欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

应用生态学报

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

大兴安岭火烧迹地不同恢复方式碳储量差异

辛颖,邹梦玲,赵雨森**   

  1. (东北林业大学林学院, 哈尔滨 150040)
  • 出版日期:2015-11-18 发布日期:2015-11-18

Difference between carbon storage of burned area under different restorations in Greater Xing’an Mountains, Northeast China.

XIN Ying, ZOU Meng-ling, ZHAO Yu-sen   

  1. (School of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China)
  • Online:2015-11-18 Published:2015-11-18

摘要: 为了探讨不同恢复方式对大兴安岭重度火烧迹地碳储量的影响,以人工恢复(兴安落叶松、樟子松)和天然恢复的林分为研究对象,采用干烧法对乔木层、灌木层、草本层和枯枝落叶层含碳率进行测定.采用全收获法和平均标准木法获得林分各组分生物量估算森林植被的碳储量,分析不同恢复方式下林分各组分碳储量的分配特征.结果表明: 人工恢复和天然恢复的林分灌木层平均含碳率高于乔木层和草本层.兴安落叶松人工林灌木层平均含碳率为45.8%、枯枝落叶层为45.3%、乔木层为44.4%、草本层为33.6%.樟子松人工林灌木层和乔木层平均含碳率高于50%.天然次生林乔木层、灌木层和枯枝落叶层平均含碳率在42%左右.森林植被层中,生物量贡献率从大到小依次为乔木层、灌木层和草本层.兴安落叶松人工林森林植被层和枯枝落叶层生物量总和为123.90 t·hm-2,远高于樟子松人工林和天然次生林.火烧后人工恢复23年的兴安落叶松人工林森林植被碳储量为50.97 t·hm-2,其中,乔木层碳储量为49.87 t·hm-2,占森林植被层总碳储量的97.8%,草本层所占比重仅为0.02%.人工恢复的林分植被层总碳储量高于天然恢复的林分,火烧迹地在这一时段内采用人工恢复的方式较天然恢复碳汇能力更强.

Abstract: In order to explore forest restoration approach effect on carbon storage of severely burned area in Greater Xing’an Mountains, the carbon contents of tree, shrub, herb and litter from two plantations (Larix gmelinii and Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica) and natural secondary forest were determined, respectively, by using dry combustion method. The biomass of each component was obtained to estimate the distribution characterization of forest vegetation carbon storage by combing whole harvest method with average standard wood method. The results showed that, for both plantations and secondary forest, the average carbon content of shrub was higher than that of arbor and herb. In the L. gmelinii plantation, the average carbon contents of shrub, litter, arbor and herb were 45.8%, 45.3%, 44.4% and 33.6%, respectively. The average carbon content of shrub and arbor was more than 50% in P. sylvestris var. mongolica plantation, while that of arbor, shrub and litter was about 42% for the secondary forest. The biomass of arbor was higher than shrub and herb. In L. gmelinii plantation, the total biomass of vegetation and litter was 123.90 t·hm-2, which was significantly higher than that of P. sylvestris var. mongolica plantation and secondary forest. The carbon storage of vegetation in L. gmelinii plantation was 50.97 t·hm-2, among which the arbor was 49.87 t·hm-2, accounting for 97.8% of the total carbon storage in forest vegetation, while the proportion of herb carbon storage only occupied 0.02%. The total carbon storage of plantations was higher than that of the secondary forest, suggesting a stronger capacity of carbon sink through artificial restoration on severely burned area in Greater Xing’an Mountains during this period.