欢迎访问《应用生态学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

应用生态学报

• 研究报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

鱼类饥饿处理量化及处理因子贡献率的神经网络随机化测试

朱艺峰;陈芝丹;关文静;吴仲宁;薛良义   

  1. 宁波大学教育部应用海洋生物技术重点实验室, 浙江宁波 315211
  • 收稿日期:2007-06-18 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-03-21 发布日期:2008-03-21

Quantification of fish starvation treatments and randomization test for the contribution rates of treatment factors by BP network.

ZHU Yi-feng;CHEN Zhi-dan;GUAN Wen-jing;WU Zhong-ning;XUE Liang-yi   

  1. Key Laboratory of Applied Marine Biotechnology of Education Ministry, Ningbo
    University, Ningbo 315211, Zhejiang, China
  • Received:2007-06-18 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2008-03-21 Published:2008-03-21

摘要: 设一直投喂(SR00)、周期性饥饿2 d再投喂2 d (SR22)、饥饿7 d再投喂2 d (SR72)和饥饿7 d再投喂7 d (SR77) 4种投喂方式,将投喂方式量化为饥饿压力(SS)和循环率(CF)因子,并结合8周实验的干物质摄食量(FI)、鱼体重(BW)、温度(TE)、盐度(SA)、pH (PH)和生长时间(GT)因子,分别对花鲈增重(WG)、特定生长率(SGR)和干物质饲料转换率(FCR)构建神经网络并对其进行预测.结果表明,不同处理对WG、SGRFCR的影响均存在显著差异(P<0.05).饥饿处理组的WGSGR均不能达到一直投喂组水平,除SR72处理组FCR显著高于对照处理外(P<0.05),SR22和SR77组与SR00组均无显著差异(P>0.05).人工神经网络对SGRWG具有极佳的预测效果,但对FCR无效.8个分析因子中,FI、SS、CFGTWG、SGR有显著贡献,且WG的大小主要取决于FI,而SGR主要取决于SS.随机化测试显示,实验处理因子(包括相关的FI因子)对WGSGR的贡献率分别为64.9%和79.7%.

关键词: 土壤性质, 蚂蚁巢穴, 有机碳矿化, 热带森林

Abstract: In this paper, four feeding treatments including continuous feeding (SR00), recycling of 2 days starvation and 2 days refeeding (SR22), recycling of 7 days starvation and 2 days refeeding (SR72), and recycling of 7 days starvation and 7 days refeeding (SR77) were designed, and the feeding treatments were quantified as two treatment factors, i.e., starvation stress (SS) and starvation frequency (CF). Combining these two factors with the factors dry matter feed intake (FI), body weight (BW), water temperature (TE), water salinity (SA), water pH (PH) and growth time (GT), three BP artificial neural networks were constructed to predict the weight gain (WG), specific growth rate (SGR), and feed conversion ratio (FCR) of Lateolabrax japonicus, respectively. The results showed that the WG, SGR and FCR of L. japonicus were significantly affected by different feeding treatments. Throughout a 8-week trial, the WG and SGR of starved fish couldn’t catch up to those of control fish. Except for SR72 group whose FCR was markedly higher than that of control group, no differences in FCR were observed between control group and experimental groups SR22 and SR77. The study also indicated that artificial neural network could well predict WG and SGR, but was unavailable forFCR. Among the eight factors, FI, SS, CF and GT had significant contributions to both WG and SGR. Furthermore, WG and SGR were predominantly dependent on FI and SS, respectively. Based on 4999 randomizations, the contribution rate of the treatment factors (including related FI) to WG and SGR was 64.9% and 79.7%, respectively.

Key words: antcolonization, tropical forest, organic carbon mineralization, soil properties