欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志 ›› 2011, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (09): 1886-1893.

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

北京不同类型居住区树种组成结构及其三维空间配置

郄光发1,任启文2,李伟3,杨颖1,王成1   

  1. 1中国林业科学研究院林业研究所, 北京 100091;2河北省林业科学研究院, 石家庄 050061;3北京清华城市规划设计研究院, 北京 100084
  • 出版日期:2011-09-08 发布日期:2011-09-08

Tree species composition and three-dimensional configure in different types of residential areas in Beijing.

QIE Guang-fa1, REN Qi-wen2, LI Wei3, YANG Ying1, WANG Cheng1**   

  1. 1Reserch Institute or Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China;2Hebei Academy of Forestry, Shijiazhuang 100091,  China;3Beijing Tsinghua Urban Planning and Design Institute, Beijing 100084, China
  • Online:2011-09-08 Published:2011-09-08

摘要: 以北京城区3种不同类型居住区为对象,对其树种组成、相对重要程度以及在胸径、树高和树冠等级上的三维空间配置结构进行了分析。结果表明:不同类型居住区既有相同的核心树种又有各自的特色主导树种,其中,毛白杨(Populus tomentosa)、国槐(Sophora japonica)和侧柏(Platycladus orientalis)是各类居住区重要值均较高的共同核心树种,而泡桐(Paulewnia fortunei)、雪松(Cedrus deodara)、加杨(Populus canadensis)和银杏(Ginkgo biloba)等高大挺拔树种是单位附属居住区中的重要树种,臭椿(Ailanthus altissima)、白蜡(Fraxinus chinensis)和枣树(Ziziphus jujube)等传统乡土树种是胡同居住区中的重要树种,刺槐(Robinia pseudoacacia)、油松(Pinus tabulaeformis)、垂柳(Salix babylonica)和龙爪槐(Sophora japonica cv. Pendula)等优良园林景观树种则是混合居住区中的重要树种;从居住区树木三维空间配置结构来看,不同类型居住区树木在水平胸径等级、垂直树高等级和树冠等级结构上的总体分布均表现出向上发展的潜力,整个居住区树木仍处于一个快速生长阶段;从3种类型居住区的比较来看,单位附属居住区的树木密度、树冠覆盖度以及平均胸径、平均树高水平都明显高于其他两类居住区,其空间绿量相对充实,而胡同居住区由于受土地所限已难以大幅提升绿量水平,但混合居住区内仍有较大的空间绿量增加潜力。

关键词: 草地生态学, 草地退化, 草地生态系统

Abstract: Taking three types of residential areas in Beijing as the objects, this paper analyzed the tree species composition, relative important value, and three-dimensional configure in diameter at breast height (DBH), height, and crown coverage. In all types of the residential areas, there existed common key tree species, and also, unique dominant species. Populus tomentosa, Sophora japonica, and Platycladus orientalis were the common key species with higher important value; tall and straight species Paulewnia fortunei, Cedrus deodara, P. canadensis, and Ginkgo biloba were the important species in enterprise-institution residential areas; traditionally native species such as Ailanthus altissima, Fraxinus chinensis, and Ziziphus jujube were the essential components in Hutong residential areas; and excellent landscape tree species such as Robinia pseudoacacia, Pinus tabulaeformis, Salix babylonica,  and S. japonica cv. Pendula had valuable traits in mixed residential areas. As for the tree species three-dimensional configure, the overall distribution in DBH, height, and crown coverage in the three types of residential areas all presented a great development potential, being still at a rapid growth phase. With larger green space, enterprise-institution residential areas had significantly higher tree density, crown coverage, average DBH, and height than the other two types of residential areas; due to the limited green land, Hutong residential areas were difficult to increase the green biomass to a higher level; whereas mixed residential areas had considerable potential in the increase of green space.

Key words: Grassland ecology, Grassland degeneration, Grassland ecosystem