应用生态学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (2): 699-711.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201702.035
张一新1, 2*, 向洪勇1, 2
收稿日期:
2016-07-06
出版日期:
2017-02-18
发布日期:
2017-02-18
通讯作者:
* E-mail: Yixin.Zhang@xjtlu.edu.cn
作者简介:
张一新, 男, 博士生导师. 主要从事河流生态学及流域生态学研究. E-mail: Yixin.Zhang@xjtlu.edu.cn
基金资助:
ZHANG Yi-xin1, 2, XIANG Hong-yong1, 2
Received:
2016-07-06
Online:
2017-02-18
Published:
2017-02-18
Contact:
* E-mail: Yixin.Zhang@xjtlu.edu.cn
Supported by:
摘要: 跨越不同生态系统之间的物质、能量和营养元素流动,即资源补贴,是生态系统的基本属性,也是生态学研究的基本问题之一.常见的资源补贴包括落入水体的树叶凋落物和陆地昆虫、水生昆虫成虫、从海洋生殖洄游的鲑鱼等,这些外源性的资源补贴对接收生态系统的生物个体、种群、群落、生物多样性和生态系统功能都有影响,包括促进个体生长、增加物种丰度和多样性、改变群落结构、增加生态系统的生产力、改变食物链长度及影响食物网、影响生态系统的稳定性等.随着未来人类活动对环境扰动的增加,尤其在土地利用、气候变化、生物入侵方面,对跨越生态系统资源补贴的时空动态影响将加剧,因而生态系统将面临更加严峻的威胁.鉴于此,未来在该领域的基础研究应着重开展以下几方面研究:单一和多重环境胁迫对资源补贴和生态系统的影响;动态资源补贴在生态系统修复及管理中的应用;关注与污染物相关的资源补贴的负面影响;加强跨越生境资源补贴在热带和亚热带以及在我国的生态学基础研究.
张一新, 向洪勇. 跨越生境的资源补贴对生态系统的影响研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(2): 699-711.
ZHANG Yi-xin, XIANG Hong-yong. Impacts of cross-habitat resource subsidies on ecosystems: A review.[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017, 28(2): 699-711.
[1] Odum EP, Finn JT, Franz EH. Perturbation theory and the subsidy stress gradient. Bioscience, 1979, 29: 349-352 [2] Polis GA, Anderson WB, Holt RD. Toward an integration of landscape and food web ecology: The dynamics of spatially subsidized food webs. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1997, 28: 289-316 [3] Baxter CV, Fausch KD, Saunders WC. Tangled webs: Reciprocal flows of invertebrate prey link streams and riparian zones. Freshwater Biology, 2005, 50: 201-220 [4] Zhang YX, Richardson JS. Contrasting effects of cross-ecosystem subsidies and predation on benthic invertebrates in two pacific coastal streams. Aquatic Sciences, 2011, 73: 53-62 [5] Sullivan ML, Zhang Y, Bonner TH. Terrestrial subsidies in the diets of stream fishes of the USA: Comparisons among taxa and morphology. Marine and Freshwater Research, 2012, 63: 409-414 [6] Reich P, Lake PS. Extreme hydrological events and the ecological restoration of flowing waters. Freshwater Biology, 2015, 60: 2639-2652 [7] Dossena M, Yvon-Durocher G, Grey J, et al. Warming alters community size structure and ecosystem functioning. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2012, 279: 3011-3019 [8] Yvon-Durocher G, Caffrey JM, Cescatti A, et al. Reconciling the temperature dependence of respiration across timescales and ecosystem types. Nature, 2012, 487: 472-476 [9] O’Gorman EJ, Pichler DE, Adams G, et al. Impacts of warming on the structure and functioning of aquatic communities: Individual to ecosystem-level responses//Woodward G, Jacob U, Ogorman EJ, eds. Advances in Ecological Research, vol 47: Global Change in Multispecies Systems. New York: Academic Press, 2012: 81-176 [10] Jonsson M, Hedstrom P, Stenroth K, et al. Climate change modifies the size structure of assemblages of emerging aquatic insects. Freshwater Biology, 2015, 60: 78-88 [11] Piggott JJ, Townsend CR, Matthaei CD. Climate warming and agricultural stressors interact to determine stream macroinvertebrate community dynamics. Global Change Biology, 2015, 21: 1887-1906 [12] Greig HS, Kratina P, Thompson PL, et al. Warming, eutrophication, and predator loss amplify subsidies between aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Global Change Biology, 2012, 18: 504-514 [13] Leroux SJ, Loreau M. Subsidy hypothesis and strength of trophic cascades across ecosystems. Ecology Letters, 2008, 11: 1147-1156 [14] Richardson JS, Sato T. Resource subsidy flows across freshwater-terrestrial boundaries and influence on processes linking adjacent ecosystems. Ecohydrology, 2015, 8: 406-415 [15] Flecker AS, McIntyre PB, Moore JW, et al. Migratory fishes as material and process subsidies in riverine ecosystems. Community Ecology of Stream Fishes: Concepts, Approaches, and Techniques. American Fisheries Society, Symposium, New York, 2010: 559-592 [16] Richardson JS, Zhang Y, Marczak LB. Resource subsidies across the land-freshwater interface and responses in recipient communities. River Research and Applications, 2010, 26: 55-66 [17] Wallace JB, Eggert SL, Meyer JL, et al. Effects of resource limitation on a detrital-based ecosystem. Ecological Monographs, 1999, 69: 409-442 [18] Chan E, Zhang Y, Dudgeon D. Contribution of adult aquatic insect subsidy to terrestrial prey resources in the riparian zones of tropical forest streams. Marine and Freshwater Research, 2007, 58: 725-732 [19] Marczak LB, Richardson JS. Spiders and subsidies: Results from the riparian zone of a coastal temperate rainforest. Journal of Animal Ecology, 2007, 76: 687-694 [20] Zhang YX, Negishi JN, Richardson JS, et al. Impacts of marine-derived nutrients on stream ecosystem functioning. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2003, 270: 2117-2123 [21] Bartels P, Cucherousset J, Gudasz C, et al. Terrestrial subsidies to lake food webs: An experimental approach. Oecologia, 2012, 168: 807-818 [22] Cross WF, Wallace JB, Rosemond AD, et al. Whole-system nutrient enrichment increases secondary production in a detritus-based ecosystem. Ecology, 2006, 87: 1556-1565 [23] Wallace JB, Eggert SL, Meyer JL, et al. Stream invertebrate productivity linked to forest subsidies: 37 stream-years of reference and experimental data. Ecology, 2015, 96: 1213-1228 [24] Kominoski JS, Pringle CM. Resource-consumer diversity: Testing the effects of leaf litter species diversity on stream macroinvertebrate communities. Freshwater Biology, 2009, 54: 1461-1473 [25] Stoler AB, Relyea RA. Leaf litter quality induces morphological and developmental changes in larval amphi-bians. Ecology, 2013, 94: 1594-1603 [26] Fey SB, Mertens AN, Cottingham KL. Autumn leaf subsidies influence spring dynamics of freshwater plankton communities. Oecologia, 2015, 178: 875-885 [27] Earl JE, Castello PO, Cohagen KE, et al. Effects of subsidy quality on reciprocal subsidies: How leaf litter species changes frog biomass export. Oecologia, 2014, 175: 209-218 [28] Cottingham KL, Narayan L. Subsidy quantity and reci-pient community structure mediate plankton responses to autumn leaf drop. Ecosphere, 2013, 4: art89 [29] Mineau MM, Baxter CV, Marcarelli AM, et al. An invasive riparian tree reduces stream ecosystem efficiency via a recalcitrant organic matter subsidy. Ecology, 2012, 93: 1501-1508 [30] Dekar MP, King RS, Back JA, et al. Allochthonous inputs from grass-dominated wetlands support juvenile salmonids in headwater streams: Evidence from stable isotopes of carbon, hydrogen, and nitrogen. Freshwater Science, 2012, 31: 121-132 [31] Nakano S, Murakami M. Reciprocal subsidies: Dynamic interdependence between terrestrial and aquatic food webs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2001, 98: 166-170 [32] Chan EKW, Yu YT, Zhang YX, et al. Distribution patterns of birds and insect prey in a tropical riparian forest. Biotropica, 2008, 40: 623-629 [33] Chan EKW, Zhang YX, Dudgeon D. Substrate availabi-lity may be more important than aquatic insect abundance in the distribution of riparian orb-web spiders in the tropics. Biotropica, 2009, 41: 196-201 [34] Krell B, Röder N, Link M, et al. Aquatic prey subsidies to riparian spiders in a stream with different land use types. Limnologica: Ecology and Management of Inland Waters, 2015, 51: 1-7 [35] Epanchin PN, Knapp RA, Lawler SP. Nonnative trout impact an alpine-nesting bird by altering aquatic-insect subsidies. Ecology, 2010, 91: 2406-2415 [36] Bultman H, Hoekman D, Dreyer J, et al. Terrestrial deposition of aquatic insects increases plant quality for insect herbivores and herbivore density. Ecological Entomology, 2014, 39: 419-426 [37] Kautza A, Sullivan SMP. Shifts in reciprocal river-riparian arthropod fluxes along an urban-rural landscape gradient. Freshwater Biology, 2015, 60: 2156-2168 [38] Stenroth K, Polvi LE, Faltstrom E, et al. Land-use effects on terrestrial consumers through changed size structure of aquatic insects. Freshwater Biology, 2015, 60: 136-149 [39] Knight TM, McCoy MW, Chase JM, et al. Trophic cascades across ecosystems. Nature, 2005, 437: 880-883 [40] Schindler DE, Armstrong JB, Bentley KT, et al. Riding the crimson tide: Mobile terrestrial consumers track phenological variation in spawning of an anadromous fish. Biology Letters, 2013, 9: 20130048 [41] Quinn TP, Carlson SM, Gende SM, et al. Transportation of pacific salmon carcasses from streams to riparian forests by bears. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 2009, 87: 195-203 [42] Lisi PJ, Schindler DE. Spatial variation in timing of marine subsidies influences riparian phenology through a plant-pollinator mutualism. Ecosphere, 2011, 2: art101 [43] Hocking MD, Reynolds JD. Impacts of salmon on ripa-rian plant diversity. Science, 2011, 331: 1609-1612 [44] Field RD, Reynolds JD. Sea to sky: Impacts of residual salmon-derived nutrients on estuarine breeding bird communities. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2011, 278: 3081-3088 [45] Samways KM, Cunjak RA. Increases in benthic community production and metabolism in response to marine-derived nutrients from spawning atlantic salmon (salmo salar). Freshwater Biology, 2015, 60: 1647-1658 [46] O’Connor JE, Duda JJ, Grant GE. 1000 dams down and counting. Science, 2015, 348: 496-497 [47] Tonra CM, Sager-Fradkin K, Morley SA, et al. The ra-pid return of marine-derived nutrients to a freshwater food web following dam removal. Biological Conservation, 2015, 192: 130-134 [48] Yang LH, Naeem S. The ecology of resource pulses. Ecology, 2008, 89: 619-620 [49] Yang LH. Periodical cicadas as resource pulses in north american forests. Science, 2004, 306: 1565-1567 [50] Atlas WI, Palen WJ, Courcelles DM, et al. Dependence of stream predators on terrestrial prey fluxes: Food web responses to subsidized predation. Ecosphere, 2013, 4: art69 [51] Newsome TM, Dellinger JA, Pavey CR, et al. The ecological effects of providing resource subsidies to predators. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2015, 24: 1-11 [52] Rosenfeld JS, Raeburn E. Effects of habitat and internal prey subsidies on juvenile coho salmon growth: Implications for stream productive capacity. Ecology of Freshwater Fish, 2009, 18: 572-584 [53] Sabo JL, Power ME. River-watershed exchange: Effects of riverine subsidies on riparian lizards and their terrestrial prey. Ecology, 2002, 83: 1860-1869 [54] Marczak LB, Richardson JS. Growth and development rates in a riparian spider are altered by asynchrony between the timing and amount of a resource subsidy. Oecologia, 2008, 156: 249-258 [55] Nelson MC, Reynolds JD. Effects of subsidies from spawning chum and pink salmon on juvenile coho salmon body size and migration timing. Ecosphere, 2015, 6: art209 [56] Cothran RD, Stoler AB, Relyea RA. Leaves and litterbugs: How litter quality affects amphipod life-history and sexually selected traits. Freshwater Science, 2014, 33: 812-819 [57] Nakano S, Miyasaka H, Kuhara N. Terrestrial-aquatic linkages: Riparian arthropod inputs alter trophic cascades in a stream food web. Ecology, 1999, 80: 2435-2441 [58] Swain NR, Hocking MD, Harding JN, et al. Effects of salmon on the diet and condition of stream-resident sculpins. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 2014, 71: 521-532 [59] Newsome TM, Ballard GA, Fleming PJS, et al. Human-resource subsidies alter the dietary preferences of a mammalian top predator. Oecologia, 2014, 175: 139-150 [60] Lewis TL, Mews M, Jelinski DE, et al. Detrital subsidy to the supratidal zone provides feeding habitat for intertidal crabs. Estuaries and Coasts, 2007, 30: 451-458 [61] Wesner JS. Seasonal variation in the trophic structure of a spatial prey subsidy linking aquatic and terrestrial food webs: Adult aquatic insects. Oikos, 2010, 119: 170-178 [62] Bartrons M, Gratton C, Spiesman BJ, et al. Taking the trophic bypass: Aquatic-terrestrial linkage reduces me-thylmercury in a terrestrial food web. Ecological Applications, 2015, 25: 151-159 [63] Tagwireyi P, Sullivan SMP. Distribution and trophic dynamics of riparian tetragnathid spiders in a large river system. Marine and Freshwater Research, 2016, 67: 309-318 [64] Briggs AA, Young HS, McCauley DJ, et al. Effects of spatial subsidies and habitat structure on the foraging ecology and size of geckos. PLoS One, 2012, 7(8): e41364 [65] Barrett K, Anderson WB, Wait DA, et al. Marine subsidies alter the diet and abundance of insular and coastal lizard populations. Oikos, 2005, 109: 145-153 [66] Junker JR, Cross WF. Seasonality in the trophic basis of a temperate stream invertebrate assemblage: Importance of temperature and food quality. Limnology and Oceanography, 2014, 59: 507-518 [67] Sitters J, Atkinson CL, Guelzow N, et al. Spatial stoichiometry: Cross-ecosystem material flows and their impact on recipient ecosystems and organisms. Oikos, 2015, 124: 920-930 [68] Singer GA, Battin TJ. Anthropogenic subsidies alter stream consumer-resource stoichiometry, biodiversity, and food chains. Ecological Applications, 2007, 17: 376-389 [69] Sullivan ML, Zhang YX, Bonner TH. Carbon and nitrogen ratios of aquatic and terrestrial prey for freshwater fishes. Journal of Freshwater Ecology, 2014, 29: 259-266 [70] Sato T, Watanabe K, Tamotsu S, et al. Diversity of nematomorph and cohabiting nematode parasites in ripa-rian ecosystems around the Lii Peninsula, Japan. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 2012, 90: 829-838 [71] Hoekman D, Dreyer J, Jackson RD, et al. Lake to land subsidies: Experimental addition of aquatic insects increases terrestrial arthropod densities. Ecology, 2011, 92: 2063-2072 [72] Kominoski JS, Marczak LB, Richardson JS. Riparian forest composition affects stream litter decomposition despite similar microbial and invertebrate communities. Ecology, 2011, 92: 151-159 [73] Compson ZG, Adams KJ, Edwards JA, et al. Leaf litter quality affects aquatic insect emergence: Contrasting patterns from two foundation trees. Oecologia, 2013, 173: 507-519 [74] Green L, Fong P. The good, the bad and the Ulva: The density dependent role of macroalgal subsidies in in-fluencing diversity and trophic structure of an estuarine community. Oikos, 2016, 125: 988-1000 [75] Allen DC, Vaughn CC, Kelly JF, et al. Bottom-up biodiversity effects increase resource subsidy flux between ecosystems. Ecology, 2012, 93: 2165-2174 [76] Wesner JS. Aquatic predation alters a terrestrial prey subsidy. Ecology, 2010, 91: 1435-1444 [77] Wesner JS. Predator diversity effects cascade across an ecosystem boundary. Oikos, 2012, 121: 53-60 [78] Baxter CV, Fausch KD, Murakami M, et al. Fish invasion restructures stream and forest food webs by interrupting reciprocal prey subsidies. Ecology, 2004, 85: 2656-2663 [79] Henschel JR, Mahsberg D, Stumpf H. Allochthonous aquatic insects increase predation and decrease herbivory in river shore food webs. Oikos, 2001, 93: 429-438 [80] Nelson MC, Reynolds JD. Time-delayed subsidies: Interspecies population effects in salmon. PLoS One, 2014, 9(6): e98951 [81] Lennon JT, Pfaff LE. Source and supply of terrestrial organic matter affects aquatic microbial metabolism. Aquatic Microbial Ecology, 2005, 39: 107-119 [82] Attermeyer K, Premke K, Hornick T, et al. Ecosystem-level studies of terrestrial carbon reveal contrasting bacterial metabolism in different aquatic habitats. Ecology, 2013, 94: 2754-2766 [83] Aristi I, von Schiller D, Arroita M, et al. Mixed effects of effluents from a wastewater treatment plant on river ecosystem metabolism: Subsidy or stress? Freshwater Biology, 2015, 60: 1398-1410 [84] Levi PS, Tank JL, Rueegg J, et al. Whole-stream metabolism responds to spawning pacific salmon in their native and introduced ranges. Ecosystems, 2013, 16: 269-283 [85] Holtgrieve GW, Schindler DE. Marine-derived nu-trients, bioturbation, and ecosystem metabolism: Reconsidering the role of salmon in streams. Ecology, 2011, 92: 373-385 [86] Earl JE, Semlitsch RD. Spatial subsidies, trophic state, and community structure: Examining the effects of leaf litter input on ponds. Ecosystems, 2013, 16: 639-651 [87] Akbaripasand A, Ramezani J, Lokman PM, et al. Can drifting invertebrates meet the energy requirements of drift-feeding fish? A case study on galaxias fasciatus. Freshwater Science, 2014, 33: 904-914 [88] Takimoto G, Iwata T, Murakami M. Seasonal subsidy stabilizes food web dynamics: Balance in a heteroge-neous landscape. Ecological Research, 2002, 17: 433-439 [89] Huxel GR, McCann K, Polis GA. Effects of partitioning allochthonous and autochthonous resources on food web stability. Ecological Research, 2002, 17: 419-432 [90] Ruffino L, Russell J, Vidal E. Anthropogenic subsidies mitigate environmental variability for insular rodents. Oecologia, 2012, 172: 737-749 [91] Uno H, Power ME. Mainstem-tributary linkages by mayfly migration help sustain salmonids in a warming river network. Ecology Letters, 2015, 18: 1012-1020 [92] Jones SE, Lennon JT. A test of the subsidy-stability hypothesis: The effects of terrestrial carbon in aquatic ecosystems. Ecology, 2015, 96: 1550-1560 [93] Coors A, De Meester L. Synergistic, antagonistic and additive effects of multiple stressors: Predation threat, parasitism and pesticide exposure in daphnia magna. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2008, 45: 1820-1828 [94] Wagenhoff A, Townsend CR, Matthaei CD. Macroinvertebrate responses along broad stressor gradients of deposited fine sediment and dissolved nutrients: A stream mesocosm experiment. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2012, 49: 892-902 [95] Heinrich KK, Whiles MR, Roy C. Cascading ecological responses to an in-stream restoration project in a midwestern river. Restoration Ecology, 2014, 22: 72-80 [96] Herman CM, Barrow JH, Jr. Tarshis IB. Leucocytozoonosis in canada geese at the seney national wildlife refuge. Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 1975, 11: 404-411 [97] Paetzold A, Smith M, Warren PH, et al. Environmental impact propagated by cross-system subsidy: Chronic stream pollution controls riparian spider populations. Ecology, 2011, 92: 1711-1716 [98] Walters DM, Fritz KM, Otter RR. The dark side of subsidies: Adult stream insects export organic contaminants to riparian predators. Ecological Applications, 2008, 18: 1835-1841 [99] Compton JE, Andersen CP, Phillips DL, et al. Ecological and water quality consequences of nutrient addition for salmon restoration in the pacific northwest. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2006, 4: 18-26 [100] Tang Y-L (唐雅丽), Cheng D-M (程冬梅), Liu Z-W (刘正文), et al. Differntial support of lake food webs by allochthonous organic carbon. Ecological Science (生态科学), 2014, 33(1): 161-165 (in Chinese) [101] Li X-D (李晓东), Zhao W (赵 文), Zhao Z-X (赵振兴), et al. Storage and diurnal change of organic carbon pools in rotifer-culturing pond ecosystem. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 2006, 17(7): 1224-1228 (in Chinese) |
No related articles found! |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||