欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志 ›› 2009, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (09): 1767-1772.

• 三北防护林生态工程研究专栏 • 上一篇    下一篇

科尔沁沙地南缘樟子松人工林地下水埋深季节变化

朱教君1,2**;康宏樟3;宋立宁1,4;闫巧玲1,2   

  1. 1中国科学院沈阳应用生态研究所|沈阳 110016;2辽宁省生态公益林经营管理重点实验室, |沈阳 110016; 3上海交通大学农业与生物学院,上海 200240; |4中国科学院研究生院, 北京 100039
  • 出版日期:2009-09-10 发布日期:2009-09-10

Seasonal variation of groundwater table for Pinus sylvestrisvar. mongolica plantations in southern Keerqin Sandy land.

ZHU Jiao-jun1,2 ;KANG Hong-zhang3;SONG Li-ning1,4 ;YAN Qiao-ling1,2   

  1. 1Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China|2 Liaoning Key Laboratory for Management of Non-commercial Forests, Shenyang 110016, China; 3 College of Agriculture &|Biology, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200240, China|4 Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing
    100039, China
  • Online:2009-09-10 Published:2009-09-10

摘要: 于2005年5—10月,在未经过度人为干扰(大面积人工造林及农田开发)的大青沟地区(42°52′N,122°55′E)和自20世纪50年代大面积人工造林并相应开发农田的章古台地区(42°43′N, 122°22′E)分别选择了樟子松疏林草地和草地(撂荒地)、樟子松衰退后皆伐地(皆伐地)及不同年龄沙地樟子松人工纯林设置固定标准地,监测了一个生长季的地下水埋深动态变化。结果表明:生长季内地下水埋深呈现出4种类型:平稳型、“V”型、“N”型和“M”型。大青沟地区的疏林草地地下水埋深在生长季变化不大,平均地下水埋深为1.88 m;章古台地区的草地和皆伐地呈现5—7月升高,之后下降;林龄较小(23年)樟子松纯林变化幅度较大,生长季地下水埋深相差4.30 m;林龄较大(33、42、45年)樟子松人工纯林生长季地下水埋深波动变化,且变幅不一。总体上,地下水埋深表现为疏林草地(大青沟地区)<(章古台地区)衰退后皆伐地和草地<林龄较小樟子松人工纯林<林龄较大樟子松人工纯林。上述结果表明,大面积造林及农田开发是造成大青沟与章古台两地地下水埋深差别的主要原因;在章古台地区,不同植被覆盖与林龄也直接影响地下水埋深。

关键词: 激素, 小麦, 光合速率, 调控

Abstract: A sample plot of Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica (MP) savanna (SMP) in Daqinggou (42°52′N, 122°55′E) where no large scale disturbances such as afforestation and farmland development were experienced, and the sample plots of grassland (GR), clearcut of declined MP sandfixation forest (CMP), and pure MP sand-fixation forests (MPP) with different ages in Zhanggutai (42°43′N, 122°22′E) where large scale afforestation and farmland development were conducted since the 1950s, were selected to monitor the variations of groundwater table (GT) from May to October 2005. The seasonal variation of the GT exhibited four types, i.e., linear, “V”, “N”, and “M” curves. The GT value in SMP plot in Daqinggou had lesser variation in growth season, with an average of 1.88 m, while the GT values in GR and CMP plots in Zhanggutai increased from May to July, and then fell down. The 23 year old MPP plot had a larger variation of GT in growth season, with a difference of 4.30 m, but the elder (33-, 42-, and 45-year old) MPP plots had a fluctuation of GT, with its variation range differed. As a whole, the GT value ranked in the order of SMP in Daqinggou < GR and CMP in Zhanggutai < 23-year old MPP < 33-years old MPP < 42-year old MPP < 45-year old MPP. These results suggested that large-scale afforestation and agricultural development were the major causes inducing the differences of groundwater table between Daqinggou and Zhanggutai, and the different types of vegetation cover and stand age in Zhanggutai also affected the groundwater table.

Key words: Hormone, Wheat, Photosynthesis rate, Regulation and control