喀斯特峰丛坡地不同土地利用方式下土壤N、P空间变异特征

生态学杂志

喀斯特峰丛坡地不同土地利用方式下土壤N、P空间变异特征

唐成^1,3,杜虎^1,2,宋同清^1,2**,彭晚霞^1,2,曾馥平^1,2,杨钙仁^1,3,梁志霞^1,3,卢成阳^1,3

(¹中国科学院亚热带农业生态研究所亚热带农业生态过程重点实验室，长沙 410125； ^2中国科学院环江喀斯特生态系统观测研究站，广西环江 547100； 3广西大学林学院，南宁 530004)

出版日期:2013-07-10 发布日期:2013-07-10

Spatial heterogeneity of soil nitrogen and phosphorus under different land use patterns in depressions between karst hills.

TANG Cheng^1,3, DU Hu^1,2, SONG Tong-qing^1,2**, PENG Wan-xia^1,2, ZENG Fu-ping^1,2, YANG Gai-ren^1,3, LIANG Zhi-xia^1,3, LU Cheng-yang^1,3

(¹Key Laboratory of Agroecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha 410125, China; ²Huanjiang Observation and Research Station for Karst Ecosystems, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Huanjiang 547100, Guangxi, China; ³Forestry College of Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China)

Online:2013-07-10 Published:2013-07-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于网格点(5 m×5 m)采样法采集土壤样品，利用经典统计学和地统计学方法，研究了喀斯特峰丛坡地不同土地利用方式(火烧迹地、刈割地、草地、封育地)下表层(0～20 cm)土壤氮、磷的空间变异特性。结果表明：研究区4种不同土地利用方式土壤全氮（TN）、全磷（TP）、速效氮（AN）、速效磷（AP）均为中等程度变异，含量分别为5.40～6.26 g·kg^-1、1.24～1.44 g·kg^-1、365.87～507.32 mg·kg^-1、3.91～8.04 mg·kg^-1，封育地、火烧迹地土壤质量优于草地和刈割地；4种土地利用方式中火烧AN、火烧AP、刈割AN、封育TN的半方差函数最佳拟合模型为球状模型，火烧TN、刈割TN、刈割AP最佳拟合模型为指数模型，其他指标的最佳拟合模型均为高斯模型。刈割TP、火烧TP、草地TP、刈割TN、火烧AP、草地AP、封育TP表现为强烈的空间自相关性，其他土壤养分表现为中等的空间自相关。4种土地利用类型土壤TN与AN、TP与AP具有相似的空间分布格局。火烧、刈割处理TN和AN呈凹形分布，TP和AP呈单峰分布特征，中下坡含量最高，往两端含量逐渐降低；草地TN、AN、TP、AP 4种养分含量均随着坡位的升高而降低；封育样地中4种养分呈类似凹形分布，中间含量低，两端略微升高。土地利用方式的变化改变了喀斯特峰丛坡地土壤养分质量，造成了土壤养分空间格局的变化，因此，在地形破碎、土层浅薄的喀斯特地区进行生态恢复与重建时，应采取合理土地利用方式，进行保护和适度开发，提高喀斯特退化生态系统土壤质量。

关键词: 抗旱性, 根叶关系, , 生理特性, 春季干旱胁迫, ,

Abstract: Soil samples were collected from the depressions between karst hills by grid sampling method (5 m×5 m), and the spatial heterogeneity of soil nitrogen and phosphorus in surface layer (0-20 cm) under different land use patterns (burned land, mowing land, grassland, and fenced land) were investigated by classic statistics and geo-statistics. In the study area, the soil total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), available nitrogen (AN), and available phosphorus (AP) under the four land use patterns showed a moderate variation, with the contents being 5.40-6.26 g·kg^-1, 1.24-1.44 g·kg^-1, 365.87-507.32 mg·kg^-1, and 3.91-8.04 mg·kg^-1, respectively. The soil quality of fenced land and burned land was superior to that of grassland and mowing land. The soil AN of burned land, AP of burned land, AN of mowing land, and TN of fenced land were fitted well by spherical model; the soil TN of burned land, TN of mowing land, and AP of mowing land were fitted well by exponential model; and the other soil nutrient variables were fitted well by Gaussian model. A strong spatial autocorrelation occurred for the soil TP of mowing land, TP of burned land, TP of grassland, and TN of mowing land, AP of burned land, AP of grassland, and TN of fenced land, while a moderate spatial autocorrelation existed for the other variables. The soil TN and AN as well as the soil TP and AP under the four land use patterns showed the similar spatial distribution pattern. The soil TN and AN of burned land and mowing land presented a concave distribution, while the TP and AP showed a unimodal distribution. The soil TN, TP, AN, and AP in grassland all decreased with slope position, while these soil nutrients in fenced land presented concave distribution. Land use pattern changed the soil nutrient quality in the depressions between karst hills, and caused different spatial patterns of soil nutrients. Therefore, in the ecological restoration and reconstruction of karst region with broken landform and shallow soil, it should adopt rational land use pattern, protection, and moderate development to improve the soil quality of degraded ecosystems.

Key words: drought resistance, physiological characteristics., spring drought stress, relationship between root and leaf

唐成1,3,杜虎1,2,宋同清1,2**,彭晚霞1,2,曾馥平1,2,杨钙仁1,3,梁志霞1,3,卢成阳1,3. 喀斯特峰丛坡地不同土地利用方式下土壤N、P空间变异特征[J]. 生态学杂志.

TANG Cheng1,3, DU Hu1,2, SONG Tong-qing1,2**, PENG Wan-xia1,2, ZENG Fu-ping1,2, YANG Gai-ren1,3, LIANG Zhi-xia1,3, LU Cheng-yang1,3. Spatial heterogeneity of soil nitrogen and phosphorus under different land use patterns in depressions between karst hills.[J]. cje.

[1]	巫清芸, 吴志伟, 林世滔, 李顺, 谢谷艾. 赣南地区森林可燃物分类及其火行为预测 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43(2): 314-324.
[2]	张运林, 田玲玲, 丁波, 张延威, 刘讯, 武燕. 贵州省林火发生驱动因子及预测模型 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43(1): 282-289.
[3]	王明明, 肖钰鑫, 庄伟伟. Pb胁迫对西北地区三种藓类植物生理生化的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(7): 1618-1626.
[4]	侯孟月, 王菲, 陈铭, 程小毛, 罗雯, 黄晓霞. 千家寨野生型茶树与栽培型茶树叶片解剖结构及生理特性 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(5): 1074-1082.
[5]	何亚婷, 姚丽, 刘子畅, 杨自云, 王金华. 石漠化地区根瘤菌的分离鉴定及盆栽抗旱效应 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(5): 1099-1106.
[6]	张雪儿, 乔雪涛, 张春雨, 赵秀海. 吉林蛟河针阔混交林生物量时间稳定性驱动机制 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(4): 812-819.
[7]	王宁宁, 孙冬梅, 杨克胤, 柯丽霞. 苦粉孢牛肝菌菌丝及其发酵液对黄山岩石的风化作用 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(4): 911-919.
[8]	董鑫, 陈效锐, 李艳忠, 古晓东, 杨存建. 基于地理探测器的四川省大熊猫国家公园生态环境时空变化及其归因分析 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(4): 946-955.
[9]	何宁, 胡阳, 吴铭轩, 张伯伦, 张生乐, 武鹏玲, 汪茂秋, 王沁怡, 何培民, 方淑波. 基于¹⁵N示踪的南汇边滩海三棱藨草氮素分配策略及修复建议 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(3): 635-642.
[10]	黄春晓, 刘全儒, 杜雨轩, 户雨, 何毅. 太行山特有珍稀濒危植物槭叶铁线莲种群年龄结构与数量动态 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(12): 2911-2917.
[11]	罗达, 史彦江, 宋锋惠. 平欧杂种榛幼苗对盐胁迫的生理响应及耐盐性评价 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(1): 1-8.
[12]	陈婉, 袁思佳, 刘威, 陈明杰, 李鹏, 胡超超, 常青. 江苏阜宁不同生境鸟类群落谱系和功能多样性 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(9): 1746-1754.
[13]	郭彦君, 郭文炯. “三生空间”视角下山西中部盆地城市群景观生态风险分析 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(9): 1813-1824.
[14]	帅林茹, 冯莉, 阳少奇. 植被种植方式对城市微环境热舒适度影响的数值模拟研究 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(8): 1611-1618.
[15]	张丹, 张冠雄, 王可洪, 王芳, 刘双爽, 潘远珍, 袁兴中. 废弃养殖塘水生大型无脊椎动物群落组成特征 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(6): 1135-1142.