欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

应用生态学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (4): 1137-1144.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201704.025

• 目次 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同光脉冲方案对光下最大荧光参数及其计算参数的影响

唐星林1,2, 曹永慧1,2, 周本智1,2*, 周燕3, 顾连宏4   

  1. 1中国林业科学研究院亚热带林业研究所, 杭州 311400
    2国家林业局钱江源森林生态系统定位观测研究站, 杭州 311400
    3建德市新安江林场, 杭州 311600
    4美国橡树岭国家实验室气候变化研究所, 橡树岭, 田纳西州 37831, 美国
  • 收稿日期:2016-10-13 出版日期:2017-04-18 发布日期:2017-04-18
  • 通讯作者: * E-mail: benzhi_zhou@126.com
  • 作者简介:唐星林,男,1988年生,博士研究生.主要从事森林生态学研究.E-mail:txl_insist@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    本文由国家重点基础研究发展计划项目(2016YFD0600202)、国家林业局948项目(2014-4-57)、浙江省自然科学基金项目(LY13C160002)、中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项(RISF2013002)和中国林业科学研究院基本科研业务费专项资金项目——海内外杰出学者讲习计划(CAFYBB2011007)资助

Effects of flash scheme on maximum chlorophyll fluorescence under illumination and its derived parameters

TANG Xing-lin1,2, CAO Yong-hui1,2, ZHOU Ben-zhi1,2*, ZHOU Yan3, GU Lian-hong4   

  1. 1Research Institute of Subtropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Hangzhou 311400, China
    2Qianjiangyuan Forest Ecosystem Research Station, State Forestry Administration, Hangzhou 311400, China
    3Xin’anjiang Forest Center of Jiande, Hangzhou 311600, China
    4Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, USA
  • Received:2016-10-13 Online:2017-04-18 Published:2017-04-18
  • Contact: * E-mail: benzhi_zhou@126.com
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFD0600202), the 948 Importing Program of State Forestry Administration (2014-4-57), the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province, China (LY13C160002), the Special Fund for Scientific Research in the Central Public-interest Research Institutes (RISF2013002) and the Special Fund for Basis Research of Chinese Academy of Forestry: Lecture and Study Program for Outstanding Scholars from Home and Abroad (CAFYBB2011007)

摘要: 光下最大荧光(Fm)是植物生理生态研究中的重要参数,一般采用饱和脉冲(RF)方案来估计.然而,光系统Ⅱ(PSⅡ)受体库的反馈调节会影响RF方案对Fm估计的准确性.为消除PSⅡ受体库反馈调节的影响,根据光脉冲强度(Q′)与叶绿素荧光(F′)的线性关系提出多相脉冲(MPF)方案,估算Q′无穷大时的F′(即Fm).本研究采用MPF和RF方案分别对苦槠、青冈和乌桕3个树种叶片的叶绿素荧光和气体交换数据进行同步测量,并对两种方案估计的Fm及其计算参数PSⅡ光化学效率(ΦPSII)、PSⅡ的电子传递速率(J)、最大电子传递速率(Jmax)、叶肉导度(gm)和叶绿体内CO2浓度(Cc)等光合参数进行比较,分析两种方案对3个树种叶片6个光合参数的影响.结果表明: 当光合有效辐射(PAR)<200 μmol·m-2·s-1时,两种方案对苦槠、青冈和乌桕叶片FmΦPSIIJ的估计无显著影响;当PAR>200 μmol·m-2·s-1时,采用MPF方案获得的苦槠、青冈和乌桕的Fm分别比RF方案获得的Fm高3.5%~5.2%、11.7%~18.0%和3.2%~7.1%;当PAR>200 μmol·m-2·s-1时,采用MPF方案获得的ΦPSIIJJmax分别不同程度地大于RF方案获得的参数,gmCc分别不同程度地小于RF方案获得的参数.说明当PAR较低(<200μmol·m-2·s-1)时,MPF与RF方案对植物叶片FmΦPSIIJ的估计没有显著影响;当PAR较高(≥200μmol·m-2·s-1)时,MPF与RF方案对植物叶片FmΦPSIIJJmaxgmCc的估计有显著影响,且RF方案对植物叶片的FmΦPSIIJJmax比MPF方案分别有不同程度的低估,对gmCc则有不同程度的高估.

Abstract: The maximum chlorophyll fluorescence yield under illumination (Fm) is one of the most important parameters in plant eco-physiological research, and usually was estimated with rectangular flush scheme (RF). However, the estimation accuracy of RF for Fmwas affected by the rapid turnover of photosystem Ⅱ (PSⅡ). In order to eliminate the effect of the rapid turnover of photosystem Ⅱ (PSⅡ), the multiphase flush scheme (MPF) based on the linear relationship between the flush (Q′) and chlorophyll fluorescence (F′) is proposed to estimate Fmat infinite irradiance. Leaf gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence of three woody species (Castanopsis sclerophylla, Cyclobalanopsis glauca, and Sapium sebiferum) were respectively measured with RF and MPF, Fm and the derived parameters [the quantum efficiency of PSⅡ (ΦPSII), the electron flux through PSⅡ (J), the maximum electron transfer rate (Jmax), mesophyll conductance (gm) and chloroplast CO2 concentration (Cc)] were compared between the two different schemes, and the effects of RF and MPF on these parameters were analyzed. The results showed that no significant difference was found in the parameters for the three species between RF and MPF at the light intensity lower than 200 μmol·m-2·s-1. Fmestimated with MPF for the three species were 3.5%-5.2%, 11.7%-18.0%, and 3.2%-7.1% higher than those with RF, respectively, at the light intensity higher than 200 μmol·m-2·s-1. The derived parameters (ΦPSII, J and Jmax) estimated with MPF for the three species were higher than those with RF, while the derived parameters(gm and Cc) estimated with MPF were lower at the light intensity higher than 200 μmol·m-2·s-1. In conclusion, estimates of parameters (Fm′, ΦPSII, and J) were not significantly affected by the two different schemes at the light intensity lower than 200 μmol·m-2·s-1. The estimates of parameters (Fm′, ΦPSII, J, Jmax, gm, and Cc) were significantly affected by the two different schemes at the light intensity higher than 200 μmol·m-2·s-1. Compared with MPF, parameters of Fm′, ΦPSII, J and Jmax estimated with RF were underestimated, while parameters of gm and Cc were overestimated.