西部山区流域生态系统服务权衡与协同关系——以甘肃白龙江流域为例

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202004.019

应用生态学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (4): 1278-1288.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202004.019

西部山区流域生态系统服务权衡与协同关系——以甘肃白龙江流域为例

巩杰^*, 柳冬青, 高秉丽, 徐彩仙, 李焱

兰州大学资源环境学院/西部环境教育部重点实验室, 兰州 730000

收稿日期:2019-11-21 出版日期:2020-04-20 发布日期:2020-04-20
通讯作者: *E-mail: jgong@lzu.edu.cn
作者简介:巩杰, 男, 1975年生, 教授。主要从事景观生态学、生态系统服务、土地变化科学、综合自然地理学方面的科研教学工作。E-mail: jgong@lzu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41771196)和第二次青藏高原综合考察研究项目(2019QZKK060300)资助

Tradeoffs and synergies of ecosystem services in western mountainous China: A case study of the Bailongjiang watershed in Gansu, China

GONG Jie^*, LIU Dong-qing, GAO Bing-li, XU Cai-xian, LI Yan

College of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Lanzhou University/Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Western China’s Environmental Systems, Lanzhou 730000, China.

Received:2019-11-21 Online:2020-04-20 Published:2020-04-20
Contact: *E-mail: jgong@lzu.edu.cn
Supported by:
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41771196) and the Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research Program (STEP) (2019QZKK060300).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 甘肃白龙江流域是长江上游重要水源涵养和生态屏障区,生态系统服务研究对该流域生态保护与经济发展的双赢具有重要意义。本研究基于InVEST模型进行4种典型生态系统服务(如土壤保持、水源涵养、食物供给、生境质量)评估,并通过相关性和均方根偏差(RMSD)开展服务间多尺度权衡及其成因分析。结果表明: 土壤保持、水源涵养和生境质量两两之间为显著协同关系,食物供给分别与生境质量、土壤保持和水源涵养间为显著权衡关系。3对协同服务和食物供给与生境质量的权衡强度高值主要集中于文县、迭部和舟曲的中高山阴陡坡林区;食物供给与土壤保持、食物供给与水源涵养间的权衡强度高值主要集中于宕昌和武都的中低山阳缓坡农牧区。人类活动驱使下的土地利用/覆被格局空间差异是影响服务权衡程度及其尺度效应的重要因素。

Abstract: The Bailongjiang watershed of Gansu is an important water conservation and ecological barrier area in the upper reaches of Yangtze River. It is necessary to reveal the tradeoffs and synergies of ecosystem services (ESs) for the “win-win” of watershed ecological system and social eco-nomy development. Based on the InVEST model, four typical ESs including soil conservation (SC), water conservation (WC), food supply (FS), and habitat quality (HQ) were assessed, and the multi-scale tradeoffs and synergies of ESs and its drivers were analyzed by correlation and root mean square deviation (RMSD). The results showed that there were significant synergies among SC, WC, and HQ, and a significant tradeoff between FS and HQ, SC, WC, respectively. The areas with high tradeoff intensity between the three pairs of synergistic services (SC-WC, SC-HQ, WC-HQ), and between FS and HQ were mainly concentrated in the steep forest area of middle-high mountain in Wenxian, Diebu and Zhouqu. The high intensity of tradeoffs between FS-SC, FS-WC were mainly concentrated in the gentle apricus farming and pastoral areas of middle-low mountain in Tanchang and Wudu. The spatial variation of land use/cover caused by human activities was an important factor affecting the degree of ES tradeoffs and its scale effect.

巩杰, 柳冬青, 高秉丽, 徐彩仙, 李焱. 西部山区流域生态系统服务权衡与协同关系——以甘肃白龙江流域为例[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(4): 1278-1288.

GONG Jie, LIU Dong-qing, GAO Bing-li, XU Cai-xian, LI Yan. Tradeoffs and synergies of ecosystem services in western mountainous China: A case study of the Bailongjiang watershed in Gansu, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31(4): 1278-1288.

参考文献 37

[1]	Costanza R, D’Arge R, de Groot R, et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 1997, 387: 253-260
[2]	乔旭宁, 张婷, 杨永菊,等. 渭干河流域生态系统服务的空间溢出及对居民福祉影响. 资源科学, 2017, 39(3): 533-544 [Qiao X-N, Zhang T, Yang Y-J, et al. Spatial flow of ecosystem services and impacts on human well-being in the Weigan River Basin. Resources Science, 2017, 39(3): 533-544]
[3]	Howe C, Suich H, Vira B, et al. Creating win-wins from trade-offs? Ecosystem services for human well-being: A meta-analysis of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies in the real world. Global Environmental Change, 2014, 28: 263-275
[4]	李晶, 李红艳, 张良. 关中-天水经济区生态系统服务权衡与协同关系. 生态学报, 2016, 36(10): 3053-3062 [Li J, Li H-Y, Zhang L. Ecosystem service trade-offs in the Guanzhong-Tianshui economic region of China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(10): 3053-3062]
[5]	Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA). Ecosystems and Human Well-being. Washington, DC: Island Press, 2005
[6]	孙艺杰, 任志远, 赵胜男, 等. 陕西河谷盆地生态系统服务协同与权衡时空差异分析. 地理学报, 2017, 72(3): 521-532 [Sun Y-J, Ren Z-Y, Zhao S-N, et al. Spatial and temporal changing analysis of synergy and trade-off between ecosystem services in valley basins of Shaanxi Province. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(3): 521-532]
[7]	郑华, 李屹峰, 欧阳志云, 等. 生态系统服务功能管理研究进展. 生态学报, 2013, 33(3): 702-710 [Zheng H, Li Y-F, Ouyang Z-Y, et al. Progress and perspectives of ecosystem services management. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(3): 702-710]
[8]	Hou Y, Lyu YH, Chen W, et al. Temporal variation and spatial scale dependency of ecosystem service intera-ctions: A case study on the central Loess Plateau of China. Landscape Ecology, 2017, 32: 1201-1217
[9]	戴尔阜, 王晓莉, 朱建佳, 等. 生态系统服务权衡:方法、模型与研究框架. 地理研究, 2016, 35(6): 1005-1016 [Dai E-F, Wang X-L, Zhu J-J, et al. Methods, tools and research framework of ecosystem service trade-offs. Geographical Research, 2016, 35(6): 1005-1016]
[10]	曹祺文, 卫晓梅, 吴健生. 生态系统服务权衡与协同研究进展. 生态学杂志, 2016, 35(11): 3102-3111 [Cao Q-W, Wei X-M, Wu J-S. A review on the tradeoffs and synergies among ecosystem services. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2016, 35(11): 3102-3111]
[11]	杨晓楠, 李晶, 秦克玉, 等. 关中-天水经济区生态系统服务的权衡关系. 地理学报, 2015, 70(11): 1762-1773 [Yang X-N, Li J, Qin K-Y, et al. Trade-offs between ecosystem services in Guanzhong-Tianshui Economic Region. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015, 70(11): 1762-1773]
[12]	Raudsepp-Hearne C, Peterson GD, Bennett EM. Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010, 107: 5242-5247
[13]	Gong J, Liu DQ, Zhang JX, et al. Tradeoffs/synergies of multiple ecosystem services based on land use simulation in a mountain-basin area, western China. Ecological Indicators, 2019, 99: 283-293
[14]	Bradford JB, D’ Amato AW. Recognizing trade-offs in multi-objective land management. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2012, 10: 210-216
[15]	Bennett EM, Peterson GD, Gordon L. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecology Letters, 2009, 12: 1394-1404
[16]	柳冬青. 流域生态系统服务时空权衡与协同关系研究: 以甘肃省白龙江流域为例. 硕士论文. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2019 [Liu D-Q. Spatiotemporal Tradeoffs and Synergy of Watershed Ecosystem Services: A Case Study of Bailongjiang Watershed in Gansu. Master Thesis. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2019]
[17]	Maes J, Egoh B, Willemen L, et al. Mapping ecosystem services for policy support and decision making in the European Union. Ecosystem Services, 2012, 1: 31-39
[18]	钱彩云, 巩杰, 张金茜, 等. 甘肃白龙江流域生态系统服务变化及权衡与协同关系. 地理学报, 2018, 73(5): 868-879 [Qian C-Y, Gong J, Zhang J-X, et al. Change and tradeoffs-synergies analysis on watershed ecosystem services: A case study of Bailongjiang Watershed, Gansu. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(5): 868-879]
[19]	彭建, 胡晓旭, 赵明月, 等. 生态系统服务权衡研究进展: 从认知到决策. 地理学报, 2017, 72(6): 960-973 [Peng J, Hu X-X, Zhao M-Y, et al. Research progress on ecosystem service trade-offs: From cognition to decision-making. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(6): 960-973]
[20]	中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 土地利用现状分类标准(GB/T 21010—2017). 北京: 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会, 2017 [General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China, China National Standardization Administration. Current Land Use Classification (GB/T 21010-2017). Beijing: General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China, China National Standardization Administration, 2017]
[21]	甘肃省土壤普查办公室. 甘肃土壤. 北京: 农业出版社, 1993 [Gansu Office of General Survey of Soil. Soil of Gansu. Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 1993]
[22]	甘肃省陇南地区土壤普查办公室. 陇南土壤. 兰州: 甘肃人民出版社, 1991 [Longnan Office of General Survey of Soil in Gansu. Soil of Longnan. Lanzhou: Gansu Renmin Press, 1991]
[23]	柳冬青, 张金茜, 巩杰, 等. 陇中黄土丘陵区土地利用强度-生态系统服务-人类福祉时空变化关系研究:以安定区为例. 生态学报, 2019, 39(2): 637-648 [Liu D-Q, Zhang J-X, Gong J, et al. Spatial and temporal relations among land-use intensity, ecosystem services, and human well-being in the Longzhong Loess Hilly Region: A case study of the Anding District, Gansu Province. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(2): 637-648]
[24]	柳冬青, 巩杰, 张金茜, 等. 甘肃白龙江流域生态系统土壤保持功能时空变异及其影响因子. 水土保持研究, 2018, 25(4): 98-103 [Liu D-Q, Gong J, Zhang J-X, et al. Spatiotemporal variation of soil conservation function and its influencing factors in Bailongjiang Watershed in Gansu Province. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2018, 25(4): 98-103]
[25]	丁程锋, 张绘芳, 李霞, 等. 天山中部云杉天然林水源涵养功能定量评估: 以乌鲁木齐河流域为例. 生态学报, 2017, 37(11): 3733-3743 [Ding C-F, Zhang H-F, Li X, et al. Quantitative assessment of water conservation function of the natural spruce forest in the central Tianshan Mountains: A case study of the Urumqi River Basin. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(11): 3733-3743]
[26]	傅斌, 徐佩, 王玉宽, 等. 都江堰市水源涵养功能空间格局. 生态学报, 2013, 33(3): 789-797 [Fu B, Xu P, Wang Y-K, et al. Spatial pattern of water retention in Dujiangyan County. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(3): 789-797]
[27]	谢余初, 巩杰, 齐姗姗, 等. 基于InVEST模型的白龙江流域水源供给服务时空分异. 自然资源学报, 2017, 32(8): 1337-1347 [Xie Y-C, Gong J, Qi S-S, et al. Spatiotemporal variation of water supply service in Bailong River Watershed based on InVEST Model. Journal of Natural Resources, 2017, 32(8): 1337-1347]
[28]	巩杰, 马学成, 张玲玲, 等. 基于InVEST模型的甘肃白龙江流域生境质量时空分异. 水土保持研究, 2018, 25(3): 191-196 [Gong J, Ma X-C, Zhang L-L, et al. Spatiotemporal variation of habitat quality in Bailongjiang Watershed in Gansu based on InVEST Model. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2018, 25(3): 191-196]
[29]	林世伟. “三江并流区”生态系统服务空间权衡与协同关系研究. 硕士论文. 昆明: 云南大学, 2016 [Lin S-W. Spatial Trade-offs and Synergies among Ecosystem Services in the Three Parallel Rivers Region. Master Thesis. Kunming: Yunnan University, 2016]
[30]	Lu N, Fu BJ, Jin TT, et al. Trade-off analyses of multiple ecosystem services by plantations along a precipita-tion gradient across Loess Plateau landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 2014, 29: 1697-1708
[31]	Luo Y, Lyu YH, Fu BJ, et al. Half century change of interactions among ecosystem services driven by ecological restoration: Quantification and policy implications at a watershed scale in the Chinese Loess Plateau. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 651: 2546-2557
[32]	傅伯杰, 徐延达, 吕一河. 景观格局与水土流失的尺度特征与耦合方法. 地球科学进展, 2010, 25(7): 673-681 [Fu B-J, Xu Y-D, Lyu Y-H. Scale characte-ristics and coupled research of landscape pattern and soil and water loss. Advances in Earth Science, 2010, 25(7): 673-681]
[33]	李双成, 张才玉, 刘金龙, 等. 生态系统服务权衡与协同研究进展及地理学研究议题. 地理研究, 2013, 32(8): 1379-1390 [Li S-C, Zhang C-Y, Liu J-L, et al. The tradeoffs and synergies of ecosystem services: Research progress, development trend, and themes of geography. Geographical Research, 2013, 32(8): 1379-1390]
[34]	陈海鹏. 区域生态系统服务权衡研究: 以横断山区小江流域为例. 硕士论文. 兰州: 兰州交通大学, 2017 [Chen H-P. Trade-offs of Regional Ecosystem Services: A Case Study of Xiaojiang Watershed in Hengduan Mountains. Master Thesis. Lanzhou: Lanzhou Jiaotong University, 2017]
[35]	Gordon LJ, Enfors EI. Land Degradation, Ecosystem Services and Resilience of Smallholder Farmers in Makanya Catchment, Tanzania [EB/OL]. (2008-10-10) [2019-10-10]. http://xueshu.baidu.com/usercenter/paper/show?paperid=7d0a1128e3b6f864301f185952a-01649&site=xueshu_se
[36]	张金茜, 柳冬青, 巩杰, 等. 流域景观破碎化对土壤保持服务的影响研究: 以甘肃白龙江流域为例. 资源科学, 2018, 40(9): 1866-1877 [Zhang J-X, Liu D-Q, Gong J, et al. Impact of landscape fragmentation on watershed soil conservation service: A case study on Bailongjiang Watershed of Gansu. Resources Science, 2018, 40(9): 1866-1877]
[37]	杜勇, 税伟, 孙晓瑞, 等. 海湾型城市生态系统服务权衡的情景模拟: 以福建省泉州市为例. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(12): 4293-4302 [Du Y, Shui W, Sun X-R, et al. Scenario simulation of ecosystem service tradeoffs in bay cities: A case study in Quanzhou, Fujian Province, China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2019, 30(12): 4293-4302]

西部山区流域生态系统服务权衡与协同关系——以甘肃白龙江流域为例

Tradeoffs and synergies of ecosystem services in western mountainous China: A case study of the Bailongjiang watershed in Gansu, China

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 37

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价