欢迎访问《生态学杂志》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

生态学杂志 ›› 2012, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (07): 1870-1875.

• 方法与技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

提取方式对土壤和植物水分提取率的影响及其氢氧同位素分析

刘文茹1,2,沈业杰2,3,彭新华2,陈效民1**   

  1. (1南京农业大学资源与环境科学学院, 南京 210095; 2中国科学院南京土壤研究所, 土壤与农业可持续发展国家重点实验室, 南京 210008; 3中国科学院研究生院, 北京 100049)
  • 出版日期:2012-07-10 发布日期:2012-07-10

Comparisons of azeotropic and vacuum distillation on water extraction efficiency of soil and plant and stable isotope analysis of extracted water.

LIU Wen-ru1,2, SHEN Ye-jie2,3, PENG Xin-hua2, CHEN Xiao-min1**   

  1. (1College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China; 2State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China; 3Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)
  • Online:2012-07-10 Published:2012-07-10

摘要: 氢氧同位素示踪技术是研究土壤-作物-大气连续体(SPAC)水分循环的重要手段,而土壤水和作物水的提取方法是氢氧同位素研究最关键的一步。本文采用真空蒸馏和共沸蒸馏2种提取方法对不同含水量(35%、25%和15%)下的土壤(红粘土、红砂土和水稻土)和植物(橘树和水稻)茎叶的水分分别进行了提取,并对提取出的水分进行了氢氧稳定同位素的对比分析,旨在提出合适的提取方法。结果表明:真空蒸馏对土壤和植物水分提取率显著高于共沸蒸馏(P<0.001);土壤含水量和土壤类型对水分提取率影响不显著;而水稻水分提取率显著高于橘树(P<0.001),且叶的水分提取率显著高于茎(P<0.001)。真空蒸馏提取出土壤水分的δD和δ18O值与标准样的差异不显著,而共沸蒸馏下提取出土壤水分的δD与标准样差异显著(P<0.001),水稻叶和橘树叶的δD和δ18O值高于茎。研究表明,真空蒸馏比共沸蒸馏更适合土壤和植物水分的提取且其提取出的水分更能真实反映样品中氢氧同位素组成。

关键词: 森林转换, 天然林, 人工林, 土壤CO2排放, 水溶性有机碳

Abstract: Hydrogen and oxygen isotope tracing is an important means in studying hydrological cycle in soilplantatmosphere continuum (SPAC), while the extraction of soil and plant water is the critical step to determine the stable isotope composition of the water. This paper compared the efficiency of azeotropic and vacuum distillation in extracting the water from three soil types (red clay soil, red sandy soil, and paddy soil) with three different water contents (35%, 25%, and 15%) and from the stems and leaves of two plants (orange tree and rice), and analyzed the stable hydrogen and oxygen isotopes in the extracted water. As compared with azeotropic distillation, vacuum distillation had a significantly higher water extraction efficiency (P<0.001). Soil type and soil water content had minor effects on the water extraction efficiency, but the extraction efficiency was significantly higher for rice than for orange tree, and for the leaves than for the stems of a given plant (P<0.001). No significant differences were observed in the δ18O and δD between the water samples from the soils extracted by vacuum distillation and the standard samples, but a significant difference was found in the δD when azeotropic distillation was applied (P<0.001). For the two plants, the δD and δ18O of the leaves were higher than that of the stems. It was suggested that as compared with azeotropic distillation, vacuum distillation could be more suitable to extract the water from soils and plants, and the extracted water could better reflect the stable isotope composition in the samples.

Key words: forest conversion, natural forest, plantation forest, soil CO2 flux, water soluble organic carbon.