欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

应用生态学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (08): 2077-2086.

• 中国生态学学会2011年学术年会会议专栏 • 上一篇    下一篇

传统景观格局指数在城市热岛效应评价中的适用性

陈爱莲1,2,孙然好1,陈利顶1**   

  1. (1中国科学院生态环境研究中心城市与区域生态国家重点实验室, 北京 100085; 2中国科学院研究生院, 北京 100049)
  • 出版日期:2012-08-18 发布日期:2012-08-18

Applicability of traditional landscape metrics in evaluating urban heat island effect.

CHEN Ai-lian1,2, SUN Ran-hao1 , CHEN Li-ding1   

  1. (1State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for EcoEnvironmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China; 2Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)
  • Online:2012-08-18 Published:2012-08-18

摘要: 以北京部分城区为研究对象,以QuickBird影像制作景观类型图,基于同年4个季节的Landsat ETM+数据反演地表温度;将120 m×120 m作为固定窗口,计算其中的景观格局指数,探寻传统景观格局指数解释地表温度的适用性.结果表明:在景观水平计算的24个景观格局指数中,只有景观组成百分比(PLAND)、斑块密度(PD)、最大斑块指数(LPI)、欧氏距离变异系数(ENN_CV)和分离度(DIVISION)与3月、5月、11月的地表温度具有稳定的显著相关.在类型水平计算的24个景观格局指数中,PLAND、LPI、DIVISION、相似邻接百分比、分散与并列指数与4个时相(3月、5月、7月和12月)的温度显著相关,且与7月温度的相关性最强;斑块密度、边界密度、聚簇度、凝聚度、有效MESH大小、分裂度、聚合度、归一化景观形状指数依据不同景观类型而与地表温度呈现相关性.传统景观格局指数可能并不适合评估河流对地表温度的影响.一些景观格局指数可以用来表征城市地表温度,辅助分析城市地表热岛效应,但需要对其进行筛选和甄别.

Abstract: By using 24 landscape metrics, this paper evaluated the urban heat island effect in parts of Beijing downtown area. QuickBird (QB) images were used to extract the landscape type information, and the thermal bands from Landsat Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM+) images were used to extract the land surface temperature (LST) in four seasons of the same year. The 24 landscape pattern metrics were calculated at landscape and class levels in a fixed window with 120 m×120 m in size, with the applicability of these traditional landscape metrics in evaluating the urban heat island effect examined. Among the 24 landscape metrics, only the percentage composition of landscape (PLAND), patch density (PD), largest patch index (LPI), coefficient of Euclidean nearestneighbor distance variance (ENN_CV), and landscape division index (DIVISION) at landscape level were significantly correlated with the LST in March, May, and November, and the PLAND, LPI, DIVISION, percentage of like adjacencies, and interspersion and  juxtaposition index at class level showed significant correlations with the LST in March, May, July, and December, especially in July. Some metrics such as PD, edge density, clumpiness index, patch cohesion index, effective mesh size, splitting index, aggregation index, and normalized landscape shape index showed varying correlations with the LST at different class levels. The traditional landscape metrics could not be appropriate in evaluating the effects of river on LST, while some of the metrics could be useful in characterizing urban LST and analyzing the urban heat island effect, but screening and examining should be made on the metrics.