欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

应用生态学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (10): 3457-3463.doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201810.032

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于稳定同位素方法的闽江口常见鱼类群落营养结构的季节性变化

石焱1,2, 何雄波1,2, 李军1,2, 沈忱1,2, 冯晨1,2, 郭峻宏1,2, 招春旭1,2, 康斌1,2*   

  1. 1集美大学水产学院, 福建厦门 361021;
    2福建省海洋渔业资源与生态环境重点实验室, 福建厦门 361021
  • 收稿日期:2018-01-11 出版日期:2018-10-20 发布日期:2018-10-20
  • 通讯作者: E-mail: bkangfish@163.com
  • 作者简介:石 焱,男,1992年生,硕士研究生. 主要从事渔业资源和生态研究. E-mail: sy74389374@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    本文由国家自然科学基金项目(41476149)资助

Seasonal variation in trophic structure of fish community in Minjiang Estuary based on stable isotope technique

SHI Yan1,2, HE Xiong-bo1,2, LI Jun1,2, SHEN Chen1,2, FENG Chen1,2, GUO Jun-hong1,2, ZHAO Chun-xu1,2, KANG Bin1,2*   

  1. 1College of Fisheries, Jimei University, Xiamen 361021, Fujian, China;
    2Fujian Province Key Laboratory of Marine Fishery Resources and Eco-environment, Xiamen 361021, Fujian, China
  • Received:2018-01-11 Online:2018-10-20 Published:2018-10-20
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41476149)

摘要: 为了解闽江口常见鱼类群落的营养结构特征,于2015年冬季(1月)、春季(5月)、夏季(8月)、秋季(11月)采集闽江口底拖网渔业资源样品,利用稳定同位素分析闽江口常见鱼类群落营养结构特征及其季节性变化,并计算了基于δ13C-δ15N量化的7个营养结构的群落范围指标.结果表明: 闽江口常见鱼类群落除夏季和秋季的δ13C值之间不存在显著性差异,其余各季节之间δ13C值均差异显著;δ15N值春季与其余3个季节都表现出显著性差异,而其余3个季节δ15N值互相之间均无显著性差异.稳定同位素的量化指标表明: 闽江口常见鱼类群落的营养结构存在季节差异,春季的生态位总空间(TA)、核心生态位空间(SEAc)、鱼类基础食物来源(CR)、营养长度(NR)、鱼类营养多样性(CD)均为四季的最大值;从夏季至秋季再到冬季,生态位总空间(TA)、核心生态位空间(SEAc)、鱼类基础食物来源(CR)、营养长度(NR)、鱼类营养多样性(CD)和营养位置差异(MNND)均逐步上升.闽江口常见鱼类群落营养结构的季节差异可能与鱼类生殖洄游和群落内食源多样性的变化密切相关.

Abstract: To study the trophic structure of fish community in Minjiang Estuary, we measured the carbon and nitrogen stable isotope ratios (δ13C and δ15N) of common fish species sampled in winter (January), spring (May), summer (August) and autumn (November) of 2015 by trawling, as well as seven quantitative metrics (ratios range of δ15N, NR; ratios range of δ13C, CR; total area, TA; standard ellipse area, SEAc; average distance of centroid, CD; mean nearest neighbor distance, MNND; standard deviation of nearest neighbor distance, SDNND). The results showed significant differences of δ13C values among all the seasons except between summer and autumn. There were significant differences of δ15N values between spring and other three seasons but no significant difference among summer, autumn, and winter. According to the results of the seven quantitative metrics, trophic structure of common fish community remarkably varied among the four seasons, as TA, SEAc, CR, NR, CD and MNND increased in succession from summer, autumn, winter to spring. Our results indicated that seasonal differences in trophic structure of common fish community were related to the fish spawning migration and the diversity of food source.