欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

应用生态学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (5): 1445-1452.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201605.019

• 目次 • 上一篇    下一篇

川中丘陵区土地利用方式对土壤理化性质影响的灰色关联分析

唐柄哲, 何丙辉*, 闫建梅   

  1. 西南大学资源环境学院三峡库区生态环境教育部重点实验室, 重庆 400715
  • 收稿日期:2015-09-06 出版日期:2016-05-18 发布日期:2016-05-18
  • 通讯作者: hebinghui@swu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:唐柄哲,男,1990年生,硕士研究生. 主要从事土壤侵蚀与水土保持研究. E-mail: tangbingzhe121@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    本文由国家科技支撑计划项目(2011BAD31B03)、国家自然科学基金项目(42171291)和农业部公益性科研项目(201003014-6-3)资助

Gray correlation analysis of the impact of land use type on soil physical and chemical properties in the hilly area of central Sichuan, China.

TANG Bing-zhe, HE Bing-hui*, YAN Jian-mei   

  1. Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Eco-environments in Three Gorges Reservoir Region, College of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
  • Received:2015-09-06 Online:2016-05-18 Published:2016-05-18

摘要: 以川中丘陵区小流域为研究对象,研究了坡耕地、坡改梯、甜橙林和水保林4种土地利用方式以及裸地(对照)对0~10和10~20 cm土壤容重、土壤孔隙度及土壤养分含量的影响.结果表明: 同一土地利用方式下,毛管孔隙度、非毛管孔隙度、总孔隙度、有机质、全氮、全磷、碱解氮、有效磷、速效钾随土层加深而减小,而土壤容重则相反,全钾层间差异不大.相同土层甜橙林毛管孔隙度、非毛管孔隙度、总孔隙度、全磷、有效磷含量最大,容重最小,水保林全氮、碱解氮含量最高,水保林0~10 cm土层的有机质含量最高,甜橙林10~20 cm土层的有机质含量最高.0~10 cm土层,灰色关联度从大到小依次为水保林(0.9441)、甜橙林(0.8858)、梯平地(0.6300)、裸地(0.5397)、缓坡耕地(0.4714);10~20 cm土层,灰色关联度依次为水保林(0.8919)、甜橙林(0.8401)、梯平地(0.5773)、裸地(0.5301)、缓坡耕地(0.5175).水保林改善土壤理化性质作用最佳,缓坡耕地改良效果最差.

Abstract: A case study was conducted in a small watershed of Sichuan hilly basin. In order to eva-luate the effect of land use type on soil characteristics, the soil physical and chemical properties of the 0-10 and 10-20 cm soil layers were analyzed through comparison between bare land and four land use types i.e., slope cropland, leveled cropland, orange forest and conservation forest. The results suggested that capillary porosity, non-capillary porosity, total porosity, and contents of soil organic matter, total nitrogen, total phosphorus, alkali-hydrolysis nitrogen, available phosphorus and available potassium under the same land use type in the 0-10 cm soil layer were more than those in the 10-20 cm soil layer, while the soil bulk density was the opposite. Moreover, there was no significant difference in total potassium between the two soil layers. The orange forest had the largest capillary porosity, non-capillary porosity, total porosity, the highest contents of total phosphorus, available phosphorus and the smallest soil bulk density under the same soil layer. The content of soil organic matter was highest under the conservation forest in the 0-10 cm soil layer and highest under the orange forest in the 10-20 cm soil layer. The order of grey correlation was conservation forest (0.9441)> orange forest (0.8858)> leveled cropland (0.6300)> bare land (0.5397)> slope cropland (0.4714) for the 0-10 cm soil layer, and conservation forest (0.8919) > orange forest (0.8401)> leveled cropland (0.5773)> bare land (0.5301)> slope cropland (0.5175) for the 10-20 cm soil layer. In conclusion, conservation forest was the best type to improve soil physical and chemical properties, and slope cropland was the worst type.