欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

应用生态学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (10): 3267-3274.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201810.029

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

控释尿素减施对双季稻田氮素渗漏淋失的影响

田昌1,2, 周旋3, 刘强1,2, 谢桂先1,2, 荣湘民1,2, 张玉平1,2*, 黄思怡1, 彭建伟1,2   

  1. 1湖南农业大学资源环境学院/土壤肥料资源高效利用国家工程实验室, 长沙 410128;
    2南方粮油作物协同创新中心, 长沙 410128;
    3湖南省土壤肥料研究所, 长沙 410125
  • 收稿日期:2018-03-02 出版日期:2018-10-20 发布日期:2018-10-20
  • 通讯作者: E-mail: zhyp2003@126.com
  • 作者简介:田 昌,男,1986年生,博士研究生,实验师. 主要从事农业面源污染防控研究. E-mail: chtian12@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    本文由国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFD0200800)、湖南省重点研发计划项目(2016NK2112)和湖南省教育厅平台项目(16K040)资助

Effects of the reduction of controlled-release urea application on nitrogen leaching in double cropping paddy field

TIAN Chang1,2, ZHOU Xuan3, LIU Qiang1,2, XIE Gui-xian1,2, RONG Xiang-min1,2, ZHANG Yu-ping1,2*, HUANG Si-yi1, PENG Jian-wei1,2   

  1. 1College of Resources and Environment, Hunan Agricultural University/National Engineering Laboratory for Efficient Utilization of Soil and Fertilizer Resources, Changsha 410128, China;
    2Southern Regional Collaborative Innovation Center for Grain and Oil Crops in China, Changsha 410128, China;
    3Hunan Institute of Soil and Fertilizer, Changsha 410125, China
  • Received:2018-03-02 Online:2018-10-20 Published:2018-10-20
  • Supported by:
    This wok was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program (2016YFD0200800), the Hunan Provincial Key Research and Development Program (2016NK2112) and the Hunan Provincial Education Department Platform Project (16K040)

摘要: 大量施用氮肥引起的土壤氮素淋失是稻田氮素损失的一个重要途径.为探究自然降雨过程中典型双季稻田氮渗漏淋失特点,采用田间渗漏池法,通过大田小区试验,研究控释尿素减施对稻田土壤60 cm深处渗漏水中氮淋失和水稻产量的影响.结果表明: 施肥初期出现氮渗漏淋失峰值,这是防控的关键时期;双季稻生长季控释尿素减氮20%(0.8CRU)和减氮30%(0.7CRU)处理全氮淋失量分别为42.3和37.7 kg·hm-2,均显著低于常规尿素(CU)处理(53.9 kg·hm-2),且0.7CRU处理显著低于等氮量控释尿素(1.0CRU)处理(51.3 kg·hm-2);各施氮处理全氮渗漏淋失率为11.9%~13.5%,处理间差异不显著.0.8CRU和0.7CRU处理较CU处理明显提高了水稻产量和氮肥吸收利用率,显著增加了氮收获指数.总之,控释尿素减氮 20%~30%能保证水稻产量和防控稻田氮渗漏淋失.

Abstract: Nitrogen (N) leaching is a major pathway of N losses in paddy fields. Here, an experiment was conducted to assess the effects of the reduction of controlled-release urea application on grain yield and N leaching in a double-cropping paddy field. Fertilization treatments included zero-N (CK, control, 0 kg N·hm-2), conventional urea (CU, 180 kg N·hm-2), and four polymer-coated urea fertilization levels, i.e., 1.0CRU, 0.9CRU, 0.8CRU, 0.7CRU, which represented 0, 10%, 20% and 30% reduction of fertilizer inputs relative to CU, respectively. Leachate was collected at the soil depth of 60 cm using field leakage pool method. Nitrogen leaching peaked shortly after fertilization, implying that measures should be taken to prevent N leaching in the early period. Nitrogen losses from leaching were 42.3 kg N·hm-2 for 0.8CRU, and by 37.7 kg N·hm-2 for 0.7CRU, significantly lower than the leaching in CU (53.9 kg N·hm-2). Nitrogen leaching in 0.7CRU was significantly lower than that in 1.0CRU (51.3 kg N·hm-2). 11.9%-13.5% of the fertilizer N was lost via leaching across the six treatments with comparable N loss rates. Rice yields, N utilization efficiency and N harvest index were significantly higher in 0.8CRU and 0.7CRU relative to CU. Our findings suggested that the use of CRU would permit a reduction in N application by 20%-30%, which could maintain the rice yield and obtain a reduction in N leaching.