油松水源保护林人工诱导更新与定向恢复机理

生态学杂志 ›› 2005, Vol. ›› Issue (11): 1267-1272.

油松水源保护林人工诱导更新与定向恢复机理

范志平¹, 曾德慧¹, 刘大勇¹, 朱教君¹, 余新晓², 牛健植²

1. 中国科学院沈阳应用生态研究所, 沈阳, 110016;
2. 北京林业大学, 北京, 100083

收稿日期:2005-03-14 修回日期:2005-06-30 出版日期:2005-11-10
通讯作者: 范志平,男,1970年生,博士,副研究员.主要从事森林生态与林业生态工程研究,发表论文60余篇.E-mail:zhiping_fan@hotmail.com.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(30100144);中国科学院“百人计划”资助项目

Mechanism of directive restoration artificially induced by creatin gaps in Pinus tabulaeformis of protection forest for water resources

FAN Zhiping¹, ZENG Dehui¹, LIU Dayong¹, ZHU Jiaojun¹, YU Xinxiao², NIU Jianzhi²

1. Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China;
2. Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China

Received:2005-03-14 Revised:2005-06-30 Online:2005-11-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以油松水源保护林为对象,进行人工诱导更新与定向恢复机理研究。结果表明,在郁闭林分内油松更新苗密度平均为5 375株·hm^-2,更新苗年龄为1～2年,而在人工Gap“效应岛”样地内,更新苗密度平均为17 062.5株·hm^-2,其中1～2年、3～4年、5～6年生更新苗分别占73.44%,13.97%和12.59%;生长季光照强度在0、1.5和2.0 m三个不同高度梯度上,在Gap内部的平均值分别为289.0×100、542.0×100和589.0×100 lux,在对照林分内分别为139.0×100、146.0×100和246.0×100lux;从夏季观测到的空气温度平均值日变化分析,在白天Gap内的温度高于郁闭林分内部,温差可差2～3℃,在夜间Gap内的温度低于郁闭林分内,温差可差0.5～1℃;在白天6:00～11:00,人工Gap“效应岛”内空气湿度明显低于郁闭林分内,在其它时间段大致相当;对于同一层次土壤而言,Gap内的土壤温度明显高于郁闭林分内且变化幅度大,在0、10和20 cm三个梯度上Gap与郁闭林分相比土壤温度最大差值分别可达10、5和2℃;0～10、10～20和20～30 cm三个层次平均土壤含水量在Gap内分别为16.9%1、5.1%和12.3%,在郁闭林分内分别为14.6%、12.5%和9.9%。总体上比较二者的光照强度、空气温度、空气湿度、土壤温度、土壤水分等有显著差异,因此人工Gap“效应岛”的创建是诱导其内部微环境因子变化的基础,也是油松水源保护林定向恢复更新的机理之所在。

关键词: 樟子松, 人工固沙林, 衰退, 衰退原因

Abstract: Mechanism of directive restoration artificially induced by creating gaps in Pinus tabulaeformis plantations of protection forest for water resources was studied.The seedling density regenerated in closed stands is 5 375 ind.·m~(-2),which age was 1～2 yr-old.In artificial gaps,the seedling density was 17 062.5 ind.·m^-2,in which 1～2-yr-old seedling,3～4-yr-old seedling and 5～6-yr-old seedling were 73.44%,13.97% and 12.59%,respectively.Daily light intensity in growth season at the height of 0 m,1.5 m,2.0 m was 289.0×100 lux,542.0×100 lux and 589.0×100 lux respectively in the gap,and 139.0×100 lux,146.0×100 lux and 246.0×100lux in closed stand,respectively.In daylight,average air temperature in gaps was higher than that in closed stands in summer at the same time,and the difference was about 2～3 ℃.At night,average air temperature in gaps was less than that in closed stands in summer,and temperature difference was about 0.5～1 ℃;Average air humidity in gaps was higher than that in closed stands at 6:00～11:00 AM in daylight and almost similar in other times a day.Soil temperature in the gaps was higher and change more acutely than that in closed stands in the same depth.The maximum extent of soil temperature difference between gaps and closed stands in 0cm,10cm,20cm depth was 10 ℃,5 ℃ and 2 ℃,respectively.Average soil water content in the layers of 0～10 cm,10～20 cm,20～30 cm was 16.9%,15.1% and 12.3% respectively in the gaps,and 14.6%,12.5% and 9.9% in closed stands.The result showed that the artificial gaps,created as disturbance patch through cutting the trees in the closed stands,induced the changes of the value of ecological factors such as light intensity,air temperature,soil temperature,soil water content,and then caused to accelerate the regeneration of Pinus tabulaeformis in the gaps.

Key words: Pinus sylvestris var.mongolica, Sand-fixation plantation forest, Decline, Decline cause

中图分类号:

S727.2

范志平, 曾德慧, 刘大勇, 朱教君, 余新晓, 牛健植. 油松水源保护林人工诱导更新与定向恢复机理[J]. 生态学杂志, 2005, (11): 1267-1272.

FAN Zhiping, ZENG Dehui, LIU Dayong, ZHU Jiaojun, YU Xinxiao, NIU Jianzhi. Mechanism of directive restoration artificially induced by creatin gaps in Pinus tabulaeformis of protection forest for water resources[J]. cje, 2005, (11): 1267-1272.

参考文献

[1] 于志民,王礼先.1999.水源涵养林效益研究[M].北京:中国林业出版社.
[2] 余新晓.2001.水源保护林培育、经营、管理与评价[M].北京:中国林业出版社.
[3] 李德志,臧润国.2004.森林冠层结构与功能及其时空变化研究进展[J].世界林业研究,17(3):12～16.
[4] 范志平,余新晓,沈慧.2000.中国水源保护林生态系统功能评价与营建技术体系[J].世界林业研究,13(1):51～58.
[5] 范志平,余新晓.1999.水源保护林定向恢复与经营模式[J].土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报,5(5):113～119.
[6] 姜凤岐,朱教君,曾德慧,等.2002.防护林经营学[M].北京:中国林业出版社.
[7] 臧润国,刘世荣,蒋有绪.1999.森林生物多样性保护原理概述[J].林业科学,35(4):71～79.
[8] 臧润国,刘静艳,董大方.1999.林隙动态与森林生物多样性[M].北京:中国林业出版社.
[9] 臧润国,杨彦承,刘静艳,等.1999.海南岛热带山地雨林林隙及其自然干扰待征[J].林业科学,35(1):2～8.
[10] 臧润国,蒋有绪,余世孝.2002.海南霸王岭热带山地雨林森林循环与树种多样性动态[J].生态学报,22(1):24～32.
[11] Denslow JS. 1995. Disturbance and diversity in tropical rain forests:The density effect[J]. Ecol. Appl. ,5(4) :962～968.
[12] Gough L, G race JB. 1999. Effects of environmental change on plant species density: Comparing predictions with experiments[J]. Ecology, 80(3) :880～890.
[13] Hubbell SP, Foster RB, O' Brein ST, et al. 1999. Light-gap disturbances, recruitment limitation, and tree diversity in a neotropical forest[J]. Science, 283: 554 ～ 557.
[14] Lamb D, Paarotta J, Keenan R, et al. 1997. Rejoining habitat remnants:Restoring degraded rainforest lands[A] . In: Laurance WF, eds. Tropical Forest Remnants: Ecology, Management and Conservation of Fragmented Communities[C] . Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 366 ～385.
[15] Pickett STA, White PS. 1985. The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics[M] . New York: Academic Press.
[16] Saldarriaga JG, West DC, Tharp ML, et al. 1988. Long-term chronosequence of forest succession in the upper Rio Negro of Colombia and Venezuela[J] .J. Ecol., 76:938～ 949.
[17] Watt AS. 1947. Pattern and process in the plant community[J].J. Ecol., 35:1～22.
[18] Whitmore TC.1978.Gaps in the forest canopy[A] .In:Tomlinson PB, eds. Tropical Trees as Living Systems[C] . New York:Cambridge University Press, 639～655.
[19] Whitmore TC. 1989. Canopy gaps and the two major groups of forest trees[J]. Ecology, 70(3): 536 ～ 538.