生物炭施用3年后对稻麦轮作系统CH4和N2O综合温室效应的影响

doi:10.13287/j.1001-9332.201801.028

应用生态学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (1): 141-148.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201801.028

生物炭施用3年后对稻麦轮作系统CH₄和N₂O综合温室效应的影响

吴震, 董玉兵, 熊正琴^*

南京农业大学资源与环境科学学院, 江苏省低碳农业和温室气体减排重点实验室, 南京 210095

收稿日期:2017-03-20 出版日期:2018-01-18 发布日期:2018-01-18
通讯作者: * E-mail: zqxiong@njau.edu.cn
作者简介:吴震,男,1992年生,博士研究生.主要从事碳氮循环与气候变化研究. E-mail: 2017203050@njau.edu.cn
基金资助:
本文由公益性行业(农业)科研专项(201503106)和国家自然科学基金项目(41471192)资助

Effects of biochar application three-years ago on global warming potentials of CH₄ and N₂O in a rice-wheat rotation system.

WU Zhen, DONG Yu-bing, XIONG Zheng-qin^*

Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Low Carbon Agriculture and GHGs Mitigation, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China

Received:2017-03-20 Online:2018-01-18 Published:2018-01-18
Contact: * E-mail: zqxiong@njau.edu.cn
Supported by:
This work was supported by the Special Fund for Agro-Scientific Research in the Public Interest (201503106) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41471192).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本试验对比观测研究了在稻田土壤中经3年陈化后的生物炭(B₃)和新施入生物炭(B₀)对稻麦轮作系统CH₄和N₂O综合温室效应和温室气体强度的影响,旨在明确生物炭对土壤温室气体排放的长期效应.田间试验设置4个处理,分别为对照(CK)、施用氮肥不施用生物炭(N)、施用氮肥和新生物炭(NB₀)以及施用氮肥和陈化生物炭(NB₃)处理.结果表明: NB₀和NB₃处理均显著提高了稻田土壤pH值、有机碳和全氮含量,并且显著影响与温室气体排放相关的微生物潜在活性.与N处理相比,NB₃处理显著增加了作物产量,增幅14.1%,并且显著降低了CH₄和N₂O排放,降幅分别为9.0%和34.0%;而NB₀处理显著增加作物产量,增幅9.3%,显著降低N₂O排放,降幅38.6%,但增加了CH₄排放,增幅4.7%;同时NB₀和NB₃处理均能降低稻麦轮作系统的综合温室效应和温室气体强度,且NB₃处理能更有效地减少温室气体的排放并提高作物产量.在土壤中经3年陈化后的生物炭仍然具有固碳减排能力,因此,施用生物炭对稻麦轮作系统固碳减排和改善作物生产具有长期效应.

Abstract: To evaluate the long-term effects of biochar amendment on greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs), a field experiment was conducted to examine the effects of 3-year field-aged biochar (B₃) and fresh biochar (B₀) on global warming potential (GWP) and greenhouse gas intensity (GHGI) of methane (CH₄) and nitrous oxide (N₂O) in a typical rice-wheat rotation system. Four treatments were established as control without nitrogen fertilizer (CK), urea without biochar (N), urea with fresh biochar amended in 2015 (NB₀), and urea with 3-year field-aged biochar amended in 2012 (NB₃). Results showed that both the NB₀ and NB₃ treatments obviously increased soil pH, soil organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen (TN) and influenced the potential activity of functional microorganisms related to GHGs compared to the N treatment. Relative to the N treatment, the NB₃ treatment significantly improved crop yield by 14.1% while reduced the CH₄ and N₂O emissions by 9.0% and 34.0%, respectively. In addition, the NB₀ treatment significantly improved crop yield by 9.3%, while reduced the N₂O emission by 38.6% though increased the CH₄ emissions by 4.7% relative to the N treatment. Moreover, both the NB₀ and NB₃ treatments could significantly reduce both GWP and GHGI, with NB₃ being more effective in simultaneously mitigating the GHGs emissions and enhancing crop yield. Since field-aged biochar showed obvious effects on GHGs mitigation and carbon sequestration after 3 years, biochar incorporations had long-term effect on GHGs mitigation and crop production in the rice-wheat rotation system.

吴震, 董玉兵, 熊正琴. 生物炭施用3年后对稻麦轮作系统CH₄和N₂O综合温室效应的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(1): 141-148.

WU Zhen, DONG Yu-bing, XIONG Zheng-qin. Effects of biochar application three-years ago on global warming potentials of CH₄ and N₂O in a rice-wheat rotation system.[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018, 29(1): 141-148.

参考文献

[1] Clough TJ, Condron LM, Kammann C, et al. A review of biochar and soil nitrogen dynamics. Agronomy, 2013, 3: 275-293
[2] Kuppusamy S, Thavamani P, Megharaj M, et al. Agronomic and remedial benefits and risks of applying biochar to soil: Current knowledge and future research directions. Environment International, 2016, 87: 1-12
[3] Jeffery S, Verheijen FGA, Kammann C, et al. Biochar effects on methane emissions from soils: A meta-analysis. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2016, 101: 251-258
[4] Knoblauch C, Maarifat AA, Pfeiffer EM, et al. Degradability of black carbon and its impact on trace gas fluxes and carbon turnover in paddy soils. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2011, 43: 1768-1778
[5] Wang J, Pan X, Liu Y, et al. Effects of biochar amendment in two soils on greenhouse gas emissions and crop production. Plant and Soil, 2012, 360: 287-298
[6] Zhang A, Liu Y, Pan G, et al. Effect of biochar amendment on maize yield and greenhouse gas emissions from a soil organic carbon poor calcareous loamy soil from Central China Plain. Plant and Soil, 2012, 351: 263-275
[7] Case SDC, McNamara NP, Reay DS, et al. Biochar suppresses N₂O emissions while maintaining N availability in a sandy loam soil. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2015, 81: 178-185
[8] Cayuela ML, Sánchez-Monedero MA, Roig A, et al. Biochar and denitrification in soils: When, how much and why does biochar reduce N₂O emissions. Scientific Reports, 2013, 3: 1732, doi:10.1038/srep01732
[9] Cayuela ML, Zwieten LV, Singh BP, et al. Biochar’s role in mitigating soil nitrous oxide emissions: A review and meta-analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2014, 191: 5-16
[10] Wang Z, Zheng H, Luo Y, et al. Characterization and influence of biochars on nitrous oxide emission from agricultural soil. Environmental Pollution, 2013, 174: 289-296
[11] Shen J, Tang H, Liu J, et al. Contrasting effects of straw and straw-derived biochar amendments on greenhouse gas emissions within double rice cropping systems. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2014, 188: 264-274
[12] Troy SM, Lawlor PG, Flynn CJO, et al. Impact of biochar addition to soil on greenhouse gas emissions following pig manure application. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2013, 60: 173-181
[13] Lehmann J. A handful of carbon. Nature, 2007, 447: 143-144
[14] Spokas KA. Impact of biochar field aging on laboratory greenhouse gas production potentials. Global Change Biology Bioenergy, 2013, 5: 165-176
[15] Hagemann N, Harter J, Kaldamukova R, et al. Does soil aging affect the N₂O mitigation potential of biochar? A combined microcosm and field study. Global Change Biology Bioenergy, 2017, 9: 953-964
[16] Nelissen V, Rütting T, Huygens D, et al. Temporal evolution of biochar’s impact on soil nitrogen processes: A ¹⁵N tracing study. Global Change Biology Bioenergy, 2015, 7: 635-645
[17] Major J, Lehmann J, Rondon M, et al. Fate of soil-applied black carbon: Downward migration, leaching and soil respiration. Global Change Biology, 2010, 16: 1366-1379
[18] Okimori Y, Ogawa M, Takahashi F. Potential of CO₂ emission reductions by carbonizing biomass waste from industrial tree plantation in South Sumatra, Indonesia. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2003, 8: 261-280
[19] Wang J, Xiong Z, Kuzyakov Y. Biochar stability in soil: Meta-analysis of decomposition and priming effects. Global Change Biology Bioenergy, 2016, 8: 512-523
[20] Zhou Z, Xu X, Bi Z, et al. Soil concentration profiles and diffusion and emission of nitrous oxide influenced by the application of biochar in a rice-wheat annual rotation system. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2016, 23: 7949-7961
[21] Li L (李露), Zhou Z-Q (周自强), Pan X-J (潘晓健), et al. Effects of biochar on N₂O and CH₄ emissions from paddy field under rice-wheat rotation during rice and wheat growing seasons relative to timing of amendment. Acta Pedologica Sinica (土壤学报), 2015, 52(4): 839-848 (in Chinese)
[22] Bao S-D (鲍士旦). Soil and Agricultural Chemistry Analysis. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2000 (in Chinese)
[23] Liu W, Lu HH, Wu W, et al. Transgenic Bt rice does not affect enzyme activities and microbial composition in the rhizosphere during crop development. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2008, 40: 475-486
[24] Hanson RS, Wattenberg EV. Ecology of Methylotrophic Bacteria. Biotechnology, 1991, 18: 325-348
[25] Kurola J, Salkinojasalonen M, Aarnio T, et al. Activity, diversity and population size of ammonia-oxidising bacteria in oil-contaminated landfarming soil. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 2005, 250: 33-38
[26] Smith MS, Tiedje JM. Phases of denitrification following oxygen depletion in soil. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 1979, 11: 261-267
[27] IPCC. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis in Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013
[28] Singh BP, Cowie AL. Long-term influence of biochar on native organic carbon mineralisation in a low-carbon clayey soil. Scientific Reports, 2014, 4: 3678, doi:10.1038/srep03687
[29] Borchard N, Ladd B, Eschemann S, et al. Black carbon and soil properties at historical charcoal production sites in Germany. Geoderma, 2014, 232: 236-242
[30] Qin X, Li Y, Hong W, et al. Long-term effect of biochar application on yield-scaled greenhouse gas emissions in a rice paddy cropping system: A four-year case study in south China. Science of the Total Environment, 2016, 569: 1390-1401
[31] Dong D, Feng Q, Mcgrouther K, et al. Effects of biochar amendment on rice growth and nitrogen retention in a waterlogged paddy field. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2015, 15: 153-162
[32] Biederman LA, Harpole WS. Biochar and its effects on plant productivity and nutrient cycling: A meta-analysis. Global Change Biology Bioenergy, 2013, 5: 202-214
[33] Liu X, Zhang A, Ji C, et al. Biochar’s effect on crop productivity and the dependence on experimental conditions: A meta-analysis of literature data. Plant and Soil, 2013, 373: 583-594
[34] Kocsis T, Biró B, Ulmer Á, et al. Time-lapse effect of ancient plant coal biochar on some soil agrochemical parameters and soil characteristics. Environmental Science & Pollution Research International, 2017: 1-10
[35] Criscuoli I, Baronti S, Alberti G, et al. Anthropogenic charcoal-rich soils of the XIX century reveal that biochar leads to enhanced fertility and fodder quality of alpine grasslands. Plant and Soil, 2017, 411: 1-18
[36] Dong H, Yao Z, Zheng X, et al. Effect of ammonium-based, non-sulfate fertilizers on CH₄ emissions from a paddy field with a typical Chinese water management regime. Atmospheric Environment, 2011, 45: 1095-1101
[37] Cai ZC. A category for estimate of CH₄ emission from rice paddy fields in China. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 1997, 49: 171-179
[38] Pittelkow CM, Adviento-Borbe MA, Hill JE, et al. Yield-scaled global warming potential of annual nitrous oxide and methane emissions from continuously flooded rice in response to nitrogen input. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2013, 177: 10-20
[39] Xu X (许欣), Chen C (陈晨), Xiong Z-Q (熊正琴). Effects of biochar and nitrogen fertilizer amendment on abundance and potential activity of methanotrophs and methanogens in paddy field. Acta Pedologica Sinica (土壤学报), 2016, 53(6): 1517-1527 (in Chinese)
[40] Jia Z-J (贾仲君), Cai Z-C (蔡祖聪). Effects of rice plants on methane emission from paddy fields. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (应用生态学报), 2003, 14(11): 2049-2053 (in Chinese)
[41] Xu X, Wu Z, Dong Y, et al. Effects of nitrogen and biochar amendment on soil methane concentration profiles and diffusion in a rice-wheat annual rotation system. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6: 38688, DOI:10.1038/srep38688
[42] Quilliam RS, Glanville HC, Wade SC, et al. Life in the ‘charosphere’ : Does biochar in agricultural soil provide a significant habitat for microorganisms. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2013, 65: 287-293
[43] Kammann C, Finke C, Schröder M, et al. Can biochar serve as a toop to reduce soil GHG costs of agricultural production in the long term? Egu General Assembly, 2013, 15: 13272
[44] Chintala R, Owen RK, Schumacher TE, et al. Denitrification kinetics in biomass- and biochar-amended soils of different landscape positions. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2015, 22: 5152-5163

生物炭施用3年后对稻麦轮作系统CH₄和N₂O综合温室效应的影响

Effects of biochar application three-years ago on global warming potentials of CH₄ and N₂O in a rice-wheat rotation system.

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价