浙江天童常绿阔叶林石栎叶片昆虫取食状类型和取食强度研究

生态学杂志 ›› 2005, Vol. ›› Issue (9): 989-993.

浙江天童常绿阔叶林石栎叶片昆虫取食状类型和取食强度研究

江红¹, 蔡永立¹, 李恺², 王红¹, 王亮¹

1. 华东师范大学资源与环境学院城市化生态过程与生态恢复上海市重点实验室, 上海, 200062;
2. 华东师范大学生命科学学院, 上海, 200062

收稿日期:2004-02-14 修回日期:2004-03-19 出版日期:2005-09-10
通讯作者: 蔡永立
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金重点项目(30130060);上海市生态学重点学科资助项目

Intensity and patterns of leaf area eaten of Lithocarpus glaber by insects,at Tiantong Forest Park,Zhejiang

JIANG Hong¹, CAI Yongli¹, LI Ka², WANG Hong¹, WANG Liang¹

1. School of Resource & Environment, East China Normal University, Shanghai Key Laboratory for Ecology of Urbanization Process and Eco-restoration, Shanghai 200062, China;
2. School of Life Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China

Received:2004-02-14 Revised:2004-03-19 Online:2005-09-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在浙江天童常绿阔叶林中随机选择10株石栎(Lithocarpus glaber)大树,每株选择冠层向阳枝条2枝,取其所有成熟叶片(2332片)对昆虫取食状类型和取食强度进行了分析。结果表明,石栎叶片昆虫取食状类型多样,计有15种,但出现频度有很大不同;顶食状和缘食状的频度分别在30%以上;切叶状、连续小孔状和大孔状的频度在10%～30%;小孔状、阴面食状、叶中脉、泡状的频度在6.4%～1.5%;其余6种类型的频度<1%。对叶片的危害程度取决于取食面积和频度,顶食状等3种类型频度高、取食面积大,对叶片的危害重;而阴面食状等11种类型取食面积较小,频度低,对叶片的危害较小;连续小孔状尽管取食频度高,但取食面积小,对叶片的危害也小。连续小孔状和切叶状之间存在显著正相关,但连续小孔食状与阴面食状之间,切叶状、连续小孔食状与小孔食状之间则存显著负相关,其它取食状之间均没有显著相关性,反映出不同昆虫类型的取食生态位关系。石栎叶片昆虫取食率为13.6%,介于温带森林和热带森林之间;但石栎叶片的昆虫取食频率64%,小于辽东栎,可能是由于防御机制上的差异所至;此外,石栎叶片昆虫取食强度还受到植株本身因素和小生境等因素的影响。

关键词: 水分胁迫, 玉米, 水流导度, 解剖结构

Abstract: Intensity and patterns of leaf area eaten of Lithocarpus glaber by insects were studied in the evergreen broad-leaved forest at Tiantong Forest Park of Zhejiang Province,China.The results showed that the patterns of leaf area eaten were diverse with their frequencies greatly varied.Totally 15 patterns of leaf area eaten by insects were identified,among which the frequencies of the top and edge defoliations were more than 30%,the cutting leaf,successive pinhole and big perforation 10%～30%,the small perforation,lower epidermis defoliation,middle vein defoliation and bloth-shaped mine 1.5%～6.4%,and the upper epidermis defoliation,rugate defoliation,excavating defoliation,spiral mine slender defoliation and striped defoliation less than 1%.The intensity of leaf damage depended on the pattern of leaf area eaten and its frequency.Because of the high frequencies and serous damage of leaves,the top defoliation,edge defoliation and cutting leaf were the most important types to damaged leaves of L.galber.There was significant positive correlation between successive pinhole and cutting leaf,while significant negative correlation between successive pinhole and lower epidermis defoliation,cutting leaf and small perforation,which indicated the difference of eating pattern of different insects in space and time. There was 64% of leaves eaten and the rate of leaf damage was 13.6%.

Key words: Water deficit, Maize, Hydraulic conductivity, Anatomic structure

中图分类号:

Q948.12

江红, 蔡永立, 李恺, 王红, 王亮. 浙江天童常绿阔叶林石栎叶片昆虫取食状类型和取食强度研究[J]. 生态学杂志, 2005, (9): 989-993.

JIANG Hong, CAI Yongli, LI Ka, WANG Hong, WANG Liang. Intensity and patterns of leaf area eaten of Lithocarpus glaber by insects,at Tiantong Forest Park,Zhejiang[J]. cje, 2005, (9): 989-993.

参考文献

[1] 于晓东,周红章,罗天宏,等.2001.昆虫寄生对辽东栎种子命运的影响[J].昆虫学报,44(4):518～523.
[2] 于晓东,周红章,罗天宏.2001.辽东栎叶片昆虫取食形状多样性及其变化模式[J].植物生态学报,25(5):553～560.
[3] 钦俊德,王琛柱.2001.论昆虫与植物的相互作用和进化的关系[J].昆虫学报,44(3):360～365.
[4] 钦俊德.1987.昆虫与植物的关系[M].北京:科学出版社.
[5] Abrahamson WG. 1989. Plant-Animal Interactions [M]. New York:Mcgraw-Hill Book Company, 123 ～ 157.
[6] Bentley S, Whittaker BJ. 1979. Effects of grazing by a chrysomelid beetle, Gastrophysa viridula, on competition between Rumex obtusi folia and Rumex crispus [J]. J . Ecol., 67:79～ 90.
[7] Cherrett JM, Powell RJ, Stradling DJ. 1989. The mutualism between leaf-cutting ants and fungus[A]. In:Wilding N. ed. InsectFungus Interactions[C] . New York: Academic Press, 93 ～ 120.
[8] Coley PD. 1996. Herbivory and plant defenses in tropical forests[J]. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 27:305 ～ 335.
[9] Crawley MJ. 1985. Reduction of oak fecundity by low-density herbivore populations[J]. Nature, 314:163～ 164.
[10] Crawley MJ. 1992. Seed predators and plant population dynamics [A]. In: Fenner M. ed. Seeds: The Ecology of Regeneration in Plant Communities[C] . Wallingford: CAB International, 157～191.
[11] Harper JL. 1969. The cole of predation in vegetational diversity [J]. Brookhaven Symposium Biol., 22: 48～ 62.
[12] Kuhlman H. 1971. Effects of insect defoliation on trees[J]. Annu . Rev. Ent . , 16:289～324.
[13] Parker MA, Root RB. 1981. Insect herbivores limit habitat distribution of a native composite Machaeranthera canescens [J]. Ecology, 62:1390～ 1392.
[14] Rausher MD, Feeny P. 1980. Herbivory, plant density and plant reproductive success: the effect of Battus philenor on Aristolochia reticulata [J]. Ecology, 61:905 ～ 917.
[15] Slanky FJ. 1974. Energetic and nutritional interactions between larvae of the cabbage butterfly, Pieris rapae L. [A]. In:Dissertation D. ed. Cruciferous Food-Plants. [C]. New York: Cornell University, Ithaca.