成渝城市群城镇化与生态环境耦合协调及交互影响

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202103.012

应用生态学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (3): 993-1004.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202103.012

成渝城市群城镇化与生态环境耦合协调及交互影响

杨亮洁^1*, 张小鸿¹, 潘竟虎¹, 杨永春^2,3

¹西北师范大学地理与环境科学学院, 兰州 730070;
²兰州大学资源环境学院, 兰州 730000;
³兰州大学西部环境教育部重点实验室, 兰州 730000

收稿日期:2020-08-15 接受日期:2020-12-13 出版日期:2021-03-15 发布日期:2021-09-15
通讯作者: * E-mail: yangljmnx@163.com
作者简介:杨亮洁, 女, 1977年生, 博士, 副教授。主要从事城市生态、城市网络研究。E-mail: yangljmnx@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41501176,41961030)资助

Coupling coordination and interaction between urbanization and eco-environment in Cheng-Yu urban agglomeration, China

YANG Liang-jie^1*, ZHANG Xiao-hong¹, PAN Jing-hu¹, YANG Yong-chun^2,3

¹College of Geography and Environmental Science, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China;
²School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China;
³Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Western China’s Environmental Systems, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China

Received:2020-08-15 Accepted:2020-12-13 Online:2021-03-15 Published:2021-09-15
Contact: * E-mail: yangljmnx@163.com
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China (41501176, 41961030)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以成都-重庆(简称成渝)城市群为研究对象,从经济、社会、生态和城乡协调4个子系统构建城镇化综合评价指标体系,将生态环境承载力和生态弹性结合构建生态环境综合评价指标体系,应用耦合协调度模型测度2005—2018年成渝城市群各地级市城镇化与生态环境的耦合协调度,借助GIS空间分析法、象限分析法和Tapio模型,分析成渝城市群各地级市城镇化与生态环境交互作用的类型、演化路径及其解耦路径。结果表明: 研究期间,成渝城市群的城镇化质量呈现波动上升趋势,以成都、重庆为高值区呈“双核”向四周辐射;生态环境质量缓慢提升,呈四周高、中部低,开口向北的“U”型空间格局。城镇化系统和生态环境系统耦合协调水平较高,总体呈上升的趋势,协调类型由以濒临失调和勉强协调为主逐渐向以中度协调为主演变,呈现中部低、东西高的空间格局。城镇化与生态环境交互作用的演化路径呈现稳定型和变化型2个大类。稳定型包括5个亚类20个城市,成都、德阳、绵阳等城市始终是良好协调型;变化型包括9个亚类16个城市,重庆主城区、铜梁等多数城市的协调度提升,呈“上升式”发展;合川、自贡等少数城市呈“下沉式”发展。生态环境增长率和城镇化增长率均为正,城镇化与生态环境的解耦路径以弱脱钩和扩张连接为主。

关键词: 城镇化质量, 生态环境质量, 耦合协调, 脱钩模型, 成渝城市群

Abstract: We built a comprehensive evaluation index system of urbanization in Chengdu-Chongqing (Cheng-Yu) urban agglomeration from four subsystems, including the economic, social, ecological, and urban and rural coordination. The comprehensive evaluation index system of eco-environment was constructed by combining ecological environment carrying capacity and ecological flexibi-lity. The coupling coordination degree model was applied to quantify the coupling coordination degree between urbanization and eco-environment in the prefecture-level cities of Cheng-Yu urban agglo-meration from 2005 to 2018. With GIS spatial analysis, phenomenon analysis and Tapio model, we analyzed the interaction type, evolution path and path of decoupling between urbanization and eco-environment in the prefecture-level cities of Cheng-Yu urban agglomeration. The results showed that the urbanization quality of Cheng-Yu urban agglomeration showed a trend of fluctuation and rise during the study period. Both Chengdu and Chongqing as high value areas showed “double-core” radia-ting to the surrounding areas. The eco-environment quality showed a slowly rising trend. The spatial pattern was a “ U ” shape with a north opening, high perimeter and low center. The degree of coupling coordination between the urbanization system and the eco-environment system was rising, with a spatial pattern of low in the middle and high in the east and west. The overall level of coupling coordination was relatively high. The type of coupling coordination degree was gradually evolving from near-disorder and reluctant coordination to moderate coordination. The evolution paths of urbanization and eco-environmental interaction were divided into two categories: stable and changing. The stable type included 20 cities in 5 subcategories, with Chengdu, Deyang, Mianyang, etc. being always well-coordination. The change type included 16 cities in 9 subcategories. The coordination degree of Chongqing main urban area, Tongliang and most other cities was improved, showing “rising” development. Hechuan, Zigong and a few other cities showed “sinking” development. The growth rates of both ecological environment and urbanization were positive. The decoupling state of urbanization and ecological environment was mainly characterized by weak decoupling and expansion connection.

Key words: urbanization quality, eco-environmental quality, coupled coordination model, Tapio model, Cheng-Yu urban agglomeration

杨亮洁, 张小鸿, 潘竟虎, 杨永春. 成渝城市群城镇化与生态环境耦合协调及交互影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(3): 993-1004.

YANG Liang-jie, ZHANG Xiao-hong, PAN Jing-hu, YANG Yong-chun. Coupling coordination and interaction between urbanization and eco-environment in Cheng-Yu urban agglomeration, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(3): 993-1004.

参考文献 40

[1]	方创琳, 刘晓丽, 蔺雪芹. 中国城市化发展阶段的修正及规律性分析. 干旱区地理, 2008, 31(4): 512-523 [Fang C-L, Liu X-L, Lin X-Q. The revision and regularity analysis of China’s urbanization development stage. Arid Land Geography, 2008, 31(4): 512-523]
[2]	刘春雨, 刘英英, 丁饶干. 福建省新型城镇化与生态环境的耦合分析. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(9): 3043-3050 [Liu C-Y, Liu Y-Y, Ding R-G. Coupling analysis between new-type urbanization and ecological environment in Fujian Province. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018, 29(9): 3043-3050]
[3]	中华人民共和国中央人民政府. 国家新型城镇化规划(2014—2020年) [EB/OL]. (2014-03-30) [2020-12-07]. http://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2014/content_2644805.htm [The State Council of the People’s Republic of China. National New Urbanization Plan [EB/OL]. (2014-03-30) [2020-12-07]. http://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2014/content_2644805.htm.]
[4]	方创琳, 崔学刚, 梁龙武. 城镇化与生态环境耦合圈理论及耦合器调控. 地理学报, 2019, 74(12): 2529-2546 [Fang C-L, Cui X-G, Liang L-W. Theoretical analysis of urbanization and eco-environment coupling coil and coupler control. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(12): 2529-2546]
[5]	王富喜, 毛爱华, 李赫龙. 基于熵值法的山东省城镇化质量测度及空间差异分析. 地理科学, 2013, 33(11): 1323-1329 [Wang F-X, Mao A-H, Li H-L. Quality measurement and regional difference of urbanization in Shangdong Province based on the entropy method. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2013, 33(11): 1323-1329]
[6]	吕丹, 叶萌, 杨琼. 新型城镇化质量评价指标体系综述与重构. 财经问题研究, 2014(9): 72-78 [Lyu D, Ye M, Yang Q. Review and reconstruction of quality evaluation index system for new urbanization. Research on Financial and Economic Issues, 2014(9): 72-78]
[7]	刘晶, 方创琳, 何伦志, 等. “一带一路”沿线国家城镇化发展质量综合评价——基于经济、制度、社会视角. 经济地理, 2019, 39(4): 59-66 [Liu J, Fang C-L, He L-Z, et al. Evaluation index system of urbanization development quality in countries along the belt and road based on economic, institutional and social perspectives. Economic Geography, 2019, 39(4): 59-66]
[8]	张引, 杨庆媛, 李闯, 等. 重庆市新型城镇化发展质量评价与比较分析. 经济地理, 2015, 35(7): 79-86 [Zhang Y, Yang Q-Y, Li C, et al. The quality evaluation and comparative analysis of new urbanization deve-lopment in Chongqing. Economic Geography, 2015, 35(7): 79-86]
[9]	杨亮洁, 杨海楠, 杨永春, 等. 基于耦合协调度模型的河西走廊生态环境质量时空格局演化. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2020, 30(1): 102-112 [Yang L-J, Yang H-N, Yang Y-C, et al. Spatial-temporal evolution of ecological environment quality in Hexi Corridor based on coupled coordination model. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2020, 30(1): 102-112]
[10]	纪学朋, 白永平, 杜海波, 等. 甘肃省生态承载力空间定量评价及耦合协调性. 生态学报, 2017, 37(17): 5861-5870 [Ji X-P, Bai Y-P, Du H-B, et al. Research on the spatial quantitative evaluation and coupling coordination degree of ecological carrying capacity in Gansu Province. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(17): 5861-5870]
[11]	刘海燕, 程全国, 魏建兵, 等. 基于改进三维生态足迹的沈阳市自然资本动态. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(12): 4067-4074 [Liu H-Y, Cheng Q-G, Wei J-B, et al. Dynamics of natural capital in Shenyang based on improved three-dimensional ecological footprint. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017, 28(12): 4067-4074]
[12]	周沙, 黄跃飞, 王光谦. 黑河流域中游地区生态环境变化特征及驱动力. 中国环境科学, 2014, 34(3): 766-773 [Zhou S, Huang Y-F, Wang G-Q. Changes in the ecological environment and there determining factors in the Heihe River basin. China Environment Science, 2014, 34(3): 766-773]
[13]	韩永贵, 高阳, 韩磊, 等. 基于模糊规则的人工神经网络模拟新疆杨蒸腾耗水. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(5): 1525-1534 [Han Y-G, Gao Y, Han L, et al. Modeling water consumption of Populus bolleana by artificial neural network based on fuzzy rules. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31(5): 1525-1534]
[14]	张广海, 刘真真, 王新越. 中国沿海区域旅游化与生态环境耦合度分析及预测. 生态环境学报, 2013, 22(5): 792-800 [Zhang G-H, Liu Z-Z, Wang X-Y. Analysis and forecast of coupling degree between tourism-oriented development and eco-environment in coastal region of China. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2013, 22(5): 792-800]
[15]	刘乐乐, 赵小锋, 赵颜创, 等. 基于城市环境气候图的宁波大气环境分析与调控对策. 生态学报, 2017, 37(2): 606-618 [Liu L-L, Zhao X-F, Zhao Y-C, et al. Ningbo atmospheric environment analysis and regulating countermeasure based on urban climatic map. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(2): 606-618]
[16]	李静, 池金, 吴华清. 基于水资源的工业绿色偏向型技术进步测度与分析. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2018, 28(10): 131-142 [Li J, Chi J, Wu Q-H. Measurement and analysis of industrial green biased technological progress based on water resources. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2018, 28(10): 131-142]
[17]	张路, 李炳章, 郭克疾, 等. 西藏唐北地区湖泊动态及空间格局预测. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(8): 2793-2802 [Zhang L, Li B-Z, Guo K-J, et al. Dyna-mics and spatial pattern prediction of lakes in the nort-hern Tanggula Mountains, Tibet. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2019, 30(8): 2793-2802]
[18]	张诗晓, 张浚茂, 张文康, 等. 泛珠江流域土地利用时空变化特征及驱动因子. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(2): 573-580 [Zhang S-X, Zhang J-M, Zhang W-K, et al. Spatiotemporal variability characteristics and dri-ving forces of land use in the Pan-Pearl River basin. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31(2): 573-580]
[19]	杨琰瑛, 郑善文, 逯非, 等. 国内外生态城市规划建设比较研究. 生态学报, 2018, 38(22): 8247-8255 [Yang Y-Y, Zheng S-W, Lu F, et al. Comparative case study of domestic and international eco-cities and its enlightenment to China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(22): 8247-8255]
[20]	王小双, 张雪花, 雷喆. 天津市生态宜居城市建设指标与评价研究. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2013, 23(suppl.1): 19-22 [Wang X-S, Zhang X-H, Lei Z. Tianjin ecological livable city construction index and evaluation research. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2013, 23(suppl.1): 19-22]
[21]	刘春雨, 刘英英, 丁饶干. 福建省新型城镇化与生态环境的耦合分析. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(9): 3043-3050 [Liu C-Y, Liu Y-Y, Ding R-G. Coupling analysis between new-type urbanization and ecological environment in Fujian Province. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018, 29(9): 3043-3050]
[22]	崔鑫生, 韩萌, 方志. 动态演进的倒“U”型环境库兹涅茨曲线. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2019, 29(9): 74-82 [Cui X-S, Han M, Fang Z. Inverted ‘U’-shape of EKC with dynamic evolution trend. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2019, 29(9): 74-82]
[23]	中华人民共和国国家发展和改革委员会. 成渝城市群发展规划[EB/OL]. (2016-05-04) [2020-12-07]. https://www.ndrc.gov.cn/fzggw/jgsj/ghs/sjdt/201605/t20160504_1170022.html [National Development and Reform Commission. Chengyu Urban Agglomeration Development Plan [EB/OL]. (2016-05-04) [2020-12-07]. https://www.ndrc.gov.cn/fzggw/jgsj/ghs/sjdt/201605/t20160504_1170022.html]
[24]	四川省统计局. 四川统计年鉴. 北京: 中国统计出版, 2006-2019 [Sichuan Provincial Bureau of Statistics. Sichuan Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2006-2019]
[25]	重庆市统计局. 重庆统计年鉴. 北京: 中国统计出版, 2006-2019 [Chongqing Provincial Bureau of Statistics. Chongqing Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2006-2019]
[26]	国家统计局城市社会经济调查司. 中国城市统计年鉴. 北京: 中国统计出版, 2006-2019 [Division of Urban Social and Economic Survey, National Bureau of Statistics. China City Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2006-2019]
[27]	四川省水利厅. 四川省水资源公报 [EB/OL]. (2019-10-18) [2020-05-01]. http://slt.sc.gov.cn/scsslt/tzgg/2019/10/18/a32478ef317a40848f338cb27b70f3f0.shtml [Sichuan Provincial Water Resources Department. Sichuan Water Resources Bulletin [EB/OL]. (2019-10-18)[2020-05-01]. http://slt.sc.gov.cn/scsslt/tzgg/2019/10/18/a32478ef317a40848f338cb27b70f3f0.shtml]
[28]	重庆市水利局. 重庆市水资源公报 [EB/OL]. (2020-9-30)[2020-05-01]. http://slj.cq.gov.cn/bysx/gsys/202009/t20200930_7939703.html [Chongqing Provincial Water Resources Department. Chongqing Water Resources Bulletin [EB/OL]. (2020-9-30)[2020-05-01]. http://slj.cq.gov.cn/bysx/gsys/202009/t20200-930_7939703.html]
[29]	梁龙武, 王振波, 方创琳, 等. 京津冀城市群城市化与生态环境时空分异及协同发展格局. 生态学报, 2019, 39(4): 1212-1225 [Liang L-W, Wang Z-B, Fang C-L, et al. Spatiotemporal differentiation and coordinated development pattern of urbanization and the ecological environment of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(4): 1212-1225]
[30]	蓝庆新, 刘昭洁, 彭一然. 中国新型城镇化质量评价指标体系构建及评价方法——基于2003—2014年31个省市的空间差异研究. 南方经济, 2017(1): 111-126 [Lan Q-X, Liu Z-J, Peng Y-R. The construction of evaluation index system for quality of new-pattern urbanization and its evaluation method: Based on study of spatial differences among China’s 31 provinces (cities) during the year of 2003 to 2014. South China Journal of Economics, 2017(1): 111-126]
[31]	朱青, 国佳欣, 郭熙, 等. 鄱阳湖区生态环境质量的空间分异特征及其影响因素. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(12): 4108-4116 [Zhu Q, Guo J-X, Guo X, et al. Spatial variation of ecological environment quality and its influencing factors in Poyang Lake area. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2019, 30(12): 4108-4116]
[32]	Rainer W. Development of environmental indicator systems: Experiences from Germany. Environmental Mana-gement, 2000, 25: 613-623
[33]	Holling CS. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1973, 4: 1-23
[34]	高吉喜. 可持续发展理论探索. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2001 [Gao J-X. Exploration of the Theory of Sustainable Development. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 2001]
[35]	罗旭, 梁宇, 贺红士, 等. 气候变化、林火和营林措施对寒温带典型森林生态弹性的影响. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(5): 1699-1712 [Luo X, Liang Y, He H-S, et al. Effects of climate change, fire and silvicultural management on ecological resilience of typical cold-temperate forests in China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2019, 30(5): 1699-1712]
[36]	刘晓平, 李鹏, 任宗萍, 等. 榆林地区生态系统弹性力评价分析. 生态学报, 2016, 36(22): 7479-7491 [Liu X-P, Li P, Ren Z-P, et al. Evaluation of ecosystem resilience in Yulin, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(22): 7479-7491]
[37]	Janssen MA, Anderies JM, Walker BH. Robust strategies for managing rangelands with multiple stable attrac-tors. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2004, 47: 140-162
[38]	徐允, 张培, 周宝同. 基于Shannon多样性t检验法的土地利用景观分区研究——以重庆市永川区为例. 中国农业资源与区划, 2019, 40(1): 134-141 [Xu Y, Zhang P, Zhou B-T. Study on landscape zoning of land use based on Shannon diversity t-test method: A case study Yongchuan Distinct of Chongqing. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2019, 40(1): 134-141]
[39]	徐明德, 李静, 彭静, 等. 基于RS和GIS的生态系统健康评价. 生态环境学报, 2010, 19(8): 1809-1814 [Xu M-D, Li J, Peng J, et al. Ecosystem health assessment based on RS and GIS. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2010, 19(8): 1809-1814]
[40]	冯雨雪, 李广东. 青藏高原城镇化与生态环境交互影响关系分析. 地理学报, 2020, 75(7): 1386-1405 [Meng Y-X, Li G-D. Interaction between urbanization and eco-environment in Tibetan Plateau. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(7): 1386-1405]

成渝城市群城镇化与生态环境耦合协调及交互影响

Coupling coordination and interaction between urbanization and eco-environment in Cheng-Yu urban agglomeration, China

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 40

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王清韵, 周丁扬, 安萍莉, 姜广辉. 自然保护地政策对区域生态环境质量的影响——以三江源地区为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(5): 1349-1359.
[2]	朱嘉晴, 秦会艳, 张梦春. 基于时变参数C-D生产函数的江西省农业碳排放驱动因素及脱钩效应 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(11): 3085-3094.
[3]	任堃, 罗漫雅, 赵永华, 韩玲, 张磊, 杨舒媛. 西安市生态环境及城市发展质量评估 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(9): 2485-2492.
[4]	岳奕帆, 陈国鹏, 王立, 杨钧, 杨克彤. 基于Google Earth Engine云平台的甘肃舟曲县生态环境质量动态监测与评价 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(6): 1608-1614.
[5]	南生祥, 魏伟, 刘春芳, 周俊菊. 土地利用变化的生态环境效应及其时空演变特征——以河西走廊为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(11): 3055-3064.
[6]	文广超, 孙世奎, 李兴, 谢洪波. 可鲁克湖流域生态环境质量诊断 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(8): 2906-2914.
[7]	周玲美, 王世航. 内蒙古杭锦旗生态环境时空变化的遥感监测与评价 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(6): 1999-2006.
[8]	朱泓, 王金亮, 程峰, 邓欢, 张恩伟, 李应鑫. 滇中湖泊流域生态环境质量监测与评价 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(4): 1289-1297.
[9]	王杰, 马佳丽, 解斐斐, 徐锡杰. 干旱地区遥感生态指数的改进——以乌兰布和沙漠为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(11): 3795-3804.
[10]	郭泽呈, 魏伟, 张学渊, 李振亚, 周俊菊, 颉斌斌. 基于RS和GIS的石羊河流域生态环境质量空间分布特征及其影响因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(9): 3075-3086.
[11]	李响, 齐文平, 谭畅, 王白雪, 王艳慧. 生态环境脆弱性与多维贫困的耦合关系——基于广西河池市1586个贫困村的实证分析 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(12): 4303-4312.
[12]	朱青, 国佳欣, 郭熙, 徐喆, 丁徽, 韩逸. 鄱阳湖区生态环境质量的空间分异特征及其影响因素 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(12): 4108-4116.
[13]	刘春雨, 刘英英, 丁饶干. 福建省新型城镇化与生态环境的耦合分析 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(9): 3043-3050.
[14]	于伟,赵林. 包容性视角下城镇化质量与资源利用的协调性——以中国288个地级以上城市为例 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(12): 4119-4127.
[15]	刘盼, 任春颖, 王宗明, 张柏, 陈琳. 南瓮河自然保护区生态环境质量遥感评价 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(10): 3347-3356.