隆植物芦苇叶片功能性状对异质环境的响应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(8): 2171-2177.
[15]	史宇骁, 李阳, 孟翊, 赵志远, 张婷玉, 王栋, 袁琳. 1989—2020年长江口九段沙湿地格局演变及影响因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(8): 2229-2236.