欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

应用生态学报

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

季节性高温和干旱对亚热带毛竹林碳通量的影响

陈晓峰1,江洪1,2 *,牛晓栋1,张金梦1,刘玉莉1,方成圆1   

  1. 1浙江农林大学浙江省森林生态系统碳循环与固碳减排重点实验室, 杭州 311300; 2南京大学国际地球系统科学研究所, 南京 210093)
  • 出版日期:2016-02-18 发布日期:2016-02-18

Effect of seasonal high temperature and drought on carbon flux of bamboo forest ecosystem in subtropical region.

CHEN Xiao-feng1, JIANG Hong1,2*, NIU Xiao-dong1, ZHANG Jin-meng1, LIU Yu-li1, FANG Cheng-yuan1   

  1. (1Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Carbon Cycling in Forest Ecosystems and Carbon Sequestration, Zhejiang Agriculture and Forestry University, Hangzhou 311300, China; 2International Institute for Earth System Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China)
  • Online:2016-02-18 Published:2016-02-18

摘要: 采用涡度相关技术对安吉亚热带毛竹林生态系统碳通量进行连续观测,选取2011和2013年月尺度净生态系统生产力(NEP)、生态系统呼吸(Re)和总生态系统生产力(GEP)数据,探讨季节性高温、干旱对毛竹林生态系统碳通量的影响.结果表明: 安吉毛竹林年际间NEP有较大差异;2013年7和8月由于水热不同步而造成的高温干旱使其NEP明显下降,相比于2011年同期分别下降了59.9%和80.0%.对2011和2013年月尺度下NEP、Re和GEP与环境因子进行相关分析发现,Re和GEP与温度因子均呈显著相关(P<0.05),但两者对空气和土壤水分的响应方式和程度有所不同,GEP相比于Re更易受到土壤水分降低的影响,而饱和水汽压差的升高会在一定程度上促进Re、同时抑制GEP,这是造成2013年7和8月安吉毛竹林NEP降低的根本原因.

Abstract: The carbon flux of subtropical bamboo forest ecosystem was continuously measured using eddy covariance technique in Anji County of Zhejiang Province, China. The monthly net ecosystem productivity (NEP), ecosystem respiration (Re) and gross ecosystem productivity (GEP) data from 2011 to 2013 were selected to analyze the impacts of seasonal high temperature and drought on the carbon flux of bamboo forest ecosystem. The results showed that there were big differences among annual NEP of bamboo forest from 2011 to 2013. Because of the asynchronization of precipitation and heat, the seasonal high temperature and drought in July and August of 2013 caused significant decline in NEP by 59.9% and 80.0% when compared with the same months in 2011. Correlation analysis of the NEP, Re, GEP and environmental factors suggested that the atmosphere temperatures were significantly correlated with Re and GEP in 2011 and 2013 (P<0.05). However, to air and soil moisture, Re and GEP had different responses, that was, GEP was more vulnerable by the decrease of the soil moisture compared with Re. Besides, the raising of saturation vapour pressure promoted the Re modestly but inhibited the GEP, which was supposed to be the main reason for NEP decrease of bamboo forest ecosystem in Anji from July to August in 2013.