欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

应用生态学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (11): 3469-3478.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201711.013

• • 上一篇    下一篇

黄土丘陵区混交林中油松和沙棘树干液流对降雨脉冲的响应

卢森堡1, 陈云明2,3*, 唐亚坤3, 吴旭2, 温杰1   

  1. 1 西北农林科技大学林学院, 陕西杨凌 712100
    2 中国科学院教育部水土保持与生态环境研究中心, 陕西杨凌 712100
    3 中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所, 陕西杨凌 712100
  • 出版日期:2017-11-18 发布日期:2017-11-18
  • 通讯作者: *mail:ymchen@ms.iswc.ac.cn
  • 作者简介:卢森堡, 男, 1991年生, 硕士研究生.主要从事植物生理生态与植被恢复生态研究.E-mail:senbaolu_91@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    本文由国家自然科学基金项目(41501576,41371506)、公益性行业(国家气象局)科研专项(重大专项)(GYHY2015060013)和中央高校基本科研业务费专项(2452016105)资助

Sap flux density in response to rainfall pulses for Pinus tabuliformis and Hippophae rhamnoides from mixed plantation in hilly Loess Plateau

LU Sen-bao1, CHEN Yun-ming2,3*, TANG Ya-kun3, WU Xu2, WEN Jie1   

  1. 1 College of Forestry, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China
    2 Research Center of Institute of Soil and Water Conservation and Ecological Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Education, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China
    3 Institute of Soil and Water Conservation,Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China
  • Online:2017-11-18 Published:2017-11-18
  • Contact: *mail:ymchen@ms.iswc.ac.cn
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41501576, 41371506), the China Special Fund for Meteorological Research in the Public Interest (Major Project) (GYHY2015060013) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2452016105)

摘要: 以黄土丘陵区油松-沙棘混交林为研究对象,运用热扩散式探针(TDP)于2015年6—10月对油松和沙棘的树干液流密度(Fd)进行连续观测,同步测定了光合有效辐射(PAR)、水汽压亏缺(VPD)和土壤水分(SWC)等环境因子,分析两树种对降雨利用的差异.采用Threshold-delay 模型、多元回归分析和偏相关分析方法,研究两树种Fd对降雨的响应过程,并确定环境因子对Fd的影响.结果表明: 随着降雨量递增,两树种Fd的最大变化量都先上升后降低;其中0~1 mm降雨范围内,油松Fd(-16.3%)和沙棘Fd(-6.3%)都明显降低;1~5 mm降雨范围内,油松Fd(-0.4%)降低而沙棘Fd(9.0%)明显升高.油松和沙棘Fd对降雨响应的最小降雨阈值(RL)分别为6.4和1.9 mm,滞后时间(τ)为1.96和1.67 d.降雨前油松Fd峰值集中在12:00—12:30(70%),沙棘Fd峰值分别集中在10:30—12:00(48%)和16:00—16:30(30%);降雨后油松Fd峰值集中在11:00—13:00(40%),沙棘Fd峰值分别集中在12:00—13:00(52%)和16:30—17:00(24%).降雨前影响油松和沙棘Fd的环境因子大小顺序为PAR>VPD;降雨后影响油松Fd的环境因子大小顺序为PAR>VPD>0~20 cm SWC(SWC0~20),影响沙棘Fd的环境因子大小顺序为SWC0~20>PAR>VPD.油松-沙棘混交林对水分利用的稳定性较高.

Abstract: Thermal dissipation probe (TDP) was used to continuously measure the sap flux density (Fd) of Pinus tabuliformis and Hippophae rhamnoides individuals in hilly Loess Plateau, from June to October 2015, and the environmental factors, i.e., photosynthetic active radiation (PAR), water vapor pressure deficit (VPD), and soil water content (SWC), were simultaneously monitored to clarify the difference of rainfall utilization between the two tree species in a mixed plantation. Using the methods of a Threshold-delay model, stepwise multiple regression analyses, and partial correlation analyses, this paper studied the process of Fd in these two species in response to the rainfall pulses and then determined the effects of environmental factors on Fd. The results showed that, with the increase of rainfall, the response percentages of Fd in both P. tabuliformis and H. rhamnoides increased at first but then decreased; specifically, in the range of 0-1 mm rainfall, the Fd of P. tabuliformis (-16.3%) and H. rhamnoides (-6.3%) clearly decreased; in the range of 1-5 mm rainfall, the Fd of P. tabuliformis decreased (-0.4%), whereas that of H. rhamnoides significantly increased (9.0%). The lower rainfall thresholds (RL) of Fd for P. tabuliformis and H. rhamnoides were 6.4 and 1.9 mm, respectively, with a corresponding time-lag (τ) of 1.96 and 1.67 days. In the pre-rainfall period, the peak time of Fd of P. tabuliformis converged upon 12:00-12:30 (70%), while the Fd of H. rhamnoides peaked twice, between 10:30 and 12:00 (48%) and again between 16:00 and 16:30 (30%). In the post-rainfall period, the peak time of Fd of P. tabuliformis converged upon 11:00-13:00 (40%), while that of H. rhamnoides peaked twice, between 12:00 and 13:00 (52%) and again between 16:30 and 17:00 (24%). Among the environmental factors, the rank order of factors associated with the Fd of both P. tabuliformis and H. rhamnoides was PAR>VPD, before rainfall. However, the rank order of factors influencing the Fd of P. tabuliformis was PAR>VPD>0-20 cm SWC (SWC0-20), whereas this order was different for H. rhamnoides: SWC0-20 >PAR >VPD, after rainfall. This mixed plantation of P. tabuliformis and H. rhamnoides trees had a high stability of water utilization.