欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

丹江口库区湖北水源区不同密度马尾松人工林水源涵养能力

丁霞1,程昌锦1,漆良华1,2*,张建1,雷刚2,刘学全3   

  1. 1国际竹藤中心, 北京 100102;2国际竹藤中心安徽太平试验中心, 安徽太平 245700;3湖北省林业科学研究院, 武汉 430075)
  • 出版日期:2019-08-10 发布日期:2019-08-10

Evaluation of water conservation capacity of Pinus massoniana plantation with different densities in Hubei water source area of Danjiangkou Reservoir area.

DING Xia1, CHENG Chang-jin1, QI Liang-hua1,2*, ZHANG Jian1, LEI Gang2, LIU Xue-quan3   

  1. (1International Center for Bamboo and Rattan, Beijing 100102, China; 2Anhui Taiping Test Center of International Center for Bamboo and Rattan, Taiping 245700, Anhui, China; 3Hubei Academy of Forestry, Wuhan 430075, China).
  • Online:2019-08-10 Published:2019-08-10

摘要: 为了研究南水北调中线水源区汛期森林的水源涵养功能,以丹江口库区龙口林场马尾松人工林为对象,于2018年6—9月采用野外观测与室内分析相结合的方法,对高、中、低3种密度马尾松人工林,从林冠层、枯枝落叶层和土壤层进行分析,探究其丰水期水源涵养功能的林分密度效应。结果表明:(1)3种密度马尾松人工林林冠截留量为56.13~77.68 mm,且随林分密度增加林冠截留量增大,林内穿透雨量则趋势相反;(2)3种密度马尾松人工林枯落物总生物量为12.76~19.56 t·hm-2,随着林分密度增加枯落物总生物量增大,且半分解层枯落物生物量均大于未分解层枯落物生物量;高密度枯落物总厚度最大,中密度次之,低密度最小;枯落物最大持水量为21.32~28.24 mm,有效持水量为16.82~22.51 mm,且均表现为中密度>高密度>低密度;枯落物持水量、吸水速率与浸泡时间分别呈对数函数和幂函数关系式;(3)3种密度马尾松人工林0~30 cm土层土壤容重为1.45~1.54 g·cm-3,总孔隙度均值为42.18%~45.71%,土壤有效持水量为2.94~4.81 mm,且土壤容重大小为低密度>高密度>中密度,土壤总孔隙度排序则与之相反,土壤有效持水量表现为中密度>低密度>高密度;(4)3种密度马尾松人工林综合水源涵养能力为204~237.55 mm,表现为中密度>高密度>低密度。综上,丹江口库区中密度马尾松人工林水源涵养服务能力最优,建议在今后库区森林抚育过程中,合理控制林分密度。

关键词: 景观格局, 生态风险, 尺度效应, 廊道切割, 高原铁路

Abstract: To clarify water conservation capacity of forests in water source area of the Middle Route of South to North Water Transfer Project in flood season, we estimated water conservation capacity of Pinus massoniana plantations with different stand densities in Longkou Forest Farm of Danjiangkou Reservoir area. Three densities (i.e., high, medium and low) of P. massoniana plantations were chosen, and the waterholding capacity of the canopy, litter and soil layers for each density was examined from June to September 2018, using field observations and laboratory analysis. The canopy interception of three densities of P. massonianaplantation ranged from 56.13 to 77.68 mm, which increased with the increasing stand density, while the penetrating rainfall showed an opposite trend. Litter biomass increased with the increasing stand density with a range of12.76-19.56 t·hm-2. Litter biomass was greater in the non-decomposition layer than that in the semidecomposed layer. The total litter thickness under high density was the largest, followed by medium and low density. The maximum and effective water holding capacity of litter varied from 21.32 to 28.24 mm and from 16.82 to 22.51 mm, respectively. Both parameters showed the following trend: medium density>high density>low density. The water holding capacity and water absorption rate of litter had a logarithmic and power function with soaking time, respectively. Soil bulk density inP. massoniana plantation with low density was the largest, followed by high and medium density, with a range of 1.45-1.54 g·cm-3 at the depth of 0-30 cm. The rank of total soil porosity for the three stand densities was opposite to that of soil bulk density, with a mean ranging from 42.18% to 45.71%. The effective water holding capacity of soil varied from 2.94 to 4.81 mm, and ranked in the order of medium density>low density>high density.The overall water conservation capacity of P. massoniana plantation was 204-237.55 mm, with an order: medium density>high density>low density. In summary, the medium density ofP. massoniana plantation exhibited the highest water conservation capacity. Reasonable density of P. massoniana stand should be maintained in forest management in the future.

Key words: landscape pattern, ecological risk, scale effect, corridor cutting, plateau railway.