欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

应用生态学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (6): 1879-1888.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201706.030

• • 上一篇    下一篇

半自然农田边界与相邻农田步甲和蜘蛛的时空分布

张旭珠1, 韩印1, 宇振荣1,2, 刘云慧1,2*   

  1. 1中国农业大学资源与环境学院, 北京 100193
    2中国农业大学生物多样性与有机农业北京市重点实验室, 北京 100193
  • 收稿日期:2016-12-01 发布日期:2017-06-18
  • 通讯作者: *E-mail:liuyh@cau.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:张旭珠,女,1987年生,博士研究生.主要从事农业景观生物多样性与病虫害生物控制研究.E-mail:421920996@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    本文由国家自然科学基金项目(41271198,31470514)资助

Spatio-temporal distribution of carabids and spiders between semi-natural field margin and the adjacent crop fields in agricultural landscape

ZHANG Xu-zhu1, HAN Yin 1, YU Zhen-rong1,2, LIU Yun-hui1,2*   

  1. 1College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
    2Beijing Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Organic Farming, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
  • Received:2016-12-01 Published:2017-06-18
  • Contact: *E-mail:liuyh@cau.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41271198,31470514)

摘要: 分别于小麦、玉米收获前后,采用陷阱法调查了华北地区典型农业景观中具有不同植被结构的农田边界及其相邻农田中两类重要天敌类群步甲和蜘蛛的多样性.通过比较农田生境及相邻农田边界间两类天敌群落的时空分布格局及其与相邻半自然生境植被群落的相关关系,探讨半自然农田边界对两类天敌类群的保护作用.结果表明: 整个取样季节农田边界处蜘蛛的多度显著高于农田内部;而步甲多样性在农田与边界间无显著性差异,仅呈现不同的群落结构;作物收获后蜘蛛分科数在边界处的增加以及在农田的减少,显示了蜘蛛在农田和边界之间的迁移活动.边界植被结构对蜘蛛和步甲多样性有不同影响:边界较高的草本层盖度和较低的乔木层盖度有利于增加农田中某些步甲优势种的多样性;而较高的草本层盖度有利于增加皿蛛科蜘蛛的多样性.因此,半自然生境的存在可以通过天敌在农田和边界之间的迁移运动促进农田天敌多样性的维持;但不同类型半自然生境植被群落结构可能影响其对不同天敌群落多样性的维持和保护作用.为促进农业景观对天敌的保护作用,提高其害虫控制功能,需要深入了解不同天敌的生境需求及食物需求,精心设计有利于天敌多样性维持的半自然生境.

Abstract: This study was conducted before and after harvesting of wheat and maize in a typical agricultural landscape of the North China Plain. We investigated the diversity of two important natural enemy groups, carabids and spiders, using pitfall traps at crop field margin with different vegetation structures and their neighboring crop field. Throughout the comparison of the spatial and temporal distribution of the diversity of carabids and spiders in field margin and neighboring field, and the investigation of the relationship between arthropod communities and vegetation structure, this study aimed to understand the role of semi-natural field margin in biodiversity conservation of different natural enemy taxa. Results showed that the abundance of spiders was significantly higher in field margin than in neighboring fields over the entire period. No significant difference of the diversity of carabids in field margin and crop field was observed, but the community composition was different. Number of spider families increased in field margin but deceased in crop field after harvesting, indicating a migration activity between field and field margin. Vegetation structure in the field margin had different association with carabids than with spiders, with diversity of dominant carabid species positively associated with herb coverage and negatively with wood coverage, while the diversity of spider family Linyphiidae was positively associated with herb coverage only. Semi-natural habitat benefited the conservation of the diversity of arthropod natural enemies in crop field via promoting their dispersal to crop field, while such impacts differed from different vegetation structures and varied from target beneficial natural enemy communities. Future studies should focus on in-depth understanding of the food and habitat source requirement of different natural enemy taxa, and hence to design suitable semi-natural habitats to maintain a high diversity of natural enemy communities.