欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

上海市景观水体水生植物现状及配置评价

唐丽红1,2,马明睿1,2,韩华1,2,王昊彬1,2,由文辉1,2**   

  1. 1华东师范大学环境科学系, 上海 200241; 2上海市城市化生态过程与生态恢复重点实验室, 上海  200241)  
  • 出版日期:2013-03-10 发布日期:2013-03-10

Present situation and configuration evaluation of aquatic plants in landscape waters in Shanghai.

TANG Li-hong1,2, MA Ming-rui1,2, HAN Hua1,2, WANG Hao-bin1,2, YOU Wen-hui1,2**   

  1. (1Department of Environmental Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China; 2Shanghai Key Laboratory of Urbanization and Ecological Restoration, Shanghai 200241, China)
  • Online:2013-03-10 Published:2013-03-10

摘要: 于2012年3—10月对上海市淀山湖和元荡以及7个公园水体的水生植物进行了样地调查,运用层次分析法构建景观水体水生植物评价模型,对上海市典型景观水体水生植物配置模式进行评价。结果表明:研究区域共有水生植物31种,分别隶属于18科,主要以挺水植物为主,以浮水植物、沉水植物为辅,其中芦苇(Phragmites australis)、再力花(Thalia dealbata)、美人蕉(Canna indica)等大型水生植物较为多见。淀山湖及元荡水生植物配置模式最佳,景观水体水生植物配置综合指数最高,为0.93;上海植物园景观水体水生植物配置综合指数为0.89,明显高于其他公园景观水体水生植物配置综合指数,水生植物配置等级为优,曹杨公园和徐汇公园水体水生植物配置为良。静安公园、金桥公园和闸北公园水体水生植物配置为中等,天山公园的水体水生植物配置较差,水体景观综合指数值仅为0.22。

关键词: 水稻, CO2浓度增高, 分化, 退化, 颖花

Abstract: From March to October 2012, a sampling plot investigation was conducted on the aquatic plants in the Dianshan Lake, Yuandang, and seven parks landscape waters in Shanghai. The analytic hierarchy process method was also applied to establish an evaluation model of the aquatic plants in landscape waters, aimed to evaluate the aquatic plants configuration in the typical landscape waters in Shanghai. In the study areas, a total of 31 aquatic plant species belonging to 18 families were recorded. The dominated species were of emergent plants, and the complementary species were of floating plants and submerged plants, with the common species being Phragmites australis, Thalia dealbata, and Canna indica. The configuration pattern of the aquatic plants in Dianshan Lake and Yuandang was excellent, with the configured composite index (CI) being 0.93, which was obviously higher than that of the parks landscape waters in Shanghai. Among the seven parks, Shanghai Botany Garden had the CI of 0.89, and its aquatic plants configuration pattern was also at excellent level. Caoyang Park and Xuhui Park were in good level in aquatic plants configuration pattern, Jing’an Park, Jinqiao Park, and Zhabei Park were in medium level, whereas Tianshan Park only had a CI of 0.22, indicating that its aquatic plants configuration pattern was the worst.