欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

应用生态学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (11): 3885-3893.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201911.015

• • 上一篇    下一篇

深圳市基本生态控制线对景观生态风险的影响

陈弼锴1, 赵宇豪1,2, 吴健生1,2*   

  1. 1北京大学城市规划与设计学院, 城市人居环境科学与技术重点实验室, 广东深圳 518055;
    2北京大学城市与环境学院, 地表过程与模拟教育部重点实验室, 北京 100871
  • 收稿日期:2019-02-18 出版日期:2019-11-15 发布日期:2019-11-15
  • 通讯作者: * E-mail: wujs@pkusz.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:陈弼锴, 男, 1995年生, 硕士研究生. 主要从事景观生态与土地利用研究. E-mail: chenbikai@pku.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    本文由深圳市科技创新计划项目(JCYJ20170412150910443)和国家自然科学基金项目(41671180)资助

Impacts of Shenzhen basic ecological control line on landscape ecological risk

CHEN Bi-kai1, ZHAO Yu-hao1,2, WU Jian-sheng1,2*   

  1. 1Key Laboratory for Urban Habitat Environmental Science and Technology, School of Urban Planning and Design, Peking University, Shenzhen 518055, Guangdong, China;
    2Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Earth Surface Processes, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
  • Received:2019-02-18 Online:2019-11-15 Published:2019-11-15
  • Contact: * E-mail: wujs@pkusz.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Science and Technology Innovation Program of Shenzhen (JCYJ20170412150910443) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41671180).

摘要: 深圳市基本生态控制线自2005年实施至今已超过10年,对生态空间具有显著的保护作用.景观生态风险指在自然或人为因素影响下景观格局与生态过程相互作用可能产生的不利后果,科学地管理生态风险是人类可持续发展的重要前提.探究政策实施以来控制线内外区域景观生态风险变化具有重要意义.本研究结合生态敏感性和景观脆弱性两种指标,对2005和2015年深圳市景观生态风险进行综合评估,并利用倍差法探究基本生态控制线政策的实施对控制线内区域景观生态风险的影响.结果表明:深圳市景观生态风险呈现西高东低的空间结构,2005—2015年间景观生态风险有所降低,降幅为13.5%;生态控制线线内和线外区域的降幅分别为0.7%和14.4%,除东部滨海分区之外,线外区域的景观生态风险比线内区域降幅更显著.控制其他变量的影响后,在市级尺度,相对于控制线外区域,控制线内区域景观生态风险高1.8%;在分区尺度,中心城区、西部滨海分区、中部分区、东部分区,控制线内区域景观生态风险比控制线外区域分别高1.6%、1.6%、1.4%、1.9%,而东部滨海分区控制线内外差异不显著.基本生态控制线政策的实施降低了控制线内的生境质量和景观脆弱性,但对归一化植被指数和人口密度影响不显著.

Abstract: The Shenzhen Basic Ecological Control Line (SZBECL) has been in operation for more than ten years since its implementation in 2005, which has a significant protective effect on the ecological space. Landscape ecological risk refers to the possible adverse consequences caused by the natural or human-induced interactions between landscape pattern and ecological processes. The scien-tific management of ecological risk is an important prerequisite for the sustainable development of human beings. Therefore, it is of great significance to explore the changes of landscape ecological risk inside and outside the SZBECL. Combining two indicators (ecological sensitivity and landscape vulnerability), we comprehensively evaluated the landscape ecological risk of Shenzhen in 2005 and 2015. The difference-in-difference method was used to explore the impacts of the SZBECL on the landscape ecological risk inside the line. Results showed that the landscape ecological risk in Shen-zhen presented a spatial structure of “high west and low east”, which decreased by 13.5% during 2005 to 2015. Inside and outside the SZBECL, the declines of the landscape ecological risk were 0.7% and 14.4%, respectively. For the five subzones, declines were more significant outside the SZBECL, except for the eastern coastal zone. After controlling the effects of other variables, at the municipal level, there was 1.8% higher landscape ecological risk inside the line compared with the region outside the line. Furthermore, at the subzone level, there was 1.6%, 1.6%, 1.4%, and 1.9% higher landscape ecological risk inside the line in the central urban zone, the western coastal zone, the middle zone, and the eastern zone, respectively. There was no significant difference between the inside and outside of the line in the eastern coastal zone. With the implementation of SZBECL, habitat quality and landscape vulnerability inside the line were lowered, but NDVI and population density did not change.