新安江流域（屯溪段）浮游植物群落结构及其与环境因子的关系

生态学杂志

新安江流域（屯溪段）浮游植物群落结构及其与环境因子的关系

张国庆^1,2,杨雨玲¹,唐爱国¹,王〓丽¹,丁涛¹,王恒星¹,孟杨¹,陆沙龙¹,董丽丽¹,段双全^2*,李伟^1*

（¹黄山学院生命与环境科学学院，黄山 245041；²西藏大学理学院，拉萨 850000）

出版日期:2020-02-10 发布日期:2020-02-10

Phytoplankton community structure and its relationship with environmental factors in Xin’anjiang River Basin (Tunxi section).

ZHANG Guo-qing^1,2, YANG Yu-ling¹, TANG Ai-guo¹, WANG Li¹, DING Tao¹, WANG Heng-xing¹, MENG Yang¹, LU Sha-long¹, DONG Li-li¹, DUAN Shuang-quan^2*, LI Wei^1*

(¹College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Huangshan University, Huangshan 245041, China; ²College of Science, Tibet University, Lhasa 850000, China).

Online:2020-02-10 Published:2020-02-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 于2017—2018年对新安江流域（屯溪段）浮游植物群落结构进行季度调查，并分析群落结构组成与环境因子间的关系。结果表明：共鉴定浮游植物7门96属160种（含变种），以绿藻门（42属72种）、硅藻门（26属49种）和蓝藻门（15属19种）为主要优势门类；可见光（PAR）、紫外线A（UVA）和紫外线B（UVB）强度以夏季最强，春季次之，秋、冬季较弱；水体pH、溶解氧和温度具有季度差异性；整体上冬季氨氮（NH₃-N）浓度和浊度显著高于其他季度，总磷（TP）浓度和氧化还原电位无明显季度差异；叶绿素a和类胡萝卜素受时空变化影响明显，夏、冬季较春、秋季高，不同站点间差异显著；Shannon指数、Simpson指数、Margalef指数以及Pielou指数不受季度更替和站点变化影响；水化学参数指示水质整体介于Ⅰ类与III类之间（I、II类居多），Shannon指数和Margalef指数反映水质为轻污或清洁，污染指示种评估水体处于乙型中污水生物带，综合水化学及生物学指标，表征流域水质总体较好；冗余分析表明，新安江流域（屯溪段）浮游植物各门属种数均与NH₃-N和TP呈正相关，UVB与硅藻门有较强的负相关性；PAR、UVA、UVB和温度是调控浮游植物丰度的主要环境因子，与硅藻门、甲藻门和裸藻门丰度呈负相关，而与绿藻门、蓝藻门、金藻门和隐藻门丰度呈正相关。

关键词: 土壤呼吸, 模拟增温, 适应性

Abstract: We investigated the seasonal variation of phytoplankton community structure and its relationship with environmental factors in Xin’anjiang River Basin (Tunxi section) from 2017 to 2018. A total of 160 species (including variants) from 96 genera belonging to seven phyla were identified, among which, Chlorophyta (72 species from 42 genera), Bacillariophyta (49 species from 26 genera) and Cyanophyta (19 species from 15 genera) were dominant. Photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), UVA and UVB had the highest intensity in summer, followed by spring, autumn and winter. The pH, dissolved oxygen, and water temperature differed among seasons. The concentration of ammonia nitrogen (NH₃-N) concentration and turbidity were significantly higher in winter than that in other seasons. There was no significant difference in total phosphorus (TP) concentration and oxidation reduction potential among the four seasons. Chlorophyll a and carotenoid concentrations varied spatially and temporally, with higher concentrations in summer and winter than in spring and autumn. The Shannon index, Simpson index, Margalef index and Pielou index did not change across seasons and sampling sites. Water quality was between the criteria of type I and type III, with most of which being located in type I and type II. The pollution indicator species showed a mesosaprobic zone. Shannon index and Margalef index revealed a slight pollution or nonpollution status of the studied area. Water quality of Xin’anjiang River Basin (Tunxi section) was generally in good condition according to the comprehensive analyses of both chemical and biological indices. Redundancy analysis results showed that the number of phytoplankton species in each phylum had positive relationship with NH₃-N and TP, where UVB had a strong negative relationship with Bacilariophyta. PAR, UVA, UVB and water temperature were the main factors regulating phytoplankton abundance, which had positive relationship with abundance of Bacillariophyta, Dinophyta and Euglenophyta but negative relationship with abundance of Chloropyta, Cyanobacteria, Chrysophyta and Cryptophyta.

Key words: soil respiration, experimental warming, adaptability.,

张国庆,杨雨玲,唐爱国,王〓丽,丁涛,王恒星,孟杨,陆沙龙,董丽丽,段双全,李伟. 新安江流域（屯溪段）浮游植物群落结构及其与环境因子的关系[J]. 生态学杂志.

ZHANG Guo-qing, YANG Yu-ling, TANG Ai-guo, WANG Li, DING Tao, WANG Heng-xing, MENG Yang, LU Sha-long, DONG Li-li, DUAN Shuang-quan, LI Wei. Phytoplankton community structure and its relationship with environmental factors in Xin’anjiang River Basin (Tunxi section).[J]. cje.

[1]	史嘉炜, 廖家强, 魏春雪, 彭逸飞, 李婷婷, 胡健, 汪金松, 周青平. 高寒草甸土壤呼吸及其组分对氮添加的响应 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43(1): 41-49.
[2]	马静, 余克服. 大规模白化对珊瑚礁生态系统的影响研究进展 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(9): 2227-2240.
[3]	冷寒冰, 苏鸣, 张春英. 锦绣杜鹃对不同光环境的光合特性响应及适应机制 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(8): 1793-1801.
[4]	常琳溪, 刘丰硕, 湛方栋, 李博, 陈建军, 祖艳群, 李元, 何永美. 13个品种杜鹃花在高原铅锌矿区复合污染农田的生长适应性 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(6): 1449-1456.
[5]	陶冬雪, 李文瑾, 杨恬, 柯玉广, 徐翀, 赵晋灵, 吴红慧, 庾强. 降水变化和养分添加对呼伦贝尔草甸草原土壤呼吸的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(3): 465-472.
[6]	孙忠林, 华明阳, 冯颖, 姜云天, 宋金枝, 尹智博. 坡向对长白山区蒙古栎林土壤根际呼吸与异养呼吸的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(12): 2317-2324.
[7]	郑雪丽, 黄艳, 付世建, 夏继刚. 胚胎孵化温度和初孵仔鱼发育温度对斑马鱼仔鱼热适应性的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(10): 1962-1968.
[8]	黄石德. 武夷山不同海拔土壤呼吸对变暖和变冷的响应 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(1): 98-107.
[9]	马澍, 陶宝先, 韩广轩, 王晓杰, 李培广, 初小静. 春季降雨分配变化对黄河三角洲滨海湿地土壤呼吸的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2021, 40(7): 2094-2103.
[10]	余景松, 付若仙, 俞元春, 李春涛. 氮沉降对北亚热带麻栎林土壤呼吸及其温湿度敏感性的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2021, 40(4): 1029-1037.
[11]	刘美, 陈亚梅, 崔宁洁, 马志良. 模拟增温对高寒灌丛生长季土壤呼吸的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2021, 40(4): 1038-1048.
[12]	安崇霄,张永杰,杜孝敬,符小文,徐文修,厍润祥,房彦飞. 不同耕作措施对伊犁河谷夏大豆农田土壤碳排放、碳平衡及经济效益的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2020, 39(3): 812-821.
[13]	田志杰, 刘晓莹, 陈春兰, 胡砚秋, 郑庆荣, 高永平. 五台山臭冷杉林土壤呼吸时空变化特征 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2020, 39(12): 3952-3960.
[14]	程寅瑞, 查勇, 陈丽娟, 韦耿. 盐城滨海湿地不同植被类型土壤呼吸 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2020, 39(12): 4090-4097.
[15]	韩尚君, 韩海荣, 程小琴, 董玲玲, 蔡锰柯, 商添雄. 改变凋落物输入对不同林龄油松林土壤呼吸的影响 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2020, 39(11): 3576-3587.